rrr^mh,
ico
=m
!CO
/=vrv •\r\*.rv
&A
sMR
JAUJ«W*UTJii.tI«SgPfT 1 '
TTTT
hMsiM&ftm
HftftAAa«R .ftftftWiUte
*rm
KfcifiO
aAtfrn'
n
Tn1
- MHrta
^fci-AI
O^.AP' A/
i HuTTTTl P
.i^&illi
:k**w
nrfnT
■MAAflnAftA
wi^ife^^i?
y
ft
4
K ,^S
CC 41
V^^^L
(
M
c <
it'
it
gift-^i-
1me
GOLDWIN SMITH
&m
<C (C
CC CC
«C c«L
; cc or
Cice
^c£
» m
cc c
G cc
c c
Ccc.C
c cc
e cc
Cv-CCl
^C'cc:
;• cc
COCC
CC cc
C c C C
Cc c«
5 cc c c<r fc i
ccn^c cc <
■r cc c c« <c: c
?.c ccccc c<r c
J". <C<«'£<
CCC CC v€C « CC CC
; cc. ■•««. £( ( S-
CC ' «d *L C < c c
r. cc < CCL«£ c
cc < • «*^ *L S
■. cc <v(«: «: <:
cc ■ ■<:<: c c
<■ cc ccfld «: c;c
cc <-5 J C c .« C C
« cc < c ««: «: c <- < c c
c c c< C" d C c « c c
3t<3C ^ CC C" Co<((
ff cc «-<c. «: c c cc c c
< cc c:«ccr c. c ■« c c •
€£
* c^ cccc
««cc «t <: <:
<^i?C^
crcccc «ef
ccc CC <C i
-~~j CC
_ <r «
^1 cc «
drnfmam mffgm
C c
C c
c c .
- c^ cC <
tercet
. CC cc <r <
CC C
CC re <
CC c
cc c<r
i« cc
\ c CCC ' <
, ( CC< (
c cc-vC
. c ccc .«
_ ccco <
CCcCx
crccc
<* < « r
<«c c c ccccr
c ccc<c
«c c c cc CC i
:< C C CCC<-
: c c <Ccc
CC «C~Ccr<
c c <rcc
c«C " CC "
C0BL CC
■cc/ccc
' cc«3C CC
®k c c
ccc cc
<r« CC
ccc :/f.cc
ccc: <cc
CCucC
: ' ^cc
, < cc <
=. ' cCCc
..Cr.C <<•<
^iSC« •<•(<
^CCCcc C<
jsgrctceo
.^CCC<<itC <
cTfecc
S-CCcccc r *
Ccsccc c
C .ere ccc .
C/3?c<c c<
jCCfC<C c
CCcCCCo
Cpgcc«Cj
*ZGjx cc <
cci« cc
c ccc cc
S3&c cc
SDc cc
C3&C cc
Vc^
cc< c<
ccc <r<
ccc c<
c:c c ccccc
CC C CCr<C
C c •«<
C c ccc
- Sec cc
ccc cc
CCC cc
PCC c c
mil
-V, cc cc f
c cc cc
CCC((
ccc <C
CCrr,
CCcc.
^SJ
< c Cc
s
rScI
/cccl
iiiim"
f £*' cs
^p~
r % Cc
^K
c SC C
^k"
r ££ Q
j^
-cr9 C
.■*^&
t- ,^ ^
^m
^ / c<3 C
^7
k rvC '«
^^L
^ S cc
«&=
Cc cc
^&?
r % cc
^^5^-
-< fc CO
^K-
'^C(o
s*
"xrec
S«- '
'/< re
L^ (: '
C( cc <4
^-
:^Cr J
L : '
^CCC J
*" '
3 C 2
?<£ ^
1 cc
CC ^S
cc
cc' St
<
- ^
C/c
^
: cc cc c
(C.C «
^z cc:c < ,
^CCC CCL CCC
.CCC^C'CC CCk:
^CCCCCC <*&<
.^COC rCCC ccgt
.cLccocgr cm
.cccccccc CCC>
^CICCiCCCTC C«£s
iccccccc c<cc
^C CC (CCC cccc
ic cccccr c«jc
xcoor cec
C( CC CCC CCC
_c #c C CC CCCc
l~ < c CCC ccc
_^ccoc c<r ccc
.^cccc cc ccsr-
-^cccc CC c MjC:
»CCCCCC c^cl
:«SC C «" c
S Ccc (
^'c Ccc <
«rc c<r c
r CCC c
. E Ccc c
■crccf c
CC. C
Ccc c
C'(C
J c c_
s c c
4- 'CC
C CO"
I- c c
£ c c_
rr vC C -
c c
^; c c '
cd c c .
C€S^ CC
TC^i • C C
c c <&r c <
(CC cc
ccc c c
C C €C C C
CCC C €
ccccc
CCCC c
(CCCC
c c«: cc
ccccc
ccc.c c
C<CCC
Cc'CCd
CccCC
CCCCCC
C< c c cc c^
Ccccj^^
' Cc CCC
rCCCCt«C
CCCC1
Cc c c
CCCCCC*
ccrc^cc
c ccrc^Cr'
CCCCcC^
CCC C(
^c;c c<
cc cc<
CCIC Ccc«
cc CCC
cCC Ccc
c:c cjcccrc^
cc ccc
cc c<c
ccc:ccTcCi
cc*
€C
cc^ccxc
C CCCCCC
C( Cc< c
fc c ccc c
J.« Cc c<
: <? cc
cc<« c <
CCCCC
ccc c C
*g*:m
c c cc
C C C/C
pc cc
Cc«|c
4
4
c «:<c 1
c^c ^
1
LIVES
OF THE
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTEEBUEY.
VOL. IX.
LO.JTOON: rillNTKD sr
SB0TTI8W00DE AND CO., HKW-8TBBSX SQCAKB
AND F%BLIAMKHT STUBBT
J4-
LIVES
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
BY
WALTEE FAEQUHAE HOOK, D.D. F.E.S.
DEAN OF CHICHESTER,
VOLUME IX.
REFORMATION PERIOD.
History which maybe called just and perfect history is of three kinds, according to the object which
St propoundeth or pretendeth to represent ; for it either representeth a time, or a person, or an action.
The first we call Chronicles, the second Lives, and the third Narratives or Relations. Of these, although
Chronicles be the most complete and absolute kind of history, and hath most estimation and glory, yet
Lives excelleth in profit and use, and Narratives or Relations in verity or sincerity. Lord Baoon.
-6
1*1
LONDON :
RICHARD BENTLEY & SON, NEW BURLINGTON STREET,
Jablisljms m (Drbnrarg to gjtr ptajeatg.
1872.
The right of translation is reserved.
ADVEETISEMENT,
An apology is due to the public for the delay in the
publication of this Volume. It would be an impertinence
on the part of an author to appeal to the sympathy of
his readers, the great majority of whom must be strangers
to him ; but it will be easily understood, how impossible
it was to engage in a work, which, to be rendered in
any respect worthy of the reader's notice, required the
undivided attention of the writer and the exercise of all
his intellectual powers, during months of intense domestic
anxiety, concluded by an affliction so stunning in its effect
as to paralyse, for a time, the powers of the mind.
A portion of this Volume having been written nearly
twelve months before the latter portion of it was resumed,
some repetitions may have occurred for which the
reader's indulgence is asked.
\i * ADTEETISEMETn1.
At the suggestion of some friendly revie^yers, and at the
request of many of his readers, the Author has divided
the Biography of Parker into several Chapters ; and lias
desired to assist the student by the addition of side notes,
referring to the statements made in the context and
occasionally supplying for his guidance a reference to
dates.
CONTENTS
THE NINTH VOLUME.
BOOK IV. — continued.
CHAPTER V.
MATTHEW PARKER.
The Parker family. — Nicolas Parker, the founder. — William Parker. —
His marriage with Alice Monins.—- Birth of Matthew Parker. — His
early education. — Death of his father. — Enters at Cambridge. —
State of the University. — Date of Parker's matriculation. — Takes his
degree. — Master of his college. — Revenue of the college. — Founda-
tion of the library. — Elected vice-chancellor. — Controversy with
Bishop Gardyner. — Interview with Henry VIII. — Visitation of
Cambridge in 1549 ....... page 1
CHAPTER VI.
PARKER AS A STUDENT AND DIVINE.
Parker's early opinions. — Lutheranrtfn at Cambridge. — Thomas
Bilney. — The Anabaptists. — Dr. Barnes and the White House. —
Martin Bucer. — Parker preaches his funeral sermon. — Scholasticism
iind the Schoolmen. — Parker's patristic studies. — The tour great
councils. — The Erglish reformers. — Catholics and Protestants 32
viii CO OF
CHAPTER VII.
PARKER AS A PASTOR AND PREACIIER.
Pinker returns to Norwich. — Is licensed to preach. — Becomes chaplain
to Anne Boleyn, and Dean of Stoke. — Appointed chaplain to
Uruvy VIII. — The deanery of Stoke. — Reforms of 153G-43. —
Statute of six articles. — Presented to the living of Ashen. — Pre-
bendary of Ely. — Rector of Burlingham. — Of Landbeach. — Is ac-
i of heresy. — Dr. Stokes. — Dissolution of Stoke. — Parker is
inted Dean of Lincoln. — Marries Margaret Harleston. — Reforms
of 1547 and 1549. — Summoned to preach at Paul's Cross.: — Dis-
turbances of 1549. — Rising in the West.— Rett's insurrection. —
Parker during the reign of Mary. — His accident. — View of his
character page G4
CHAPTER VIII.
FROM THE DEATH OF MARY TO THE ELECTION OF PARKER.
Position of Parker on the accession of Elizabeth. — The great parties in
the country. — The Reformers. — The Exiles. — Anabaptists and
Lollards. — Papists. — Condition of the clergy. — Character of Eliza-
beth.— Policy of the government. — Conduct of the pope. — Corona-
tion of Elizabeth. — Parker summoned to London. — Liturgical
Reforms. — Act of Uniformity. — Act of Supremacy. — Spoliation Act.
— Westmin.-ter Conference. — Diocesans summoned before the Privy
Council. — Reception of the Prayer Book. — The regular clergy advo-
cates of the papal supremacy. — The secular clergy in favour of the
:i nation. — Apostolical Succession. — Primacy offered to Parker.
— Refused. — Offered to Dr. Wotton. — Offered to Feckenham. —
Parker nominated Primate. — His letter Jo the queen. — His election,
— Commissions for his confirmation. — Difference between valid and
legal consecration. — Number of officiating bishops to make a conse-
cration Kegel. — Parker's confirmation. — Letter of the emperor to the
queen.— Petition of the Puritans. — Court of High Commission. —
Preparations for Parker's consecration. — William Barlow chosen to
j reside. — His history. — Co-operating bishops. — The consecration. —
Appendix ........... 120
THE NINTH VOLUME. ix
CHAPTER IX.
PROCEEDINGS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PARKER'S CONSECRATION.
Parker's position as primate. — Archbishop Heath's letter of remon-
strance.— Parker's reply. — Treatment of the non-juring bishops. —
Change of policy at Borne. — Death of Paul IV. — Pins IV. and Queen
Elizabeth. — Invitation to the Council of Trent. — Elizabeth an avowed
Catholic. — Consecration of bishops. — Correspondence with John
Calvin. — Rules for ordination. — Lay help. — Disagreement among the
bishops. — Fire at St. Paul's. — The episcopal assessors. — John Jewel.
— His sermon at Paul's Cross. — Apology for the Church of England.
— Sketch of the condition of the English Church . . page 255
CHAPTER X.
PREPARATIONS FOR CONVOCATION.
Authority of a Metropolitan. — Powers of Convocation. — Prohibited
degrees of marriage. — Lax notion among Protestants on the subject
of marriage. — Latin version of the Prayer Book. — Office in behalf
of benefactors. — Communion office at funerals. — Re-introduction of
the Catholic Calendar, and its reformation. — The Lectionary. —
Second Book of Homilies. — The Great Bible. — The Geneva Bible. —
Bishops' Bible. — Parker's selection of translators. — Thirty- nine
Articles. — Articles as much opposed to ultra- Protestantism as to
Popery . . . 292
CHAPTER XT.
PARKER IN CONVOCATION.
Programme for the opening of Convocation drawn up by the archbishop.
— Meeting of Convocation on 12th of January. — Sermon preached by
the Provost of Eton. — Dean Nowell prolocutor. — Defaulters pro-
nounced contumacious. — Meetings at the Chapter House of St. Paul's
and in Henry VII. 's Chapel. — Revolutionary measures of the minority.
— Bishop Sandys. — Alterations proposed in the Prayer Book. — Mino-
rity of thirty-three. — Dissenting tactics. — Church saved by Anglo-
Catholics. — Prolocutor accepted by the primate. — Thirty-nine Arti-
cles accepted by the Northern Convocation as well as by that of Can-
terbury.— Clause in the 20th .Article. — Novell's Catechisms. — Cecil
CONTESTS OF
and Parker op] Sectarianism. — Catechism formally received,
bat not adopted by the Synod. — Freedom of Bpeech encouraged. —
Legislation prevented.— Unsatisfactory state of the Temporalities. —
Dissolution of Convocation. — Parker's description of the members. —
!<t policy. — Clerical apparel. — Marriage with a deceased wife's
:. — Convocation of 1571. — Subscription to the Articles.— Catho-
licism of the English Church. — Ancient Catholic canons still the law
iA' the Church of England. — Convocation of 1572. — Archbishop's
page 340
CHAPTER XII.
CONTROVERSIES.
Party government. — Vestment controversy. — The principle of Eliza-
beth's government. — Reformation of an old Church, not the estab-
i lishment of a Protestant sect, — Elizabeth's ecclesiastical policy. —
Two-thirds of clergy and laity were Anglo- Catholics. — Concessions
made on both sides. — Bishop Gheast's letter on the Eucharist. — Di-
versities of practice. — Bad taste of the Puritans. — Persecution of
Parker. — His life threatened. — Mandate of the queen to the primate
and his suffragans to enforce uniformity. — Vacillation of the queen.
— Earl of Leicester ; his evil influence with the queen. — A profligate
man, though* the leader of the Puritans. — Parker's employment of the
press. — Foreign theologians consulted. — Parker's misunderstanding
with the queen. — Change of opinion in Jewel and others. — The
attack nominally on vestments, in reality on Episcopacy. — Puritans
discovered Anti-Christ in the Church of England. — Royal Com-
mission.— Controversy with Sampson and Humphry s. — Parker's
generosity to his opponents. — Disturbances in London churches. —
Eucharist profaned — Clergy in surplices mobbed. — Insults offered to
the archbishop's chaplains. — Forms observed in celebrating. — London
clergy cited before the Ecclesiastical Commissioners. — Addressed by
the Chancellor. — Licences for preaching revoked and renewed. —
Papal privileges asserted at Cambridge. — Parker's success. — Cha-
racter of the English Reformation. — Peter Heylin, Wolfgang
Musculus. — Establishment of Anglo- Romanism in opposition to
Anglo-Catholicism. — Excommunication of Elizabeth by the prpe. —
Establishment of Protestant Dissent. — Thomas Cartwright. — Cppo-
sition to Episcopacy. — All Church principles denied seriatim. —
Romish dissent not fbimally established before the time of Cardinal
Wiseman.— Puritan pchitm established at Wandsworth. — Trouble
THE SIXTH VOLUME. xi
towards the close of Parker's life. — Parliament of 1571. — Bitter
feeling of the Puritan members against the bishops and the Church. —
Violence of Strickland. — Peter Wentworth. — Precisians. — Brownists.
— Prophesyings. — Earl of Sussex. — Visitation of the Isle of Wight. —
Parker insulted at Court. — His angry letter . . . page 3G6
CHAPTER XIII.
VISITATIONS.
Parker's care not to increase the expenses of the inferior clergy. —
Determined to hold a metropolitical visitation. — Opposed by his
Suffragans. — The returned Exiles preferred. — Their avarice. — Visi-
tation of Canterbury by Commission. — Anglo-Catholics and Puritans.
— Inquiry into the state of churches. — Irregularity of the inquiries.
— Irregularities brought to light. — Incestuous marriages. — Diocesan
visitations. — Parker declined procurations. — Parker appeared in great
state, but paid all expenses from his private purse. — His residence at
Bekesbourne. — Scarcity of food. — Fast appointed by the archbishop.
— Form of prayer drawn up by Grindal. — Corrected by Parker. —
Visitation of Hospitals and Schools. — Visitation of Sandwich. — The
archiepiscopal peculiars. — State of Canterbury Cathedral. — Regula-
tions for preachers. — Complaints of irregularity in the local dioceses.
— Articles of inquiry in the diocese of Norwich — Visitation of the
Metropolitan Cathedral. — Efficacy of Prayer.— Quarrel with Lord
Keeper Bacon. — Visits his own diocese in person. — Confirmations and
Statutes given to Cathedrals of the new foundation. — Concealers. —
Consecrations. — Dispute between the Dean and one of the Canons. —
Hospitals visited. — Appointment of a Suffragan Bishop of Dover. —
Visits the Universities. — Royal Commission. — Disturbances at Cam-
bridge.— Condition of Bene't College. — Winchester, Eton, and West-
minster visited. — Alarm at the report of the Parisian Massacre on
St. Bartholomew's Day. — Seminarists in England . . 420
CHAPTER XIV.
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS.
Inns of Court. — Difficulties besetting a judge — Ecclesiastical Commis-
si on. — Tendency of Puritanism to democracy — Dr. Yale. — Parkers
defence of Yale's appointment. — Court of Faculties. — Papal encroach-
ments.— Archbishop's authority to supersede papal dispensations. —
xil CONTENTS OP
Reform of Court impeded. — Court of Faculties an offensive Court.-
Parker accused of partiality by Leicester. — Reformation of the Court
of Faculties. — Case of Bigamy. — Singular case. — Case of Lady Katha-
rine Grey. — Judgment given against her, and the Earl of Hertford,
who claimed to be her husband.— Their imprisonment, — Lady Katha-
rine's apartments in the Tower. — Lady Katharine committed to the
custody of her uncle, Lord John Grey, when the plague was in
London. — Her death. — Parker censured. — Lady Mary Grey. — Case
of George Googe. — Cecil's interference. — Parker's conduct vindicated.
— Reform of the Court of Arches. — Dr. Clarke. — Bornelius page 458
CHAPTER XV.
parkeu's literary pursuits.
Version of the Psalms. — On celibacy of the clergy. — Excerpta from
Martin's book. — Parker obtains an order of the Privy Council to
borrow books. — Number of books collected. — Matthias Flacius, sur-
named Ulyricus. — Elfric's Anglo-Saxon Homily. — Gildas. — John
Josceline. — Bale, the precursor of the Master of the Rolls. — The
Chronicles. — Flores Historiarum, — Matthew Paris. — Walsingham's
Historia Anglicana and Hypodigma Neustriae. — Asser's Life of
Alfred. — Parker as an editor. — De Antiquitate Britannica? Ecclesia?.
— Parkers bequest to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. — List of
his works ... ...... 48G
CHAPTER XVI.
PRIVATE AND DOMESTIC LIFE.
The lordly state of bishops defended. — Addition to Parker's coat-<
arms. — The motto assumed by Parker attests his humility. — Parker's
seal. — Sustained the"port" of a bishop. — Hishouschold, order, attend-
ance.— Definition of duties to the members of his family. — Paid high
wages. — Surprising that he should be accused of penuriousness. —
Accused to Cecil both of extravagance and penuriousness. — Sir John
Parker's description of the revenues of the see. — Cheque Roll.
Benefactions to his University and College. — Dilapidated state of the
property. — Repairs at Lambeth and at Canterbury.— Parker's care
of the accounts. — Repairs atBekesbourne. — Increases the endowment
of the Bekcsbourne living. — Rebuilds his house at Bekesbourne.
Revenues froinFord. — Opposition of the courtiers. — Lambeth Manor
THE NINTH VOLUME
Xlll
House converted into the Palace of the see of Canterbury. — Splendour
of Parker's entertainments. — Robbery of the episcopal estates. — The
three festivals at Canterbury. — The archbishop continued to enter-
tain ambassadors, and to act as jailer to state prisoners. — Tunstall,
Boxall, Thirlby, Lord Henry Howard, Lord Stourton. — Schedule of
state prisoners. — French ambassador entertained by Parker. — Mrs.
Parker's private apartments. — The archbishop stands, with the
queen and Duke of Norfolk, sponsor to the child of the Margrave of
Baden. — The archbishop receives the communion with the queen.
— Visit of the queen to the archbishop in 1560. — Noble members of
Parker's household. — His table.— Provision for his wife. — For his
children. — Death of Mrs. Parker. — Death of Parker's second son. —
The queen visits Parker at Lambeth. — The queen's maundy. — She
visits the archbishop at Croydon. — Visits him at Canterbury. —
Parker's contemporaries. — Prepares his tomb. — His will. — Death
and character ..... . page 519
SUCCESSION
OF
ARCHBISHOPS AND CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS.
Archbishop
Conse-
cration
Consecrators 1 ^JJJ*"
Death
Contemporary
Sovereign
Matthew Parker .
1559
(Will. Chichester . /
J John Hereford . . .
J John Bedford . . .
1 Miles (ex) Exeter .,
1559
1575
Elizabeth
TABLE
OF
CONTEMPOEAEY SOVEREIGNS.
A.D.
England
Scotland
Germany
France
Pope
Spain
1559
Elizabeth
Mary .
Ferdinand I.
Francis II.
Pius IV. . .
Philip II.
15C0
.
Charles IX.
1564
.
Maximilian II.
.
1666
.
.
PiusV. . .
1507
James VI.
1572 .
.
Gregory XIII.
1674
•
Henry III.
LIVES
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTEKBURY.
BOOK IV.— continued.
CHAPTER V.
MATTHEW PARKER.
The Parker family. — Nicolas Parker, the founder. — William Parker. —
His marriage with Alice Monins. — Birth of Matthew Parker. — His
early education. — Death of his father. — Enters at Cambridge. —
State of the University — Date of Parker's matriculation. — Takes his
degree. — Master of his college. — Revenue of the college. — Founda-
tion of the library. — Elected vice-chancellor.— Controversy with
Bishop Gardyner. — Interview with Henry VIII. — Visitation of
Cambridge in 1549.
The family of Matthew Parker, the seventieth Archbishop
of Canterbury, occupied a respectable position among the
commercial aristocracy of the country, at a time when to
the wholesale dealer in England the title of merchant
Authorities. — The works of John Strype, in the collections he has
made from the public archives, are of incalculable value to the student of
English history, whether civil or ecclesiastical. . When we remember the
VOL. IX. B
CHAP.
V.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Parentage,
birth, and
education.
lives ov Tin:
chap, prince was Grst attached. The founder of the family, or
— ; — ' of its commercial prosperity, was Nicolas Parker, who,
Parker.1" being by profession a notary public, was appointed by
difficulties, now removed, which attended such researches at the begin-
ning of the eighteenth century, his incessant industry does indeed appeal
marvellous ; but from the vast extent of his labours, and the haste
in which some of his transcriptions were necessarily made, it would
have been almost a miracle if he had been invariably accurate; while,
at the same time, we have to complain of the careless manner in which
the references to his authorities are given. Strype was not so much an
historian as a collector of the materials of history; and the historian
finds it necessary to verify the quotations of Strype, and to collate his
transcriptions with the original, before he can venture to adopt them
as authoritative. This labour in the nineteenth century is very different
from what it was in the time of Strype. The present Master of the
Rolls, with sagacious forethought, has not only provided means of easy
access to the public documents under his custody, but he has, with a
soundness of judgment seldom at fault, selected as editors of those
documents which have been submitted to the press, scholars equally
distinguished for their eminence in general literature and for their
archaeological studies ; while in Sir Thomas Duffus Hardy the inquirer
finds a living index to our national muniments, and one who takes
pleasure in facilitating and abridging the labours of research. From
these circumstances we may express surprise, while we give utterance
to the complaint, that Strype has never had an editor. His works,
as they issued from the Clarendon Press some years ago, are simply
a reprint, and nothing more, — a reprint in which are often retained
what were mere clerical blunders in the original edition. In works
such as those which are attributed to Strype, what to the ordinary
reader may appear to be a trivial error, may become a serious mistake,
either hindering or misdirecting further research. An edition of Strype
was contemplated by one eminently qualified to discharge the duties
of an editor, — the late Dr. Maitland, whose papers have been placed in
my hands. What has been said of Strype may be repeated with refer-
ence to Jeremy Collier. Collier, like Strype, had no acumen as a
critic : the art of criticism in his days had scarcely come into existence;
and while in the present generation it is the fashion to throw doubt
upon every historic statement hitherto received as authentic, so, in
Collier's time, the authenticity of traditional assertions was accepted,
too often without sufficient examination. Collier is nevertheless the
historian of the English Church. Later historians have done little more
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
Archbishop Stafford, in the year 1450, principal registrar chap.
of the Spiritual Court of Canterbury. On Nicolas Parker —J —
devolved the custody of all the public acts, muniments, Parker*
than modernize the statements inartistically arranged by him, and
expressed in what is now called a slipshod style. He invariably refers
to contemporary authorities ; and, having had occasion for many years
to follow him, I may say that he quotes or translates, if not always
correctly, always with intentional fairness. He is, on the whole, the
most impartial historian with whom I am acquainted. His collections
in the Appendix to his History are extremely valuable ; but they are
subject to the same detraction we adopt in reference to Strype. To
the latter writer, Collier, as a learned divine, was much superior. To
both Strype and Collier, Bishop Burnet is in every respect inferior ; but
his History of the Reformation has obtained, extrinsically, a value not
pertaining to the work itself, in the fact that it possesses in Mr. Pocock
an. editor who, for accuracy and research, has seldom been equalled,
and never surpassed. In preparing his edition of Burnet, Mr. Pocock
has examined other documents relating to the Reformation, which, it is
to be hoped, he may in due time commit to the press. In the mean
time, his criticism on Burnet, the most unfair and prejudiced of
historians, has thrown considerable light upon the history of the Re-
formation. Heylin also has found, in Canon Robertson, an editor worthy
of a work, the merits of which are brought into stronger light by the
ableness of his researches. To other collectors of public documents,
such as Haynes, Forbes, D'Ewes, and the Cabala, it will be seen from
the foot-notes that I am indebted ; but as I have had to refer to them
only occasionally, I forbear to offer with respect to them any critical
remarks. I will only observe, that I have found it necessary, when
quoting D'Ewes as an authority, to refer, in the first instance, to the
Journals of Parliament. The brief sketch of his early history by Parker
himself, and the ' Mathaaus ' appended to the ' De Antiquitate,' throw
light upon his history. His letters, both of a private and of a public
character, are invaluable to his biographer, and have been brought
within easy access by their publication by the Parker Society, under
the careful and judicious editorship of Mr. Bruce and the Rev.
T. T. Perowne, — worthy representatives of Corpus Christi College,
Cambridge. To the authorities of that college, literature in general is
indebted for the careful preservation of the Parker Papers ; and students
in particular, for the readiness and the courtesy with which the literary
treasures in their possession are opened to inspection.
b 2
1559-
LIVES OF THE
I
I
chap, and ra of the entire province: and amid the fearful
«* corruption of the spiritual court-, of which mention has
been made in the life of Warham, it is no ordinary praise
is. that, through a long period, the character of Nicolas
Parker, for integrity, professional zeal, and sound judg-
ment, was never impeached. Archbishop Stafford ap-
|)( tinted him M < >ul ( »f regard to the honesty of his behaviour,
and his other gifts of integrity and honour." When, in
1 183, "broken in age, and hindered from business by
many infirmities," he tendered his resignation to Arch-
bishop Bourchier, the archbishop refused to receive it,
but appointed an assistant. Nicolas Parker did not long
enjoy his comparative retirement: the last document we
possess to which his name is attached bears the date of
June, 1484. About that time he died at his house in Ivy
Lane, in the parish of St. Faith's in the city of London.
It is to be recorded to the credit of Nicolas Parker,
that, while holding an office in which, through peculation
and extortion, fortunes had been dishonestly made, he
bequeathed no fortune to his descendants, but only the
competence which enabled them to make a fair start in
business. But, although he would not pollute his soul
by the dishonest acquisition of filthy lucre, he par-
ticipated in the general feeling of the age, and by ob-
taining a grant of arms, he established the gentility of
his family. At that time, the College of Heralds was a
reality, and no one could venture to assume a coat of
arms until he could prove his right to the distinction at
the visitation of the heralds. Parker bore for his coat of
arms, on a field gules, three keys erected ; and so im-
portant did the archbishop think this distinction, that,
when he desired to establish a distinct branch of the family,
he obtained for it an addition to the shield, — a chevron
charged with three resplendent estoiles. The age
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
in this respect punctilious, and in heraldry three classes chap.
existed. Arms paternal and hereditary were transmitted - — ^ — «
to the descendants of the original grantee : the son pHrkeaT
becoming a gentleman of the second coat armour, the 1559-75.
grandson a gentleman of blood, the great-grandson a
gentleman of ancestry.
The grandson of Nicolas, William Parker — the arch-
bishop's father — was a tradesman in Norwich, a calenderer
of stuffs. The fact of his being a gentleman of blood was
of service to him, no doubt, when he sought to ally him-
self by marriage with " the worshipful house of Monins, His
or Monings." This was a Kentish family, a branch of Aifce61"'
which had originally migrated from Norfolk. From the Monius-
manner in which the marriage is referred to by the con-
temporaries of the archbishop, it is evident that, when
William Parker was married to Alice Monins, he was
regarded as having made a good match ; and such in
every respect his marriage was. It was through his
mother that Matthew Parker was related to the Earl of JfrI.of
Notting-
Nottingham. His grandmother* was Alicia, daughter ham.
of John Carey, gentleman, of Snetisham, in the county of
Norfolk ; and Matthew Parker's uncle had, apparently,
married another member of the same family. The Careys
of Snetisham and Carey Lord Hunsdon, a relative of
Queen Elizabeth, were originally of the same trunk.
Katharine, the daughter of Henry Carey Lord Hunsdon,
in the reign of Elizabeth, was the first wife of Charles
Howard, first Earl of Nottingham. If we may say of
any fact of history, that it is unimportant, we might be
tempted to pay little regard to such a statement as this,
were it not that it implies a reason for the presence
of the Earl of Nottingham at Parker's consecration, his
testimony to which transaction being, as we shall here-
* See original pedigree, A 211-12, at Heralds' College.
6 Lmes of the
OHAF. after have occasion to show, of considerable contro\
v.
value.
SSte The marriage of William Parker and Alice Moninfl
1659-75. was productive of \mn'\\ domestic happiness, although
they had to mourn the loss in early life of two children,
who died before the birth of Matthew. Matthew was
the eldest of the children who survived his father. Of
Botolph, the next son, we know little, except that lie
was in holy orders ; but the name of Thomas, next in the
family succession, will frequently occur in these p;:
Thomas Parker became a tradesman of Norwich, though
it does not appear whether he pursued his father s busi-
ness or not. Between him and Matthew a cordial friend-
ship existed, and on several occasions Thomas was able
to render assistance to his brother, in whose household,
after Matthew's consecration, he held an important post.
It was a proud day for Thomas when, as Mayor of Norwich,
he publicly entertained his brother, the Lord Archbishop
of Canterbury, Primate of all England, and Metropolitan.
Matthew Parker felt justly proud when, the first peer in
parliament next to royalty itself, he pointed to the cir-
cumstance of his having risen to this eminence from that
great middle class with which, through his brother, he
continued to be connected. There was a sister named
Margaret.
Biographi- In the biographical memorandums preserved in Corpus
Christi College, Cambridge, Matthew Parker refers in the
following quaint terms to his early years, and his primary
education : — *
* These memorandums are written on a small roll of parchment.
It is evident that they were made at various times, sometimes long
after the events recorded took place, and probably towards the close of
the archbishop's life. Hence they cannot always be taken as chrono-
logically correct. Their accuracy must be tested by reference to other
records. They do not extend beyond Parker's consecration.
I
cal memo-
randums.
AKCHBISIIOPS OF CANTERBURY.
" In the year of our Lord 1 504, on the 6th of August, the
letter Gr and F, Matthew Parker was born, at Norwich, in the
parish of St. Saviour; and was brought up in the parish of
All Saints, near Fyebridge Grates, and educated in the parish
of St. Clement, near Fyebridge, under William his father, who
lived to 1516 and to the 40th year of his age, and Alice his
mother, who lived to a.d. 1553 and to the 83rd year of her age.
'Thomas Benis, Bachelor of
Matthew-
Parker.
1559-75.
" He was
instructed
in reading: 1.
in writing : 2.
in singing
in grammar : 4.
by 1
Theology, Eector of St.
Clement's, and partly by
Richard Pope, priest.
William Prior, clerk of the
church of St. Benedict.
W. Love, priest; E. Man-
thorp, clerk ; of St. Ste-
phen's— severe teachers.
William Neve, an easy
and kind schoolmaster."
When Matthew was only twelve years of age, his father Death of
died. This severe calamity proved, however, to be a loss 1516.
not irreparable, since his mother, in the course of a few
years, selected for her second husband Mr. Baker, who
loved his wife's children, and watched over them as ten-
derly as over his own only son.
John Baker, the second husband of Mrs. Parker, is John
simply described as " gentleman," by which we are pro- stepfather.
bably to understand, that although he was not a landed
proprietor, he was, nevertheless, not engaged in trade.*
* " As for gentlemen," says Sir Thomas Smith, " they be made
good cheape in England. For who soever studieth the lawes of the
realme, who studieth in the Universities, who professeth liberall
Sciences : and, to be short, who can live idly, and without manuall
labour, and will beare the port, charge and countenance of a Gentle-
man, hee shall bee called master, for that is the title which men geve
to esquires and other gentlemen, and shall bee taken for Gentlemen." —
Smith's Commonwealth of England. According to Jacob, in his Law
Dictionary, " a gentleman may be defined to be one who, without any
Matthew
liM-76.
8 LIVR8 OF tin:
(ii \v. By her second husband, the mother of Matthew Parker
had a son. John Baker by name To this half-brother,
Matthew became much attached, and found in him, at all
limes, a sympathizing friend, ready with his assistance
whenever it was required and could be had.
It was the custom in most families of the middle class
to select one son to be educated as a scholar ; and it is
evident that Matthew's father had destined him to a
university education. His mother determined to fulfil
the wishes of her first husband, and at her own expense
to support her eldest son at Cambridge.
Goes to A native of Norwich had certain advantages at Cam-
bridge. bridge, which may have influenced Matthew Parker to
select that university ; and one of his masters having been
educated at Bene't College, his mother may have been
persuaded by him to enter her son as a member of that
house. But there were other reasons for choosing Cam-
bridge. Whether we can account for the fact or not, a
fact it certainly is, that almost all our distinguished men,
state of at this period, were Cambridge men. Until this time,
bridge. Cambridge had occupied a very secondary place among
the universities of Europe as compared with Oxford, and
the name of this university was little known on the Con-
tinent at a time when Oxford challenged an equality
with Paris ; but during the early days of the Refor-
title, bears a coat of arms, and whose ancestors have been freemen ; and
by the coat a gentleman giveth, he is known to be, or not to be, de-
scended from those of his name who lived many hundred years ago."
Selden, in his Titles of Honour, p. 705, states that a gentleman is
" one that, either from the blood of his Ancestors, or the favour of his
Soveraign, or of them that have power of soveraignty in them, or from
his own vertue, employment or otherwise, according to the Laws and "
customs of honour in the Country we speak of, is ennobled, and made
Gentile, or so raised to an eminency, above the multitude, perpetually
inherent in his person, that by those Laws and customs he be truly
Nobilis or noble, whether he have any of the precedent Titles or not."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 0
mation, both statesmen and divines gave the preference chap.
to Cambridge. The residence of Erasmus at this uni- < r — -
versity may have added to its fame ; but the question Parker.
recurs, why should Erasmus prefer Cambridge on his 1559-75.
second visit to England, when at his first visit he took
up his abode at Oxford, and acknowledged his obliga-
tions to many Oxford scholars ? We have one answer,
doubtless, in the fact that he was invited to Cambridge
by Bishop Fisher : but his discomforts were great, and
he complained of his hard fare, and that " the ale was
raw, small, and windy;" he declared that it was not "vis
Cereris, but Ceres vitiated, and therefore justly called
Cervesia."* We may suspect that, under such circum-
stances, the Epicurean scholar would have removed to the
more luxurious university, if there had not been some
impediment offered to his removal. This impediment we
find in the opposition offered at Oxford to the study of
Greek. When we are told that so great a man as Sir
Thomas More interfered in the disputes between the
Trojans and Greeks at Oxford, we may fairly conjecture
that these disputes were more than " a university row "
among the younger members. Other circumstances, too,
may induce us to suppose that an opposition was offered
by the heads of colleges to an innovation which, it was
asserted, was closely connected with heresy. At Cam-
bridge, undoubtedly, the study of Greek literature was
encouraged, and at the same time a spirit in favour of a
reformation of the Church prevailed.
There is some difficulty in fixing precisely the time Date of his
of Matthew Parker's matriculation. He himself, in the ktion.
* Fuller, to whom we are indebted for the pleasantry, will by no
means admit its justice. He vindicates the character of Cambridge
ale, " until the innovation of beer, the child of hops, was brought into
England."
10 LIVKS OF THI-:
ii u\ memorandums already referred to, asserts that he went to
^ Cambridge on the 8th of September, 1522. Butthememo-
jfite randums, as we have observed, were made from recollee-
;,.. linn a! a later period of life, and not when the occurrenc
actually took place. His memorandum with reference
to Cambridge stands thus: "On the 8th of September,
1522, about the seventeenth year of my age, I was sent
to Cambridge, by the help of Mr. Bunge, of the parish of
St. George ; but at my mother's expense." * Mr. Bunge
used his influence to obtain an admission for the young
man into the university ; but Parker is careful to add, that
for a university education he was indebted solely to his
mother's self-denying generosity. The difficulty which
here occurs is this, that in the year 1522, young Parker
was in his eighteenth year, not in his seventeenth, since
he was born in August, 1504. He incidentally supplies
an explanation. Among the MSS. of C. C. C. C. there
is a paper by Bishop Gardyner, to which Parker appends
the following note : hoc anno in festo Nativitatis Beatw
Maria M. P. accessit Cantabrigiam. Now the festival to
which reference is here made certainly falls on the 8th of
September, but this document is dated anno millesimo
guingentesimo vicesimo primo. I
I think that I can show cause why Parker, writing
towards the close of life, should make this mistake ; and I
do so to point out how the veriest trifles may be of
importance in history, and how necessary it is to pay
attention to minute particulars. On referring to Hall's
Chronicle, I find that, in the Lent of 1521, the jail fever
made its appearance in Cambridge, and raged to such an
* The memorandum is in Latin, and stands thus: a.d. 1522, 8
Septem. circa annum aetatis mese 17, missus Cantabrigiam opera
Mri. Bunge, Parochiae Sancti Georgii, sed sumptibus matris, in Colleg.
Corporis Christi.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 11
extent, proving so frequently fatal, not only to the pri-
soners, but to a vast number of persons in the town and
neighbourhood, that, in order to escape infection, all who
had the means made their escape from the place. That 1559-70.
an anxious mother would recall her son from what had
become a pest-house, almost as soon as he had reached
his destination, we may feel quite certain ; and we shall
not be far wrong if we presume that the young student
matriculated in the year 1521, but that he did not come
into residence until the year 1522.*
Matthew Parker was admitted a member of Corpus
Christi College, or, as it was generally called till a late
period, Bene't College, of which he lived to become a
generous benefactor, f
In these days, a college in a university is regarded as
little more than a school for adults. In Parker's time, a
college — being thus distinguished from a monastery — was
regarded as a society of secular clerks who were associated
for the purpose of prosecuting their studies. Some lay
members were admitted to manage the secular business,
and to regulate the affairs of the institution. The income
of this society was derived from landed property, held upon
certain conditions, among which was the education of a
given number of pupils, who were to receive board and
lodging within the precincts.
In the middle ages, as we have seen, independent
members, — persons who, without being attached to a
college, desired to attend the lectures of the university, —
* See MSS. C. C. C. C, cvi. Art. 63. Strype gives the date 1520,
which is clearly a mistake.
j" This college acquired the name of Bene't probably from its vicinity
to the church of that name. This adventitious title was admitted even
in legal documents, whenever the college was styled " the College of
Corpus Christi and the Blessed Virgin Mary, commonly called Bene't
College." Masters' Hist, of Corpus Christi College.
12 LIVES OF THE
( hap. lodged at first in private houses, and then in halls, which
„ \m ., were placed under the surveillaiice of the university
authorities. When it was found that this arrangement
was insufficient to secure the proper discipline, colleges
were induced to receive independent members, in addition
to the scholars on the foundation. This arrangement was
found to be profitable ; but in times when it was still
difficult to maintain discipline,* and when there was small
accommodation for students not on the foundation, the
fellows were accustomed to hire or purchase a hostel. A
hostel is described as a convictorium, or boarding-house,
over which, when it was attached to a college, one of the
fellows presided, and where lectures were given.
Attached to Corpus Christi College w^as the hostel of
St. Mary, and here young Parker at first took up his
abode.f
Although he complains of his tutor, Eobert Cooper,
that, notwithstanding his being a master of arts, he was,
nevertheless, a man of small learning, yet Parker laboured
so diligently at his studies, for the purpose of exonerating
his mother from the expense of his education, that so
early as the month of March, 1522-3, he obtained a
bible-clerkship in his college. This bible-clerkship was
a scholarship, to w7hich certain duties wrere attached. It
* Flagellation was still resorted to. Fuller mentions that the Lady-
Margaret being, once upon a time, a visitor at Christ's College, saw the
dean of the college administering corporal punishment to one of the
members. The compassionate princess did not go so far as to call
upon the executioner to stop, but simply exclaimed, " Lente ! "
Fuller, 108.
f Masters, in his history of the college, p. 74, throws a doubt upon
the fact of Parker's residence in the hotel. He surely cannot have
read, or he had rather forgotten, that Parker, in his biographical memo-
randums, unequivocally declares the fact : " Edoctus partim in Hospitio
Divae Maris; partim in Collegio (Corporis) Christi."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 13
had been founded, in the reign of Henry VII., by the char
Duchess of Norfolk — a lady to whose munificence the > — ^ -
college was in other respects indebted. Parker now re- ParkerT
moved into the college. 1559-75.
It is said of Parker, that from the commencement of
his university career, he was " a painful student." But
public examinations had become a mere formality ; and
the consequence was, that every student shaped his studies
according to his inclination, and with a view to what
would be serviceable to him in after life. The old uni-
versity system, which in former times had answered its
purpose by enforcing mental exertion, had now become
obsolete ; and when the whole field of literature was in a
transitional state, no new system had been authoritatively
adopted. The condition of the university when Parker
came into residence, was not unlike that which is repre-
sented as its condition towards the close of the eighteenth
century. Certain formal exercises were required of the
candidates for a degree ; but the examination was con-
ducted,— not with alarming severity, — by masters of arts
selected by the person who presented himself for examin-
ation. Idleness met with no punishment. But, on the
other hand, when a young man desired to make himself
a proficient in any department of human learning, he was
sure to find learned men ready and happy to assist him.
Every facility for his improvement was offered him : there
were public lectures delivered from time to time by
accomplished professors ; libraries were open to him — a
vast advantage when books were rare and dear ; and he
associated with some of the first wits of the age.
Hence it came to pass, that in the sixteenth, as in
the eighteenth century, the university could produce
the most opposite characters. Men who in after life
proved, owing to their youthful idleness, to be disqualified
1 1 uvi:s of THE
chap, for the discharge of the duties which, from circumstances,
- might devolve upon them, threw the blame from them-
Park«r. selves upon the university. Even if by later studies they
had remedied past deficiencies, they would exaggerate
their own merits by depreciating the university, to which,
as they could make it appear, they owed nothing
Whereas, on the other hand, those who — like Parker
and others among his contemporaries — had resisted every
temptation to idleness, and had mastered all the learning
of the age, would refer with gratitude to the happy days
they passed, when, assisted and assisting, they received in-
struction from their elders to impart it to the younger
members of the community ; when, in the midst of friendly
intercourse, they could understand experimentally th
saying of the wise man : " Iron sharpeneth iron ; so
man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend."*
It was the characteristic of Parker's mind to do wha
his hand found to do with his might. He therefore
directed his attention to dialectics and philosophy, and,
by so doing, he subjected his mind to a discipline most
important in a controversial age. The soil was ploughed
and drilled, as it were, and so prepared for the sowing of
intellectual seed, when he directed his attention to theo-
logical study. His philosophical studies included the
works of Duns Scotus and Thomas Aquinas ; and these
studies implied an intimate acquaintance with Scripture.
ra. 1526. He took his degree of Bachelor of Arts in 1525 ; and on
T^2g. tne 22nd of December in the following year, he became
!
con
^iT'Tie^t a subdeacon. He was ordained deacon on the 20th of
1M7. April, and priest on the 15th of June, 1527.
Antecedently to his ordination he returned to his home
at Norwich, and it was under the title of "Barwell and
* Proverbs xxvii. 17.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 15
the Chapel in the Fields " that he commenced his pastoral
labours.
That Parker was early distinguished as a scholar is ap- p^ker*
parent from the fact, that, when he was only a young man, 1559-7.3.
two or three and twenty years of age, he was one of the
Cambridge men who were selected to hold office in the
new college which Cardinal Wolsey was founding at Ox-
ford. Parker was not an ambitious man, and preferred
remaining at Cambridge, where a fellowship in his own
college was contemporaneously offered for his acceptance.
Although, as has been said, he was not ambitious of a
high position, he always desired to excel, and to take the
lead in any department of human exertion to which he
might be called ; he therefore now devoted himself to the
service of the college and university, to which he became
attached.
About the time of his election to his fellowship, he took
his degree of Master of Arts : the exact date of his
degree has not been ascertained, but it was probably in
the summer of 1528. From this time, he devoted him- MA. 1528.
self to theological studies ; but he did not graduate in
divinity till the 14th of July, 1535, and he deferred taking b.d. 1535.
his degree of Doctor of Divinity till the 1st of July, d.d. 1538.
1538.
Long before that event, he had, however, established a
high character as a preacher. He had been introduced
to court, and was now regarded as a rising man.
The narrative of these events, and an account of his
studies in divinity will be reserved for separate chapters.
We shall, at present, confine attention to his academical
career, both in his college and in the university.
The mastership of his college became vacant in 1544, Master of
... the col-
by the death of William Soworde, B.D., and, under iege. io«.
16 uvi:s OP THE
royal mandate, Matthew Parker was appointed hi;
successor.*
In this document, Parker is described as a man
well for his approved learning, wisdom, and honesty, ai
for hifl singular grace and industry in bringing up youth
in virtue and learning, so apt for the exercise of the said
room " — i.e. mastership — " that it is thought very hard to
find the like for all respects and purposes."
on- In the measures proposed for the improvement of the
,t- college, the new master found his fellows prepared to co-
hiseoi!^-. operate, and he instantly commenced his work of reform.
For the better management of the benefactions placed
at the disposal of the college, regulations were speedily
adopted. Among these may be noted " Billingford's
hutch," or chest, a fund to assist the needy members of
the college by an occasional loan, to be advanced under
certain stipulations. This is specially noticed, because it
affords an instance of the watchful piety of Matthew
Parker. He required that every one who should have
recourse to the hutch, should offer up a prayer with
the custodians, for the benefit of Billingford's soul. At
this time, when prayers for the dead were allowable, he
did not forget his own especial benefactress, the Duchess
of Norfolk, nor her sister the Lady Eleanor Butler.
He made provision that she who had endowed the
bible-clerkship, which had offered to him the first step on
the ladder of promotion, should be remembered in the
prayers of that community which had been enriched
by her munificence. The accounts of the college were in
* The king's letter is still preserved. The royal signature *n
affixed to it by a stamp. MS. cxiv. 2, Nasmith. It is printed in
note to Masters' history of the college, and in the Appendix to Strype.
For all that relates to Corpus Christi College, the reader is referred
to Masters and Lamb; and, for an account of the original documents,
Nasmith.
2/)
■
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 17
great confusion, and the first step taken by Parker was to chap.
reduce them to order. The sources of the collegiate income * ^ .
he carefully investigated, and economically regulated paikerW'
the expenses. He discovered arrears of rent, and much 1559-75.
property lost by the carelessness or peculation of bursars
in times past he reclaimed. Inventories of the college
possessions were made under his direction, and account
books are still in existence, which, written by his own
hand, or engrossed under his direction, are living attest-
ations of his accuracy. When the accounts were reduced
to order, the income of the college was found to be as
follows : —
Corpus Christi College.*
The master, for stipend and commons .
Nine fellows, of whom eight are priests, who
have each per annum 51. 6s. Sd., and one
not priest, 4d. .....
Three bible-clerks, 21. per annum each .
Ministers, namely, manciple, for commons,
21. 3s. 4cL, and stipend, 6s. Sd. Cook, for
commons, 21. 3s. 4c#., and for stipend,
6s. Sd 5 0 0
Distributions annually between the master
and fellows for their liveries . . .600
Exequies, alms, and refections . . . 10 2 3
Fees, namely of Mr. Cooke (steward of all the
possessions), 13s. 4d. Collector of the
rents, 21. Surveyor of all the possessions,
Zl. 6s. Sd 6 0 0
Expenses extraordinary, 51. Fuel, 21. Purchase
of utensils, 2l. 10s. Kepairs, 961. 3s. 4d. 105 13 4
Total 192 2 3
Total of the clear revenues . .171 7 6
So the total expenses exceed the total
revenue ...... £20 14 9
£ s.
d.
6 13
4
46 13
4
6 0
0
* Masters' History of Corpus Christi College, App. No. 21.
VOL. IX. C
18 lives of Tin:
CHAP. He was economical in order that lie might be gene-
_^ — » rous, and incited his brethren to acts of munificence by
PtakST his own example. Having, by his industry and firmness,
1559-75. increased the income of the college, instead of adding that
increased income to the dividends of the existing members,
lie persuaded his brethren to establish two new fellowships
and six scholarships. It certainly is interesting, and it
may be of some importance, to know what was con-
sidered in those days a sufficient endowment, or nearly so,
in the University of Cambridge. Accordingly, I have to
remark that each scholar had for his commons an allow-
ance of eightpence a week, which was afterwards aug-
mented to a shilling, with a small additional allowance
per annum for his laundress and his barber. He had a
chamber provided for him, and was exonerated from the
payment of college fees.* Candidates for the new scholar-
ships were to be competently learned in grammar, and
a preference was to be given to the poorest children,
provided they were likely to proceed in arts, and to make
divinity their study. In addition to what was done by
the college, Parker, out of his private resources, endowed
two fellowships and five scholarships. Each fellow was
to have six pounds a year for his stipend, and chambers
were provided for him. The fellows were to be Norfolk
men, and were to undertake gratuitously the instruction
of scholars who came from Norwich.
In the fellowships endowed by the college he secured
a preference for Norfolk men, on the ground that it was
from that county most of the benefactors of that college
came. By those who like to speak disparagingly of every
* Of the establishment of a professor we have an account in Strype's
Life of Sir Thomas Smith. We are told that Smith kept three servants,
three guns, three winter geldings, which, together with his own board,
cost him thirty pounds a year.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 19
generous action, Parker was sneered at for having be-Nor- chap.
folked his college ; but Fuller, in his usual quaint style, . V" _,
* observes, " The worst I can wish this college is, that they bS^*
may have the like benefactor, who, on the same terms, 1559-75.
may be partial to the same college." If it were intended
to insinuate that his attachment to his native place — that
kind of feeling which our ancestors delighted to cultivate
as the germ of patriotism — implied any narrowness of
mind on the part of Parker, the calumny is refuted by the
fact, that he gave 63/. 13s. M. to Gonville and Caius
College for the maintenance of a student educated in the
Cathedral School of Canterbury, at the nomination of
the Archbishop of Canterbury : to this he added both
plate and books. A similar sum, with plate and books, he
conferred on Trinity Hall.
The wisdom with which his benevolence was directed, Founds
was exemplified in the regulations he made with reference library.
to his greatest benefaction, — the library which he instituted
in Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, and which is cele-
brated not only in England, but throughout the civilized
world.
It must indeed in justice be admitted, that he was not
the first to found a library in his college ; but when we
refer to the library bequeathed to the college by Dr.
Markaunt, in 1417, we must add that, although the legacy
was peculiarly valuable, considering the age in which it
was made, Dr. Markaunt's bequest only amounted to
seventy-six volumes. To this an addition was made by
the liberality of Dr. Nobys ; but the whole library was
in such a dilapidated state when Dr. Parker became
master, that of the present library he may be regarded as
the founder. By him the keepers of Billingford's hutch
were made the custodians of the library ; and he ordered
that if the chains which attached the books to the desks
c 2
ngnla
tiuns.
I
S
I
e
i
LIVES OF THE
OHAP, were broken, or any damage were done to the books,
_. chains and book- were to be repaired at the college
Matthew
Parker, expense.
The monastic libraries had been damaged, when no
destroyed, by mobs, seeking plunder with the cant o
reformation on their lips. When the jewelled and cm
bossed bindings had been torn from the books, the books
themselves could be purchased at small price. Parker
availed himself of the opportunity thus placed within hi
reach, to make a collection of MSS. and printed books
These, when bequeathed to his college, formed, in the
words of Fuller, " the sun of English antiquity, until it
was eclipsed by Sir Eobert Cotton." To the works con-
tained in this library we are indebted for the chief mat
rials of English history, civil and ecclesiastical. Some o
the most valuable of the documents are now in print ;
but the originals are carefully preserved for collation, as
Library well as for the inspection, of archaeologists. The stringent
regulations made by Parker for the preservation of his
library are many of them still in force, and the suc-
cessive masters and fellows of Corpus Christi College,
Cambridge, have proved themselves worthy of the trea-
sures committed to their care. The college is honourably
spoken of by grateful students, for the courtesy shown,
and the facilities afforded to them in their investigations.
Dr. Parker attended to the comforts of the college by
giving, for the support of the hall-fire from the feast of
All Saints to Candlemass, no less a sum than a hundred
pounds. He obtained a licence of mortmain for enabling
them to hold a hundred pounds per annum more than
they were at that time possessed of, and fitted up
chambers in the college for the scholarships by him en-
dowed. He added four hundred pounds for the increase
of the commons of the master, fellows, and scholars ; an
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 21
he undertook, at his sole charge, so many public works, chap.
that he received a vote of thanks from the vice-chancellor . / ,;
and the senate. Parker!"
It is only just to the memory of Dr. Parker to mention 1559-75.
these things, because, by writers who have " evil-will at
our Zion," he is sometimes mentioned as grasping and
avaricious.
That he was economical, as most persons who have
afforded to be public benefactors have certainly been, is
not to be denied ; and when his undoubted property was
sometimes withheld from him by the despotism of Elizabeth
and the mean arts of her courtiers, he was obliged to con-
tend vigorously for his rights. But let his actions speak
for themselves.
After mentioning his munificence, as evinced not only Benefac-
to Corpus Christi College and the University of Cambridge canter-
generally, Masters refers to his benefactions to Canterbury ^J^^jf
and Norwich, and continues : —
" As a further specimen of his bounty to the corporation of
Norwich, he gave them a magnificent gilt bason and ewer,
weighing 175 oz. ; in acknowledgment of which, with his
many other singular favours conferred upon them, they sent
him a letter of thanks, and at the same time entered into a
covenant with this society, whereby they bound themselves,
under a penalty of 100?., never to alienate it, unless in a case
of urgent necessity, and then not without the approbation of
the masters of this college and of Trinity Hall. The two
colleges gave bonds in like manner, of 20?. each, for their cups
and covers ; yea, such was his liberality, that, within the four
first years after his advancement, he gave the servants of his
household, in leases of lands, rectories, &c, 1,291?. 13s. 4c?.
beyond his yearly gifts amongst them, amounting to 2,01 7?.
His foundations of fellowships, scholarships, increase of com-
mons, &c, cost him 2,000?., whilst his yearly disbursements
were 2,400?. He gave Nevile 100?. for his book, laid out
22 LIVES OF Tin:
(HAP. 500Z. upon the University Street, and 1,400£. upon his palaces,
when the value of the archbishopric did not exceed 3,428£. per
v.
Matthew annum. All his ijoods and chattels, at the time of his death,
Parker.
amounted to no more than 2,766L; whereas his legacies, funeral
charges, debts, &c, exceeded 3,376Z., which deficiency was made
1559-75.
up by his son out of the estate he left behind : but the whole
produce of this not being much above a hundred pounds
a year, he was put to difficulties in doing it; as it appears
both from the smallness of the sums the college was obliged
accept, and from the time he took to pay in the remainder
the five hundred pounds that was unpaid at his father's deat
Yea, such was his dilatoriness herein, that, by reason thereof,
they were once forced to borrow fifty pounds of Dr. Hatcher
upon a pawn of their plate." *
re,
I
Such was Parker as the head of a house. We procee
to offer some remarks upon his conduct to the university
in general. Soon after his appointment as master of his
Vice-chan- college, he became vice-chancellor of the university.
SJJ! ° The communication was made to him by his friend, Dr.
Jjjgj Mere, in January, 1544-5.f Dr. Mere states, that th<
proctors were very desirous that he should return home, as
soon as possible, to undergo the formalities of admission.
He mentions that there was a canvass for Dr. Eidlev and
Dr. Standish, but their interest was divided by the ap-
pearance in the field of Mr. Atkinson, the vice-provost
of King's College. It appears from the voting paper that
the votes were, for Eidley, five ; for Atkinson, six ; for
Standish, eight ; for Parker, seventy-nine. Dr. Mere con-
cludes his letter thus : " I pray you have me commended
to Mr. Baker, both young and old, to your brother
Thomas, and all their wives." There is a letter, in the
handwriting of Mere, announcing Parker's re-election in
* Masters' History of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, p. 108.
| I infer the date of the letter from the voting paper appended to
it. Corresp. p. 19.
ARCHBISHOrS OF CANTERBURY. 23
February, 1547-8. It is amusing, from the incidental in- chap.
formation it conveys. He informs Parker that he was « -^ -
elected almost unanimi consensu. He adds : " Many parked
more long for your coming, and most more wishing that 1559-75.
ye will in any wise take it. Mr. * would have had f^lf®^'
you to supper on Thursday, for it was a play ; on
Friday likewise, a tragedy ; and then very earnestly he
wished you. He had at his drinking, wmich was with
jowls of fresh salmon, &c, Drs. Eedmand, Glyn, Hatcher,
Mr. Sands, Grindal, the Minor Proctor, Masters Pilkington,
Christopherson, Gonell, and Aylond."f I give these
names, denoting the associates of Parker at this time, as
most of them, at a later period, rose to distinction.
Parker's health was never good, and on that account
he received a dispensation enabling him to eat meat in
Lent. Dr. May, through whom the dispensation was
obtained, observes : " Your sickness is sufficient licence
and dispensation for you to receive, absque scandalo, that
meat which is most meet for you." J
From that time Dr. Parker was always ready to show
his hospitality. We read of his entertaining the visitors
in Edward the Sixth's time, when supplying the place of
the vice-chancellor for the time being.
But he had, through the divided state of the university, Contro-
many difficulties to contend with. Soon after his first Bishop
appointment as vice-chancellor, he wras involved in a ar }n€
controversy with Bishop Gardyner on the subject of a
play which had been acted in the university. He was
accused by Cuthbert Scott, who, under Queen Mary,
became Bishop of Chester, of permitting some of the
essentials of religion to be turned into ridicule. This
had been frequently done in the satirical plays permitted
* This name has been erased in the MS.
t Corresp. p. 37. % Ibid. p. 38.
24 LIVBS of tin:
cii \r. and encouraged by Crumwell in London; but there
_); appears to have been no fair ground of objection in
FutaT fl^ present case. Some follies of the monks and some
1559-75. superstitions were exposed, but care had been taken
to avoid anything approaching blasphemy.
Parker observed, that he had " used the wisdom of the
doctors and presidents of all the colleges of the university
for the trial of the truth concerning the tragedy." The
fellows of every college were consulted, and by their ver-
dict Parker was acquitted of all blame.
In Cuthbert Scott's own college, only one of the fellows
was found to support him.
The haughty spirit of Gardyner could ill brook oppo-
sition, and he brought this trifling affair under the cog-
nizance of the Privy Council. In the mildness of the
Council's rebuke we may suspect an implied censure on
the irate chancellor himself. They simply admonished
the " heads and governors of the university to act with
greater precaution for the future." *
Gardyner, mortified by the little weight he possessed
at Cambridge, determined to enforce by authority what
he could not win by influence. He had now recourse to
a railing accusation, evidently for the purpose of irritating
his opponents. Writing to Parker, he says : " I hear many
things to be very far out of order, both openly in the uni-
versity and severally in the colleges ; whereof I am sorry ;
and amongst other, in contempt of me, the determination
of the pronunciation of certain Grece letters agreed unto
by the whole university to be violate and broken without
any correction therefor. The motive is low, and the con-
tempt so much the more. I was chosen chancellor, to be
so honoured (although above my deserts) of them, and I
* Documents, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, p. 53.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 25
have given no cause to be despised. I will do that I can chap.
for the maintenance of good order there, and challenge . ; .
again of duty to be regarded after the proportion, not of parked
my qualities, but of mine office." * 1569-75.
The chancellor's style is so confused, that we can only
arrive at its general meaning. He refers to a controversy
then in progress, and in which he had already com-
mitted himself, on the proper mode of pronouncing the
Greek language. The few scholars who studied Greek at iotacists
this time in Cambridge, were divided into two parties, the
Itacists and the Etists.f The Itacists represented the ori-
ginal Greek scholars, who were taught by modern Greeks,
and pronounced the language according to accent, and
as the living tongue is still spoken. The Etists claimed
for their leader no less a scholar than Erasmus, and he
was followed by Sir Thomas Smith and Sir John Cheke,
who were the friends, and in some sense the pupils, of
Parker. About two years before his dispute with the
latter, Gardyner, who now alluded to the controversy, as
an indirect mode of attacking and annoying his vice-
chancellor, had adopted a method of settling the dispute,
which, if generally adopted, would easily settle all disputes.
His letter to a predecessor of Parkers, while it exhibits
* Documents, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, p. 56. I shall
have presently to mention some acts of kindness on the part of
Gardyner to men of the party of the Reformation. Gardyner was
evidently an overbearing man, who resented the slightest opposition to
his will or opinions ; but, at the same time, to those who yielded to
him and courted him, he was kind and gracious. The two characters
are quite compatible; but, as men remember injuries longer than they
remember kindnesses, he was one of the most unpopular men of the age.
In the life of Pole, I have shown that his character was not so bad as
is represented by Foxe and the historians who blindly followed the
martyrologist.
t Tims I find the word ; but surely they ought to have styled them-
selves Iotacists.
26 uvks OF Tin;
( ii it. (Janlyncr as a scholar, is characteristic of the man wl
— ^ — ■ wrote it, and of the age in which it was written: —
Matthew
"The last \cn', by consent of the hoi imiversitie, I made a
ordre concernying pronounciation of the Greke tonge, appoynt-
lug paynes to the transgressors, and finally to the Vicechaun-
celer if he sawe them not executed, wherein I praye youe be
persuaded, that I will not be deluded and contempned. I did
it seriously, and wyl mayntayne it. If youe see the trans-
gressors punished I have cause to be contented, but otherwise
I entende in your and in the proctour's persons to use myne
authoritie given me by the universitie whereunto I trust ye
will not enforce me. To be chaunceler of the universitie is
oonly honour which by contempt is taken awaye, and I wyl be
ware to give any man cause to contempne me. What in-
formation I have I wyll not wryte; but by that I shall see
from henceforth I wyl byleve that is past. How necessary it
is to brydle the arrogance of youngest the experience of your
yeres hath I doubt not taught youe, and it wold much greve
me privately to have any varyance with youe with whom I
have had soo olde acquayntance. Which cannot be if ye
suffre them not by tolleration to hope more of youe thenne ye
wold avowe they shulde. The Kinges Majestie hath, by the
inspiration of the Holy (roost, componed all maturs of religion,
which uniformities I pray Grod it maye in that and in all other
t hinges extende unto us, and forgetting all that is past goo
forth in agrement as Siough ther had been noo such matur ;
but I wyl withstande fancies even in pronunciation, and fight
with the enemye of quiet at the first entree. Wherefore I
praye youe, Master Vicechaunceler, loke ernestly on these
matures, and geve me cause by your industrie to rejoyse in the
universitie, and oonly to care for acquyeting our materes with
the towne, wherein I trust we shal have good speede by the
grace of Grod, who sende youe hartely well to fare.
" At the courte the xvth of Maye.
" Your assured loving Frende,
" Ste. Winton." *
* Documents, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, p. 44.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 27
The authority of Gardyner was quietly ignored. chap.
While he was vice-chancellor, Parker was brought into , — J. — %
correspondence with the Bishop of London, Dr. Bonner, parked
Bishop Bonner made complaint that, among the graduates 1559-75.
of Cambridge, scarcely any of late years had proffered ^^f^
their services to preach at Paul's Cross ; " whereof," he ^am"
says, " I greatly marvel, and suppose the same rather to
proceed for that they have not been specially incited there-
unto. I thought it good, for the honest love particularly
I bear to you for your good qualities, besides the love I
bear to you for your brother's sake, and also for the very
hearty affection I bear to your university, to write unto*
you hereby, that ye will exhort such as ye know apt and
meet for that purpose."
Bonner was at this time a more advanced Protestant
than Parker. Being suspected of Eomanizing tendencies
by Henry VIII. , he vindicated his character in a preface
to Gardyner 's work, Be vera Obedientia. In this he
declares " the Pope's pay in England to be almost as great
as the revenues of the crown ; " and he remarks, that
although " the Pope was a very ravening wolf dressed in
sheep's clothing, yet he assumed the title of servant of
the servants of God."*
At this time the courtiers of Henry VIII. began to cast Property
greedy eyes upon the property of the university and university
of the colleges. The king was solicited to appoint a ^*j*-
commission, under the act for the dissolution of chan-
tries and hospitals, with the view of ascertaining the
nature and extent of the collegiate property, in the hope
that some of his courtiers might obtain a portion of the
landed estates as a grant from the crown, or in exchange
for impropriated tithes. The alarm felt in the university
* See the preface, and statements to the same effect, Hooper's Works,
ii. 268, 557, 567. Jewel, Works, i. 34, 60, ed. Park. Soc.
I
28 LIVKS OF THE
CHAP, waa great, and the eyes of all were turned to Parker,
. v> - who succeeded in having the commission issued to himself
PtafcerT an(l to two otner heads of houses. By the commissioner
1559-75. an inventory was made of all the possessions belonging t
the colleges, together with the revenues and expenses o
each. The commissioners then repaired to the court with
bterriew a summary written on "a fair sheet of vellum." We
}yth possess an account, under the hand of Parker himself, of
vi 11.' their interview with Henry VIII. at Hampton Court. The
question related, not so much to the enriching of the king
himself, as to that of his courtiers. Henry therefore could
afford to be impartial. He was amused at seeing the
latter discomfited, and he received the commissioners very
graciously. His majesty carefully perused the statement.
A man of business himself, he was pleased to see work
done in a business-like manner. Turning to his courtiers,
he observed, " that he thought he had not in his realm so
many persons so honestly maintained in living by so little
land and rent." He added, "pity it were these lands
should be altered to make them worse." Parker shrewdly
remarks, " at these words some were grieved, for they
disappointed lupos quosdam Mantes" " In fine," he con-
tinues, " we sued to the king's majesty to be so gracious
lord, that he would favour us in the continuance of our
possessions such as they were ; and that no man, by his
grace's letters, should require to permute with us to give
us worse. He made answer and smiled, that he could
not but write for his servants and others doing the ser-
vice of the realm in wars and other affairs ; but he said
he would put us to our choice, whether we would
gratify them or no, and bade us hold our own, for, after
writing, he would force us no further. With these words
we were well armyd, and so departed."*
* This statement is in the handwriting of Archbishop Parker.
C. C. C. C. Documents, 58, 60.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 29
Thus, chiefly by the judicious management of Matthew chap.
Parker, the possessions of the colleges were preserved - — / -
from the ravening wolves who had already devoured the pJLT'
lands and possessions of the religious houses throughout 1559-75.
the kingdom.
Although Henry VIII. kept his word, and the lands of
the university were not touched, the courtiers, neverthe-
less, had laid hands on many of those ecclesiastical prefer-
ments which had hitherto been regarded as the rewards
of learning. The consequence was, as Latimer complained,
the study of divinity had declined, and both universities
were in a low condition. The counsellors of Edward VI.
did not put a stop to the evil ; we should say, rather,
that they hungered and thirsted after the property of the
Church with a greed quite equal to that which was dis-
played in his father's reign. The Duke of Somerset may
be taken as an example. Eeformer as he was, he held a
deanery, a treasurer's stall, and three good prebends in a
cathedral ; his son had a pension of three hundred a year,
nearly equivalent to three thousand according to the
present value of money.
The townspeople, perceiving the weakness of the uni-
versity, invaded its rights ; and, by their unjustifiable en-
croachments, added to the difficulties by which the vice-
chancellor was surrounded. On the death of Henry VIII.
the affairs both of Church and State became more per-
plexed, and then it was that, as before stated, Dr. Parker Re-elected
was again elected vice-chancellor. He thus became a chancellor.
reformer of the university before he was called upon 1547~8-
to engage in the reformation of the Church.
Soon after the accession of Edward VI., Parker carried
a petition to be presented to the Lord Protector, calling
upon the government to protect the university from the
aggressions of the town. Although the commission
30 LIVES OF THE
ni \r. thereupon appointed did not immediately succeed in the
< r — • reconciliation of the two corporations, the articles then
;^r. drawn up formed the groundwork of the charter which
14M-7& Parker succeeded in obtaining in the reign of Queen
Elizabeth,
visitation As regards the university, at Parker's suggestion a
bridge!" commission was appointed, which held its visitation in
1549. The interval between the issue of the commission
and the holding of the visitation was employed in drawing
up a body of statutes for the future government of the
university. To Parker, who was vice-chancellor in 1548,
may be attributed the reform in the examinations of the
university wThich was promulgated in 1549.* They were
read by Sir John Cheke to the senate on May 6, 1549,
and were then delivered to the vice-chancellor. In
labouring for the reform of the university, Parker had
efficient fellow-labourers in Eoger Ascham, Smith, Cheke,
Cecil, and Bacon, who, though his inferiors in point of
standing, were admitted to his intimacy and friendship.
He was certainly contented with his lot, and was not am-
bitious of any higher position in the Church. Cranmer,
Eidley, and Latimer desired to employ his talents in a
more extended sphere of action ; but he determined to
remain satisfied with the position achieved by his merits,
moral and intellectual, in Cambridge.
In accepting the prebend of Corringham, in the church
of Lincoln, to the deanery of which cathedral he was
soon after advanced, Parker sought chiefly an increase of
income ; but his attachment to Bene't College induced him
to refuse the mastership of Trinity College, and, at the
same time, he declined a bishopric.
His happy home was broken up on the accession of
Queen Mary. As a married man he was deprived of all
* Statute Regis Edwardi Sexti, 122.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
31
his preferments, but he does not appear to have been
harshly treated. He was permitted to nominate his suc-
cessor ; but, either by his own choice or on compulsion,
ie now quitted Cambridge.
The events of Parker's life during this time of trial must,
lowever, be reserved for a separate chapter.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
32 LIVES OF THE
CHAPTEE VI.
PARKER AS A STUDENT AND DIVINE.
Parker's early opinions. — Lutheranism at Cambridge. — Thomas
Bilney. — The Anabaptists. — Dr. Barnes and the White House. —
Martin Bucer. — Parker preaches his funeral sermon. — Scholasticism
and the Schoolmen. — Parker's patristic studies. — The four great
councils. — The English reformers. — Catholics and Protestants.
chap. The history of Parker, as a student and divine, is reserved
i — ^ — - for a separate chapter. To a biographer, desirous of ob-
ParkerT taining an insight into his character, the subject here
1559-75. treated of is one of considerable importance. Its im-
portance is increased when we bear in mind the influence
of Parker in directing, to a satisfactory result, the re-
formation of the Church of England, as attempted in
their different ways under Warham, Wolsey, and
Cranmer. The reader, it is hoped, will not forget what
was stated at some length in the introductory chapter
of this book. He must be reminded that the reformation
of our Church did not consist of one revolutionary act,
but that it was a series of events extending over at
least a century and a half, which was capable of being at
one time retarded, at another resumed, according to cir-
cumstances, and which was in some measure dependent
upon the ascendency or depression of rival factions.
Had the religious movement of the sixteenth century
in England related to the establishment of a sect, whether
Eomish or Protestant, the violation of a principle would
have been speedily detected and easily remedied ; but
AKCHBISIIOPS OF CANTEEBURY. 33
^hen a Church was to be reformed, it was more easy to chap
letect the existence of errors than to remove them, and ._-
jare had to be taken lest the introduction of new opinions p^kerT
should interfere with the principles to which the people 1559-75.
were attached, and of the truth of which no doubt existed.
Nothing could be further from the fact, than the sup- Parker's
position encouraged by the evil-disposed, and accepted opinions^
unquestioned by ignorance, that Matthew Parker went ^young
up to Cambridge a Protestant, determined to carry out
Protestantism as it is now stereotyped for the use of
speakers in Exeter Hall. The anti-Papal spirit, which
had existed through many generations, had become a
national passion long before the time of Parker's matri-
culation in 1521-2 ; but, as a learned historian remarks,
as late as the year 1534 the Eeformation, so far as doc-
trine was concerned, had scarcely dawned in this country.
By those who were leading the attack upon Eome, no
intention was entertained of proceeding further in this
direction, than to remove the abuses that were more or
less directly connected with the Papal supremacy. A few
chronological outlines may, therefore, be of service, and
the chief dates assigned to the events occurring between
the matriculation of Parker in 1521-2 and the death of
Queen Mary in 1558, which is the real date of the
beginning of Parker's career in the character of a
reformer.
At the time of his arrival at Cambridge, he certainly
could not have called himself a Protestant, for the name,
if not the thing, did not at that time exist. The desig-
nation was not known, even in Germany, until the Diet
of Spires, when, on the passing of the decree, at the
suggestion of Charles V., for the purpose of supporting
the peculiarities of the Church of Eome, six Lutheran
princes and the deputies of thirteen imperial towns pro-
VOL. IX. d
ior
5
34 LIVES OF THE
chap, tested against it ; and the Diet of Spires was not convened
- V1^ until the year 1529.
Itate Parker was not likely to be called a Calvinist, for
1669-76. Calvin, having been born in 1509, was Parkers junio:
by a few years. The Institutio Christiana Religioni
though composed in 1533, was not issued till 1535.
Although the name of Luther must have been familiar
to English ears in 1521, yet it is only from the time when
Leo X. issued a grant of indulgences to be sold for money,
that is to say, not until the year 1517, that Lutheranism
can be dated.
Lutheran- At an early period of Parker's residence at Cambridge,
cam-1 some of Luther's works were clandestinely circulated ;
bridge. tne mciination so often displayed, especially by the
young, to act at some risk against authority, may have
conduced to their circulation. Henry VIII. 's polemical
zeal against Luther induced many young men to ascertain
for themselves what it was that provoked the wrath of
the king. Henry VIII. , at this time, was so desirous of
establishing his character as Defender of the Faith, that, as
it was well known, he was urging Lewis of Bavaria to
prove his orthodoxy by adopting measures in his duke-
dom for the extirpation of heresy. It was not till 1531,
ten years after Parker's matriculation, that Henry VIII.
succeeded in compelling the Catholic Church in this realm
to declare the king to be, not only the head of all things
in the State, but the supreme head also of the Church.
Thirteen years were after this to elapse before Luther's
Bible made its appearance* It was not until 1536, that the
translation of the sacred volume into English by Tyndal
* Calvin, says Archdeacon Hardwick, does not appear to have been
generally known in England before the close of Henry's reign. Arch-
bishop Laurence observes, that he could not ascertain when the word
Calvinist first became general. Foxe does not use it.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
and Coverdale was placed in the hands of the public, chap.
In 1537, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Cranmer, - VL _, •
proved his adhesion to the dogma of transubstantiation Sk^
by causing Lambert to be burnt for the denial of it. 1559-75.
Six more years were to elapse before the first English
Litany was used. It was not till the year 1547, that the
first reformed Prayer Book made its appearance, being
set to music by Marbeck in 1550.
In short, Parker had been thirty years at the University
before the second revision of our Liturgical offices took
place.
That Parker was present at Bilney's execution, at an Thomas
early period of his university career, is certain ; but the ■Bllney*
question is, What kind of Protestant was little Thomas
Bilney ? We suspect that the frequenters of Exeter Hall
will be astonished to hear of Bilney, who is claimed by
Poxe as a Protestant martyr, that the same Foxe remarks,
— " that, touching the mass and the sacrament of the
altar, Thomas Bilney never varied or differed from the
most grossest Catholics."
Bilney, like Pole in Italy, imagined that he could agree
with Luther in holding the doctrine of justification by
faith only, and hold it in consistency with the acceptance
of sacramental doctrine. It was with a view of recon-
ciling these two doctrines that Luther introduced his
dogma of consubstantiation. But Bilney, on this point,
did not go so far as Luther ; and we may presume that
to his reputed orthodoxy on the subject of the sacraments,
the kindness is to be attributed which was certainly
evinced towards him by many who, on other grounds,
were his opponents. Bilney was a vehement, enthusiastic,
affectionate, and indiscreet man ; who was the more be-
loved by his friends from their conviction that he was
always sincere, and that he required their aid to extricate
D 2
36 LIVES OF THE
chap, him from difficulties into which he was hurried by t
— \L _, impulses of a mind not always in a condition of sanity.
Mow? ^ls violent tirades against " idolatry, invocation of saints,
io.vj-7.3. vain worship of images, false trust in men's merits, and
such other points as seemed prejudicial and derogatory to
the blood of our Saviour," exasperated the men of " the
old learning," against whom the men of progress, though
not always going so far as he did, determined to defend
him. He did not argue, but he appealed to men's affec-
tions, and generally with success. This was certainly the
case with respect to Matthew Parker, who exhibited in
his conduct towards Bilney that mixture of generosity
and caution, of moral courage and physical timidity, which
became one of his characteristics. When Bilney had,
through timidity and an appeal to his affectionate dispo-
sition, recanted before the Bishop of London, Dr. Tunstall,
and was, on consideration, driven to the verge of despair,
he found in Parker a kind and sympathizing friend, and,
notwithstanding the disparity of their years, a wise
adviser.
Present at When it was reported in Cambridge, that Bilney was
deatk S prosecuted at Norwich as a relapsed heretic, Matthew
Parker started immediately for his native place, that he
might be at hand to render assistance, if Bilney stood
in need of it. When he arrived at Norwich, he found
Bilney committed to the custody of one of the sheriffs,
who, without sharing his opinions, or, at all events, with-
out approving of his manner of expressing them, was
nevertheless his personal friend. If we put out of con-
sideration the final act, Bilney could not complain of harsh
treatment. Dr. Warner, Parson of Winterton, was in
attendance upon him, received his confession, gave him
absolution, and administered to him the Holy Communion.
Parker probably attended the mass on the occasion.
nun.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 37
As he went to execution, Bilney distributed alms among chap.
the people, conversed cheerfully with the bystanders, < — ,- — -
and spoke words of moderation and piety. It had been parker7
reported that the Mendicants had been active in his 1559-75.
prosecution ; and Bilney, at their request, acquitted them
of any share in bringing him to judgment. Although
adhering to all Catholic truth, he continued to the last to
censure the corruption of the Church, through the igno-
rance, superstition, or avarice of the leading clergy of the
day. We can easily understand how a person so situated
could be misrepresented ; and that, ignorant of the denun-
ciations of Thomas Bilney, as pronounced on the evil
practices of the Church, no less a person than Sir Thomas
More, having heard that he held the doctrines of the
Church as distinguished from the superstitions of its
ministers, gave currency to the report that Bilney had
again recanted. This statement, circulated to the detri-
ment of his friend's character, Matthew Parker, at all
times, indignantly denied.
Looking at the treatment experienced by Bilney from
a theological standing point, it is as unaccountable as
it was cruel. He held the doctrines of the Church as it
then existed, with a few insignificant qualifications. But
against the ministers and rulers of the Church he was so
violent, that he was suspected of being an Anabaptist.
Parker was still a student at Cambridge when the Anabap-
Anabaptists made their appearance in England. A brief
notice of them becomes necessary, because, by the alarm
which they occasioned, they, without intending it,
strengthened the hands of the English reformers, who,
throughout their career, made a clear distinction between
reform and revolution.
The origin of the Anabaptists of the sixteenth century
is involved in obscurity. They appeared first in Saxony,
tists.
38 LIVES OF THE
citap. or in Switzerland ; but it was not until they established
. Xi— themselves in Northern Germany that, by their peculiar-
^arke'T ities and eccentricities, they attracted general attention.
1559-75. Their conduct, based on the most absurd theories, would
have led, except for the interposition of the civil power,
to the entire disruption of civilized society. They con-
tended that they had as much right as Luther, or any
other of the foreign reformers, to place their owm con-
struction upon Holy Scripture, and to bend it to the
support of their private judgment. According to their
view of revealed truth, they insisted upon a community
of goods and universal equality ; not only tithes, but
tribute in every form, together with all usury, were
denounced as unscriptural ; baptism of infants was in
their opinion an invention of the devil ; as all Christians
had a right to teach, the appointment of ministers was
condemned ; Christ being King, no magistrates were
needed ; revelations were still made from God to man,
through dreams and visions, vouchsafed to persons who
regarded themselves as prophets.*
At what time they first appeared in England is not
exactly known ; but in the remnant of Wiclifites and
Lollards, and other discontented spirits, they met with an
amount of sympathy which alarmed a suspicious govern-
Anabap- ment impatient of contradiction. Of these unhappy per-
lurnedin sons some were consigned to the stake in the reign of
Edward Edward VI., the reformers being the more exasperated
* See Mosheim, book iv. sec. 3. part ii. ch. vi. § 1, ed. Stubbs.
Maclaine says that " Bockholdt, or Bockelson, alias John of Leyden,
who headed the Anabaptists at Mlinster, ran stark naked in the streets,
married eleven wives at the same time, to show his approbation of
polygamy, and entitled himself King of Sion." Fuesslin, in his
Beytrage, iii. 119, denies that the Anabaptists in general advocated
polygamy, or rejected the Divinity of our Lord. Mosheim's statement,
however, is generally believed.
m cm,
i
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
against tlieni by their inability, without denying the chap.
right of private judgment, to convict them of error ; and -- — r- — -
7 ir • xi • c n/r Matthew
among the sufferers in the reign ot Mary many were parker.
accused, with more or less justice, of holding these 1559-75.
tenets. Traces of them occur as early as 1536 ; and in
1538, the year when Parker took his D.D. degree, a
royal commission was issued against them.* So great
was the alarm with respect to these sectarians, that Hugh
Latimer, when Bishop of Worcester, referred without com-
punction to the numerous Anabaptists who were, in the
reign of Edward VI., burned in the different towns of
England. He states that, though he did not witness the
executions himself, he was credibly informed that they
"went to their death even intrepide, as ye will say,
without any fear in the world, cheerfully." He argued
from their conduct, that it was no proof that a man had
truth on his side, because, for the maintenance of his
opinions, he was prepared to die : he concluded with
saying, " well, let them go." f
Parker's conduct in standing by his friend Bilney,
amidst the fires of persecution, contrasts favourably with
the conduct of this illustrious Protestant martyr. J
It is affirmed by Strype, that Parker, when a young Dr. Barnes
man, was a disciple of Dr. Barnes; but he gives no white
authority for the statement ; and, even admitting its cor- l^T'
rectness, it will not throw any light upon Parker's
opinions at the time. The opinions of Dr. Barnes, when
he presided at the meetings at the White House, did not
differ much from the theological opinions of the Church.
* Wilkins, iii. 856. t Latimer, i. 160.
J It has been shown incidentally by Dr. Maitland, that nearly all
who suffered in the days of Henry VIII. and Edward VI., and many,
also, of the sufferers under Queen Mary, were prosecuted, because it
was known, though it could not always be proved, that they held these
socialistic opinions.
40 lives of Tin:
chap. Considerable latitude was allowed to speculation, provide
« — r- — ' there was no attempt to disturb the public peace. Parker,
Parkoi\ when he went to the University, was fully convinced, as
1559-75. all England was, that the Church required a radical
reform. He was quite prepared to admit, that this im-
plied a reconsideration of many doctrines and opinions
which had hitherto been unquestioned. He never ex-
hibited any tendency to oppose the authorities of Church
or State ; but he desired, under the influence of the
spirit of the age, to make himself master of the contro-
versies prevalent on the Continent, and now introduced
into England. Although the White House was nick-
named Germany, and German books were clandestinely
circulated, the meetings were not secret ; nor were they
disturbed until, by the violence of some of the speakers,
a suspicion of Anabaptism was excited against the mem-
bers. Cardinal Wolsey issued an order, that Lutheran
books should be searched for and destroyed ; but his
treatment of Barnes showed that he could act with tolera-
Dr. Barnes tion. Barnes had made a personal attack on the great
before Cardinal, and ridiculed his golden shoes, his poleaxes,
0 sey* his pillars, and his crosses : when he was summoned
before Wolsey, the Cardinal remarked, that he thought
Barnes might find scope in the Scriptures to teach the
people, without maligning him for accepting the forms
and ceremonies pertaining to the high office to which he
had been providentially called.
Young Parker ran no risk, therefore, by attending the
meetings at the White House, even if it be true that
he attended the lectures of Dr. Barnes. As to Barnes'
protestantism in 1527, he held the Eomish doctrine of
transubstantiation without hesitation ; and such being the
case, he was not likely, on doctrinal points, to become
obnoxious to the ruling authorities.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 41
It is sometimes stated that, for his theological views, chap.
Parker was much indebted to Martin Bucer ; but this < — ^—>
statement will hardly bear investigation. Martin Bucer parked
arrived in England, and was appointed Professor of 1559-75.
Divinity at Cambridge by the council of Edward VI., in Martin
the year 1549. Now Matthew Parker was at that time' 1549.
in the forty-sixth year of his age. He had devoted him-
self, as we shall presently see, to patristic studies for
seven years ; he had had considerable experience as a
pastor ; he was a dignitary of the Church ; he was a
royal chaplain ; he was a doctor of Divinity, S.T.P. ; he
was master of Corpus Christi College ; he had been twice
elected vice-chancellor of the University of Cambridge ;
and, on the second occasion, so high was his repute, that
the election was nearly unanimous. If we are to indulge
in conjectures, the historian of Matthew Parker has as
much right to suppose, that a person so qualified and so
highly endowed would act in the character of Bucer's
instructor, as the biographer of Bucer can be justified in
making his hero the preceptor of Parker. If we pass
from conjecture to fact, we do not find, so far as I am
aware, that Parker ever applied for advice to Bucer ;
while we certainly can produce a letter from Bucer him-
self,* in which he solicits an interview with Parker, in
order that he might confer with him on the subject of
the lectures, which the foreign professor was preparing to
deliver to the English University. In writing his book,
De Regno Christi, Bucer admitted, that he was deeply
indebted to the opinions expressed in conversation by
Dr. Parker, who also assisted the professor in a public
disputation which he held in Cambridge with Dr. Yong.f
The intercourse between Parker and Bucer was very
short, and was rendered shorter by the infirm state of
* Corresp. p. 41. f Strype, i. 56.
:
42 LIVES OF THE
chap. Bucer's health. Bucer arrived at Cambridge in 1550,
VI
« — r-^— and died on the 28th of February, 1551. To Parker,
Varker. who had seen little, but had heard much of foreign divines,
1559-75. the arrival of Bucer caused much excitement. He learn
to value him for his learning and his virtues ; and, o
several occasions, proved himself to be a useful friend.
Of their friendly intercourse we have one or two in-
stances ; to which, trifling as they are, it is pleasant at
this distance of time, we scarcely know why, to refer.
In the letter in which Bucer says, that he will call at
Bene't College to receive Dr. Parker's advice on the sub-
ject of his lectures, he accepts an invitation, for himself
and his wife, to dine with Dr. and Mrs. Parker on the
following Wednesday.* Not long after, another invita-
tion to dinner is sent to Bucer, and accepted conditionally,
that he may take with him as his umbra, a German
friend, who had just arrived from London. There is
another letter, at the foot of which is a touching note
in Parker's own hand : Scriptum novissimum omnium
quod scripsit D. Bucerus paulo ante mortem ejus.
The letter is so brief, that we may give it in the original :
" S. D. Oro. D. T. clarissime D. Doctor, ut des milii x. coro-
natos mutuo, uno tamen mense reddam, bona fide. Opt. vale.
" D. T. deditiss. in Domino Martinus Bucerus
tamen persegre scripsi.f
Clariss. viro D.D. Matthseo Parkero, domino ac fratri
in Christi charissimo."
During the short time of his residence at Cambridge,
Bucer was a great sufferer in his bodily health. Writing
to Brentius, in May, 1550, he tells his correspondent that,
ever since August, he had suffered from severe illness,
which left him in a state of weakness in his legs, arms
* Corresp. p. 41. f Ibid- P- 42«
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 43
and hands. He seems to have been partially paralyzed, chap.
being unable to move one of his fingers in his left hand, « — ,- —
. . Matthew
and two in his right. He complains of severe pains in parker.
all his limbs, succeeded by the greatest weakness and 1559-75.
prostration of strength ; * also of the want of comfort and
the prevalence of filth, and that he misses the German
stove, f When wood was the chief fuel, and that fuel
dear, our ancestors seldom indulged in a fire except in
the great hall. " Think," says Bucer, writing to the minis-
ters at Strasburg, " what it must be for this frail body of
mine, which has been, from my childhood, utterly unable
to bear the cold, to be without a stove during the
winter, which is occasionally most severe, and at all times
injurious, and also to be without my usual wine and diet." J
In addition to bodily suffering, Bucer, always a friend
of peace, felt very deeply the misunderstandings which
divided the anti-papists, and which rendered them weak,
by splitting them into sects. His friendship with Peter
Martyr, now located at Oxford, had been long and
sincere. He deplored, therefore, their disagreement about
the real presence in the Eucharist. It is difficult to decide
what were Bucer's real opinions on the subject, for he
had acquired the evil habit of expressing himself, of set
purpose, obscurely, with the object of creating an appear-
ance of agreement when all the while he knew that, at
the bottom, there was a vital difference.
If Bucer had any influence over Parker's mind, he led
him, no doubt, to the partial adoption of this unwise
course. We shall see, hereafter, that Parker, contenting
himself with securing the recognition of a fundamental
verity, was sometimes careless in the mode of enunciating
* Zurich Letters, ii. 544.
f Edward VI. presented him with a German stove.
J Zurich Letters, ii. 550.
:
44 LIVES OF THE
chap, it, that thus he might disarm immediate opposition, leavinj
. — X^— - the truth to be more firmly asserted, at a more conveniei
Parker, season. Parker came the more generously to Bucer'
1559-75. support, because he found him fiercely assailed by
Calvinistic party as it existed abroad, and was gradu-
ally forming itself in England.
John Burcher, writing to Bullinger, does not hesitate
say: "I am ignorant as to what the hireling Bucer, who
fled from this church (Strasburg) before the wolf came i
sight, is plotting in England. He is an invalid, and,
report says, is either becoming childish, or is almost i
his dotage, which is the usual result of a wandering an
inconstant mind." *
A letter to the same effect, but more fiercely worde
from Hooper, may be produced.
There seems, nevertheless, to have been something
peculiarly fascinating in " the pacific Bucer," as Eanke
styles him. At the lodge of Corpus Christi College were
frequently assembled, to discuss various subjects occupy-
ing the public mind, such men as Sandys, Grindal, and
Bradford. Parker and his friends watched with anxiety
the increasing weakness of Bucer, until at length he was
unable to converse, and, welcoming Parker with a smile,
employed the time in silent meditation. He said that his
whole soul was fixed on Christ and Him crucified, that
God was in his heart, that he was contemplating nothing
but heaven, and a speedy departure from 'the body.j*
Martin On the 28th of February, 1550-1, Martin Bucer died.
1650-1. Parker and Haddon were appointed his executors. It
was a great occasion, and Parker was distinguished as a
preacher. The sermon was published in English in 1587.;
I
a
4
* Zurich Letters, ii. 666. f Bucer. Script. Aug. p. 874.
J " Howe wee ought to take the Death of the Godly," printed at
London by Ingge ; without date. The edition of Bucer's Scripta
Anglicanum is dated 1577.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 45
I have not been able to procure a copy, but there is a chap.
careful Latin translation in Bucer's works. Attestation « r- — -
was borne to Bucer's popularity, or to the popularity parked
of the cause of which he was the representative, by the 1559-75.
immense assemblage of all classes of persons when the
funeral discourse was delivered. The university attended
in full costume — the vice-chancellor, proctors, doctors,
and graduates. This procession was joined by that of
the mayor and corporation, and a large concourse of
townsmen. Dr. Parker took his text from the Apocrypha, parker's
Wisdom iv. 7-19. He dwelt at considerable length on funeral
& sermon.
the fact, that the death of a true Christian is really a source,
not of sorrow, but of joy. Survivors might indulge in
grief at the contemplation of their loss, but their grief
should not be immoderate. The loss of Bucer might be
lamented. He had been a burning and a shining light,
his very enemies admitting* the sanctity of his daily life,
and his diligence in the discharge of his professional duties.
Bucer, it was said, was taken from the University as a
udgment on their sins : the thought of which, and to
escape heavier judgment, should urge them to more com-
plete reformation. It will be seen that there is nothing
very remarkable in the sermon ; but Parker enlarged upon
the topic with copious references to Scripture, and he con-
cluded with a peroration of much force and eloquence.
Then followed the bidding prayers — an exhortatio ad
preces of the Catholic Church for all wanderers from the
one and only fold; for the Churches of England and
Ireland ; for King Edward VI. ; for all relatives who had
departed this life ; for themselves, that they might be
admitted with patriarchs and saints to the beatific vision,
inter quos vobis numero hunc prasstantem et reverendum
patrem D. Martinum Bucerum, pro quo fideliter gratias
agamus Deo, quod in Sanctitate requiem suam inciperit.
Silent prayers were then offered.
46 LIVES OF THE
ire
The reader has now before him a slight view of the diffi-
culties with which Parker had to contend in his desire to
Parkw* arrive at the truth, and the very little help he received.
1559-75. Although he was a man of strong mind and sterling
common sense, with business habits and great powers
application, he was not a man of genius ; and the mannei
in which he gradually acquired knowledge, strengthene(
his convictions and distinguished nicely between the less
marked lines which separate truth from error, may lead
us to perceive, that the moral faculties of a resolute mind
may so far raise the possessor of it, as to enable him to
direct and control many who, in the struggle of life, art
in intellectual power his superiors.
Learning, especially as it existed in the universities, w<
in a transition state when Parker first engaged in the
conduct of its affairs. More attention was paid to the old
scholastic system than was the case when his friends and
disciples, Smith and Cheke, rose to power. To their master
and harbinger these distinguished scholars were much
indebted. Though beginning where his academical la-
bours had ended, they worked under advantages not
possessed by him. Instead of stating that a new learning
had begun, we should be more correct in saying, that the
old learning had merged into the new. To the present
Schoiasti- hour the effects of the scholastic system has its influence on
European learning. As the old trivium and quadrivium
in the schools had merged into scholasticism, so scholasti-
cism has merged into modern philosophy. It is discredit-
able to many pretenders to learning, and even more so to
some really learned men, when they venture to speak with
contempt of men, their equals certainly — perhaps their
superiors — in vigour of mind and in moral excellence,
merely because the conclusions at which the latter have
arrived, or their manner of investigating a common subject,
asm
J cui,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 47
may differ from the principles which their self- constituted
censors assert to be indisputable. This conduct becomes
an act of dishonesty, when these intellectual inquisitors parkerT
admit that they have never studied the works upon which 1559-75.
they presume to sit in judgment and to pass sentence.
Such a treatment, until of late years, the Schoolmen have
received at the hands of modern philosophers. Men of
learning, or — as in the last century, the title then implied —
philologists, deeply read in the classics, and despising as
barbarian whatever did not accord with the literature and
philosophy of Greece and Eome, introduced that mode of
speaking disparagingly of scholasticism which has been
imitated by the petit litterateur of our own age. From
the deference, however, which is now evinced to German
literature, we may expect to find the subject of scholas-
ticism once more fearlessly discussed, its faults fairly
exposed, but its merits duly admitted. It is said by
Semler : " The poor scholastici have been too much
despised, and that, frequently, by people who would not
be good enough to be their transcribers." Ullman calls
the scholastic theology, " in its commencement, a truly
scientific advance upon the past ; in its entire course, a
great dialectic preparatory school of Christianity in the
West ; in its completion, a grand and highly finished
production of the human mind."* These writers are ad-
vanced Protestants, men of the Eationalistic or Unitarian
school. To their testimony we may add the opinion of
Sir James Mackintosh, when, in his " Progress of Ethical
Philosophy," he has occasion to speak of Thomas Aquinas.
His panegyric is qualified, but his qualification will, in the
opinion of the readers of these pages, add to the merit of
the Sum ma Theologian. The ethical system of the School-
* I give these quotations from Hagenbach, whose own opinion
accords with those of the writers to whom he refers.
JCI
>m
in
le
48 LIVES OF THE
men, or, to speak more properly, of Aquinas as themaste
of Christendom for three centuries, was in its practi
part so excellent as to leave little need of extensive change,
1559-75. with the inevitable exception of the connection of his
religious opinions with his precepts and counsels. His
rule is neither lax nor impracticable ; his grounds of duty
are solely laid in the nature of man and in the well-being
of society. Such an intruder as subtlety seldom strays
into his moral instructions. With a most imperfect
knowledge of the peripatetic writings, he came near tin
great master by abstaining, in practical philosophy, froi
the unsuitable exercise of that faculty of distinction, in
which he would probably have shown that he was little
inferior to Aristotle if he had been equally unrestrained.
His very frequent coincidence with modern moralists i*
doubtless, to be ascribed chiefly to the nature of the
subject ; but in part also to that unbroken succession
of teachers and writers which preserves the observations
contained in what had been long the text-book of the
European schools, after the books themselves had been for
ages banished and forgotten. The praises bestowed on
Aquinas by every one of the few great men who appeal
to have examined his writings since the downfall of hie
power, among whom may be mentioned Erasmus, Grotius,
and Liebnitz, are chiefly, though not solely, referable t(
his ethical works."*
After rendering the honour which is their due to the
great philosophers of the middle ages, we are not guilty
of any inconsistency if we remark that, long before the
beginning of the sixteenth century, it was perceived and
acknowledged that, out of scholasticism, a new and a
better system was rising. Scholasticism had begun in the
* Mackintosh's Ethical Philosophy, ed. Whewell, p. 105. See
the excellent preface of Leibnitz to Nizolius, sec. 37. ,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 49
3 founded by Charles the Great, with the noble chap.
object in view of effecting an alliance between revelation
and reason. Theology supplied the dogma from Scripture, ParkTiT
and the aim of philosophy was to penetrate the principles 1559-75.
of revealed truth, and to establish their objective cer-
dnty. If the conclusions of the philosopher were not in
tccordance with the declarations of Scripture, it was
lodestly assumed that the philosopher was in error,
id he resumed his investigations. In philosophical
Lvestigations the means employed were logic and meta-
)hvsics, or dialectics.
Scholasticism, in the first period of its history, may be a.d.
escribed as the application of dialectics to theology;
and this period may be considered as extending from
Lanfranc and Anselm to John Scotus. The astonishing
intellectual powers of John Scotus the Irishman accom-
plished less than might have been expected, because he
laboured under the suspicion or charge of heresy. In
Anselm's Cur Deus Homo, of which some notice has been
taken in the life of that distinguished primate, we have a
fair specimen of the services which have been rendered to
religion by the scholastic philosophy. The scheme of
satisfaction on which he speculated so largely, is the
foundation of the theological system of those sects which,
at the present time, assume to themselves the title of
evangelical.
Against the restraints which theology had imposed AD- 120°-
upon its speculations, the European mind, when thoroughly
awakened, was prepared to rebel. The philosophy which
at first professed to be only the ancilla theologice, now
regarded theology and philosophy as standing upon an
equality. The Nominalists, in the eleventh century, com-
menced their interminable warfare against that realism
which had, till then, been taken for granted. Between
VOL. IX. E
50 LIVES OF THE
10
5
lis
char the two parties — the Realists and the Nominalists — who
< ^ — , agreed that the essential object of dialectics was the cli
Parker* cussion of wiiversals, as distinguished from particular an
1559-75. individual things, the question arose, whether universal
are words and names only, or things and real essences.
It was by John Boscelin that the Nominalists were first
formed into a sect. They found in Peter Abelard a zealous
supporter ; in talent, learning, and fame transcending his
leader. Some of their conclusions, however, leading pal-
pably to heresy, the Nominalists were condemned by the
Church ; and realism regained an ascendency which it
retained to the thirteenth century. Fresh energy was, at
this time, infused into the schools of philosophy by a
revival of the study of Aristotle. Although we have
neither time nor space to recount the circumstances
under which this revival took place, we must remark, in
passing, that the Aristotelian philosophy was received by
the Schoolmen, not from " the mighty Stagyrite " himself,
but as diluted through Arabian translators and com-
mentators. In the reforms of the thirteenth century, our
a.d. 1250. countryman, Alexander de Hales, took the lead. By
Albertus Magnus he was surpassed in learning ; but even
to him he did not yield in point of natural ability or
genius. In learning and in genius, however, both of
these distinguished men were inferior to Thomas Aquinas,
the Doctor universalis et angelims, of whom we have
already spoken at some length. The Summa Theologian
remained for many years the text-book of the schools of
Western Christendom. Against the Thomists, as his re-
presentatives were called, war was incessantly waged by
the Scotists, who had for their founder Duns Scotus,
another Englishman, a native of Northumberland. Al-
though by those who have studied his works, Duns
Scotus is represented as a deeply learned philosopher, yet,
from the vain and idle distinctions in which he indulges,
1300-1400.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 51
he appears to those who regard him only as a controver- chap.
sialist, as one who in his attack upon Aquinas had less » A -
regard for truth than a logical triumph. In the. long Parked
war waged by the Scotists against the Thomists, although 1559-75.
much subtle disputation was displayed on both sides, yet
the result was an odium theologicum very damaging to
the Christian character and cause. During these violent
disputes, nominalism continued to gain ground, until it
came to a climax under the leading of another English-
man, William of Occam, or Ockham, in Surrey. He was Ld.
a disciple of Scotus, and achieved the title of Doctor singu-
laris, invincibilis et venerabilis Inceptor. Without hesi-
tation William of Occam set aside the dogmas of the
Church whenever they interfered with his private judg-
ment, or appeared to be inconsistent with his philoso-
phical speculations. Notwithstanding this, his arguments
and influence led to important practical results. By him
the rights of the Gallican Church were openly and vigor-
ously defended from the usurpations of the Pope. To
his school, moreover, those great men attached them-
selves, of whose conduct at the Councils of Pisa, Constance,
and Basle we have, in preceding chapters, spoken at some
length. Thus scholasticism wore itself out, and was
merged into the modern philosophy, for which it prepared
the way.
The Scholastics employed dialectics as their weapon of
offence and attack ; and by degrees, in their schools, re-
ligion was too often turned into a mere matter of idle dis-
pute. How jejune all this appeared to souls which were
hungering and thirsting after righteousness, it is easy to
understand. It was not head-work, but heart-work, for
which the rising generation sighed ; and it too often hap-
pened that, when the demand was made for bread, they
received a stone. Hence, concurrently with the decline
52 LIVES OF THE
chap, of scholasticism, undermining rather than attacking
— ^—s mysticism made its appearance. By the Mystics, logi<
Parked was subordinated to sentiment, and they contended that
L66&-7& the intuitions of a true believer led to a knowledge of re-
ligion superior to anything attainable by dialectics. While
dialectic theology was regarded by one party as the pii
nacle of wisdom, so by the opposite party, in devotiom
feeling and contemplative lore, all true religion was su]
posed to consist.
Although this system would, in common minds, nc
unfrequently degenerate into fanaticism, or develop itself
into heresy, there were, nevertheless, great men among
the religious Mystics who anticipated the Beformation of
the sixteenth century ; and, while encouraging devotional
fervour, and sensible communion with God, neither neg-
lected to cultivate the understanding, nor evinced any
disregard of the fundamental doctrines of the Christian
Church.
They argued with the Schoolmen ; they worshipped
with the Mystics. Such were John Tauler — some of whos
writings were, in after times, attributed to Luther — Gerson
of Eheims, and Peter d'Ailley, of whom we have read in
former volumes of this work, and pre-eminently Thomas
Hamerken of Kempen, better known as Thomas a Kempis.*
* "The ideas of the orthodox Mystics rest on the positive foundation
of the Creed ; and all the spiritual transactions described by them are
most intimately connected with the doctrine of the Trinity, the incarna-
tion of Christ, the influence of the Spirit promised by Christ, and the
mystery of the Lord's Supper. The abstract theory of the heretical
Mystics seeks to fathom the depth of the soul, which, in their opinion,
is nothing but God himself. They teach that sanctification is the work
of man himself; and regard the said positive doctrines as, at most, the
symbols of those spiritual transactions on which the accomplishment of
the design of our life depends. It is of special importance, in an exposi-
tion of the history of this period, distinctly to separate these two kinds
of orthodox and heterodox Mystics." Engelhardt, Richard von S. Victor,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
53
CHAP.
VI.
Matthew
Parker.
Enough has been already advanced to account for the
decline of scholasticism, at one time so universally popular.
Everything in nature, or connected with man, has in it,
from its beginning, or birth, the seeds of decay. In 1559-75.
addition to the internal elements of decay in the scho-
lastic system already noticed, political events had been
long tending to shake its dominion over the minds of
men. The Crusades, which opened a communication with
the East, and made the Latin Church acquainted with the
Arabic translations of Aristotle, and their commentaries —
the invention of the art of printing — the conquest of Con-
tantinople, which inflamed the Western world with a
ove of ancient literature, and placed the genuine, un-
dulterated works of Aristotle in the hands of the learned —
the formation of a middle class of citizens — the develop-
ment of modern languages — the firmer establishment of
the civil power, and its increasing independence of Eome
— the advancement of experimental knowledge of the
sciences — the better taste introduced by the study of the
classics — the detection that the Latin Vulgate, which, like
our authorized version, had been too often made to stand
in the place of the original text, required complete re-
vision,— all conduced to the gradual formation of a public
opinion, that the foundations of philosophy, as well as of
theology, demanded re-examination, and that every school
of thought must be subjected to a careful reform.
p. 2, quoted by Hagenbach, Hist. Doct. p. 413. In Hagenbach,
Tenneman, and G-ieseler we have an account of the Schoolmen and
their systems. They refer to German writers who have written the
history of these philosophers and divines. I am not aware of any
English writer who has attempted this interesting subject. It is touched
upon by Mr. Maurice in an article in the Encyclopaedia Metropolitana,
in reading which regret is felt that his powerful mind had not been
directed entirely to this investigation. Bishop Hampden just enters
on the subject, but stops short.
5 I LIVES OF THE
chap. When the philosophy, on which the education in tl
Universities was based, was in a transitional state, the r
VI.
I
Ptoker? form of the Universities became necessary. The you
1559-75. mind requires dogma for its basis of thought ; and con-
fusion was sure to ensue, when, ceasing to dogmatize, eve
youth was left to think out the most complicated subjects f<
himself, and without assistance. Although, as it has be
before remarked, the obsolete system did a good work in
the exercise of the mind, yet complaint was justly made,
that the studies of the Universities had not risen to the in-
tellectual requirements of the age. There was said to be
no end of quoting and answering, of laying down theses
and antitheses, of arguments and counter-arguments, of
divisions and subdivisions, which seemed to be intermin-
able. Complaint wTas made that the youth of the day
were taught to argue, not for truth, but for victory ;
and, consequently, objections were multiplied that answers
might be supplied. Heretical positions were not un-
frequently advanced by the orthodox believer, and the
unbeliever would offer himself in sarcastic mockery, with
a sneer on his countenance, as a malleus hcerelicorum. In
short, as Erasmus observes, " there were innumerable
quibblings about notions, and relations, and formalita-
tions, and quiddities, and hascceities, which no eye could
follow out but that of a lynx, which is said to be able,
in the thickest darkness, to see things that have no
existence." *
a.d. 1525. When, in the year 1525, Parker was emancipated from
studies!0 college discipline, and was at liberty to pursue his own
course of reading, he devoted himself, for seven years, to
the study of the Fathers. Whether this course of study
was the suggestion of his own mind, or whether he acted
* Erasmi, Stultitise Laus, p. 141.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
upon the advice of others, the plan adopted rendered him chap.
independent of modern authorities, and he grew up - — ^ — -
Matthew
Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri. Parker.
1559-75.
When, in process of time, the followers of Luther, or of
Calvin, appeared in England, and sought to overthrow the
foundations of the Church, that on its ruins they might
erect a Protestant sect, Parker was willing to hear, and
duly to consider, what good and learned men, whether his
compatriots or foreigners, had to say ; but their conclu-
sions were not authoritative to him. He rather, by an
appeal to the Fathers, acted towards them as a judge : he
might read their writings ; but it was in the spirit, not of
a disciple, but a critic.
The Fathers were not to him as they are to the Eo-
manist, when the Eomanists attribute to them the same
kind of inspiration as was vouchsafed to the Apostles :
they were to him as witnesses — as persons qualified to
bear testimony to the dogmas universally received by
apostolic Churches. The Apostles preached before they
wrote, and the primitive bishops sat at their feet, antece-
dently to the reception of the Epistles, or even of the
Gospels. Of the apostolic teaching a record was kept ;
and if in one church a dogma was disputed, a correspond-
ence between several Churches took place, to ascertain
what each and all had received from the beginning *
Our English reformers, as distinguished from the conti-
nental controversialists, believed that in the primitive
Church there had been, from the beginning, a traditio ex-
egetica, called by Irenaeus the xavwv t% aK^elctg^ by
* Routh, Opuscula, p. 690. See also St. Cyprian, Ep. 55, where he
says, that the bishops, over the face of the whole world, acted together
in one harmonious concert.
t Adv. Haares. lib. i. cap. 9. sec. 4. See the whole subject admir-
ably treated by Irenaeus. Regula Fidei, ed. Routh, p. 690.
56 LIVES OF THE
chap. Clemens Alexandrinus the xavcvv IxxXria-iaa-Tixoy* The
— ^ — - whole of Tertullian's book, De Prcescriptione,f is an ap-
Parker. plication of this principle to the controversies of his age.
1559-75. The principle of deference to the traditio exegetica was
what distinguished the Catholic from the Heretic; the
man who, in the interpretation of Scripture, had respect to
the dogma of the Church, and the man who, however
ignorant he might be, relied exclusively on his private
judgment. % That, through a constant intercourse between
churches the most distant, a harmony of doctrine existed,
such as prevails, at the present time, between different
branches of the same sect, is expressly affirmed by
Irenasus,§ by Tertullian, || by Hegesippus,^" by Clemens
Alexandrinus,** and by Origen. ff The whole Church
was organized for the purpose of ascertaining and preserv-
ing the quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus.
Matthew Parker devoted his attention to these early
writers. He knew, what few would deny, that, to pre-
serve the faith first orally delivered by apostolic preachers
of the Church, a constant intercourse and correspondence
were sustained between the bishops located in all parts
of the world. Iremeus informs us that, even in his
time, there were churches in Germany, in Spain, and
in France, as well as in the East, in Egypt, in Africa, and
in the middle of the world, in which one and the same
tradition was preserved. He found many such letters in
Eusebius, and he knew the care that was taken to pre-
vent interpolation and forgery, and, by the employment
* Strom, lib. vi. c. 15.
•J* See especially De Prescript, xxii. xxvii.
\ This is well stated by Vincentius Lirinensis, cap. 34.
§ Lib. i. c. 10, alias 3 ; lib. iii. c. 3.
|| De Prescript, xx. xxviii. % Apud Euseb. iv. 22.
** Strom, lib. vii. 898, 899. Conf. Strom, i. 322.
If In Apolog. Pamph. inter opp. Hierom. torn. v. 223.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
of trustworthy messengers, to secure the delivery of the chap.
letters. They were called Uteres formates, because they -_^^_-
were written in a peculiar form, with some peculiar marks parked.
or characters, which served as private signatures to dis- 1559-75.
tinguish the true from the counterfeit. Optatus remarks,
that the whole world was united in one common society
or communion, by the mutual intercourse of these canon-
ical letters.* "Is it possible," Tertullian asks, "to suppose
that so many and such great Churches have blundered
into one and the same faith? "f It is from the existence of
this principle in the primitive Church that the first four
councils have obtained an authority which no subsequent
councils have ever possessed. By refusing to take part in
the Council of Trent, it was on this ground that Parker
and the English reformers defended their orthodoxy.
The Council of Trent, as was the case with the councils
of the middle ages, was convened to define the faith ac-
cording to the private judgment of the persons composing
the assembly. It was with a very different object in
view that the first four councils were summoned. The
question then asked had not reference to the private
opinions of the Fathers, but simply, as was the case with
the Uteres formates, to ascertain with greater precision
what the truths were which had been handed down from
father to son. The Council of Nice had special reference
to the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. The Fathers of the
Nicene Council were very careful to declare, that the form
t)f faith promulgated by them was no invention or deduc-
tion of their own, but simply what they had received
when first they were instructed in the principles of
Christianity. J The Novatian bishop, Acesius, himself
* Lib. ii. 48.
\ De Prescript. Hser. xxviii. : " Ecquid verisimile est ut tot ac tantae
in imam fidem erraverint ? " J Soc. lib. i. c. 8,
58 LIVES OP THE
admitted to Constantino, that it was no new thing that at
that time was decided upon. He affirmed that the council
had decided according to tradition; and this was probably
ioo9-75. the reason why, at the commencement of the sessions,
when the logicians began to discuss and dispute, they were
immediately put to silence. The fact is clearly stated by
Eusebius in a letter which he wrote to his diocese on the
occasion : "As we have received by tradition from our
predecessors, from our predecessors the bishops, then
when we were instructed in the first principles of the
faith, and received our baptism as we have learned from
the sacred Scriptures, as also we do now believe, and do
make a public declaration of our faith." *
The very contest about the word opoouviov may be traced
to the misapplication of this principle. It was thought by
some to be a new term ; and so it was, but it was em-
ployed to express the fact universally acknowledged. It
is easy to show that, in the three other councils, the design,
object, and intention were the same. We are not con-
cerned with the character or the opinions of those who
were summoned to the council. It was for the purpose of
preventing the introduction of novelties, and of reporting
that which was received from the beginning, that these
councils were convoked. The members, while they
solemnly disclaimed any design of adding to the faith,
solemnly professed their resolution to follow the steps of
the Fathers.f
In making this assertion, it is not intended to affirm of
insinuate that no discussions took place ; for there were
many points, namely, those which related to the regulation
of different churches, which were open to, and indeed
* Soc. lib. i. c. 8.
"j" UdiTiQ ol tvXafiefrruToi eftoijaav AtKaia ?/ Kplaig tGjv rraTeptot
Canones Chalcedonensis. Concil. Univ. p. 419.
CANTERBURY.
called for, discussion. It is only contended that these chap.
discussions did not take place when articles of the faith » — ^ — -
were under consideration. To make this distinction is a Parker7
•matter of great importance, and nothing can tend more 1559-75.
strongly to prove its existence than the difference in the
form of words used when any canon pertaining merely to
a rite or ceremony, or to a case of discipline, was enacted,
from the course adopted when assent was given to an
'tide of faith. In the former case the form was soo£$ to.
u7roTSTay^.svoL (these things seem good to us), in the latter
)i)Ta)g 7ri(TTs6si tj xaSoXixr) sxx^o-la (so the Catholic
/hurch believes) ; not presuming to act on their own
judgment, but simply declaring the fact of tradition.*
Such were the principles of the English reformers, and Principles
well would it have been for the Church of England if to £^1^
diose principles they had consistently adhered. In their reformers-
weakness they frequently yielded to the clamours of the
ultra-Protestants, and became involved in perplexities,
Prom which even now we find it difficult to escape.
^rker, and those who coincided with him — that is to
say, those who, in seeking the reformation of the Church,
acted on the principle now laid down — regarded them-
selves, as indeed they were, as persons baptized into,
representing, and called upon to govern the old Catholic
Church of this realm ; this — the old Catholic Church —
they never quitted. That, in the middle ages, corruptions,
both in discipline and doctrine, had gradually been in-
troduced by the negligence of our ecclesiastics at home,
* Athanasius, De Syn., quoted by Hammond in his Paraenesis, p. 558.
Hammond continues : " To which purpose also was, I suppose, the
second versicle in the doxology (the orthodoxal form of acknowledging
the Trinity), ' As it was in the beginning,' as it stood by original tradi-
tion apostolical, ' is now, and ever shall be, world without end.' " No new
doctrine was ever to be brought into the Church, by whatsoever council,
but only that which the Apostles had delivered.
■
id
GO LIVES OF THE
and the gradual, but incessant, usurpations of the myrini
dons of Popery, they were so far from denying, that they
PftrkerT felt ^ their duty to emancipate their Church from the
ioo9-7o. foreign thraldom, and to bring it back from mediaeval
romance to primitive truth. Unfortunately, they wer
or imagined themselves to be, too weak to effect tlii
without recourse to an alliance with another power, an
they soon found a new tyrant in the sovereign whom they
first accepted as an ally.
They seem never to have forgotten their position, which
was strictly that of reformers. It has been elsewhere
observed that Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin were not,
properly speaking, reformers ; they were merely leaders
of a great revolution. A reformation supposes the pre-
existence of something to be reformed — the old Catholic
Church. That Church they regarded as Naaman, captain
of the host of the king of Syria, had been regarded by
the prophet of the Lord. Naaman was a mighty man in
valour, but he was a leper. The Church had been
leprous. In order to wash it, the Eomanists at Trent
boasted of their Abana and Pharpar ; our English re-
formers would cleanse it by the waters of Jordan ; the
foreign reformers, though they preferred the waters of
the Jordan, would have destroyed the man, and arrayed
a new creature of their own fabrication in the splendid
garments with which, in the spirit of Gehazi, they woul
have decorated him.
Ecclesiastical events are, from this time, liable to b
confused in the mind of a general reader, from the wan
of a clear definition of terms and titles. Men use, very
frequently, one and the same term to express very differ-
ent ideas. We may mention such words as regenerati
with reference to one sacrament, and the real presen
with respect to the other. So, again, with respect to title
;
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY.
Who, for example, are the Catholics ? That title, the
English reformers could not give to the Eomanists, be-
cause it would imply that the English reformers were parker.
heretics. A heretic, as we have before seen, means, in 1559-7-3.
the vocabulary of the primitive Church, a man who, in- Catholics,
stead of deferring to the tradition of the Church, inter-
preted the Bible according to his own private judgment ;
and, as we have already seen, and shall have occasion
hereafter to show, from the writings of Bishop Jewel,
it was by an appeal to primitive tradition that our re-
formers silenced the Eomanists.
Then, again, who are the Protestants ? At the early Protest-
portion of the Eeformation period, Protestant and
Lutheran were convertible terms, and Protestants, holding
the doctrine of consubstantiation, were opposed in lan-
guage most bitter by the Zwinglians and Calvinists. The
confusion to which we have alluded is occasioned by
readers applying to the Eeformation period the ideas
entertained in the nineteenth century on these and similar
subjects. They divide the religionists of England into two
parties, distinguished from each other by a line clearly
defined. Catholics — by whom they mean Eomanists —
and Protestants, including all who are opposed to the
Church of Eome, descending even to Unitarians, to whom
the name of Protestant, in strict propriety, should be
confined, for they carry the rights of private judgment
to its extreme point, and protest, in many cases, not only
against Eomanism, but against fundamental tenets of
Christianity itself, leaving us a Christianity without a
Christ.
It is important to observe that, for many years after the
Eeformation in England, there was no Eomish sect in
this country ; and indeed it is only within a few years
that the Eomanists gave to their sect, by the introduction
ve
;
02 LIVES OF THE
chap, of a schismatical hierarchy, the appearance of a Chur
— ,- — - in rivalry to the old Catholic Church which our ancestors
Parker, reformed. " Our forefathers had," says the learned
1559-75. Bishop Sanderson, " no purpose, nor had they any
warrant to set up a new religion, but to reform the old
by purging it of those innovations which, in the tract of
time, some sooner, some later, had mingled with it and
corrupted it, both in doctrine and worship." This, w
have to repeat, was the position occupied by the Engli
reformers. In the time of Parker, although this w
their principle, they permitted the title of Protestant to
be imposed upon them. In narrating Parker's history, we
shall adopt the term, but with this explanation, — that the
term Protestant, though still confined to the Lutherans
abroad, was not so employed in England. On the Con-
tinent the custom was, and in many places still is, to
divide the dissentients from Eome into two great classes,—
the Protestants and the Eeformed ; the Eeformed meaning
the sects which, whatever their present tenets, originated
in Calvinism. In Parker's time, the word Protestant was
understood to denote the Eeformed Church of England,
or the Anglo-Catholic Church. Opposed to the English
reformers stood the Puritans, the representatives of Cal-
vinism. We will here repeat what has been said. There
were the Anglo-Catholics, who, except when in contro-
versy they were obliged to come to precise terms, were
content to be called Protestants. There were the Puritans,
in whom we find the germ of what has since been called
" Evangelicalism." Soon after the first decade of Eliza-
beth's reign there was the Eomish sect — pure sectarians,
without any hierarchy, representing, not the primitive
Church, but the existing Eoman government. The
English reformers, unwisely — for all insincerity is un-
wise— were the more willing to accept the designation o
ARCHBISHOPS OJ
63
Protestants, as it enabled them the better to make common
cause with parties on the Continent opposed to Eomanism.
This involved them in many inconsistencies, and strength-
ened the hands of the Puritans by enabling them to appeal,
their various disputes, to the public opinion of conti-
nental sects. It was productive of another great evil, by
weakening the Church at home. When they assumed
the name of Protestants, there was a large party, who,
accusing the English reformers of being false to Protest-
ant principles, set up independent and rival places of
worship. Others, desiring to obtain a share in the
emoluments of an endowed Church, conformed with great
discontent, their avowed object being to transmute the
old Catholic Church into a mere Protestant sect. This
party, which, without intending it, strengthened the
Eomish cause, has always been the weakness of the
Church of England, and created most of those difficulties,
to contend with which was the business of Parker's life
throughout his archiepiscopate.
CHAP.
VI.
Matthew-
Parker.
1559-75.
64 LIVES OF THE
CHAPTER VII.
PAKKEK AS A PASTOR AND PREACHER.
Parker returns to Norwich. — Is licensed to preach. — Becomes chapl
to Anne Boleyn, and Dean of Stoke. — Appointed chaplain to
Henry VIII.— The deanery of Stoke.— Reforms of 1536-43—
Statute of Six Articles. — Presented to the living of Ashen. — Pre-
bendary of Ely.— Rector of Burlingham. — Of Landbeach. — Is ac-
cused of heresy. — Dr. Stokes. — Dissolution of Stoke. — Parker is
appointed Dean of Lincoln. — Marries Margaret Harleston. — Reforms
of 1547 and 1549.— Summoned to preach at Paul's Cross. — Dis-
turbances of 1549. — Rising in the West. — Rett's insurrection.-
Parker during the reign of Mary. — His accident. — View of his
character.
us-
his
chap. In the preceding chapters, attention has been chiefly
- — , — - directed to the academical life of Parker, and to his studies
Parked as a divine ; we have reserved for a separate chapter a
1559-75. description of his character as a pastor and preacher.
In treating of him in this character, it will be necessary
occasionally to retrace our steps, for much of what is
about to be related occurred contemporaneously, or nearly
so, with circumstances already described. It was pro-
videntially ordered that the future reformer should be
trained for his great work practically, as well as theoreti-
cally. He learned that in dealing with men we must,
while aiming at the highest excellence, be contented
sometimes with what the selfishness of friends, or the
malignity of opponents, can be allowed or compelled
to grant. Having commenced a good work, it becomes
sometimes necessary, with whatever amount of reluctance
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 65
or misrepresentation, to leave it for a future generation chap.
to effect or perfect. « — r--^
Matthew Parker having, it will be remembered, parked
graduated in the year 1525, returned for a short time 1559-75.
to his native place. He found a united family, Master At Nor-
wich..
Baker having proved himself a father equally affectionate
to his wife's children and to his own. The difficulties, and
even the dangers, of travel were at that time so many and
so great, that visits, few and far between, were generally
of long duration. Parker now remained at home for about
two years ; but he was not the man to pass his time in
idleness. I have already traced his professional history
to the 15th of June, 1527, when he was ordained priest.
His ordination did not include a licence to preach. Priests not
Before the Eeformation, as is still in churches under the preachers.7
Eoman obedience, so many of the offices of religion are
reduced to a kind of histrionic display, and the mind is
so dissipated by a conglomeration of ceremonial details,
that to a large portion of the clergy little time is left for
the pursuits of learning ; and, in the sixteenth century,
literature was by no means so closely connected with the
clerical profession as at the present time. Ordination was
sought by a large body of men springing from the lower
classes of society, and endowed with some slight intel-
lectual power, as the means of obtaining a scanty sub-
sistence more easily than by manual labour. The upper
classes of the clergy were landed proprietors, possessing
large estates in the character of glebes, or through the
system of fines ; and these persons were employed in
high offices in Church and State, seldom residing on their
benefices. Under them was the class of clergy just de-
scribed, upon whom devolved the ordinary duties of
the ministry, or who were employed, as we have before
had occasion to remark, in promoting litigation instead of
vol. ix. 1
66 LIVES OF THE
I
1533.
chap, furthering the cause of peace in the lower ecclesiastical
— T '-^ courts. These persons were not permitted to preach
ParVerT without a licence, first obtained from the bishop ; for it
J559-75. would have been impossible to surmise beforehand the
amount of nonsense to which they might have given
utterance. As the business in the ecclesiastical courts
diminished, and as many of the beneficed clergy were
compelled to reside in their vicinity, proctors became
discontented: if, as sometimes happened, they had the
gift of eloquence, they became preachers of sedition ; and
many of them, taking part in the reform movement, were
not so much the assert ers of God's truth, as the maligner
of their superiors.*
Parker The parties thus described could only be fairly met by
preach. preachers selected from the really learned members of the
Universities, among whom Parker already ranked high.
It is remarkable, however, that although Parker was
ordained priest in 1527, he was not licensed to preach
till 1533. This was the year in which Dr. Cranmer was
consecrated Archbishop of Canterbury. To represent
Cranmer, however, as at this time a Protestant, would be
an anachronism, of which only the ignorance of ultra-
Protestantism, or the malice of Romanism, could be guilty.
Cranmer and Latimer would, at this time, have been
among the first to commit Parker to the flames, had he
propounded some of those opinions for which they them-
selves, at a later period, laid down their lives. Neverthe-
less, Parker's appointment was significant. It is remark-
able in his history, that he never sought high office,
although he did not shrink from discharging its duties
when he was duly called. He was invited to be a preacher,
* It was to meet the views of this unlearned class of the clergy, wh
when the Bible was translated and put in their hands, had become
really religious and devout, that the Homilies were provided. They
were able to read, though not to write.
ii
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY.
and a zealous preacher he became. He was selected be-
cause Cranmer, as at that time were Gardyner and Bonner,
was, on the question of the divorce of Queen Katherine,
on the side of the king against the pope. The pulpit was 1559-75.
often employed, as is the public press in the present age,
to create a public opinion, or to sustain it. Parker was
a safe man in this respect. He was a young man of
I learning, siding with the king on the divorce question,
and known to be on the side of progress. We may
truly say that he was a reformer, even in 1533, if we
bear in mind that the Eeform party had not, up to this
period, formed any definite opinions as a class. It was
certainly not Protestant, and, as we have shown, it could
not have been Calvinistic. It was accused of Germanizing ;
and, without being conscious of the fact, many members
tof the party may have coincided more or less in the
opinions of Luther.
Matthew Parker noticed, as an important incident in his
life, that he entered on the office of a preacher on the first
Sunday of Advent, 1533. On that Sunday he preached
at Grantchester ; at Beach, or Landbeach, on the second
Sunday in Advent ; on the third Sunday at St. Bene't's
church, Cambridge ; at Madingley on the fourth ; and
on Christmas Day, which fell this year on a Sunday, at
Barton. As these places were in the vicinity of Cambridge,
many University men attended, and by them report was
made of his eloquence, as well as of his learning. The
Bishop of Ely appointed him to preach at his visitation,
and again in 1534; and the Archbishop of Canterbury
granted his licence to the young divine to preach through-
out his province.
Parker was one of those men who, conscious of certain
intellectual powers, are pleased when distinction is justly
accorded to them ; while, at the same time, they shrink
f2
68 LIVES OF THE
chap, from the responsibility of office. Many such persoi
x-V*L.. there are who would prefer to be second instead of fi]
•PtokerT *n command ; to have the real power of office, while the
-1.559-75. semblance rests with another. If we do the work, and
permit our superior in office to have the praise, there is
scarcely anything that we cannot accomplish. Parker was
now happily situated. A leading man in the University,
he was consulted as an amicus curice by the chief people
in the country. He knew himself to be useful as a
preacher, when useful preachers were rare ; and he stood
aloof from that great world, which appeared to him like
a volcano, fitted at any moment to be in eruption. To
ascend its sides might lead to a more expansive view,
and to an elevation in the sight of men ; but, by the least
false step, the unwary might be overwhelmed with the
lava. He preferred to remain at the mountain's foot, and
to point the way to those who desired to climb.
chaplain Every one likes to be noticed by his superiors ; but, at
Anne.een tne same time, while he accepts the honour, a modest
1535. man may shrjnk from the responsible publicity of high
office. We can understand, then, the feelings with which
Parker, in March, 1535, received the following letter from
Dr. Skyp, afterwards Bishop of Hereford, and at this time
almoner to Queen Anne: —
" Mr. Parker, I commend me heartily unto you. Our friend
Master Betts is departed out of this world. And the Queen's
Grace commanded me to write unto you to the intent that ye
should come up and speak with her with all the speed that ye
can. I would ye might come before Easter ; but if ye cannot,
I pray you in any wise to be here in the week after, and then
shall ye know further of her pleasure. Thus fare ye well.
"Your,
"John Skipped
" From Hampton Court,
" The Tuesday after Palm Sunday."
* Corresp. p. 1.
Boleyn.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
In another letter, bearing the same date, Dr. Skyp says chap.
of Anne Boleyn, " I think her mind is to have you her chap- v, i— -
lain. I pray you resist not your calling, but come in any patkerT
wise, to know further of her pleasure. Bring with you 1559 75,
a long gown, and that shall be enough until ye shall return
to Cambridge." This summons Parker obeyed, and in
due course became chaplain to the queen.
Anne Boleyn has been the subject of undue vituperation Anne
on one side, and of eulogy, equally undeserved, on the
other. This has been occasioned by the absurd mistake,
already noticed, of those who drawT a clear and distinct
line between Eoman Catholics and Protestants. Foxe,
Burnet, and their followers call Anne Boleyn a Protestant
queen ; and the Protestants immediately have credited her
with every grace that can adorn the female character.
The Puritans forget the dissipations of her court,* which
were such as to induce Sir Thomas More to predict the
shortness of her reign. But the question arises, What is
meant by Protestantism ? That she was decidedly anti-
papal must be universally admitted. By the pope her mar-
riage was declared to be invalid, and she was in constant
alarm, lest Henry should be induced to reconcile himself to
the Eoman see ; a proceeding not yet regarded, by either
party, as an impossibility, especially if he could liberate
himself from the fascinations of Queen Anne. To the
anti-papal party, which at that time included such men
as Gardyner and Bonner, as well as Cranmer, Eidley, and
* Margaret Roper, when visiting her father, Sir Thomas More, in
the Tower, was asked how Queen Anne was going on. " Faith, Father,"
she answered, " never better ; there is nothing else in the court but
dancing and sporting." " Alas ! Meg," he replied, " these dances of
hers will prove such dances, that she will spurn our heads off like
footballs ; but it will not be long before her own head will dance the
same dance." Roper's Life of More. From the privy expenses of
King Henry VIII., it appears that she was addicted to cards and dice.
70 LIVES OF THE
chap. Latimer, she gave her support. As indicating her attach-
— r^—> ment to the reformers, she availed herself of the roys
Parker* permission to read the Bible, as it had lately been pub-
1 559-75. lished, in the vulgar tongue ; but one step further than
her husband she had no inclination to advance. The
reformers found in him a supporter, when by them he
was himself supported in the question of the divorce. He
was with them when they preached against the unjust
usurpations of the Bishop of Eome, and declared the king,
under certain qualifications, to be the supreme head of
the Church. He supported them when, by the suppression
of the monasteries, they filled his exchequer, and weakened
the popish power by turning the Eegulars adrift. With
similar feelings he supported them in exposing the nullity
of miracles ascribed to popular saints, the lavish offerings
at whose shrines found, in his estimation, a better place
at the gambling tables of royalty. But if Queen Anne
had expressed a doubt on transubstantiation, or purgatory,
or the invocation of saints, or the celibacy of the clergy,
or auricular confession, or the seven sacraments, the
royal controversialist, proud of the "Assertio septem sacra-
mentorum, adversus Martinum Lutherum" would have
translated her from the matrimonial couch to the scaffold.
When we have accepted the seven sacraments, tran-
substantiation, purgatory, and the invocation of saints,
the Protestant residuum, according to modern notions,
will be small indeed. Neither Parker nor the queen were
at this time Protestants in the modern sense of the word,
although she may have been willing to hear from her
chaplain that, in ecclesiastical affairs, amendments were
required greater than had hitherto been accomplished.
Having mentioned the faults in Queen Anne's character,
we must not leave unnoticed her generosity, her extreme
readiness to do kind actions, when, in behalf of suffering
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 71
humanity, an appeal was made to her charity. If the chap.
religious principle was not sufficiently strong to prevent . A—
her from doing evil, yet she encouraged those religious p^er^
feelings which take pleasure in acts of devotion. It was 1559-75.
this part of Queen Anne's character — her zeal against the
pope and the ardour of her devotion — which attached to
her the ecclesiastics who held office in her court, but
were not likely to mingle in those dissipations in which
their presence would be acceptable to no one, and least
of all to her. Acting under the advice of Cheke and
Parker, she supported several poor students at the uni-
versity ; and having a command of money, she devoted
large sums to charitable objects.
As was the case with all who approached her, Parker
was evidently attracted by her charms. He only saw the
best parts of her character. His visits to court were few
and far between, and the period of his chaplaincy did not
extend much beyond a year. He referred to her in after life
with kindly feelings, and in several letters he alludes to a
conversation he had with her within six days of her fall,
in which it would seem that, anticipating the possibility of
such an event, she entreated him to watch as a paternal
friend over her daughter, afterwards Queen Elizabeth.
Parker, at the same time, commended himself to thejudg- Chaplain
ment of Henry VIII., for, having been appointed chaplain king.
to the queen, he was in 1537 summoned to the court of the 1537*
king, and made his chaplain. In the king's regard for
Parker, the disgrace of Queen Anne made no alteration.
Henry VIII. was quite capable of appreciating the faith-
fulness of Parker to the queen, if Parker were the author
of that affecting letter which, in her last moments, Anne
Boleyn is said to have transmitted to her husband. It
appears from Parker's correspondence,* that he had seen
* Corresp. p. 59.
72 LIVES OF THE
citap. her not long before ; but Kingston, in one of his letters
— ^— - Crumwell, relating to the queen, speaks of her almoner
Parker* having been with her at the last, and to him, probabh
.1559-75. the document, if authentic, should be attributed
Parker, alluding on several occasions to his interviews
with Anne Boleyn, does not mention this letter, which he
would hardly have failed to notice, if he had been in any
way concerned in it. We have had occasion before to
remark on the destruction of all the documents relating to
the public trials of this reign. That some dreadful revelation
was made to Cranmer, who had come up to London with
the intention of defending her cause, in his last interview
with Anne Boleyn, is almost certain ; but it is equally
certain that Parker regarded her as innocent, or thought
her repentance sincere, from an expression parenthetically
made in one of his letters, in which, speaking of Queei
Anne, he says, " whose soul, I doubt not, is in blesse(
felicity with God." I may mention here what I have
not seen noticed by other historians, that, when Parker
was archbishop, he informed Burghley, when writing
him in 1572, confidentially, that at one time her majesty
the queen had told him secretly of a pope's bull, whereii
King Henry's marriage with Queen Anne was confirme(
" She willed me," wrote the archbishop, " to seek it oul
I did so among mine old registers, and others which
thought might have it. I did it as secretly and prudently
as I could, and to mine own self; but I could not hear
of it."*
Officials were at this time seldom, if ever, paid by
salaries. The notion of treating the clergy like trades-
men, paying them so much money for so much work
done, had not entered into the minds of men. Certain
* Lansdowne -MSS. xv. Art. 50. It is possible that it was the queen's
intention simply to mystify the archbishop.
It
S
id
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 73
landed estates were held by persons in holy orders, to
which was assigned the performance of certain duties by
the beneficiary himself, or his deputy.*
The deanery of Stoke by Clare was attached by 1559-75.
custom to the office of queen's chaplain. The deanery
had been held by " Master Betts," and by his predecessor,
the chaplain of Queen Katharine. When Catherine Parr
shared the throne of Henry VIII., she evidently thought
that her connection with the college was so close, that
in its concerns she had a right to interfere. On one
occasion we find her recommending a bailiff, and on
another she interfered to obtain the beneficial lease of a
manor for one of her friends. The requests are grace-
fully preferred ; but coming from the queen of Henry VIII.,
they were regarded, of course, in the light of commands.f
Stoke by Clare, or Stoke next Clare, was originally Dean of
an alien priory — in fact, a cell of the celebrated abbey 1535/
of Bee. Its founder was Eichard of Tonbridge, or
of Clare, Earl of Hertford. In the year 1124, he trans-
lated the Benedictine monks of Bee, whom his father had
placed in his castle of Clare, first into the parish church
of St. Augustine, and afterwards to this priory, which he
endowed with the manor of Stoke Hoe. It was released
in 1395 by Eichard II. from its subjection to the foreign
abbey of Bee, and it became indigena on the payment of
1,000 marks, which were appropriated in aid of the new
works at St. Peter's, Westminster.^ In 1415, Edmund
* Within the memory of the writer of these pages, the royal chaplains
had a table provided for them in the king's palace, and this honour was
their sole remuneration. They now receive a fixed salary, and their
table is discontinued. The professional man receives an honorarium;
the tradesman demands pay.
f The letters are preserved among the MSS. of Corpus Christi College,
Cambridge.
X Monast. Anglic, and Richard Taylor's Index Monasticus.
I
74 LIVES OF KHfl
chap. Mortimer, Earl of March, its patron, obtained the roy*
VII • • •
- — ,-^ permission to change this into a college of secular priests.
ParkeaT Tne constitutions were drawn up in 1422 by Thomas
1559-75. Barneslay, at that time dean. The college consisted of a
dean, from six to ten prebendaries, eight vicars, four
clerks, six choristers. It was pleasantly situated in a close,
surrounded by six acres of land and an orchard. It was
richly endowed with lands, rents, tithes, portions, and
pensions in fifty-six parishes. Among the endowments
was the payment of 8,000 eels annually from Fordiam
and Lackenheath.
For the next twelve or thirteen years Stoke by Clare
was the happy home of Matthew Parker. Here he de-
lighted to gather his friends around him ; and by one of
them, Walter Haddon, his residence at Stoke was called
" Parker's Tusculanum ; " a place which seemed, as it
were, created for scholars, both to receive and impart
instruction — a locus ad delectationes honestas et ingenuas
aptissimus. An occasional supply of venison from the
royal forests enabled Parker to entertain his neighbours.
Among his papers we find a mandate of Henry VIII. to
" Master Forester, of our forest of Weybridge, desiring
him to deliver, or cause to be delivered, unto our trusty
and well-beloved Matthew Parker, chaplain to our dearest
wife the queen, one doe of season."
When Parker became archbishop he had a right to
claim a certain number of bucks from the different royal
parks; and, on one occasion, he received "a great and a fat
stag," killed by the fair hand of Queen Elizabeth herself,
and forwarded, by her express command, through Lord
Eobert Dudley.* While he was at Stoke, his larder was
frequently supplied by the kind consideration of the
queen consort, and, with a command of eels at all times,
* Corresp. p. 190.
ni
5
I
fli
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 75
found no difficulty in keeping up that hospitality, chap.
rhich implied the providing board at a common table to — ^— -
all who lodged within the precincts of the college. Into ptrkerT
his garden he introduced the tuberose and the pink, and 1559-75.
galed his friends occasionally upon apricots, which had
een lately introduced from Epirus.
When the report prevailed that monasteries and re-
ligious houses were in danger, the hypocrisy of the
onks being more offensive to the people than the pro-
igacy of the courtiers who sought to supersede them,
Parker felt that the only chance of securing the perma-
nency of establishments such as that over which he was
presiding, was to adapt them to the requirements of the
age. His first attempt as a reformer was now made.
He established a grammar school, in which the children
of the neighbourhood were to be brought up in all the
studies of humanity. He provided a yearly stipend for
the master, and procured for him learned assistance.
According to the custom of the age, the wealthy were
required to pay in money. Poorer persons, desiring a
learned education, offered their services for the discharge
of the menial offices. It was counted no shame in that
age for persons who had not money, to act as servitors;
and the opulent, upon whom they waited, readily received
them on equal terms to the same classes as themselves.
Parker's school, under his superintendence, soon became
popular. He required the prebendaries, all of them, to be
preachers, and sent them, from time to time, to preach the
gospel in parishes in which the college had estates. The
boys in the school were taught to sing and to play upon
the organs. The statutes were considered to be models
of what such statutes ought to be, and wrere translated
by Sir John Cheke, who, on the dissolution of the college,
became one of the grantees.
76 LIVES OF THE
chai\ Parker, who never hurried anything, readily adopted
v_ — ,-1— * all the improvements of the age, as they were forcet
Parker* upon Henry VIII. ; and progress, during this reign, was, i
1559-75. point of fact, greater than is generally supposed. In 1536
Creed and he readily obeyed the royal injunction; and having ol
noster in tained copies of the translations lately made of the Cree
tou^uegar the Decalogue, and the Paternoster, caused them to b
1536. reac| in the vulgar tongue, in all the churches in whic
he had influence, or over which he had control. I
a.d. 1537. 1537 he took a deep interest in one of the most im-
portant publications of the period, " The Godly and Pio
Institution of a Christian Man," commonly called th
Bishops' Book. In all the parishes within the peculia
jurisdiction of the Dean of Stoke, he adopted the paris
registers in accordance with the instructions issued b
a.d. 1538. Crumwell in 1538. He accepted with pleasure, an
a.d. 1543. acted upon it, the royal mandate which, in 1543, directe
the Litany to be said in English. However much dis-
appointed he may have been in the reactionary spirit
manifested in the King's Book, he received compensation
when, in 1545, the Primer made its appearance, con-
taining a form of prayer for morning and evening, in th
English tongue.
A deep mortification awaited Parker on the enactmen
of the Statute of Six Articles. Mixing, at that time, in
general society, he had won the affections of one who was
a lady by birth and education, and the only impediment
to their marriage was offered by this statute. We have
had occasion before to remark, that Parker was thought
of as likely to be a bishop when, in 1541, the sees of Peter-
borough, Oxford, and Gloucester were established, the
bishoprics of Bristol and Chester being constituted in the
< following year. From his determination to enter into the
holy estate of matrimony, we can account for his refusal.
:
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 77
ough he was much too cautious to marry in defiance chap.
of the law, it was the general opinion, that the Statute of - — ,— ^
Six Articles was only a temporary and minatory measure ; pLkerT
and he entertained little doubt that, ere long, the govern- 1559-75.
ment would see the wisdom of conniving, to say the least
of it, at the marriage of the clergy. Although among
thinking men the demoralization of the clergy was attri-
buted in part to their constrained celibacy, yet it is aston-
ishing to observe how long a prejudice against clerical
marriages existed. The marriage of a bishop would have
created a disturbance in the public mind. Even to a very
late period such marriages have been rare. Determined,
therefore, to marry, Parker thought it expedient to de-
cline a bishopric. Looking forward to the establishment
of a family, he preferred making provision for it by an
accumulation of several smaller preferments to the acqui-
sition of one calculated to excite the envious passions of
his contemporaries. The prejudice against pluralities did
not at that time exist. So long as a good man was pro-
vided to discharge parochial duties, the parishioners made
no inquiry as to the terms upon which he entered on
an engagement with his principal. It was not till the
clergy were surrounded with large families that such a
question arose. Before that time, a man engaged in
the public service, either in Church or State, was put to
expenses which he met by an accumulation of small
benefices. The unambitious man, preferring private life,
and having no family claims upon him, was content when
food and raiment were provided for him. Parker there-
fore, without any compunctious visi tings of conscience,
records that, in 1542, he was presented to the living of Rector of
Ashen in Essex. About the same time, when the king 1542. '
was establishing secular priests in the cathedral of Ely, he Pr-
emised Parker to be installed in the second prebend esta- of Ely.
1542!
78 LIVES OF THE
chap. Wished in that church. In 1544 Parker resigned Ashci
^ — r_ and was presented, probably in exchange, to the rectory-
Parked °f Burlingham, in his native county of Norfolk. In
1559-75. 1545 he obtained the living of Landbeach from Corpus
Eectoi of Christi College, of which he had become master in 1544.
ham!ng Although Parker, until the year 1547, divided his time
chiefly between Stoke and Cambridge, he felt it his duty
wT-r °f t0 visit occasionally his other benefices ; and he desire
3d,
15451' therefore, to concentrate his preferments either in tl
vicinity of Cambridge, or near his home in Norfolk.
At this time he was indefatigable as a preacher, and as
preachers were few, and the prevalent ignorance was great,
he was rejoicing in the thought of his having become an
instrument in the Divine hand for promoting God's glory,
the good of his Church, and the benefit of his fellow-
creatures. But wherever the servants of God are active,
the author of evil, the accuser of the brethren, is diligent,
by himself or through his agents, to frustrate their labours,
and to raise against them a persecution. Some of the
inhabitants of Clare, under the leadership of one George
Accused Colt, accused Dr. Parker of heresy before the Lord
i539MSy* Chancellor Audley. Having pointed out that the splen-
did ceremonials of Easter Day were a vain pageant, unless
they were an indication that they who took part in them
were dead to sin, and determined to walk in newness of
life, Dr. Parker was accused of turning into ridicule the
ceremonies of that blessed festival. Having preached that,
for those who had no regard for the mystery of the Cross,
it was mere superstition to worship the wood of the Cross,
he was accused of denying the atonement. At the time
of the Pilgrimages of Grace, and of the rising in Lincoln-
shire under the Prior of Barlings, Parker exhorted the
people to contribute with cheerfulness towards the ex-
penses of war, since, without incurring such expenses, tlic
AECHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
79
CHAP.
VII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
:ing could not maintain the peace of the realm. He was
now accused of asserting that, by the money levied from
the commons, the king purchased a dishonourable peace.
Not only were these charges pronounced to be frivolous
and vexatious, but a kind message was sent to Parker by
the Lord High Chancellor, "to go on, and not to fear
such enemies."* Very different was the treatment which
Parker received from his diocesan, Dr. Nykke. f There
was a party in Clare who regarded with alarm the reform-
ing principles of the Dean of Stoke, and whose desire it
was to counteract his influence. With this object in view,
they obtained from the bishop a licence to preach for
Dr. Stokes, who was a man of mark, being a D.D. of Dr. stokes
Cambridge and prior of the Austin Friars at Norwich. J
Upon the arrival of Dr. Stokes at Clare, Parker addressed
to him a letter, in which he stated, " that if he came to
decry the truth which Parker had preached, or to make
invectives to the decay of the king's authority and lawful
ordinances, or to sow schism and confusion among the
people," he, Parker, " must and would, according to his
duty, give information against him ; but that if it were
his intention to declare the truth and edify the king's
* See a note in Parker's own hand, on his letter to Dr. Stokes, pre-
served in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.
•f Richard Nykke was consecrated to the see of Norwich in 1501, and
died on the 14th of January, 1536. He was succeeded by Dr. Rugg or
Reps. Strype must therefore be in error, when he represents Dr. Stokes
as sent to preach against Parker in 1537 by Bishop Nix, as he calls him.
Rugg was a mere timeserver, and it is difficult to conjecture why he
should take part against Parker after Lord Audley's judgment. The
measures were probably taken by Bishop Nykke, whose successor let
things take their course.
X Parker MSS., Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, cviii. Art. 38.
Draft of answer. The date is not given ; but, as Audley was made
Chancellor on the 29th of November, 1538, we may probably date the
letter in 1539.
80 lives of Tin:
chap, subjects, he would promise to join hands with him an(
, vn- , live on friendly terms." * The letter is too long foi
p^k1 pW transcr^Pti°n I but, for style and temper, it does much credil
1559-75. to the writer ; the more so, since, in the life of Cardinal
Pole, we have had instances of the extreme violence oi
language in which controversialists in the sixteenth
century indulged. This advice, Dr. Stokes was not wise
enough to follow. He rendered himself obnoxious to the
king's government, and was for a short time imprisoned.
He was not a straightforward man, for when, among other
things, allusion was made to his exciting an unnecessary
controversy against Parker, Dr. Stokes, in writing to the
Lord Privy Seal, denied that he had done so, although it
wag known that he was sent to Clare for the very purpose
of counteracting the effects of Parker's preaching.
Parker's favour with the government was manifested
when he received a summons from the Lord Privy Seal
to preach at Paul's Cross. The appointment was a gra-
tifying one, as the Lord Privy Seal expressly stated, that
it was made " out of respect to the honest report of Par-
ker's learning in holy letters, and incorrupt judgment in
the same."
Dissolution In 1545, Parker heard, with astonishment and alai
threSed. tnat tne possessions of colleges, of hospitals, and of all
1545. institutions that could be brought under the denomina-
tion of a religious house, were to form part of that con-
fiscation of ecclesiastical property, by which the royal
coffers might be filled. It was at the option of the king
to seize the property of any religious house, except a
cathedral, or for a consideration to spare it. Parker
read in this iniquitous act of Parliament the doom of
Stoke next Clare, unless he exerted himself for its pre-
servation, and in his exertions he was successful.
* E. Bibliotliec. Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. - Miscellan.
t in
trm,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 81
arker was aware that, if he were ejected from this chap.
deanery, he would receive compensation by the offer of « — ^— <
higher preferment ; but his attachment to his native Parker.
county prevented him from listening to the most favour- 1559-75.
able terms. Nothing, indeed, could compensate him for
the loss of a home, rendered " the more homely " by his
good taste, and surrounded by orchards and gardens where
the scholar had composed those discourses by which his
name had already become famous, and through which
many had been led to seek the one thing needful. That
home he had been preparing for a wife ; for Margaret
Harleston and Matthew Parker had long been attached to
one another, and were patiently " biding their time," until
the king's changeful mind and the persuasions of Cranmer
had again rendered the marriage of the clergy legal.
The person who, next to the dean, was interested in
the preservation of Stoke College, was the queen consort.
The college, as we have before remarked, was under
her patronage ; and, if it were dissolved, together with
other establishments of the same kind, her chaplain would
in future have to be paid out of the privy purse, or, as was
already the case with the king's chaplains, the remu-
neration would consist solely in the honour conferred.
Parker succeeded in interesting Henry's sixth wife, Cathe-
rine Parr, in the fate of his college. It was easy to justify
her interference. Stoke College was situated in the midst
of the queen's tenants, and, on this account, the patron-
age had been conceded to her. In the hospitality of
the college, and the civilizing society of its inmates, the
wealthier tenants found edification and amusement, at a
time when the metropolis was seldom visited, and these
institutions might be regarded as civilized colonies in
different parts of the world. The labourers on the estate,
in the mean time, were accustomed to apply to the college
VOL. IX. G
82 LIVES OF THE
chap, in all their difficulties and distresses, and, by the charity
^- — ^— ' there liberally displayed, the queen's exchequer was span
Parked expenses, from which it would have otherwise been unab]
1559-75. to escape. All received instruction, and that at a tim
when, in the excitement of the age, good instruction w
specially needed. In addressing the queen, and soliciti
her interposition, Parker referred with satisfaction to the
exertions of the dean and his prebendaries. High and
low, her tenants were gratuitously instructed in the new
learning ; and such had been their hospitality, that persons
coming from a distance, on the queen's business, would
remain at Stoke with their suites for seven or eight days,
making the college their home. These facts were laid
before the queen, and in pleading the cause of her college
she was successful with Henry VIII. What was prac-
ticable under Henry VIII. became impossible when the
queen consort had become the queen dowager, and a
new kennel of courtiers were let loose upon the Church
to devour it. The property, which had hitherto supported
many, and in the enjoyment of which the poorest man on
the estate might hope to see his son have a slfare, was
now transferred to another class of society, and the poor,
unconsciously wronged, were taught to approve of a sys-
tem which only tended to further the selfishness of the
wealthy few.
Ousted The confiscation took place ; but, except for the extreme
stoke. inconvenience of being turned out of his home, Parker
had few grounds of complaint personally. The confis-
cated estate was purchased by a college friend, Sir John
Cheke ; and the pension of forty pounds a year, with which
it was saddled, was paid regularly to the ousted dean.
He had to quit his home in obedience, as he expresses it,
Dean of to an act of Parliament, on the 1st of April, 1547.
1552! the way of compensation he was, in 1552,, appointed
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 83
deanery of Lincoln. He retained the mastership of chap.
Corpus Christi College, to which, it will be recollected, he - VIL_-
was appointed in 1544. ^kheerw
Parker immediately started for his new deanery, and 1559-75.
Ivas installed in person. After this he divided his time
>etween Lincoln and Cambridge, making occasional visits
0 his friends in Norwich.
Although the new reign, and the avarice of Edward VI. 's
ounsellors, drove Parker from the home he loved, he
was, nevertheless, able to console himself by a marriage
with the lady to whom he had been engaged for seven
years. The act, indeed, authorizing the marriage of
the clergy, was not obtained until the year 1549 ; but
Parker felt so sure that the privilege could not be with-
held, that, on the 24th of June, 1547, he became the happy Married.
husband of Margaret Harleston. The law, as it then stood, 1647,
regarded clerical marriages as voidable, but not void ; and
when Parker heard that the Archbishop of Canterbury
was awaiting at Dover the arrival of Mrs. Cranmer from
the Continent, he felt sure that the penalties to which a
married clerk was still liable would not be enforced.
He was in his forty-third year when he led to the altar
Mistress Margaret, the daughter of Eobert Harleston,
esquire, in the county of Norfolk. She was twenty-
eight years of age. Never was man more fortunate in
his marriage. A lady by birth and manners, Mrs. Parker,
according to the custom of the age, had received an edu-
cation which enabled her to sympathize with her husband
in his studies and ecclesiastical pursuits ; at the same time
she was endowed with such sound common sense, that
she so managed his household affairs as to enable him
to keep hospitality, and maintain his dignity as a lord
spiritual, without being involved in debt. When, during
the reign of Queen Mary, Parker was reduced in circum-
g2
I
8-1 LIVES OF THE
chap, stances, and with an increasing family found it difficult
— r— - make both ends meet, she contrived to render the home
Parker* her husband comfortable, and, with a decreasing income,
.1559-75. still to maintain the respectability of the family. The
kindness with which, in Edward VI. 's time, she enter-
tained her husband's guests in his college at Cambridge
is incidentally and gratefully mentioned by some of his
correspondents.
The master's lodge at Corpus Christi College was the
first place to which men of learning and piety repaired,
when circumstances brought them to Cambridge. It was
to his friend Dr. Parker's house that Martin Bucer repaired,
when he happened to be in want of a dinner ; and, whei
he was in need of money to pay his bills, it was t(
Dr. Parker's purse that he had recourse. To the enter-
tainment of her husband's guests, Mrs. Parker contributed
by her ready wit, her genial courtesy, and a conversation
replete with common sense. Even grave divines like
Bishop Eidley condescended to pay compliments t(
Mrs. Parker ; and much is implied in the appellation,
when that great prelate would speak jocosely of " Par-
ker's lady abbess." When, in after times, and in th<
reign of Elizabeth, Mrs. Parker was called upon to preside
over the household of the first peer of the realm, royalty
only excepted, we are told that, in Parker's palace, every-
thing was done nobly and splendidly. To her manage-
ment the archbishop left everything ; and, while she was
economical in her arrangements, she knew that her hus-
band's was a generous spirit, and in his generosity she
cordially sympathized.
The quiet manner in which such men as Cranmer and
Parker consented, for a time, to separate from their wives,
or to defer their marriage, confirms what has been stated
in the life of Cranmer, that, by those who, were at the
; ine
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 85
head of affairs, the Statute of Six Articles was regarded as chap.
only a temporary measure, necessary to meet the violent — — ^— -
aggressions of the Anabaptists, but sure to be repealed pttrkeaT
when its purpose had been answered. It was like a 1559-75.
suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act in modern times.
We may feel assured of this, that if measures of reform
had not been privately, and by the king's connivance,
prepared in the reign of Henry VIII., it would have been
impossible to have effected those reforms, which were Reforms of
almost instantaneously enacted, when, on the 28th of
January, 1547, Edward VI. ascended the throne. The
Statute of Six Articles was immediately repealed. The
first book of Homilies, already composed, was now pub-
lished, and through these Homilies some of the chief
doctrines of the Eeformation were promulgated. The
sacrament of the altar was, according to primitive usage,
administered in both kinds. Proclamations were soon
after issued against superstitious observances, most ob-
noxious to the reformers, such as carrying candles on
Candlemass Day, and ashes on Ash Wednesday ; and
orders were given for the removal of images, wherever
they had been treated with superstitious respect. In Reforms of
1548 a commission was issued to certain of the bishops,
with whom were associated other divines, whose business
it was to subject to a careful examination, the Breviary,
the Missal, the Manual, and other office books of the
Church, with a view to their translation into the vulgar
tongue, and the cutting off of all false doctrine.*
So well prepared were these divines, by previous study
and consultation, for the great work, to execute which
* The Breviary contained the daily services, including the lessons.
The Missal contained the service for the Holy Communion, including
the Epistle and Gospel. The Manual contained the Offices of Baptism,
Visitation of the Sick, and other rites and ceremonies.
86 lives OF Tin:
chap, they were commissioned, that, in about seven months'
time, that is to say, at the end of November, 1548,
1549.
^alkherW Dr. Parker received at Cambridge a copy of the book o
1559-75. Common Prayer, commonly described as the First Book
of Edward VI. Everything was done in that orderly
manner which was always satisfactory to the mind of
Parker. By the commissioners it had been submitted to
Convocation ; by Convocation it was sent to the king in
council ; by the Privy Council it was laid before the great
council of the nation assembled in Parliament ; by Parlia-
ment it was incorporated into an act — the first Act of
First Uniformity. This act, embodying the Prayer Book
Book. exactly as it was sent up by Convocation, was passed at
the end of January, 1549 ; and, on the following Whit-
Sunday, it was taken into general use. Thus were super-
seded those various Uses which had hitherto prevailed in
our Church, and one form of worship was adopted
throughout the land. To divines like Parker, whose
minds had been uncontaminated by foreign controversies,
or by contact with what Parker calls " Germanical
natures," this book was entirely satisfactory ; the ancient
religious formularies were blended into one, unscriptural
superstitions were tacitly abolished, medieval observances
were superseded by primitive practice, and all was trans-
lated into a language " understanded of the people." It
seemed that a work of wonder had been accomplished,
and that all that was required was to reform the other
offices of the Church in deference to the primitive and
scriptural principles hitherto observed. Consequently, in
the same year, a commission was issued to six prelates and
six divines, for the reformation, revision, and translation
of the Ordinal, in which it was proclaimed, that to all men
diligently reading the Holy Scripture and ancient authors,
it was evident that, from the Apostles' time, there had
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 87
been these orders of ministers in Christ's Church — chap.
bishops, priests, and deacons : bishops, with the power of
handing on the apostolical succession ; priests, with the ^f^er!
power of consecrating the eucharist ; deacons, with the 1559-75.
honourable office of assisting the other two orders ; so
careful were our early reformers to carry on the apos-
tolical succession, or, in other words, to show that their
object was, not to establish a new sect, but to reform
their ancient Church.
Unfortunately for the Church and the realm, " Ger-
manical principles," together with Zwinglianism, were
found to be more prevalent in England among the
learned few, than was expected or desired. Men at the
head of affairs, like Somerset and Cranmer, had formed
no definite principles of their own, and were easily moved
by every wind of strange doctrine. Not content with the
verdict of learned Englishmen, they invited to England
foreign teachers, who, although they did not agree among
themselves, were accustomed to find fault with every-
thing, and they too soon taught our people to join them
in assailing the Book of Common Prayer.* It was contrary
to the policy of some of the leading statesmen to permit
the reformation to be conducted quietly and peaceably.
It was by the quarrels of churchmen that they hoped to
obtain possession of the property of the Church, and, in a
desire to have a scramble, the lower orders united with
them. Hence, in 1552, the Prayer Book was revised, Revision
and a new Act of Uniformity was passed. Prayer
A rapid sketch has thus been given of the reforms J^."
which took place during the short reign of Edward VI.,
because in all of them Parker acquiesced ; and though
he preferred the first Prayer Book to the second, with the
second, with some slight alterations, he was quite ready
• See Vol. VII. p. 25.
inactivity.
88 LIVES OF THE
chap, to concur. We cannot advert to the fact without
— r-^— ' pressing our surprise, that, in these stirring times, Parker
Parker* took no part in the conduct of public affairs. Although
1559-75. taking an active part in what related to his college and
Parkers university, and although he was consulted very frequently
by his superiors, he lived in comparative retirement. It
was not from want of solicitation on the part of those
engaged in state affairs, who were aware of his sagacity,
learning, and discretion. Within a short time after the
king's accession, Parker was summoned by the Council to
preach at Paul's Cross. He evidently did this willingly ;
but when the archbishop sounded him, to know whether,
if invited to preach before the king, he would be willing
to attend, to the primate's letter he returned no answer.
He thought that it was only a compliment, and that he
might treat it as such ; and it was not till a command
from the king himself, through the Bishop of Westminster,
Dr. Thirlby, was addressed to him, that he preached at
court ; the result of which was, as he expected and feared,
that he was made one of the royal chaplains. By Bishop
Eidley he was earnestly entreated to preach at Paul's
Cross. The bishop informed him of the difficulty he
experienced in finding suitable preachers. "I may have,"
he said, " if I would call without any choice [preachers]
enow ; but in some, alas ! I desire more learning, in some
a better judgement, in some more virtue and godly con-
versation, in some more soberness and discretion. And
he in whom all these do concur shall not do well to refuse
(in my judgement) to serve God in that place." He
would not bring the Council to command the service,
but he would rather proffer a request.* Notwithstanding
this appeal, Parker shrank from the duty, and earnestly
desired to be excused. It was part of his nature in all
* Corresp. p. 45.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 89
things to do his best, and, without vanity, he might fairly chap.
suppose that, if he did his best, he would be again em- — ^L- *
ployed, and brought into that public life which he desired ^arkerT
to avoid. However strong was his desire for retirement, 1559-75.
his merits were so well known, that, on the 13th of De-
cember, he received a document, signed by the leading
members of the Privy Council, in which it is stated :
"Whereas the king's majesty hath willed us to send for
you, to confer with you and take your opinion in certain
things touching his highness' service : these are to pray
you, upon the sight hereof, to put yourself in a readiness
to make your repair hither unto us as soon as ye con-
veniently may for the purpose aforesaid. " *
For what purpose the Council desired Dr. Parker's
opinion is not apparent ; but there is another letter
extant, written by Bishop Latimer, in which he re-
monstrates with Dr. Parker for refusing to take an active
part in things pertaining to Church and State. What
were Parker's real reasons, if any, beyond the apparent
ones, existing in his mind, it is useless to conjecture. He
was unmoved by these flattering solicitations, and re-
mained at Cambridge, paying visits occasionally to Lin-
coln and to Norwich. He did not shrink from con-
troversy when it was forced upon him, though he never
sought it.
When Bishop Eidley and others came to Cambridge,
and held a discussion on the subject of transubstantiation,
Parker felt it his duty, as a leading member of the univer-
sity, to take part in the discussion. The fact is, that al-
though he was a reformer, he was not by any means an
enthusiastic Protestant ; and, though he was not opposed to
the government of Edward, he was by no means inclined
to support a ministry which had robbed him of his pro-
* Corresp. p. 46.
90 LIVES OF Tin:
chap, perty. For this surmise we have some authority, for
> — ,— - Parker wrote and published a powerful tract, which is
JVIatlhcw .
Parker, be found in Strype's Collectanea, and is described by him
1 oo9-75. as " a learned discourse of Dr. Parker against the alienation
of the revenues of the Church." He mentions that, to the
avarice of the great nobles, Martin Bucer was accustomed
to trace the calamities to which Germany was at this
time exposed, and by which that country, guilty of what
he called the sacrilegium et diminutionem patrimonii cru-
cijixi, had called down the divine wrath. One thing is
certain, that among the insurgents in Norfolk under Kett,
Parker was at first decidedly popular.
It is further to be remarked, that through his preaching,
and the preaching of his associates of Stoke College, this
was the only place in which the Eeformation was received
by the common people without opposition, and, we may
even say, with some measure of favour. The arbitrary
acts of the government, which, under the pretext of re-
formation, set law and the rights of property at defiance,
brought the Eeformation itself into peril so early as the
year 1549, and thus unintentionally prepared the way for
the terrible reaction of the following reign. The opposition
to the Eeformation was, at first, nearly confined to the
Eegulars, who had been turned out of church and home ;
but when the Seculars became alarmed, under the notion
that what was done with respect to the monasteries was
only paving the way to an attack upon all ecclesiastical
property, the zeal began to slumber, which, alarmed under
Mary, was only kindled into enthusiasm in the reign of
Elizabeth. But, admitting this, there were other circum-
stances over which the government could exercise no
control, but which caused a strong feeling of discontent.
Feudal Superficial readers and writers are so accustomed to
ej-Btem. Qwe}} Up0n the faults of the feudal system, and the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 91
miseries which attended its decadence, that they forget chap.
that no system whatever could for a long time prevail, L ...
unless it possessed some counterbalancing advantages. p^T
There was, under the feudal system, a reciprocity of 1559-75.
benefits : service rendered was repaid by protection ; rights
were claimed and admitted on both sides, and an appeal
was made, not merely to what was sordid and base in
human nature, but also to the affections on either side.
Self-love, if not selfishness, conduced to this, when the
power of the landed proprietor depended mainly on the
forces he could bring into the field in time of war ; when
the nobleman was applauded by the sovereign for the
gallant appearance of his well-appointed retainers ; when
the sons of the labourers, if really little better than serfs of
the soil, were well fed and well cared for ; when, in time
of peace, old and young felt that they possessed certain
rights in the soil, for which they were ready to fight;
when, in the field sports, master and man met together
on an equality; when, on festive occasions, the inha-
bitants of the cottages felt that they had a position in
the lordly castle, even when visited by royalty ; goodwill
was found generally to prevail ; and the landed proprietor,
who disregarded the welfare of the people, was accounted
as a man not only hard of heart, but neglectful of his own
interest. Fully admitting that as the system was dying
out, the abuses became more oppressive and apparent, it
cannot be denied that, under such a system, much of
physical happiness prevailed. Admitting, also, that the
system by which it has been superseded, is more con-
ducive to the national welfare, by rendering each man
more independent, we cannot shut our eyes to the fact
that, in the transition from one system to another, there
could not fail to be grounds of discontent. These grounds
of discontent were, in some measure, substantial ; but the
92 LIVES OP TIIK
chap, discontent became more alarming, when the appeal wj
— J-l^ made also to the imagination, and the demagogue coulc
Parker* suggest that an attempt was made to rob the poor of their
1559-75. rights.
A great middle class had risen in the country ; thai
middle class which is the strength and pride of England,
which has limited the power of the crown, and controlle(
the pretensions of the aristocracy, into which all classes
can obtain admission. It was a revolution, silent and
progressive, as revolutions in England have generally been,
but not free from that attendant suffering from which no
revolution can be entirely exempt. The first step was
taken when land was brought into the market. The
moneyed men in the cities became large purchasers. The
landed aristocracy has always in England taken pre-
cedence of the commercial aristocracy ; and the merchant
princes desire the estates of the ancient nobility, without^
in the first instance, recognizing the responsibility of
property, in the recognition of which the safety of England
at this time mainly depends. The nobleman, when he
had squandered the price of his land in the dissipations
of the court and the metropolis, viewed with no friendly
feeling the stranger revelling in those ancestral halls, from
which, through his vices, he had become self-expatriated.
Throughout the disturbances of this period, complaint
was frequently made by the government, that, from the
ranks of the aristocracy, insurgents were sure to find
leaders, whom, from old associations, they delighted to
follow and to serve. The commons themselves felt
bitterly the change of masters. In place of the old here-
ditary chief, they found a landlord in their parish, who,
instead of identifying his interests with those of his tenants
and neighbours, thought only of obtaining the maximui
of work for the minimum of pay. They purchased
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 93
land as an investment of their money, and, having made chap.
a bargain, they felt it due to themselves to make the
best of it. The new proprietors were distinguished from pLkeT
the old barons by the title of gentlemen, and " Down with 1559-75.
the gentlemen ! " was the cry from one end of England Disturb-
to the other. Many of them became purchasers of the 1549.
abbey lands and of church property, and let them at rack
rents. Hundreds of farmers with their families were
driven from holdings, the tenure of which their ancestors,
though paying a rent, had regarded as indisputably secure.
Many held estates by easy leases, in the shape of fines, to
be paid to the church or monasteries, perfectly certain
that, when times were hard, there would be a mitigation
in their payment. The families of franklins had most of
them certain rights in the monasteries themselves. Here,
if their children were ambitious to become ministers of
state or learned divines, they could claim, on the ground
of some half-forgotten benefaction, a gratuitous educa-
tion. Here, for the aged and infirm, corrodies might
be demanded or easily procured from the charity of the
lords, who, in founding a monastery, had reserved therein
certain rights for their family and their tenants. Here
the sick would find the best advice, and a labourer might
live to see a son of his house riding before him in prelatic
pomp. The reformers could tell how these advantages,
for such at one time they were, had been perverted and
abused ; they could dwell on the iniquities permitted to
exist unrebuked in some monasteries ; they could point
out how funds, provided for the studious and ascetic, had
tendered to the fostering of luxury, carnality, and pride ;
but still, in all cases except the very worst, the people
could look back with pleasure to what had been, and
demand with indignation, What have you given us in
return? Of the farmer and the poor there was now no
94 LIVES OF THE
chap, thought. The gentlemen who had bought the land found
— r^— - it profitable to become graziers, whose interest it was to
Parker, diminish the number of able-bodied men on their several
1 559-75. estates. Those wide-spread commons, which, from the
earliest English times, long before the Conquest, had been
regarded as the poor man's estate, were now inclosed ;
and, by that inclosure, the poor man regarded himself as
robbed of his rights. A robbery and a wrong it was,
more infamous than that of the monasteries. But it was
a mere question of might against right, without an attempt
to show that the lower orders were more depraved than
the sybarites of the court, who, in becoming courtiers,
had ceased to be princes of the land. They became
minions of the prince, instead of fathers of the people ;
and who shall blame an oppressed people, when they
took up arms to assert their rights, we might almost ;,say,
to defend their lives ?
To the discontented agriculturists the ousted monks
were soon found to attach themselves. Thousands of these
there were, who, at one time enjoying a competence, if
not living in luxury, were now reduced to penury and
wrant, complaining loudly that the pensions promised to
them were irregularly paid, even if paid at all. To
these were added the usual number of vagabonds who,
having nothing to lose, are always ready for a scramble.
The Anabaptists, the successors of the Lollards, were still
propagating what we should now call Socialistic prin-
ciples ; and these, together with discharged soldiers, who
claimed as a debt due to them the wages which the
government was unable, if not unwilling, to pay, were
always ready to swell a mob. All these classes were in-
dignant, and, in their indignation, the mass of the people
sympathized, when they found that Somerset had engaged
foreign troops against the subjects of the King of England.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 95
rorkshire was again prepared for a rising ; Northampton- chap.
shire and the midland counties were in a state of in- » — r— -
subordination. But the government was most alarmed at Parker.
the state of affairs in Cornwall and Devonshire : there, 1559-75.
20,000 strong, the insurgents for a long time held out
against the most experienced generals of the royal army.
The failure of the insurrection is to be attributed, as is
so frequently the case, to the absence of some clear defi-
nite object to be attained. If the insurgents had deter-
mined to depose the youth upon the throne as too young
to reign, causing him to be superseded by his sister, or
if any clearly denned object had been put before them,
the probability is that a revolution would have been
accomplished. The insurrection in Cornwall and Devon
had become formidable, because there was an approxima-
tion to this great principle. Through the influence of the
monks, the watchword was, "Down with the Beforma-
tion!" If the attempt had been to establish a new sect
instead of reforming the old Church, the insurrection
might not have been unsuccessful. The answer made to
the demands of the insurgents was, that abuses only had
been removed, and that the Church remained in its cor-
porate capacity, as it had been from the beginning. The
consequence was, that the insurgents were compelled to
state their grievances in detail ; and, even when it was
admitted that, on some points, a grievance might be esta-
blished, it did not follow that the Eeformation in toto was
to be condemned. It was the more easy to put down
the insurrections, to which reference has now been made,
because, in the counsels of those insurgents, the monastic
element prevailed. The majority of those then under arms
were willing to give a religious colouring to the move-
ment ; but cared little for the enforcement of the demand.
Their object was apparently definite, but it was so far
surreetion.
90 LIVES OF THE
chap, from being really such, that they easily yielded to the
— , '— cajolery of the government.
Parker. I nave dwelt upon this topic in order to account in
1559-75. some measure for the different result of the rising in
Norfolk. Among the followers of Kett there was no
Kett's in- absence of religious sentiment or principle ; but religion
was not then used as the watchword of faction. Although
they were not the partizans of Protestantism, they had
generally acquiesced in the proceedings of the Eefor-
mation. Although the insurrectionary movements were
simultaneous in the different parts of the country, the
insurgents did not act in concert, and Norfolk and Suffolk
had. little sympathy with the shires. The object of Kett
and his followers was patriotic. They desired to uphold
the rights of the lower orders, and to prevent the gentle-
men, who had purchased the county estates, from becom-
ing despotic. The citizens of Norwich made no secret of
their sympathy with the insurgents, so far as a hatred of
the new " gentlemen " was concerned ; and many of the
landed proprietors, better known from the antiquity of
their families than from the number of their acres, were
prepared to deal very gently with the outraged poor.
Among the followers of Kett, few, if any, of the regular
clergy were to be found, and the Anabaptists were scarcely
known. The tradesmen of Norwich, as may be instanced
in the Parker family, were content, after having realized
a competence, to pass the remainder of their days in the
society of their old friends, and in the discharge of muni-
cipal functions. They were contemned by the wealthier
traders, who, coming from a distance, had purchased the
old estates of the county families without sharing in
that county feeling which, in Norfolk and Suffolk, was
especially strong. They shared the indignant feelings of
the people when the latter were robbed of their rights, or
i
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 97
they believed to be such ; when the commons were chap.
• . VJI
inclosed ; when the public pastures were converted into « — ^— -
private closes ; when the forests were turned into fields ; Parked
when the day-labourer was turned from his home, and 1559-75.
had to seek wages elsewhere ; when the arable land, on
which many had laboured, was turned into the solitary
sheep-walk. " Down with the hedges ! Fill the ditches !
Level the enclosures ! " This was the general cry. Here
something definite was proposed : the people were ready
to act ; the neutrals looked on, and, though urged by the
government, were not prepared for energetic measures.
At a great annual festival — a " play," as it is called by
Holinshed and Hay ward — held on the 6 th of July, at
Wymondham, about six miles from Norwich, the wTar-
cries just described were distinctly heard. A mob had
assembled. At the head appeared Eobert Kett, or
Knight,* a man of importance in the neighbourhood, a
tanner by trade. He was a man of superior intelligence
and firmness, one of those who are born to command.
The assemblage was addressed by him ; the mob was
organized and drilled, and soon assumed the appearance
of an army, such as armies then were. The people were
irregularly armed, each having seized the weapons which
came to hand from gentlemen's houses in the neighbour-
hood. Their arms, sometimes taken from foes, and
sometimes borrowed from friends, consisted of swords,
lances, bows, arrows, and even guns. Although defiant
of the laws of the land, they could not be regarded as
altogether lawless, for a code of laws was extemporized
by Kett, and resolutely enforced. Life was secure ; and,
although depredation was needful for the support of so
* The family of Kett is of great antiquity in Norfolk : the name was
originally spelt Cat, Chat, Kett, or Knight. See Gurney's " Record of
of the House of Gournay."
VOL. IX. II
UVBS OF Till:
CHAP, large a multitude, yet private theft was severely punished.
L- Robert KVtt Boon found himself at the head of an army
,:;:v of 10,000 men, if reliance may be placed on the figure
1659-7.). given by the chroniclers. Huts were erected. A camp
was regularly formed. A commissariat was established ;
ami with sheep, cows, and poultry the market was stored
Luxuries even were not wanting, for mention is made o
-wans ; and swans, we may presume, were no ordinary
article of food; unless, as is probable, the swans were
in point of fact, only geese under another name. In th
middle of a common called Mousehold Hill stood a)
oak ; it was called by the people the Oak of Eeformation
Here Eobert Kett administered justice, and he was th
more particular in treating with impartiality and strict
ness all who were summoned to his presence, because o
the importance of keeping on good terms with the in
habitants of Norwich. The good citizens, at the risk o
giving offence to the government, permitted free ingres
and egress to and from their town to all parties. Th
mayor of Norwich and some of the leading magistrate
were invited to attend — and did attend — to see justic
done, when a trial of more than ordinary importance too
place at the Oak of Eeformation. In a proclamatio
issued by Kett, that remarkable man declared, that th
people under his command were neither insurgents no
rebels ; they were the king's loyal subjects and deputie
Oppressed by the self-constituted " gentlemen," they wer
in arms, not against the king, but to protect themselve
from robbery and wrong. The people, he complainec
were now compelled, like beasts of burden, to live o
onions and peas, while whole rivers of wealth flowed in
the coffers of the landlord. The wealthy and the money
men had obtained such power in the state that the
ceased to bear their fair proportion of the public burden
AECHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 99
while the poor were gnawed to the very bones. More of chap.
these commonplaces — to which we marvel that a man - vn'
ofKett's power could condescend — were uttered on the pS?
occasion, the real oppression and wrong being in such 1559-75
cases too often lost sight of in the manifest exaggeration
of the orator. At this proclamation, however, I merely
glance, to show the contrast which it exhibits when com-
pared with similar documents proceeding from the
" shires." There was no pretext of religion ; the insur-
gents of Norfolk contented themselves with the statement
of real, not imaginary, grievances ; and yet to the offices
of religion more attention was paid in the camp of
Eobert Kett than has been sometimes found in better
disciplined armies. Chaplains of the Eeformed Church of
England were regularly appointed ; and by a chaplain-
general, the Eev. Dr. Conyers, vicar of St. Martin's,
Norwich, church discipline was maintained. The Oak of
Eeformation, with outspread branches, served for the
cathedral as well as for the hall of justice to " the king's
loyal subjects and deputies." Here every morning and
evening matins and evensong were duly sung or said,
according to the reformed ritual as presented in the
Book of Common Prayer. A special prayer was offered
by Kett's direction, for the prosperous speed of their
enterprise.
Dr. Parker was at this time staying with his friends at
Norwich. He took a deep interest in what was passing
before his eyes ; and his conduct on the occasion was
characteristic, exhibiting his moral courage, which was
often rendered unavailable by the timidity of his cha-
racter. Daily service was performed in the churches of
Norwich, and was attended by many from the camp of
the insurgents. Dr. Parker was often seen in the pulpits
of the city churches, warning the citizens, who many
h2
100 LIVES OF THE
OHAP. of them sympathized with the insurgents, against
_VIYL ... consequences of a breach of the peace. On one occasion,
Jtato attended by his brother Thomas and other friends, he
1659-75. determined to proceed to Kett's camp, where, while not
denying their grievances, he might exhort them to submit
their complaints to the proper legal authorities. On
arriving at the Oak of Eeformation, he found Kett and
his counsellors in communication with Thomas Codcl,
mayor of Norwich, a man who was justly respected for
his courage, firmness, and discretion. Kett had pressed
him to resign his office of mayor, and to place the keys
of the city in Kett's own hands. Codd boldly replied,
that he would die first. The people around were in
great excitement, clamouring for the mayor's resigna-
tion. The weather was exceedingly hot, and many of
the people were under the influence of drink. Parker,
therefore, thought it useless to address them, and he re-
turned to the city. In the watches of the night, being
conscience-stricken, he determined to return to the post
of duty; and in the morning, accompanied by his brother,
he revisited the camp. Very different was now the state
of affairs. The people were on their knees around the
oak, responding to the English Litany, which their chap-
lain, Thomas Conyers, was saying or singing. The Litany
finished, Dr. Parker went up to that part of the oak which
served for a pulpit or a rostrum. Immediately there
was silence throughout the multitude, and he commenced
his sermon. Alluding indirectly to the excesses he had
witnessed on the preceding day, he exhorted them to
temperance and sobriety, and entreated them to regard
as God's gift, the . provisions with which the camp was
stored. He implored them to live at peace one with
another ; in dealing with their enemies, to guard against
the indulgence of any angry and revengeful passions
ivyixu ,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
101
and, with respect to their prisoners, neither to load
them with chains, nor to shed their blood. He called
upon them, from regard to the common good, to desist
from their present purpose. He urged them to place
confidence in any heralds or messengers who might be
sent to them by the king ; and to give to the king, young
as he was, the honour due to the royal office ; then they
might expect that, when he came to riper years, inherit-
ing the valour and prowess of his ancestors, he would
restore their rights and defend their liberties.
The preacher was heard with much attention, for he
expressed himself with earnestness ; and the doctor was
described as "a most charming preacher." The error
committed was, that there was no definite proposition sub-
mitted to the meeting ; instead of a discussion, therefore,
a pause ensued, of which those who preferred lawlessness
with plenty, to work and law, availed themselves. A
voice at the outskirts was heard, " How long shall we
bear with this hireling doctor ? He is hired by the gentry,
and he comes among us with words for which they have
paid him; they have bribed his tongue. For all his
prating, we will bridle their intolerable power ; we will
hold them bound, spite of their hearts, by the cords of our
law." The demagogue succeeded to a certain extent, for
a tumult ensued. Harsh and threatening words were
uttered, until at last they reached Parker's own ears.
Some of them are said to have cried out fiercely, " Since
he has spoken so finely, and sprinkled his speech with
such bitter words and sentences, the best thing to do
would be to pierce him with pikes and arrows, and so
make him come down." Parker was considerably alarmed ;
he thought the angry multitude intended to kill him on
the spot. He said that he felt their spears' points under
his feet. For these apprehensions, however, there was very
CHAP.
VII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
102 LIVES of tin:
chap, little occasion, for he afterwards discovered that by nearly
all the persons under the oak he was highly respected
Parked and esteemed, and they were glad that he had ventured
1559-75. into the camp. They had hoped that, influenced by his
words, the people would have conducted themselves with
greater decorum ; and that for their prisoners they would
have shown more consideration. A wiser man on this
occasion was their chaplain, Thomas Conyers. Disregard-
ing the tumult, he directed the choristers, who had come
with him from his church of St. Martin's in the city, to
sing the Te Deuni in English. The people were charmed
by the music. Many of them joined in the chorus, and
the disturbance was by degrees appeased. Parker availed
himself of the interval, descended from the tree, and, with
his brother, departed from the camp. They were pur-
sued by some of the discontented insurgents, and were
overtaken by them before they reached the Pockthorpe
gate. Thinking to convict Parker of an illegal act, they
began to question him about his licence as a preacher.
Parker having managed to make his escape, left his brother
behind him to show that, both from the civil and eccle-
siastical authorities, he held a licence.
Parker again took courage, and the next day appeared
in St. Clement's church. In the church he was aware
that many of the insurgents had assembled with their
abettors in the city ; and he took occasion, from one of
the lessons, to censure the tumult of which he had lately
been a witness. No disturbance ensued. The congre-
gation dispersed ; but certain of the insurgents waiting at
the door, followed him to his house. Here they de-
clared that they knew him to be in possession of three or
four good horses — the mode of travelling at that time
being on horseback — and they desired him to have them
ready, since they were determined, immediately after
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 103
linner, to seize them for the service of the king, and to chap.
irry them to the camp. Parker received the demand - — ^— >
in silence ; but he secretly sent for a farrier, and to him parkerT
he gave directions that, from certain of the horses, the 1559-75.
shoes should be taken off, that their hoofs should be pared
to the quick, and that all should be rubbed with nerve-
oil, to give the appearance of their having been lamed by
too much travel and work. The insurgents being de-
ceived, did not molest the grooms as they led the horses
to pasture ; and Parker soon after left the city for the
purpose apparently of taking a walk. At Cringleford
Bridge, about two miles from Norwich, he met his
horses, mounted, and rode to Cambridge.*
Parker's conduct on this occasion made such an im-
pression upon the minds of the leading members of the
government, as to cause them to make another proposal
to him, that he should engage in public affairs ; but he
still refused to go to the metropolis. He declared himself
to be not a man of action, and that he desired to remain
at Cambridge.
Of Parker's life at Cambridge we have already spoken.
He stayed there long enough to form friendships with
men such as Cecil and Bacon, Smith and Cheke, together
with others who, his juniors in age, may have resorted
to him at first as a tutor, but were afterwards admitted
to his intimacy.
What were the circumstances of Parker's life during Reign of
the reign of Queen Mary, is a question which can only be 1553L58.
answered by a reference to the historical facts and docu-
ments within our reach, or open to our inspection. We
* For an account of Rett's insurrection, see Bloomfield's History of
Norfolk, but more particularly " Rett's Rebellion in Norfolk," by the
Rev. Frederick William Russell, M.A. This is an historical sketch of
considerable value.
104 LIVES OF THE
chap, must dismiss from our minds, not only the misstatement^ i >('
VII. . c
« r-:— - Foxe and Burnet, but sometimes even the conjectures of
Parker. Strype. The Protestant hagiologists are too apt to draw
1559-75. upon their imaginations, and to state as having actually
taken place what they, from a party view of the case,
suppose to be probable. By such writers we are informed,
that Parker underwent the most cruel privations, and a
persecution which obliged him to fly from place to place.
By Parker's own account, he lived during Mary's reign
in great retirement in the house of one of his friends.
He led, according to his own statement, a quiet life with-
out any men's aid or succour. Nevertheless he assures
us that he was so well contented with his lot, that in that
pleasant rest and leisure for his studies, he would never,
in respect of himself, have desired any other kind of life,
the extreme fear of danger only excepted. His wife he
would not be divorced from, or put her away, all this
evil time, as he might have done had he desired it, and
as he was rigorously required to do.
Of his preferments, he was, 'of course, as a married
clergyman, deprived ; but even in this he received some
consideration from the authorities, being permitted, on
resigning his headship of Corpus Christi College,* to
Deprived name his successor. This was done in December, 1553.
ferments6" In April, 1554, he tells us that he was deprived of his
Dec. 1553. prebend in the church of Ely and of his rectory of Land-
1554/ beach ; but here again he was permitted to nominate
his successor — William Whalley, a canon of Lincoln.
May 21, Qn faQ 21st of May, 1554, Parker says, "I was despoiled
of my deanery of Lincoln, as also, on the same day, of
my prebend of Corringham, to which Mr. George Pierpoint
was presented by virtue of an advowson of the same
granted unto me by the Bishop of Lincoln, J. Turner.
* Quoted from the College MS. by Strype, i. 63.
AECHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 105
'he deanery was conferred upon Francis Malet, D.D., by chap.
>ueen Mary. After this," says Parker, " I lived as a
Matthew
private individual, so happy before God in my conscience, p!^k
and so far from being either ashamed or dejected, that 1559-75.
the delightful literary leisure to which" the providence
of God called me, yielded me much greater and more
solid enjoyments than my former busy and dangerous
kind of life ever afforded me. What shall befal me
hereafter I know not ; but to God, who cares for all men,
and who will one day reveal the secrets of all hearts, I
commit myself wholly, and my good and virtuous wife
with my two very dear children. And I beseech the
same most merciful and almighty God that, for the time
to come, we may so bear the reproach of Christ with
unbroken courage, as ever to remember here we have
no abiding city, but may seek one to come, by the grace
and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom with the
Father and the Holy Ghost be all honour and dominion
for ever and ever, Amen." This was written on the 26th
of October, 1554, and recurring to what he then said on Oct. 26
. 1554.
the 6th of August, 1557, " I persevere," he remarks, "in
the same constancy, supported by the grace and goodness
of my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ ; by whose inspi-
ration I have completed a metrical version of the Psalter
into the vulgar tongue, and I have written a Defence of
the Marriage of Priests against Thomas Martin." In Feb- Feb. 1555.
ruary, 1555, he remarks, " Hitherto so happy before God
and content with my own lot have I lived, as neither to
envy my superiors nor despise my inferiors ; directing
all my efforts to this end — to serve God in a pure
conscience, and to be neither despised by those above me,
nor feared by those beneath me." Again, on the 14th of
October, 1556, " I still live happy, contented with my lot, Oct. 1556.
trusting in the testimony of my conscience in the Lord,
10G
LIVES OF THE
CHAP
VII
relying on his word, waiting for the redemption of my
- — ._- body, through Christ my Saviour."
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
English
reformers.
While denouncing the persecutions which took place at
one period of Mary's reign, the unprejudiced reader will
probably think that much exaggeration has on this sub-
ject prevailed. During the reign of Edward VI. many
foreign reformers were invited to England, and many
Englishmen, some of them great and good men, were in-
duced to adopt their principles. The great objects of the
foreigners were to demolish the Church and to establish
a Protestant sect. These were the persons that Mary's
government could not tolerate ; but, as we have shown in
the life of Cranmer, the object of her government, at
the commencement of her reign, was to induce these
parties to quit the country, and to find their home with
the foreign reformers. Here we discover the germ of
ultra-Protestantism, Puritanism, and Dissent.
There were, at the same time, in England a very dif-
ferent class of reformers, men who refused to separate
from the Catholic Church, but were determined, as oppor-
tunity should offer, to reform that Church, if not through-
out the world, at least in that portion of it in which they
were themselves concerned. Such men were Cecil, Bacon,
Lord Paget, Eoger Ascham, and many others, including
Queen Elizabeth herself. They were called Protestants,
simply because they protested against the medieval cor-
ruptions of the Church and the usurpations of the Pope ;
in other words, against modern Eomanism. They enter-
tained respect for the labours of the foreign reformers,
but evinced no sympathy in their work. By Lutherans
and by Calvinists, equally, they were distrusted, some-
times courted, but more frequently reviled. f
Biographical Memorandums.
f See Zurich Letters, imssim.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 107
These men, and Matthew Parker was among them, had chap,
lo inclination to fly the country ; and, although their « — -,— *
situation in England was precarious and uncomfortable, faX&t!
there was evidently no wish on the part of Mary's govern- 1559-75.
ment to molest them so long as they kept the peace.
This must be evident to every impartial reader who is
acquainted with the literature of the period. These men
attended the services of the Church with sufficient regu-
larity, although they were prepared, when called to
account, to maintain the principles of the Eeformation.
It is impossible to deny the fact that Queen Elizabeth,
Cecil, Bacon, Paget, and most probably Parker, would
occasionally be present at the celebration of mass ; * —
although, as we find in the reign of Elizabeth, papists
received, for a pecuniary compensation, a dispensation
from the penalties to which all were subjected by law
who did not attend the public service of the Church : so
it may have been in the reign of Queen Mary. The diffi-
culty to be encountered by persons in Parker's situation
was this, that any informer might hale any one of these
* Of this number was also Dr. Wright, Archdeacon and Vice-
chancellor of Oxford. Pie was an English Reformer, not a foreign
Protestant. He was not only tolerated, but he was employed under Mary.
He was known to be a reformer, but one who willingly waited to know
what kind of reform Pole would offer. He courageously defended the
Gospellers, and befriended Jewel.
Among the number of those English Eeformers who conformed in the
reign of Mary, we may mention an eminent divine, called the Apostle
of the North, Bernard Gilpin. He remained in legal possession of the
lucrative benefice of Houghton le Spring during the whole of Mary's
reign, not without hazard, but in the unrestrained performance of his
pastoral duties. He had a powerful protector in his relation and friend
Dr. Tunstall, Bishop of Durham ; but the bishop was quite aware that
Gilpin protested against the dogma of transubstantiation ; and the
bishop himself freely censured Pope Innocent III. for dictating a belief
in it to be essential to salvation.
108 LIVES OF THE
chap, occasional conformists before the ecclesiastical judge.
VII.
When thus forced upon their trial, the ecclesiastical judge
Parker* might compel the accused to criminate himself, by com-
1559-75. manding him to exhibit a confession of faith, or to de-
clare his acceptance of the dogma of transubstantiation.
It is to the uncertainty and constant anxiety arising from
this circumstance, that Parker alludes as the single draw-
back to the happiness he enjoyed during his sequestration
in Mary's reign. Of the annoyances to which men were
sometimes subjected by the petifogging employes of the
ecclesiastical courts, we have had occasion to speak before
at some length. It was the first grievance that gave an
impulse to the reformation movement in England. In
the reign of Henry VIII., the powers of the ecclesiastical
court were curtailed ; but it is certain that some of the
abuses still remained ; and, to this circumstance, we may
probably attribute much of the persecution which dis-
graced a portion of Mary's reign. Men who had no
interest to protect them at court were accused, provoked,
and having exasperated their judges by the manner in
which they honestly defended their opinions, were cruelly
condemned.
The more distinguished among the laymen were not
only protected, but were actually employed by Mary's
government. In the life of Pole we have seen how the
deputation, sent to invite him to England, consisted of
men who, like Parker, while regarding themselves as
Catholics, did not conceal their inclination to Protestantism,
or their desire to effect a reform in the Church. The
difference in point of principle between them and the
exiles was, that while these desired a reform of the Church,
the others meant, by a reformation, the changes instituted
by Luther, or Zwingle, or Calvin. For a reform, Pole,
as we have seen, was himself prepared.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 109
& to those readers who are not well acquainted with chap.
the literature of the period, but depend upon the asser-
tions of Foxe and Burnet, what has just been advanced Par£?rT
will appear contradictory to their preconceived opinions, 1559-75.
I will refer, as confirmatory of the surmises now made
with respect to Parker's position, to the life and corre-
spondence of his friend, Eoger Ascham.*
Boger Ascham was well known to be a reformer. He R°gpr
i t i • /-n Ascham.
had been appointed, when m Germany, secretary to
Edward VI. On his return to England, on the death of
the king, he was surprised to find that, by the interven-
tion of Bishop Gardyner and Lord Paget, he was per-
mitted to retain his office at the court of Queen Mary,
with a salary of forty marks. Certain other perquisites
were conceded to him. Writing to Thorne from Greenwich,
in 1555, he informs his correspondent, " all that the former
kings, Henry and Edward, bestowed upon me, has been
restored and doubled. I have been made secretary for
the Latin tongue to the king and queen ; and I would
not change it, so help me Christ, for any other way of
life that could be offered me. Stephen, Bishop of Win-
chester, Lord High Chancellor of England, has patronized
me with the greatest kindness and favour, so that I can-
not easily determine whether Paget was more ready to
* See the whole works of Roger Ascham, now first collected and
revised, with a life of the author, by the Rev. Dr. Giles. I add the
following from Dr. Carwithen : " With a few exceptions their departure
was voluntary; for, by a prudent and inoffensive demeanour, many laics
were unmolested, even in the open profession of the reformed faith.
Ascham, whose opinions were not disguised, enjoyed, by the favour of
Gardyner, not only security, but an honourable station, because he was
contented to remain in his own country without disturbing its govern-
ment ; while Cheke, who thought to preserve his conscience by flight,
was seized in Flanders, compelled to a recantation, and died from the
pangs of remorse." Hist, of the Church of England, i. 488.
110 LIVES OF thi:
chap, recommend me, or Winchester to protect and exalt me.
— ^ — - There have not been wanting some who have endeavoured
Variur. to hinder the flow of his benevolence towards me on
1559-75. account of my religion ; but they have not succeeded.
I owe much, therefore, to the kindness of Winchester
(Bishop Gardyner),* and I willingly own it. Not only
I, but many others have felt his humane consideration."
Ascham is said to have been not only protected by the
officers of state, but to have been favoured and coun-
tenanced by the queen herself; and, in fact, remarks his
biographer, he seems to have been as much a favourite at
court, as if he had been the staunchest of papists. With
Cardinal Pole, Ascham was a great favourite, and, by the
cardinal, Ascham was employed to translate into Latin
a speech made by him before the English Parliament.
Grant, writing at a time when the transactions of Queen
Mary's reign must have been well remembered, mentions
that Ascham always made open profession of the reformed
religion ; at the same time, he admits that suspicions, and
charges of temporizing and compliance, had somewhat
sullied his reputation. I lay these facts before the reader,
and I leave it to him to reconcile them with statements
elsewhere made.
In the reign of Queen Mary, it is stated by Foxe, Strype,
and Burnet, that Parker underwent the most cruel pri-
vations, and a persecution which obliged him to fly from
* Gardyner was# evidently a man who resented opposition to his
will. To the courteous Ascham, he could be gracious; but to Sir
John Cheke and others, who opposed him in his despotic endeavours to
force a particular pronunciation of the Greek language on the Univer-
sity of Cambridge, he could be relentless. Cheke was subjected to
the usual process which was adopted against those who gave offence
to the government. He was compelled to a recantation. Being ac-
cused, he was, — in the refusal of the government to interpose, — without
a protector
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. Ill
place to place. It is further stated, that at one time in chap.
this reign, a " narrow search was made for him, which he, _^__^
having some notice of, fled in the night in great peril, and pf^JT
got a fall from his horse, so dangerously that he never 1559-75.
recovered it." The question arises, When did this accident Parkers
occur? We have already read of Parker's peace and
happiness during the years 1554, 1555, and 155G : he could
hardly have failed to mention the disturbance of that peace
and happiness if the search and flight had occurred in any
of these years. If the accident had happened during the
last months of Cardinal Pole's administration, we may be
sure that, instead of being concealed, the fact would have
been referred to by his friends, as giving him a claim to
consideration on the accession of Queen Elizabeth. In-
stead of this, the accident occurred under circumstances
of which Parker was evidently ashamed*. In a letter to
Sir Nicolas Bacon, in the year 1558-9, in which he urges
his reasons for declining the episcopate, he employs these
remarkable words : " To come to another consideration of
a further imperfection, which I would have dissembled to
you and others ; but it cannot be ; I must open it to you,
my asured good master and friend, in secresy. . . . In
one of my letters I made a little signification of it ; but,
peradventure, ye did not mark it." What the secret was,
he goes on to state in ambiguous terms : " Flying," he
says, " in a night, from such as sought for me to my
peril, I fell off my horse so dangerously that I shall
never recover it."* We have here* the fact that the
accident .did really occur : we have the further fact, that
it took place under circumstances of which Parker was
ashamed, or desired the concealment. The question is,
Was there an event in his life which, on the accession
of Queen Elizabeth, as well as during the reign of her
* Corresp. p. 58 ; Strype, i. 64.
112
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Proclama-
tion at
Cam-
bridge of
Queen
Jane.
July 15,
1553.
sister, it was politic to conceal ? To such an event we can
undoubtedly refer.
At the time of Edward the Sixth's death, Parker was
enjoying his otium cum dignitate at Cambridge. But the
news of the demise of the crown must have filled him with
anxiety, for every one knew that the accession of Mary
would impede the progress of the Eeformation. Parker,
as we have seen, never mingled in the politics of the day,
and he received with complacency, rather than with the
zeal of a partizan, the report that the late king, with the
advice of his privy council and the sanction of the Arch-
bishop of Canterbury, Dr. Cranmer, had set aside the
claims of the daughters of Henry VIIL, and had appointed
the Lady Jane to be his successor. News, at that time,
did not fly fast, and the provinces were greatly influenced
by what took place in the metropolis. The authorities
at Cambridge had not determined upon their course of
action. When the Duke of Northumberland, as the re-
presentative of the government, appeared at the city
gates, he required, in the name of the government, that
measures should be instantly adopted for the proclama-
tion of Queen Jane. To Dr. Parker, as to other leading
men in the university, the duke sent an invitation re-
questing them to sup with him on the evening of his
arrival, Saturday, the 15th of July. Dr. Parker accepted
the invitation, and met at supper Dr. Sandys, the vice-
chancellor, Dr. Bill, and the master of St. John's, Mr.
Lever. These were zealous supporters of Queen Jane.
Parker, by not opposing the proposed measures, was sup-
posed to have acquiesced in them. On the Sunday, the
vice-chancellor preached ; and there wras considerable
excitement among all classes of the people. Parker
watched the progress of events with his usual caution,
not to say timidity, and remained, as much as possible, in
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 113
retirement. He saw the duke on the 17 th marching to chap.
Bury, where he expected to receive reinforcements. For ^-Jl1'-^
reinforcements there was a necessity, as there was no parkliT
enthusiasm among his soldiers ; and there was, from some 1559-75.
cause or other, a reaction with the mob. His soldiers were
deserting, and he was himself disappointed and dispirited.
He returned to Cambridge on the 18th, and received in-
telligence on the 19th, that Mary had been proclaimed
in London as the undoubted queen of this realm.* On
the 20th, the Duke of Northumberland, demented by his
fears, proclaimed Queen Mary at the Market Cross in
Cambridge. Of the members of the university, some fled
in alarm from the city, and those who remained used
their influence to persuade the people, at first favourable
to Jane, to espouse the cause of Mary, in whose favour
a reaction had taken place. Dr. Sandys and Dr. Bill
were both of them insulted in the regent's house, and the
former was sent a prisoner to the Tower of London.
But where, all this time, was Dr. Parker ? We know
how easily he was alarmed, and for alarm there was now
just cause. After his attendance on the Duke of Northum-
berland at supper, his name is not mentioned. Although
he had not openly sent in his adhesion to the government
of Queen Jane, he certainly had not come forward as a
loyal subject of Queen Mary. If he had asserted the
rights of Mary when Northumberland arrived at Cam-
bridge, he would have had nothing to fear from the
mob. It was now only known that he had been present
at the Duke of Northumberland's supper ; and whether
he were silent on that occasion or not, by outsiders he
was regarded as a partizan of Jane. Against him, there-
fore, the angry passions of the populace were directed.
He fled, escaping with difficulty ; and if we may hazard
* Stow's Annals, p. 612.
VOL. IX. 1
114 . lives of Tin;
chap, a conjecture as to the time and circumstances of his fall
. r-L^ from his horse, when flying by night, in peril, and pur-
Parfc«r sued by his opponents, he fractured his leg, we may refer
1669-75. to the facts just stated ; and perhaps we shall not be far
wrong if we come to the conclusion, that it was at this
time that the accident occurred, the cause of which
Parker desired to keep secret.
It is most probable, that Parker's usual caution pre-
vented him from acquiescing openly in the claims of the
Lady Jane. At the same time, he had not declared
manfully in the cause of Queen Mary. The cause of
Mary was, in this case, identified with that of Elizabeth ;
hence we see that, in both reigns, there was ample reason
for circumspection and reticence.
Parker's We have now followed Matthew Parker through the
earlier portion of his career. We have seen the training
he providentially received for the great work to which
he was about to be called. It may not be inexpedient
here to pause, that we may take a view of his character,
as impartially given by two eminent writers, who, although
they differed in many of their opinions, were equally
capable of arriving at a conclusion, which is worthy of
the attention of all who, in considering a great man's
character, would weigh fairly his advantages and diffi-
culties, his merits and defects. Dr. Cardwell, in speakin
of Parker, describes him as " a man of learning, of mo-
deration, of system, and of piety, cautious in the for-
mation of his opinions, and firm in maintaining them ;
but he was retiring in his habits, slow in his apprehen-
sions, and disqualified for public speaking." He con
tinues to observe, " that, in his general habits of prudence
and moderation, there were two other points which
would be thought likely, at that critical period, to qualify
him for the exercise of Church authority. He had a
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 115
profound respect for the prerogative of the crown, and chap.
dreaded the Germanical natures, as he styled them, of < ^—
the English exiles."* Archdeacon Hardwick, a discri- parked
minating historian, describes Matthew Parker as one 1559-75.
" who, by nature and by education, by the ripeness of
his learning, the sobriety of his judgment, and the in-
corruptness of his private life, was eminently fitted for
the task of ruling in the Church of England, through a
stormy period of her history ; and, though he was seldom
able to reduce conflicting elements of thought and feeling
into active harmony, yet the vessel he was. called to pilot
has been saved almost entirely by his skill from breaking
on the rock of medieval superstitions, or else drifted far
away into the whirlpool of licentiousness and unbelief, f
.... He was intimately acquainted with the records of
the ancient Church, and uniformly based his vindication
of our own upon its cordial adherence to the primitive
faith, and to the practice of the purest ages. His great
skill in antiquity, to quote the language of Strype,
reached to ecclesiastical matters as well as historical ;
whereby he became acquainted with the ancient liturgies
and doctrines of the Christian Church in former times.
He utterly disliked, therefore, the public offices of the
present Eoman Church, because they ' varied so much
from the ancient.' On addressing 'the expulsed' bishops
in 1560, Parker himself wrote : ' Pray behold, and see
how we of the Church of England, reformed by our late
King Edward and his clergy, and now by her majesty and
* CardwelPs Common Prayer, p. 13.
j" " These times," Parker himself writes, " are troublesome. The
Church is sore assaulted, but not so much of open enemies, who can less
hurt, as of pretended favourers and false brethren, who,under the colour of
reformation, seek the ruin and subversion both of learning and religion."
Corresp. p. 434.
1 2
116 LIVES OF Tin:
chap, hers reviving the same, have but imitated and followed
s- — ^1— * the example of the ancient and worthy fathers.' * In his
Parker, last will Parker declared, * I profess that I do certainly
1559-75. believe and hold whatsoever the holy Catholic Church
believeth and receiveth in any articles whatsoever per-
taining to faith, hope, and charity,- in the whole sacred
Scripture.'" f
We have reason to bless the providence of God who,
in Queen Elizabeth and her primate, raised up for us, in
the most critical period of our Church's history, two
persons, who, in spite of their faults or defects, were
enabled to see with clearness through the surrounding
gloom, and to steer the ship into a port where the waters,
if not as calm and still as could have been wished, could
no longer be destructive.
Of the faults of Elizabeth we shall have often to speak ;
of his own defects, Parker shall speak for himself. Of
himself he gives the following characteristic account in a
private letter to Cecil : " I cannot be quiet till I have dis-
closed to you, as to one of my best willing friends, in
secresy, mine imperfection ; which grieveth me not so
much to utter in respect of my own rebuke, as it grieveth
me that I am not able to answer your friendly report of
me before time ; whereby, to my much grief of heart, I
pass forth my life in heaviness, being thus intruded, not-
withstanding my reluctation by oft letters to my friends,
to be in such room, which I cannot sustain agreeably to
the honour of the realm, if I should be so far tried. The
truth is, what with passing those hard years of Mary's
reign in obscurity, without all conference, or such man-
ner of study, as now might do me service, and what with
my natural vitiosity of overmuch shamefacedness, I am
* Corresp. p. 111. \ Hard wick on the Articles, p. 117.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 117
so abashed in myself, that I cannot raise up my heart and
stomach to utter in talk with other, which (as I may saye)
with my pen I can express indifferently, without great
difficulty; and again, I am so evil acquainted with strangers,
both in their manner of utterance of their speech, and
also in such foreign affairs, that I cannot win of myself
any ways to satisfy my fancy in such kind of entertain-
ments."*
I have made these quotations from my desire to afford
the reader some insight into Parker's character before
we enter upon his history as a public man. His faults
as well as his virtues, his weakness of temper as well as
the firmness of his principles, left an impress upon the
Church in the reformation of which he sustained so con-
spicuous a part. He informs us, in his diary, that a
"Defence of the Marriage of Priests," in answer to
Thomas Martin, occupied a portion of his time during
Queen Mary's reign. Of this work, however, he was
the editor, rather than the author. Who the author
was, I do not know. The work was probably revised by
Parker to a considerable extent, and at the end of the
treatise were added ten sheets of Parker's own composi-
tion. In this, which may be regarded as an appendix
to the work, Parker gives a concise history of the mar-
riage and celibacy of the clergy of the Church of
England, from the first introduction of Christianity to
his own time.
He employed himself also on a metrical version of the
Psalms. Of his version of Psalm xcii. I give the follow-
ing specimen : —
* Corresp. p. 199.
118
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
THE ARGUMENT.
Of Sabbath day, the solemn feast
Doth us excite by rest,
God's mighty works that we declare,
Love him for all the best.
Bonum est confiteri.
A joyful thing for man it is,
The Lord to celebrate ;
To thy good name, 0 (rod, so high !
Due lauds to modulate.
To preach and show thy gentleness
In early morning light ;
Thy truth of word to testify,
All whole by length of night.
Upon the psalm, the decachord,
Upon the pleasant lute,
On sounding, good, sweet instruments,
With shaumes, with harp, with flute.
For thou hast joyed my fearful heart,
0 Lord ! thy works to see ;
And I with praise will just rejoice
These handy-works of Thee.
How glorious, 0 blessed Lord !
Be these, the facts of thine ;
Thy thoughts be deep, thy counsels high,
Inscrutable, divine.
The true elect, and righteous man
Shall flourish like the palm ;
As cedar tree in Libanus,
Himself shall spread with balm.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
119
Deep planted they, in roots alway,
In (rod's sweet house to bide ;
Shall flourish like, in both the courts
Of this our Grod and guide.
In age most sure, they shall increase
Their fruit abundantly ;
Well liking they, and fat shall be,
To bear most fruitfully.
CTTAP.
VII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
That is to say, they out shall preach
This Lord's true faithfulness,
Who is my strength and mighty rock.
Who hates unrighteousness,
120
LIVES OF THE
CHAPTER VIII.
FROM THE DEATH OF MARY TO THE ELECTION OF PARKER.
CHAP.
VIII.
Position of Parker on the accession of Elizabeth. — The great parties in
the country. — The Reformers. — The Exiles. — Anabaptists and
Lollards. — Papists. — Condition of the clergy. — Character of Eliza-
beth.— Policy of the government. — Conduct of the pope.— Corona-
tion of Elizabeth. — Parker summoned to London. — Liturgical
Reforms. — Act of Uniformity. — Act of Supremacy. — Spoliation Act.
— Westminster Conference. — Diocesans summoned before the Privy
Council. — Reception of the Prayer Book. — The regular clergy advo-
cates of the papal supremacy. — The secular clergy in favour of the
Reformation. — Apostolical Succession. — Primacy offered to Parker.
— Refused. — Offered to Dr. Wotton. — Offered to Feckenham. —
Parker nominated primate. — His letter to the queen. — His election.
— Commissions for his confirmation. — Difference between valid and
legal consecration. — Number of officiating bishops to make a consecra-
tion legal. — Parker's confirmation. — Letter of the emperor to the queen.
— Petition of the Puritans. — Court of High Commission. — Prepara-
tions for Parker's consecration. — William Barlow chosen to preside. —
His history. — Co-operating bishops. — The consecration. — Appendix.
Matthew
Parker.
During the reign of Queen Mary, Parker had been
living on his capital, and, at the period of Elizabeth's
accession, his means were nearly exhausted. He had
1559-75. in hand money equivalent to about three hundred pounds
of the present currency. He was anxious, of course,
to be restored to the preferments he had forfeited; but it
was a time of considerable anxiety, for Parker was well
aware, that Elizabeth was obstinately opposed to the mar-
riage of the clergy, and he was resolute in his determi-
EUzabeth's nation not only not to be separated from his family, but,
Com-
mence-
ment of
AECHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 121
To crave fit disposition for my wife ; CHAP.
Due reference of place and exhibition,
With such accommodation, and besort, Matthew
Parker.
As levels with her breeding.* 1559-75.
He had now two sons,f whom he regarded with parental
pride and fondness. He thought fit, therefore, to " bide
his time" and to remain in retirement. He possessed
the means, with great economy, of supporting himself
for a year or two, until the affairs of the Church should
be settled. His brother, Thomas Parker, was a thriving
tradesman ; and he had a wise adviser in his half-brother,
Baker. The family was a united family ; and the only
cause of anxiety, which had lately existed in the chance
of his being haled by a common informer or by an enemy
before an ecclesiastical court, was now removed.
The position of the government was one of great
difficulty; and the difficulty of understanding that po-
sition becomes the greater, from the fact that many
historians, employing the modern nomenclature, divide
the country at this period into two great parties, with
their principles clearly defined. The truth is, as may be
gathered from what has been before stated, that there at
this time existed in the country several parties diametri-
cally opposed in fundamental principles, even when they
were prevailed upon, as was sometimes the case, to act
in concert.
There was the great body of English reformers, prac- English
tical men, whose object was, not to establish a school of
thought, but simply to correct abuses in the Church ; not
to introduce new doctrines, but to return from medieval
fables to primitive truth. We have already mentioned,
* Othello, act I., sc. 3.
f He had had four sons; of these two were taken from him soon
after their birth.
122 LIVES OF Tin:
€itap. as belonging to this party, the queen herself, together
• — . — * with Cecil, Sir Thomas Smith, Sir Ealph Sadler, Dr.
Matt how
Parker. Walter Haddon, and all those who, in the first privy
1559-75. council of Queen Elizabeth, were characterized as re-
formers. They had, many of them, occasionally con-
formed in Mary's reign, because they knew, that although
there were very serious differences between them and
the papists, yet if these were for a season allowed to
lie in abeyance, and if minor reforms were gradually in-
troduced, they would win to their side not a few of those
who were now opposed to them. We need not say more
upon this point, having enlarged upon it in the preceding
chapter. These men, at the accession of Queen Elizabeth,
assumed a position from which they were soon driven :
their desire having been, in the first instance, to bring
back ecclesiastical affairs to the condition in which they
had been left at the close of Henry VIII. 's reign, and
thence to proceed, with more or less of rapidity, in
effecting systematically the reform of the Catholic Church
in this realm.
In their scheme they were thwarted, and their wise
measures were not unfrequently frustrated by the oppo-
sition they had to encounter, from what may be regarded
Exiles. as the second great party — that of the Exiles. These
persons contemned the moderation of the English re-
formers; and had associated with those foreigners who
were so unwisely invited into the country in the reign
of King Edward. For English institutions the foreigners
entertained not the slightest affection or respect. In the
oldest and noblest of the institutions inherited from our
ancestors — the Church of England — they actually desired
the demolition of all but its revenues. They had been,
many of them, consulted on its reformation by such men
as Cranmer, but with nothing less than a revolution would
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 123
;hey be content. They thought not of cleansing the chap.
ancient fabric, but they desired to establish a sect upon
its ruins ; and their sectarianism having passed through ParkeT
Lutheranism into Zwinglianism, settled down at last into 1559-75.
Calvinism.
A third party consisted of the remnant of the ancient Anabap-
Lollards, who had merged imperceptibly into the Ana- LoUards1.
baptists ; their political principles being nearly identical.
Both to the English reformers and also to the party of
the exiles, the Anabaptists stood opposed. Animated by
sentiments of a revolutionary character, their profession
of religion was generally a pretext ; while to the statesmen
it certainly appeared that they sought the overthrow of
the Church, only as a step towards the demolition of the
throne.
A fourth, — a very small party, — consisted of those who Papists.
were simply papists, who desired the re-establishment of
papal supremacy, and, in point of doctrine, were ready to
receive the dogmas of Trent, as they were gradually pro-
pounded or decided.
While on this subject, we must pause to correct another Condition
misrepresentation of the Puritan writers, when they affirm, ciergy.
without shadow of proof, that the clergy generally were
papists at heart, and came into the Eeformation with
great reluctance ; an assertion which charity is slow to
accept, since it would insinuate that, out of a body of
more than 10,000 men, almost all were hypocrites and
cowards. If they had been papists at heart — a fact which
none but the Searcher of hearts can know — they belied
the traditionary feeling of centuries. The secular clergy
had for centuries murmured at the papal usurpations ;
and we may infer from the legislation of synods and
councils, that they submitted with reluctance to the im-
position of ceremonies, which seemed, during every cen-
I
124 lives of Tin:
citap. tury, to increase. From this allegation the Regulars are
« — -r-^ of course excluded. The Regulars were called the pope's
Matthew .... . , ,. , 7i ■ •
Parker, militia ; and the histories ot the various great monasteries.
1569-75. 0f late brought to light, serve to show how vehement
their desire was to transfer their allegiance from the
long-established hierarchy of the Church of England to
a foreign master. These were the clergy who were
ready to organize and conduct the various insurrections
in the time of Henry and Edward; and among the
Regulars, to their eternal disgrace it must be recorded,
were found too many who, coming from foreign parts,
were only prevented by lack of opportunity from becom-
ing the assassins of Queen Elizabeth. But it is to be
remembered, that the Regulars had been deprived and
deposed before the accession of Elizabeth; for the few
monastic restorations in the time of Mary are not worthy
of notice. Some of the Regulars, by assuming the
character of secular priests, occasionally obtained posses-
sion of preferments in the Church; but these were ex-
ceptional cases, not noted by the historian. The clergy
who remained were Seculars, always opposed to the pope,
as far as they dared to oppose him, and in a state of
chronic hostility to the monks. They were at this time
generally in favour of the royal supremacy ; and although
many were not sufficiently learned or well informed to
appreciate, to its full extent, the merit of those changes
which had taken place in our formularies, yet they
acquiesced in the mandates of their ecclesiastical supe-
riors, when these were backed by the authority of the
sovereign. Slow and unwilling the older men were to
learn a new lesson ; and to this unwillingness may be
generally traced the occasional omissions in regard to
the new service book. What the royal and episcopal
visitors complained of was, not wilful opposition, but neg-
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 125
ligence ; many of the clergy would retain the old mump- chap.1
simus, not from opposition to the orthodox sumpsimus, ,_ ^
but because they would avoid the trouble of making a p^ker^
change in books to the handling of which they had 1559-75.
been accustomed from their youth. The ignorance among
some of the lower class of clergy was such, that they
trusted, in the performance of the divine offices, more
I to the memory than to the eye. They found it difficult
to read the new offices, and they would sometimes prefer
the repetition of the old office which they knew, to a
learning by heart of the new which they knew not.
So far were they from evincing a desire to return
to the former state of things, that, in spite of these in-
conveniences, they progressed, as rapidly as could be
expected, in the line of the Eeformation ; for, at the end
of ten years, the Pope, from want of sympathizers among
the English clergy, was obliged to create a schism, and
send a special mission to this country. This mission
itself failed in its object, because, during those ten years,
England had become decidedly Protestant — so Protestant
that the representatives of " the Exiles " possessed a large
party in the country, as hostile to the English reformation 4
as were the papists themselves, by representing the
English reformers as not sufficiently Protestant. If the
clergy had been, as they are frequently represented to
have been, inimical or permanently indifferent to the
Eeformation, there would have been no need of that
Jesuit mission which the Bishop of Eome sent into
England. The acquiescence of the clergy in the . re-
forming measures of the Church, receives a still further
indirect proof from the fact, that, among the leading dig-
nitaries of the Church, there were some who would have
encouraged them to resistance. Archbishop Heath, and
the bishops who acted with him, would not have retired
Elizabeth.
126 lives of Tin;
chap, so quietly as they did from their preferments, if the;
■ r— ' had not become quite aware that, in a resistance to the
pJrkerT government, they could depend on scarcely any support
1559-75. from their clergy. We shall have occasion hereafter
to show, that although they thought it due to the dignity
of their character to resign their sees, they were, many
of them, by no means opposed to such a reformation
as would, if taken in time, have satisfied the English
reformers.
Queen ^ Having given a brief sketch of the great parties*
which met the government of Elizabeth on her first
coming to the throne, it is important that I should lay
before the reader the opinion which I have formed of
the great queen's character ; for it is to be remembered,
that Elizabeth ruled as well as reigned, and thus be-
came, not only the queen of the realm, but a party in
the state.
Of the character of Queen Elizabeth, a view too
favourable may, at one time, have been adopted by a
nation grateful for the benefits she had conferred upon
it : in the present age, on the contrary, a pleasure
seems to be taken, which may almost be described as
malignant, in vilifying the private character of a vain
woman, in order to detract from the marvellous powers
of mind exhibited by — the solecism will be pardoned — a
female statesman, in whose reign England was raised
from a second-rate power to the high position among the
kingdoms of the earth, which the nation has ever since
sustained. The merits of Queen Elizabeth as a politician
and statesman are summed up by Camden, in the remark :
* The great body of clergy and laity described in the preceding
paragraph, were not formed into a party ; they did not act in concert ;
they were not Papists and Protestants, but Medievalists with Pro-
testant proclivities.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 127
"Let her noble actions recommend her to the praise chap.
and admiration of posterity : religion reformed ; peace - — r—
established ; money reduced to its true value ; a most parked
complete fleet built ; our naval glory restored ; England, 1559-75.
for forty years, most prudently governed, enriched, and
strengthened ; Scotland rescued from the French ; France
itself relieved ; the Netherlands supported ; Spain awed *
Ireland quieted." He adds as a climax, what in these
days would be regarded as scarcely worthy of notice,
" the whole world sailed round." To this we may fur-
ther add, without seeking to justify, or even to palliate,
the tyranny and passion with which she effected her
objects, she pursued with success the policy of her
grandfather, in repressing the almost regal power of the
nobles, and in elevating the commercial aristocracy of
the land. When to her moral character and that of
her court reference is made, we must not leave out of
our consideration the spirit of the age and the character
of the times. Society was, at that period, in a trans-
itional state. It was passing from the unreality of a
worn-out age of chivalry, without having yet reached
the point of modern refinement. In external things
there was much of pomp and ceremony ; but the gross-
ness of vice was not concealed when the pressure of
ceremony was withdrawn. There was much magnificence
with little elegance ; much of grandeur, but little of com-
fort ; a superfluity of ridiculous sentiment combined with
actual licentiousness. There was courtesy, on the part of
courtiers, towards their equals ; but, upon their vindictive
passions, by these very persons no restraint was placed,
when those passions were roused against an enemy or
an inferior. The nobles and the men of the middle class,
though frequently at variance with one another, were
united too often in the oppression of the lower orders.
128 LIVES OF TUG
chap. When, over a society so composed — split into factions,
. — _* religious and political, and open to the threats and ma-
Parker. noeuvres of Spain and France — a young woman, at first
1559-75. almost unbefriended, was called upon to preside, the
marvel is, not that she should occasionally err, but that
she should come forth acknowledged by her contempo-
raries as one of the wisest statesmen of an age abounding
with great characters.
If libels, gossip, and caricatures are to be regarded
in the light of historical documents, no historical character
can be protected against the envy and misrepresentations
to which, whoever is eminent in any of the various
departments of human exertion, will, in an evil world,
be exposed. Prominence in position provokes attack.
If, on such authorities as those to which allusion has
been made, we were to rely, the purest and most amiable
of the present generation might be handed down to
posterity, the very opposite in appearance to what he is
in reality.
We must reprobate the attempt frequently made to
blacken the character of Queen Elizabeth, by the repub-
lication of the scandalous chronicles of her age. At all
events, these statements should be qualified, if not con-
tradicted, by the testimony borne to the excellence of
Elizabeth's character, by the great writers who shed lustre
upon the Elizabethan era, — poets, historians, divines,
philosophers, including Shakspeare and Spenser, Bacon,
Burghley, Hayward, Camden, and Hooker. They do not
hesitate to admit and to lament the frivolities, the absurd-
ities, the indiscretions of the woman ; but, admitting this,
we must observe that of the indecent stories, on which
persons of a stern morality, if not of deep religious feel-
ing, delight to dwell, most of them are to be traced to the
scandalous correspondence of foreign ambassadors with
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 129
their respective courts, when it was the policy of those chap.
courts to create a prejudice against the queen; or else < — S L-^
they may be traced to the libels industriously circulated p^LiT
by Jesuits and Seminary priests. 1559-75.
With respect to the scandals circulated in foreign courts,
we have no less an authority than that of Catherine
de Medici herself, to affirm that they were easily accepted,
but never believed. We have the still stronger testimony
of the French ambassador, Michael de Castelnau, to the
same effect. This personage had been much in England ;
he was in close and confidential correspondence with
Mary Queen of Scots ; and while his diplomatic relations
were with the enemies of Elizabeth, he was, at the same
time, so familiar with her court, her favourites, and her
nobles, that he must have known almost all that could be
known of her secret history. Therefore we may attach
no ordinary credit to his assertions, when, convinced of the
untruth of the defamatory stories so industriously pro-
pagated, he went out of his way to leave the following
honourable and decisive testimony to the character of the
queen : " If some persons have wished to tax her
memory with having amorous attachments, I will say
with truth that they are inventions forged by the ma-
levolent, and from the cabinets of ambassadors, to avert
from an alliance with her those to whom it would have
been useful/' This was written by him in his private
memoirs, when he could have had no possible motive for
defending the queen, or for making a statement which
was not true.
As regards the principle upon which the Jesuits and
papists acted, it is unintentionally, but very clearly, revealed
to us by no less a person than Cardinal Allen. Speaking
of Elizabeth, he says : " She is a caitiff, under God's and
holy Church's curse, given up to a reprobate mind, and
VOL. IX. K
130 LIVES OF THE
chap, therefore " (let the conclusion be compared with the pre-
mises), and therefore " her open enormities and her secret
Parked sms must ^e great ail(l not numerable.', The cardinal
1559-75. might have added another therefore ; and might with
equal force have affirmed, that, because these sins must
have existed in this caitiff, though they cannot be dis-
covered, yet they may be imagined ; and therefore the
inventions of a prurient imagination have been handed
down to posterity as historical statements.
Cardinal Allen has a bad pre-eminence in the art of lying ;
but he was surpassed by Sanders, of whose veracity we may
judge, when we find him repeatedly asserting, that, in the
English Prayer Book, the devotions offered by the papis
to the Virgin Mary are tendered to Queen Elizabeth
A well-informed writer, who has thoroughly examine
the subject, has with great accuracy and ability trace
to their source the stories impeaching the queen's m<
rality, which have been stereotyped for the use of car
less or partial historians, male and female. Having
verified his references, I have no hesitation in endorsing
his conclusions, when he proves them to rest upon a
countess whose " naturel" was notorious, and who
least on one occasion made a public confession of lying
upon an ambassador, whose secretary ran away from hi:
on account of his abhorrence of his system of lying
upon a Scotch courtier, who made a boast to his court
his success in lying ; upon a groom, who was pilloriec
for lying ; upon an unknown rogue, whose ears wen
cut off for lying; upon another, whose words were sc
shocking, that the magistrates were ashamed to writ(
them down ; upon two murderers ; and, finally, upor
Cardinal Allen and Dr. Sanders.*
Whether it be more reasonable to give credit to the
* See Fraser's Magazine, Nov. 1853, where will be found the au
thorities for these statements
ie
:
:
ig
>g
a
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 131
assertion of persons known to be liars and libellers in chap.
the age in which they wrote, or to suppose all that — ^1—
England held in every rank of life, and in every depart- pSW
nient of literature, in the most celebrated epoch of our 1559-75.
country's history, to have been flatterers, sycophants,
and worse caitiffs than the worst of women could have
been, may at least admit of a doubt.
One other argument in her favour I cannot forbear to
produce. Her three favourites, about whom scandal has
been most busy, were Leicester, Hatton, and Essex ; and
these three men were victims of her tyranny as Well as
of her affection. Leicester had often to tremble under
her capricious disposition ; the last days of Hatton were
embittered by her bringing against him a charge of
peculation ; Essex died on the scaffold. When favour-
ites have at any time secrets to divulge, they invariably
become the tyrants of the sovereigns who place them-
selves in their power ; their silence is purchased by un-
worthy concessions unwillingly made.
Upon the whole, the reader would not be far wrong
who should give credit to any amount of indiscretion on
the part of Elizabeth, in social and private life ; but if he
sifts the evidence adduced by her most bitter enemies, he
will repudiate the charges brought against her morality
— with which, after all, we are only then concerned —
when it can be proved that they influenced her conduct
as a queen.
We must here pause again to remind the reader, that
Elizabeth is not to be regarded as a constitutional
sovereign, dependent upon the advice of responsible
ministers. Throughout her life she was her own prime
minister ; and some of the worst instances of her vulgarity
and insolence upon record may evidently be traced to
her determination to show, that although, as she re-
JL 2
132 LIVES OF THE
chap, marked, " she had but the body of a weak and feeble
— ^-1— woman, she had nevertheless the heart and stomach of a
ParkerT king, aye, and of a king of England too." There may
1559-75. have been something of policy as well as of passion in the
oaths she occasionally uttered, and the violence of action
to which she sometimes condescended. She was proud
of being able to swear like a king. Cecil was not a
minister in the same sense as Chatham, Pitt, Peel, or
Gladstone. Although Elizabeth was guided by his wis-
dom and influenced by his counsel, Cecil was made to
keep his distance as a servant of the crown, and was care-
ful, as her confidential secretary, to let it be known, that
the policy of his government depended, not on his own
will, but on that of the queen. What is mentioned by
the great Lord Bacon in commendation of Cecil, would be
produced as an impeachment against a modern minister :
" having given advice when asked, Cecil rested on such
conclusions as her majesty in her own will determined
and then did his best to carry them into effect
great matters she would defer to him ; in minor matters
she took pleasure in showing her independence, some-
times to the detriment of the public service."
When seated on her throne, when presiding at th<
council board, or when conversing with the agents of diplo
macy, Elizabeth would put forth such masculine powers
of mind, as not only to astonish the illustrious statesmen,
whom her sagacity had called to her counsels, but to
compel foreign ministers, such as the illustrious Sully
himself, to acknowledge and declare that, even in her old
age, she held, and deserved to hold, among the politicians
of the day, the highest place.
But with her robes of office, Elizabeth seemed too often
to put off her better self; and, when she descended from
her throne, she not unfrequently fell as much below the
LCh
t
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 133
level of her own sex, as on other occasions she rose above chap.
it. She unwisely disregarded the conventionalities of - vnL -
society ; and the frivolities — tolerated in a young woman ParkST
by astonished statesmen — being persevered in when an 1559-75.
unacknowledged old age crept upon her, she became an
object of ridicule to many whose sardonic smiles belied
the flattery of their lips. There sometimes seemed to be
an ingrained malignity in her very nature, which found
pleasure in giving pain, or in causing annoyance, in little
things. After accepting the advice of her councillors in
Church or State, she would sometimes find a perverse
pleasure in making the performance of their duty as
irksome and difficult as possible. When measures of
real and great importance were under consideration, she
would repel the approach of her courtiers, if they sought
to make private gain out of public events. But, although
what we are about to say seems scarcely consistent with
what has been said before, yet it was the cas'e with
Elizabeth, as it had been with her father, she found
pleasure in giving pleasure to others, and would some-
times gratify her favourites by concessions and grants
which her ministers found it difficult to meet. In fact,
the besetting sin both of Henry VIII. and of Queen
Elizabeth was selfishness. They were willing to do kind
acts, but were equally willing to destroy any one, high
or low, who offered an impediment to the progress of
their selfish desires ; but, in both cases, the sovereign was
identified with the people, and England felt that, although
Elizabeth, like her father, would sacrifice individuals to
her caprice, she also, like her father, was ready to lay
down her life for her country.
It is thus that we can account for her treatment of
Leicester. She wished to marry; she pined for the
comforts of domestic life. Her heart was given to Kobert
134 LIVES OF THE
chap. Dudley; but, after severe struggles, she sacrificed her
VIfL-, private affections for the good of her country. Any one
Parker* acquainted with the correspondence of Cecil and his con-
1559-75. temporaries must arrive at this conclusion ; and, instead
of ridiculing the weakness of the woman, he will seek
to do justice to the conduct of a patriotic queen.
Such was the mistress whom Matthew Parker, a shy,
retiring, stammering, studious valetudinarian, was com-
pelled to serve. His character was not yet developed ; his
many excellences were upon the surface ; his weaknesses
at this time were known only to himself. In the selection
or acceptance of Parker for her primate, Elizabeth exhi-
bited that sagacity by which she read, as it were by
intuition, the character of those with whom she was
associated. She had known Parker, not intimately, but
long ; and she saw that, in an age of progress, his prin-
ciple was festina lente. Amidst enthusiasts he had
no enthusiasm ; amidst the controversies of the day
he distinguished between reform and revolution. He
had studied the writings of Zwingle, Luther, and
Calvin; and, knowing their faults as well as their
merits, he had no inclination to follow their lead. He
had studied the fathers and the general councils,
and knew the deviations of the Church of Eome from
primitive truth. He could distinguish between things
essential and things non-essential. Like the queen herself,
he had perceived how he might avoid giving offence to
the existing government in Queen Mary's reign, without
renouncing his character as a reformer. Perhaps no
one could be found whose principles more nearly
accorded with those of Elizabeth ; but she, instead
of invariably aiding him in the difficulties he had to
surmount, was continually found to thwart him by the
concessions she made to unworthy courtiers.
I
measures
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 135
On the 17th of November, 1558, Queen Elizabeth
ascended the throne. Historians, writing with a foregone
conclusion, are accustomed to represent her government ^j^
as directing its first attention to ecclesiastical affairs ; but, 1559-75.
if we have recourse to fact instead of conjecture, this was
certainly not the case. It was her opinion, as it was the
hope of her wisest advisers, that, unpopular as had been
the extreme though opposite measures of the respective
governments of Edward VI. and Queen Mary, the Church
would at once subside into the condition in which it had
been left by Henry VIII. ; and that her ministers and
clergy would, on that basis, gradually carry on the
reformations, the necessity of which they all admitted.
While Elizabeth was yet at Hatfield, and before her First
first interview with her council for the despatch of enter'
business, she had, after a consultation with Cecil, directed reign*
him, as her confidential adviser, to draw up a statement of
the measures which at once, and without loss of time,
ought to occupy the attention of the government. De-
plorable, indeed, was the condition of the country. The
treasury was exhausted, the revenue anticipated; in
addition to which there was a debt, considered, at that
time, enormous, of not less than four millions. Not only
was trade depressed, but the coin was scandalously
debased ; there was pestilence, to make more vehement
the discontent at home ; the feeling of indignation at the
loss of Calais was heightened by the fact, that the country
was involved in war for the interest of Spain; there
was a pretender to the throne, and the legitimacy of
its occupant was called in question. In this long list of
grievances the religious question was only one item ; and
in Cecil's scheme of business, so far from making the re-
ligious question the primary consideration, he scarcely
thought it necessary to notice it.
136 LIVES OF THE
VIII
i*
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
chap. To satisfy the reader upon this point, I will present him
with the minute itself.
" I. To consider the proclamation, and to proclaim it, and
to send the same to all manner of places and sheriffs with
speed, and to print it.
" II. To prepare the Tower, and to appoint the custody thereof
to trusty persons, and to write to all the keepers of forts and
castles in the queen's name.
" III. To consider for the removing to the Tower, and the
queen there to settle her officers and council.
" IV. To make a stay of passages to all the ports until a cer-
tain day ; and to consider the situation of all places dangerous
towards France and Scotland, especially in this charge.
" V. To send special messengers to the Pope, Emperor, the
Kings of Spain and Denmark, and to the State of Venice.
" VI. To send new commissioners to the Earl of Arundel and
Bishop of Ely [who were treating a peace at Cambray'], and
to send one into Ireland with a new commission ; and letters
under the queen's hand to all ambassadors with foreign
princes to authorize them therein.
" VII. To appoint commissioners for the interment of the
late queen.
" VIII. To appoint commissioners for the coronation and the
day.
" IX. To make a continuance of the term, with patents to
the chief justice, to the lord treasurer, justices of each bench,
barons, and masters of the rolls, with inhibition, Quod non
conferant aliquod officium,
" X. To appoint new sheriffs and justices of the peace, to
continue the old, by a proclamation to be sent to the sheriffs
under the great seal.
"XI. To inhibit by proclamation the making over of any
money by exchange, without knowledge given to the queen's
majesty, and to charge all manner of persons that either have
made any, or have been privy to any exchange made, by the
space of one month before the 17th of this month.
"XII. To consider the preacher of Paul's Cross, that no
.
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 137
occasion be given by him to stir any dispute touching the CHAP,
overnance of the realm." * ^-L-^
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
In this memorandum it will be observed, that, instead
of defying the pope, communications were to be opened
with him ; instead of encouraging Protestants, precautions
were taken against the possible exhibition of party feeling
at Paul's Cross. The sermon at Paul's Cross very fre-
quently partook of a political character, and had much
the same effect upon the public mind as a leading article
of " The Times " in the present day. What was heard
was repeated, and even when assent was not given to the
opinions uttered, those opinions, nevertheless, had a silent
influence upon the public mind. It belongs to the general
historian to notice the rapidity and decision with which
the measures here suggested were carried into effect.
It may be doubted whether any page of history can be
produced in which an account is given of so much having
been done in a single year as was accomplished in the
first twelve months of Elizabeth's reign. In one short
year the country was raised from " the slough of despond ;"
and the first great step was taken in a career of prosperity,
which terminated only, if it can be said to have terminated
then, with the great queen's life.
Our object in alluding to these political events in this
place, is simply to show that, although the government,
for reasons presently to be advanced, was at a very early
period involved in religious controversy, the establishment
of Protestantism, as distinct from the Catholic Church,
was not the object of Queen Elizabeth or her advisers,
when first she succeeded to the throne of this realm. In
the modern sense of the word — although always a re-
former— she was not and never became a Protestant.
* Cottonian MSS. tit. C. x. 21.
138
LIVES OP THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew-
Parker.
1559-75.
If, at any time, she upheld the Protestant cause, it was
upon political grounds, and not from a religious en-
thusiasm. If we confine the word Protestant to its modern
meaning, we have to remark, that not a single Protestant
was, on Elizabeth's accession to the crown, added to her
council. All the members of the council were Catholics;
all insisted on their right to that title. The queen, in the
proclamation of her title, declared herself to be not only
the defender of the faith, but, as if to exclude all doubt
upon the subject, " of the trewe, ancient, and Catholic
faithe."*
The Catholic queen retained in her council thirteen
statesmen who had occupied the same post in the council
of Queen Mary. Elizabeth added to that council seven
other persons, not one of whom was, at that time, a
Lutheran, a Zwinglian, or a Calvinist. Whatever they
may have afterwards become, these eminent men had
conformed to the existing services of the Church, when
the Book of Common Prayer had been superseded by
the Breviary, Missal, and Manual.f If the queen desired
to gather round her political advisers, we can scarcely
* Nares's Burghley, ii. 24.
f See Soames, iv. 604. When a party writer is unable to account
for conduct, he is too apt to attribute motives. If he does so, he ought,
even when attributing, through lack of charity, a wrong motive, at least
to admit the possibility of the existence of a right motive. Soames
attributes the occasional conformity of such men as Cecil and Knollys
simply to a fear of the stake. We have seen that another motive may be
attributed to them : that they did not regard the corruptions of the
Church, in which they had been educated, as touching upon fundamen-
tals ; so that, without concealing their opinion, that a reformation was
required, they were ready to " bide their time." Some of them after-
wards may have taken a different view of the case, but such was their
opinion at the time under consideration. Mr. Hallam, whose charity
seldom slumbers except when religion is concerned, speaks of the
majority of Elizabeth's council as consisting of pliant conformists.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 139
imagine a council more judiciously chosen. All English chap.
parties were fairly represented ; the Protestants being, at ^-I^L.
this period, regarded in the light of foreigners. If it had Mpa^.
been the design of the queen or of Cecil to erect a Pro- 1559-75.
testant sect upon the ruins of the English Church, their
conduct would have been as impolitic as it would have
been iniquitous. Their object, which was a compromise
between the contending extremes, was defeated, almost as
soon as it was conceived, by the violence of the Protestants
on one side, and a want of wisdom, as well as of charity, on
the part of the pope and his partizans. The first measures
of the government were, in truth, directed against the
Protestants; and the papists were unwise enough to
complicate affairs by refusing to assist the government, or
to tolerate a compromise.
The exiles had assumed that the accession of Eliza-
beth was to be the triumph of their party. Although
Elizabeth had conformed to the Eoman ritual, although
she had never regarded herself as a Protestant, she was
known to be a reformer. Her chief friends had been
selected from the friends of the Eeformation : they had
been the persons to whom her education had been
confided ; and by them stories were propagated, showing
her hostility to the Eomanist party, under which she
had been persecuted, her very life having been more than
once threatened. The exiles imagined that the papists
would rise in favour of Mary Queen of Scots, and that
Elizabeth would be dependent entirely upon Protest-
ants for the support of her throne. They calculated,
judging from their own feelings, on the reactionary spirit
in England. They believed that the Anabaptists and
Lollards were more in number than was actually the
case ; that they only waited for that leadership which
they were ready to supply. With the exception of the
140
LIVES OP THE
CHAP.
VIII.
small party at Frankfort, they were eager to supplant
the English Keformation by the introduction of foreign
Protestantism, and they had most of the learned writers
on their side. Associating with the foreign Protestants,
they divided the religious world into two great parties
— Protestants and Papists. By Protestantism the major-
ity of the English exiles meant, not Lutheranism, but
Calvinism. They regarded the Lutherans as semi-papists,
and predicated Lutheranism of the English reformers,
such as Parker and Cecil. In a state of enthusiasm,
such as party feeling only can excite, they rushed into
England intent on the demolition of popery. Uninvited
by the government, they appeared unexpectedly in the
country, and were inflaming the minds of the people ; by
too many of whom the idea of reformation was con-
nected with spoliation and rapine.
In an age when the first principles of toleration were
unknown, the moderation evinced by Elizabeth's govern-
ment was as remarkable as it was praiseworthy. The
majority, both of the clergy and of the people, until the
arrival of the exiles, were evidently prepared to remain
at peace so long as they were assured of security to their
persons and property ; they were ready to submit to
reforms rather than to seek them. It was not known
how the bench of bishops was likely to act. Many of
them had acquiesced in the reforms of Henry VIII. ; and
it was felt that if, as was probable, they would give their
support to the government, the Protestants might be
brought to terms. In the mean time it was the policy
of the government to protect the peaceable subjects of
the queen, and not to exasperate the fanatics on either
side.
From the lukewarmness, if not the avowed hostility of
the hierarchy, it was gradually perceived that the queen,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 141
owever unwilling, might have to place herself at the chap.
head of the Protestant interest. Extreme caution was < — ,— ^
necessary, and there was not likely to be want of caution Parked
in a ministry of which Cecil was the head. On the 28th 1559-75.
of December a proclamation was issued, which has been
so often misrepresented, that I think it right to place it
before the reader, in order that he may form his own
judgment upon the contents.
" The Queerfs proclamation to forbid preaching, and allowing
only the reading of the Epistles and Gospels, &c, in English
in the churches.
" By the Queen.
" The Queen's majesty, understanding that there be certain
persons, having in times past the office of ministry in the
Church, which now do purpose to use their former office in
preaching and ministry, and partly have attempted the same ;
assembling, specially in the city of London, in sundry places,
great number of people, whereupon riseth among the common
sort, not only unfruitful dispute in matters of religion, but also
contention, and occasion to break common quiet, hath there-
fore, according to the authority committed to her highness, for
the quiet governance of all manner her subjects, thought it
necessary to charge and command, like as hereby her highnes8
doth charge and command, all manner of her subjects, as well
those that be called to ministry in the Church as all others,
that they do forbear to preach or teach, or to give audience to
any manner of doctrine or preaching, other than to the Gospels
and Epistles, commonly called the gospel and the epistle of the
day, and to the Ten Commandments, in the vulgar tongue,
without exposition or addition of any manner of sense or
meaning to be applied or added ; or to use any other manner
of public prayer, rite, or ceremony in the Church but that
which is already used and by law received ; or the common
Litany used at this present in her majesty's own chapel, and
the Lord's Prayer, and the Creed in English, until consultation
I
142 LIVES OF THE
CHAP, may be had by Parliament by her majesty and her three estates
. . of this realm,* for the better conciliation and accord of such
Matthew causes as at this present are moved in matters and ceremonies
1559-75. of religion."!
In this document we see nothing of the Protestant
queen, for it is evident, that it was against the returning
exiles that the proclamation is chiefly pointed. The tone
of the proclamation was preserved in a speech soon after
addressed to Parliament in the queen's name by Sir
Nicolas Bacon — what would now be called the Queen's
Speech. Sir Nicolas stated, in the name and by the
authority of his royal mistress, that " no party language
was to be kept up in this kingdom ; that the names of
heretic, schismatic, papist, and such like, were to be laid
aside and forgotten ; that, on the one side, there must be a
guard against unlawful worship and superstition, and, on
the other, things must not be left under such a loose
regulation as to occasion indifferency in religion and
contempt of holy things." J
In this speech we have an exposition of the principles
of the government. What the government desired was,
that things might be left in statu quo until the proper
time arrived for deliberation. The men of the old
learning were satisfied by the pledges given, that no altera-
tions in the service of the Church should take place,
except those to which they had formerly sent in their
adhesion. Mass continued to be celebrated in the churches
from November, 1558, to June, 1559. Among the return-
ing exiles there were many who had been ejected from
their livings ; or whose livings, on their flying from the
country, had been declared to be vacant : these persons
* /. e. the lords spiritual, the lords temporal, and the commons in
parliament assembled.
f Strype's Annals, I. ii. 391. J D'Ewes' Journal, p. 12.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 143
expected that, in the new reign, they would be re-admitted chap.
into their benefices ; but they had been legally dispossessed . r—
on account of their flying from their cures, or from want Parked
of compliance, on their part, with the statutes of the 1559-75.
realm, or with the canons of the Church ; and the queen
would not permit the present occupants to be disturbed
so long as they consented to conform to the regulations
of the Queen, the Convocation, and the Parliament.*
The queen's conduct was in keeping with her policy.
She was as regular as her sister had been in her attend-
ance at mass ; and to the ancient ceremonies she did not
hesitate to declare her attachment, even after, as an act of
policy, she had given her assent to the Bill of Uniformity.
* Strype remarks, that the affairs of the Church " continued for a
while in the same posture and condition they were in before, abating
persecution for religion, mass celebrated in the churches, the ejected
and exiled clergy not restored to their former places and preferments,
the popish priests keeping possession ; orders that things in the Church
should for the present continue as they were ; such punished as inno-
vated in anything in the Church or public worship ; which put the
favourers of the gospel," as he calls them, " under great fears and
jealousies; and they began to suspect the queen intended to make none
or very little amendment in religion." Annals, I. i. 74. The returned
exiles were impatient as well as intolerant, and they exhibited a spirit
quite as persecuting as that of Mary. " In the time of Mary," says
Jewel, who afterwards became a wiser and a better man, " every thing
was carried impetuously forward. There was no waiting then for law
and precedent. But now every thing is managed with as much slow-
ness and wariness as if the word of God was not to be received on his
own authority. As Christ was thrown out by his enemies, so He is now
kept out by his friends. The consequence is, that they who favour us
are grievously discouraged, while our adversaries are full of hope and
exultation." This letter is given by Burnet, but he does not quote his
authority. It is important to observe, that there was as much want of
charity on one side as on the other. In another letter Jewel complains,
that the returned exiles were not consulted ; and he adds : " The
queen will not be entitled the Head of the Church, at which I certainly
am not displeased."
144 LIVES OF THE
chap. The Protestants, on the other hand, were saved from
*rr— -— despair, when they heard, that she prohibited, during the
Parker, celebration of the mass, the elevation of the host. The
1559-75. host was elevated that it might be worshipped; and
against this worship, which they regarded as idolatrous,
the English reformers stood as resolutely opposed as the
foreign Protestants. This, it will be remembered, was
the danger alluded to in the preceding chapter, which the
English reformers constantly dreaded. They did not object
to attend at the mass, against which, except as related
to the elevation of the host, the Protestants had little to
urge. But, on the point of transubstantiation, they were
determined to make a stand. Elizabeth's conduct there-
fore, in this respect, was significant. Although she did
not declare herself a Protestant, as the exiles understood
the word, yet she took her place among the reformers.
The extreme parties were, of course, discontented ; and,
from their correspondence with the foreign Protestants,
we find the returned exiles the most violent, and the most
intolerant. They expected the queen to place herself at
the head of their faction, and their indignation was equal
to their disappointment, when they found her determined
to act as the sovereign of the realm, instead of being
merely the queen of a party. She took the Church as she
found it, and, admitting the necessity of a reformation, she
felt her way with caution, and, until she was compelled
by circumstances, she desired to persuade all honest
parties, by mutual concessions, to co-operate for the well-
being of Church and State. The royal chapel — the model
of other places of worship — remained the same as it had
been in the late queen's reign ; the ancient ceremonies
were continued ; on the decorated altar a crucifix stood,
with the approbation of the Lutherans, though denounced
by the Calvinists ; before the sacrament, tapers were
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 145
lighted, while, with the smoke of incense, prayer was chap.
offered to the King of kings ; to the altar — the solium x__Z^Hl^
Christi — obeisance was made whenever the chancel was porker*
approached. It must, indeed, be admitted, that the chapel 1559-75.
royal bore a nearer resemblance to a ritualistic church of
the nineteenth century than to a Protestant meeting-house.
If it be said that this was unbecoming in a Protestant
queen, it is to be observed that this title was not, at this
time, assumed by Elizabeth ; it was forced upon her by
the Puritans, as the exiles were now beginning to be
called, when they determined to elect her as their leader.
Determined as she was to have the Protestants in readi-
ness to act as an army of reserve, her first desire was to
induce her bishops to resume the position they had oc-
cupied in her father's reign. On the 19th of November,
when the queen went in state from Hatfield to London,
the prelates of the Church of England met her at High-
gate, where they were graciously received and kissed
hands. We are informed that she received a loyal ad-
dress from them " with no small contentment." By her
desire the obsequies of the late queen were celebrated
with great magnificence in Westminster Abbey ; and there,
as in her own chapel and the other churches in London,
the mass was celebrated under the forms observed in King
Henry's reign. In the same place, shortly after, were
celebrated the obsequies of the Emperor Charles V. She
thus proclaimed to Europe, what she had already left it
to her own people to infer, that, although she was deter-
mined upon a reformation, she intended to preserve the
ancient Church of her realm ; ready to advance, but to
advance with caution."* In the funeral of Pole, both
* Heylin, ii. 266, ed. Rob. By this writer it is said, that Elizabeth
refused to permit her hand to be kissed by the Bishop of London, the
notorious Bonner; but, if such was the case, Bonner did not take
VOL. IX. L
146 LIVES OF THE
chap, the queen and Cecil took such a deep interest as to con
* — r-^ firm the general opinion that, to his kind offices, both of
Parker, them had been under obligations. When the Convocation
1559-75. assembled on the 27th of January, 1559, it was opened
with the high mass. It was not concealed that negotia-
tions had commenced at Eome ; and it was evident to all,
that no decided steps would be taken in the affairs of
religion until the policy of Eome, as it regarded the ac-
cession of the queen, should be made known.
Conduct of Such was the policy of the queen and Cecil. On a
t © ope. reform they were determined ; to Calvinism they were
opposed. The character of the reformation would depend
upon the proceedings of the pope, whether conciliatory
or otherwise. There was no wish to form an alliance with
the Protestants ; but Elizabeth soon showed that she was
not to be trifled with ; and when she was obliged to
make a stand, she made it sufficiently clear that her
disposition to effect a reconciliation between discordant
parties did not proceed on her part from want of vigour
of mind or strength of will. Whether she would come
to terms with the pope, it was for his holiness to decide.
But instead of meeting her half way, the impassioned old
man lent an ear to the hostile representations of the French
ambassador; and the French ambassador had already
acquired an influence over a mind often distorted by pas-
sion and prejudice, and now deprived of its pristine vigour
offence ; for, although he was not permitted to officiate at the queen's
coronation, he lent his vestments to one of his brethren. " Let me add
one particular more, as preparatory to the queen's coronation. The
lords sent to Bonner, Bishop of London, to lend to the Bishop of
Carlisle, who was appointed (as they writ) to execute the solemnity of
the queen's majesty's coronation, universum apparatum pontificium qiw
uti solent episcopi in hujusmodi magnificis illustrissimorumregum inaugu-
rationibus, i. e. all the pontifical habits that bishops were wont to use in
such glorious inaugurations of most illustrious kings."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 147
by the increasing imbecility of old age. Sir Edward chap.
Carne, the English ambassador at Borne, was instructed to ^
wait upon the pontiff, and in due form to acquaint him
of the accession of his royal mistress to the English
throne. He was also directed to express the young
queen's determination not to offer violence to the con-
sciences of her subjects ; an assertion tantamount to a
proposal to confer with his holiness on the condition of
the Church of England. To conciliate the pope was a
matter of considerable importance to the queen. Being
aware that the Protestants could not do without her, she
paid but little attention to their interests. The one point
she wished now to establish was the recognition of her
right to the throne. Foreign powers were hesitating,
doubtful as to the course which their several interests
might induce them to adopt. One word from the pope
would have disarmed the enemies of Elizabeth, and would
have strengthened the hands of her friends.
To the overtures of Elizabeth, however, an answer was
returned, insolent in tone, and offensively coarse in lan-
guage. Paul IV. dared to affirm, that " the kingdom of
England was held in fee of the apostolic see ; that Eliza-
beth, being illegitimate, could not succeed to the throne ;
that assuming the government without his sanction was
on her part an impertinence ; and yet," he added, " being
desirous to show a fatherly affection, if she would re-
nounce her pretensions, and refer herself wholly to his
free disposition, he would do whatever might be done
without damage to the holy see."*
By this insolent and impolitic answer it became appa-
rent to Elizabeth and Cecil, that, while still intending to
pursue a conciliatory policy, they must in future rely
* Sarpi, p. 111. PaUavicino, ii. 532. Heylin, ii. 2G8. Strype,
Annal^, I. i. 36.
t 2
148 LIVES OF TIIU
chap, upon the Protestants. The exiles were now permitted to
- — r— ' return to their homes, and were at this time invariably
Parker, treated with the respect due to their learning, their piety,
1559-75. and their past sufferings, precautions being at the same
time taken to maintain the principles of the Church ; and
by concessions, which were often too liberally made, to
win them over to support the English against the foreign
Eeformation.
But a greater attention to the conciliation of Pre
testants did not prevent the government from pursuing
the course they had already adopted, of meeting the
wishes of those among the queen's subjects whose in-
clinations were known to attract them to Eome, pro-
vided they were willing to submit to the royal supre-
macy, and to obey all legal enactments. Here again the
policy of the government was thwarted, not so much by
the hostility, as by the weakness of the existing hierarchy.
The bishops, unaware of the master-mind of their youthful
sovereign, imagined that by declining to support her go-
vernment, they might bend her to their will. We know,
that to the Eeformation itself they were not disinclined;
but disgrace had been brought upon the episcopate by
their submission to the various changes in regard to re-
ligion, which had taken place in the preceding reigns ;
they felt, that they ought to make a stop somewhere,
and they could not do so better than when an inex-
perienced young woman, with a questionable title, had
ascended the throne. They evidently wished, while main-
taining their position, to offer as little trouble as possible
to the queen and her council ; but, on the other hand,
they were urged by their friends on the Continent to act
with determination and vigour. They miscalculated both
their own strength and the weakness of the queen. They
soon found that there existed in her that clear perception
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 149
of her aim and that firmness of purpose in which they chap.
themselves were lacking. Beyond their opposition there - VIT11'-,.
was little to complain of in their conduct, and this ac- ^trkeT
counts for the kind treatment accorded to them when they 1559-75.
resigned their sees. An indiscreet sermon by the Bishop
of Winchester, Dr. White, at the funeral of Queen Mary,
gave just cause of offence to the Protestants, whom he
outraged; but it does not appear that he was regarded,
either by the bishops themselves or by the government,
as speaking the sentiments of the hierarchy. It was the
outburst of an intolerant temper, which was visited by
an order of council that he should confine himself to his
house for a week, a precautionary measure, both to pacify
the Protestants and to prevent a disturbance.
It was the policy of the government to remain on good Prepara-
terms with the bishops, because, from the circumstances the Coro-
under which Queen Elizabeth ascended the throne of her natlon-
ancestors, the coronation was, in her case, a ceremonial of
more than ordinary importance. It was important that
ancient precedent should be followed as nearly as possible,
and, as the essential point in the service was not the mere
placing of the crown upon the sovereign's head, but the
unction of the royal person, whereby she was invested
with a quasi-sacred character, it was also important that
this function should be discharged by a bishop. There
were indeed several bishops in England, but they had
been ousted from their dioceses ; and the attendance of at
least three of the diocesans was greatly to be desired.
As in modern times a coronation is regarded as a mere
court pageant, the following remarks of a learned writer
are worthy of being quoted for the information of the
reader: "The anointing was always held to confer
sacreclness upon the person of the sovereign, and for this
we have the authority of St. Augustine, who speaks,
150 LIVES OF THE
chap, indeed, of the earlier unction of the Jewish kin^s ; but
- — r-^ the argument is the same. ' Quaero, si non habebat Saul
Parked sacramenti sanctitatem, quid in eo David venerabatur?
1559-75. gi autem habebat innocentiam, quare innocentem per-
sequebatur ? nam cum propter sacrosanctam unctionem,
et honoravit vivum, et vindicavit occisum : et quia vel
panniculum ex ejus veste praescidit, percusso corde trepi-
davit. Ecce Saul non habebat innocentiam, et tamen
habebat sanctitatem, non vitas sua? (nam hoc sine inno-
centia nemo potest) sed sacramenti Dei, quod et in malis
hominibus sanctum est.' The reader will observe that
St. Augustine calls the regal unction, in the above pas-
sage, a sacrament ; nor, relying upon his authority, does
there appear to be any objection to the use of so high a
term, in the same wide sense in which we speak of the
sacrament of orders, or of marriage. So, also, St. Gregory
the Great says expressly, 'Quia vero ipsa unctio sacra-
mentum est, is qui promovetur, bene foris ungitur, si intus
virtute sacramenti roboretur., ' Eex unctus,' says Lynd-
wood, ' non mere persona laica sed mixta secundum
quosdam.' But this anointing must not be looked upon,
neither ever has it been, as conferring any sacerdotal
right or privilege : the sovereigns of England are supreme
in all cases whether ecclesiastical or civil, as in the one,
so in the other, both before and after the solemnity of
the coronation ; nor are their prerogatives increased by
its performance, or hindered by its delay: and, as before
they have no power, so neither after the regal unction
have they any right or authority to minister the sacra-
ments, or the Word of God." *
* Maskell, iii. xiv. ; see also Freeman's Norman Conquest, iii. 622.
This remarkable work is as valuable to the archgeologist as to the histo-
rian. One of the ecclesiastical laws of St. Edward the Confessor is entitled
"Quid sit regis officium" and begins, "Rex autem, qui vicarius sumnii
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 151
We come now to an extraordinary page of history. It chap.
is the custom for almost every writer to state, that only * — r— -
one bishop officiated at the coronation of Queen Elizabeth ; ParkerT
but these very writers, when describing the coronation, 1559-75.
are obliged to admit the presence of others.* The queen,
Cecil, and her present advisers, generally, were accustomed
to attend the mass, though the queen would not permit
the elevation of the host, for the reasons already given. It
was probably on this account that Archbishop Heath, on
whom devolved the right of crowning the queen, the see
of Canterbury being vacant, declined to officiate on the
occasion. But the elevation of the host was not necessary
to satisfy those who assisted at the mass, i. e. who attended
the celebration without partaking of the sacrament. The
regis est, ad hoc est constitutus, ut regnum terrenum et populum
Domini et super omnia sanctam veneretur ecclesiam ejus, et regat."
Wilkins's Concilia, i. 312. And compare the second of the Anglo-
Saxon Institutes of an Earthly King. Thorpe, Ancient Laws and
Institutes, ii. 305. Maskell, vol. iii. p. xiv. xvi.
* Dr. Nares, for example, in his Lite of Burghley, asserts that the
bishops refused to assist at the coronation ; and, drawing upon his
imagination, he gives the reasons for their absence ; and yet he says of
Burghley, that he " appears to have been placed particularly nigh to the
queen's person; since, in the account to be seen in the Ashmolean
Museum, when the queen approached the altar, where cushions of gold
were placed for her use, we read that Secretary Cecil delivered a book
to the bishop, and there was a bishop standing at the left hand of the
altar." Nares, ii. 24. Camden seems to be the authority on whom
the historians alluded to have relied; but Soames reminds us that, when
Elizabeth was crowned, the great antiquary was a child ; and, although
he asserts that the Bishop of Carlisle officiated, he does not say that the
others were absent. Soames truly remarks, that all the bishops were
present, although so great had been the mortality on the episcopal
bench, that the number was small. I may l^ere add, that Bishop
Oglethorpe was by no means a narrow-minded man ; he admitted even
that " the form and order of religion now set forth," in the reign of
Edward VI., was nearer the practice of the primitive and apostolical
Church than that which was formerly in England.
251
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
difficulty was at length overcome, Bishop Oglethorpe
having expressed his readiness to meet the wishes of the
queen. If the queen conceded everything to the dio-
1559-75. cesans, except one ceremony, it was not much for the
diocesans, at a time when they still entertained the hope
of bending Elizabeth to their will, to yield to what they
regarded as a prejudice on her part which might hereafter
be overcome. So many concessions had already been
made that more might be fairly expected.
The coronation was in fact performed with the usual
ceremonies and with the mass ; not according to the
Eomish form, as some unfriendly historians are pleased to
assert, but according to the old Church of England formu-
lary, which, admitting adaptations to the exigencies of
each reign, had existed from the earliest periods of our
history, and which is substantially the form still in use.*
* The late Sir Francis Palgrave informed me, that it is the form that
was always adopted at the coronation of the emperor. The learned
writer whom I have already quoted remarks: " It would not be right to
speak of the coronation service, which I have edited in this volume, as
of the use of Sarum, although taken from the pontifical of that church;
nor, in like manner, of the same service as according to the use of
Winchester or Exeter. Those churches, at the periods when the par-
ticular copies of their pontificals were written, now at one time, now
at another, adopted and included, according to its then state, this office,
which formed one of the chief duties of the bishops of the Church.
The coronation service was always ' according to the use of the Church
of England ; ' or, on account of its high privilege as the place where the
solemnity was to be performed, ' according to the use of the church of
Westminster ; ' so also, in modern times, the coronation service must be
regarded as ' according to the use of the Church of England.' The
earliest state in which we find the order as it was in the pontifical of
Egbert, Archbishop of York, in the eighth century, is not different in-
deed from that which, was last used upon the coronation of her present
majesty. The alterations, whether of omission or addition, have been
made gradually ; and it is probably true that there has never yet been
a coronation without the service being subjected to some change, either
for the better or for the worse. The records of Ethelred, Henry I.,
Jan. 15.
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 153
The diocesan bishops attended with the exception of chap.
Bonner, who, nevertheless, as has been before stated, ^J^L^
lent his scarlet robes to one of the prelates, who would pST
not otherwise have been properly equipped for the 1559-75.
occasion. The prelate who officiated was the Bishop of
Carlisle, Dr. Owen Oglethorpe. On the 15th of January Corona-
the coronation took place in Westminster Abbey. The EiiLbeth.
queen went first to Westminster Hall, and, says Strype,
"there went before her trumpets, knights, and lords,
heralds of arms in their rich coats ; then the nobles in
their scarlet, and all the bishops in scarlet; then the
queen, and all the footmen, waiting upon her to the
Hall. There her grace's apparel was changed. In the
Hall they met the bishop who was to perform the cere-
mony, and all the chapel, with three crosses borne before
them, in their copes, the bishop mitred, and singing as
they passed, Salve festa dies — all the streets, new laid
with gravel and blue cloth, and railed in on each side,
and so to the Abbey to mass, and there her grace was
crowned. Thence, the ceremony ended, the queen and
her retinue went to Westminster Hall to dinner ; and
every officer took his office at service upon their lands,
and so did the Lord Mayor of London and the Alder-
men. *
From a desire to explain the position assumed by the
several parties with which the government had to contend,
I have been induced partially to anticipate the history of
Edward II., and Richard II. prove this, no less than those of James I.,
or George I., or Queen Victoria."
* Strype's Annals, I. i. 44. The writer of these pages was pre-
sent at the coronation of George IV. : seeing him first in the Hall, he
followed him to the Abbey, and then returned to the Hall, where was
"high feasting;" and, except. that the mass was turned into the com-
munion, he might have described what he witnessed very nearly in
the words given in the text.
154 LIVES OF THE
chap. Parker. Antecedently to the coronation he had arrived in
. ,_ ' London ; and to his conciliatory manners and clear in-
ParkeiT sight into the real position of affairs, we may attribute the
1559-75. satisfactory termination of the negotiations relating to the
coronation. No party could now gainsay the fact, that
Elizabeth of England was an anointed sovereign.
Although considerably senior to Cecil and Bacon, Parker
had been their friend and adviser during their career at
Cambridge, and an intimacy ensued. When the concilia-
tory policy of the government was determined upon, Cecil
advised the queen to call Dr. Parker to her counsels.
He might fairly be considered as the leader and repre-
sentative of the English Eeformers. Like the queen and
Cecil, his desire was to conciliate the Eomanizers, and
thence to proceed in a course of gradual reform. Eepelled
by the Eomanizing party, they soon found that it would be
necessary to conciliate the Protestants, and to save from
their extravagance as much as they could of Catholic truth.
Parker Almost immediately after the nomination of Bacon as
to London. Keeper of the Great Seal, and before he was sworn into
office, Parker received from him a kind and friendly letter.
Parker wTas invited to London in the first instance, to
confer with his friends upon his private affairs. Bacon
offered to receive him as a visitor at Burgany House, his
town residence.*
If Parker could not make it convenient to undertake
a journey to the metropolis before Bacon left town,
Cecil, now become Bacon's brother-in-law, offered to
receive him as a guest. Parker was obliged to decline
the invitation, as he was at that time suffering from the
* Burgany, or Burgavenny, House had been the residence of the
Earls of Abergavenny, at the north end of " Ave Mary Lane." Stow's
Survey, p. 127. It was probably hired by Sir Nicolas Bacon, who after-
wards purchased and rebuilt Shelley House in Noble Street, Aldersgate,
thenceforth called Bacon House.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 155
ague. He states that he had signified through his friend, chap.
Sir John Cheke, who had made known to him Cecil's . VITIXL
desire to serve him, that he desired no high preferment, parktr*
"I would be inwardly heavy and sorry," he writes, " that 1559-75
Sir William Cecil's favourable affection should procure
me anything above the reach of mine ability, whereby I
should both dishonest myself, and disappoint the expecta-
tion of such as may think that in me which I know is
not ; but specially I might clog and cumber my conscience
to God- ward, before whom I look every day to appear to
make mine answer, which I think, and, as I trust, is not
far off. Notwithstanding, though I would most fain wear
out the rest of my life in private state, yet concerning
that very small talent credited unto me, I would not so
unthankfully to God ensue my quiet, that I could not be
content to bestow it, so it were there whither my heart
and conscience afore this time, and daily yet doth incline
me."* He goes on to state, that he wishes for nothing
more than the revenue of some prebend, so that he
might occupy himself in preaching the gospel in poor
and destitute parishes ; for this, he thought, was better
suited for his decayed voice and small quality, than in
theatrical and great audience. Of all places in England
he would prefer to live in the University of Cambridge,
where much reformation was wanted. " To tell you my
heart," he continues, " I had rather have such a thing as
Bene't College is in Cambridge, a living of twenty nobles
by the year at the most, than to dwell in the deanery of
Lincoln, which is two hundred at the least." He especially
deprecated any public appointment. There is a reference
in the letter to certain exhibitions at Cambridge, main-
* See Parker's Corresp. p. 50. The letter is without date, but the
editors of the volume place it between the 9th and the 20th of Decem-
ber, 1558.
156 LIVES OF Till-:
chap, tained by the generosity of Bacon, which leads us
— r-^— suppose that Parker had already returned to the Uni-
Parker. versity he so dearly loved. He was certainly there ii
ioo9-75. March, when he was actively employed in procuring
Cecil's election to the office of chancellor.
Having neglected the invitations he received from Bacon
and Cecil, under the impression that they wished to force
some public employment upon him, he received a short
and peremptory note from Cecil, conveying a royal com-
mand that he should, " upon the sight hereof, put himself
in order to make his indelayed repair unto London, when
he would declare her majesty's further pleasure."
It appears that, probably on the ground of his ill health,
he neglected to obey the summons ; for, on the 4th of
January, he received another letter from Bacon, who
supposes that Cecil's letter had miscarried, and warning
him that he must immediately commence his journey to
London if his health permitted. * As we have no letters
from Parker in his Correspondence between the 4th of
January and the 1st of March, we may presume that he
acted in obedience to the royal command, and repaired
to London. He was certainly soon after in frequent
conference with the ministers, and became a leading per-
sonage in those councils of state which Cecil now in the
queen's name convened. The state of his health, how-
ever, continued so infirm, that he was under the necessity
of occasionally seeking, for two or three days, a little
country air. We have already stated the condition of
public affairs ; and it became every day more apparent,
that, contrary to the wishes of Cecil and Parker, they
would have to make terms, not with the Eomanizing
party, but with the exiles. Although the persons forming
the party are described by the learned editor of Fuller,
* Corresp. p. 53.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 157
as "new men of the very lowest principles, and most chap.
doubtful orthodoxy," yet there were many exceptions,
and among the exiles a party had arisen which, through p^T
evil report and good report, had adhered to the principles 1559-75.
of the English Eeformation. For an account of the
fierce controversies which prevailed among the English,
who fled from the persecutions of Mary, the reader must
be referred to the general historian. Nevertheless, it is
necessary briefly to touch upon the subject.
When the English refugees applied for protection to
the Protestants strictly so called, that is, to the Lutherans,
they were treated as worse than Papists, and the Papists,
bad as they were, had certainly no monopoly of persecu-
tion. In vain did the English refer to their sufferings ;
it was retorted that, even by heretics, persecution could
be endured. In vain, so far as the continental Protes-
tants were concerned, did they discard the dogma of
transubstaatiation if consubstantiation was rejected. In
vain did they reject the supremacy of the Bishop of
Eome, unless they allowed Martin Luther to usurp his
place. These were severe measures ; and the more severe
because it was of Lutheranizing that the English reformers
were accused at home. But the Germans declared the
English martyrs under Mary to be the devil's martyrs,
not the martyrs of God. In vain did the gentle Melanc-
thon plead in their behalf. They were told that the
Protestant or Lutheran religion and the religion of the
Church of England were two distinct and different things ;
a fact, the forgetfulness of which has, for three centuries,
involved us in difficulties and endless controversy.*
* Vociferantur quidam Martyres Anglicos esse Martyres Diaboli.
See Melancthon, ep. i. 2. Melancthon makes an exception in favour of
Latimer and a few others whom he had known. On the Continent, the
Lutherans for a long time assumed exclusively the title of Protestants.
The Calvinists,when not called by the name of their founder, took the title
158 . LIVES OF THE
chap. Under these circumstances, the refugees were thrown
viii. . .
*■ — r— ^- into the arms of the Calvinists, and soon became more or
Parker, less under the influence of the illustrious founder of that
1559-75. sect. Even of those who, with justifiable national preju-
dice, upheld in foreign parts the cause of the formularies
of the Church of England, too many returned with a
desire to approach Calvinism as nearly as they consis-
tently could. These had, many of them, made a manful
stand in favour of the Prayer Book at Frankfort. It
was through them that the Anglo-Catholic party, under
Parker and Cecil, opened communications with the re-
turned exiles ; but, for reasons just assigned, they did not
receive that cordiality of support which they had a right to
expect. Even these mediating parties were in frequent
correspondence with the leading Calvinists abroad ; and
some of them received the dishonest advice, that they
should conform to the Church, in order that they might
obtain the power and the means of subverting those prin-
ciples which the English reformers desired to maintain ;
and, for the maintenance of which, whatever their previous
vacillations may have been, Eidley, Latimer, and even
Cranmer, declared that they laid down their lives.*
Liturgical When Parker came to town, he found that the queen
Keform. an(^ Cecil had determined to retain the first book of
Edward VI. as the Book of Common Prayer for the English
Church. Although published in the reign of Edward VL,
of " the reformed." From the want of a strict nomenclature on this point
endless confusion has been introduced into the ecclesiastical history of
England. It is easier to adopt terms than to change them. I shall in
this biography apply the term Protestant to the Anglo-Catholics, that
of Puritan to the Calvinists, and that of Papist to the emissaries of
Rome.
* Even Peler Martyr, in his letters to Jewel, recommended that
scrupulous divines should wear the vestments, and yet never cease to
preach against them.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 159
it had been prepared in the reign of Henry VIII. It might chap.
admit of some alterations, but those alterations would . vnL .
have been made with a view of reclaiming some Catholic ^^7
observances which had been overlooked ; but Parker was 1559-75.
soon convinced that he must so far yield to the exiles, as
to permit them to make the second book of Edward the
basis of his liturgical reforms. If Parker was disappointed
with respect to those, among the returned exiles, who
still professed to uphold the principles of the English
Eeformers, he was equally disappointed by finding the
Eomanizing party mustering its forces to reject every
attempt at reformation. The tangible difficulty at this
time was the hostile front presented by the Convocation.
The attention of the government had been exclusively
directed to the parliamentary elections. When we say
that they sought to pack the House of Commons, we do
not intend to convey a censure so severe as that, to
which such a course would in these days be obnoxious.
As in the election of a bishop, freedom of choice is legally
conceded to the electors, while the conge d'elire is ac-
companied by a letter missive, naming the person in
favour of whom the choice is to be exercised, so was it
customary in those days, for the court, at a general elec-
tion of members of parliament, to nominate five candi-
dates for each shire, and three for each borough, out of
whom the election was to be made. In either case it was
an act of despotism ; but, until the passions of the mul-
titude are inflamed by demagogues, it is astonishing to
see how passively to customary acts of despotism the
multitude will yield. The feeling was that, in electing a
parliament, they were electing a great council to advise
the crown, and the object was to select everywhere the
wisest men. This system answered well, until it was dis-
covered that Parliament might be the means of gratifying
ICO LIVES OF THE
chap, private ambition ; and that those who denounced a poor
»- » r* elector for taking bribes, might promote the interests of
Parte, himself and family by devoting himself to the service of
1559-75. a party which, if bitter against opponents, has always
known how to reward its supporters.
What had been done with respect to Parliament, might
have been done with respect to Convocation. But it will
be remembered that the religious question was not the
first which occupied the minds of Elizabeth's councillors.
They thought, moreover, that the majority of the clergy,
caring little for doctrinal questions, would sanction any
reforms which did not interfere with the rights of pro-
perty. In the absence of government interference, the
archdeacons and officials of the ecclesiastical courts, whose
interest it was to retard the Eeformation, bestirred
themselves. Parker soon perceived that little could be
done with the then existing convocation, and that, before
the dissolution of Parliament, a new convocation could
not be called. It was a sad oversight, and rendered
necessary a recourse to an appeal to the prerogative, as
well as to measures such as Parker would not otherwise
have recommended.
Two parties, it was represented to the queen, stood
prepared, neither to be conciliated, and both to intimidate
the youthful sovereign. Little did those parties know the
master mind and the stern will to which they stood
opposed. Elizabeth was determined, by the aid of Parlia-
ment and the exertion of her prerogative, which was at
that time very high, to bring the one party down and
to raise the other party up to her own level.
Appoint- She directed Cecil to appoint a committee to prepare
commas- measures, to be submitted to the Parliament about to be
sionf?r . assembled. This committee was to consist of persons
eccJesiasti- 1
cai reform, who represented the English reformation and the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 161
)pinions of the queen herself; that is to say, of men de- chap.
termined to preserve the old Catholic Church of England ; ^ -VJtII_^
not to deviate from its hereditary customs in ceremony "parkeT
or in vestments, except when such deviations were neces- 1559-75.
sary to support the primitive truth against medieval error ;
to venerate antiquity, while avoiding superstition ; to
secure the apostolical succession ; and to insist on nothing
de fide except what could be proved from Scripture as
interpreted by patristic tradition. Here was a platform
on which latitude was allowed to all parties whose desire
it was, notwithstanding minor differences of opinion, to
unite and co-operate.
The leading advocates of these principles, in addition
to Cecil and the queen, were Dr. Parker, late Dean of
Lincoln ; Dr. Bill, late Master of Trinity College, Cam-
bridge, and almoner to the queen ; Dr. May, late Dean of
St. Paul's ; and Bernard Gilpin, the Apostle of the North.
The government nominated the chairman, Sir Thomas
Smith, though the duties which devolved upon him cor-
responded with those which are generally, in the present
day, assigned to the secretary of a royal commission. He
was to prepare the business, to arrange the details, to
report proceedings, to secure requisite information on all
topics suggested for discussion. The commission met at
his house in Canon Lane, where every necessary of life
was provided for the members of the commission. In
his office of chairman or secretary, Sir Thomas Smith
added weight to the authority of the commissioners
already named ; for he was regarded as the queen's re-
presentative. To invite the bishops to become members
of the commission was evidently useless, because, though
they showed no violent opposition to the government,
they evidently expected, by withholding their support,
VOL. IX. M
162 LIVES OF THE
chap, to compel the queen to defer to their opinions and
« r^— accede to their terms. They thought to rule her ma-
Parker, jesty, and her majesty intended to be ruled by neither
1669-75. the one party nor the other. Equally useless it was to
call in the aid of the ultra-Protestants, for they ignored
all that had hitherto been done, and desired that
the Eeformation should begin de novo, on principles
in direct opposition to those of the queen and of the
English reformers. They were most of them devoted
to Calvin, by whom the English Church and its refor-
mation had already been coarsely denounced ; and of
Calvin, the queen had a just and increasing abhorrence.
But the Puritans could not be entirely passed over, for
among them were some of the most devout and learned
men of the age; and others there were, who, though
under the influence of foreign Protestants, were open to
conviction. The persons last mentioned gave in their
adhesion to the second Prayer Book of Edward VI.,
although it unequivocally asserted the doctrine of bap-
tismal regeneration ; and, as the English reformers were
accustomed to maintain, the Eeal, as distinguishable from
the Corporeal, Presence of our Lord in the Sacrament
of his Body and Blood. Among these we may mention
Whitehead, Grindal, and Pilkington, who, for the most
part orthodox themselves, were frequently led into incon-
sistencies from their desire to obtain concessions for the
extreme Puritans ; they sometimes succeeded to the de-
triment of the Church. Their acceptance, however, of a
place in the commission, so far strengthened the hands
of the government, that it showed the bishops, who
headed the opposition, that if they continued to withhold
their support, the government had the means to defy
them ; and the Puritans, if not satisfied, were at least for
the time pacified.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 163
The commission met.* Parker and Cecil, supported chap.
by the queen, determined to concede as little as was - VIIL_
possible, and to retain of the ancient ritual as much as ^rkeT
they were able. The discussions were amicable, and 1559 75.
Parker was the personal friend of every member of the
board. Unfortunately, however, for the Church, Parker's
ill health continued, and from the meetings of the com-
mission he was frequently obliged to absent himself.
When he found this to be the case, he permitted Dr.
Gheast f to be added to the commission.
Edmund Gheast had not been one of the exiles, and
he upheld the English reformation. He was regarded
as representing Parker's opinions ; but he was frequently
open to the charge of vacillation. Such was his dread of
giving offence, that he was found sometimes to yield to
the Puritans, and even to adopt their sentiments, when,
if Parker had been present, their proposals would have
been resisted.
Everything in which Cecil was concerned was con-
ducted methodically, and a plan of the proceedings
had been prepared by him, after consultation with
Parker, which was called a Device. It is a document Cecil's
of considerable length, in which the necessity of making
some alterations in Church affairs is asserted, the dangers
attending such alterations being admitted, and the best
mode of meeting the difficulty being suggested. Imme-
* See Strype's Life of Smith, p. 56. Nares's Burghley, ii. 41,42.
Strype's Annals, I. i. 1. Heylin, ii. 273.
f See Life of Bishop Geste by Henry Geast Dugdale. The name is
differently spelt. Stubbs gives the name Gheast, taking it from the
registers. I give it as I find it in the Eegistrum of Professor Stubbs,
in accordance with a rule formerly laid down. Stubbs may not always
be right ; but it is very difficult to prove him to be wrong.
m 2
1G4 LIVES OP THE
chap, diate action was declared to be necessary, in order
VIII. .
- — — - that the policy of the pope might be anticipated and
Matthew .. i - . if i «.' , -«
Parker, frustrated. ; tor it was expected that the Bishop of Eome,
1559-75. as ne was designated, might excommunicate Elizabeth,
and, on her excommunication, invite the continental
powers in league with Eome for the invasion of Eng-
land. Among men of the " Papist sect," the pope might
find supporters in England, if precautions were not
taken in good time to coerce or restrain them. It was
remarked, however, that it was not from this quarter
only that danger was to be apprehended; there were
others who would abet " an alteration from the Church
of Eome — who would, when they saw many of the old
ceremonies retained, and those doctrines — the doctrines
of the foreign reformation, which they had embraced —
not only not allowed, but abolished and disproved,
would be discontented, and would call the alteration
a clokecl papistry, or a mingle-mangle." It is impor-
tant to observe, that the English reformers foresaw their
difficulties on either side, and knew what they were about.
In the solution of the difficulty last named, the whole
policy of Parker and Cecil is foreshadowed. "It is," says
the Device, " better that they — the ultra-Protestants or
Puritans — should suffer, than that her highness, or the
commonwealth, should shake or be in danger."
The via media is clearly laid down.
Bill of In preparing a Bill for the ensuing Parliament, the
mity.0*" real position of the queen was a point first to be decided.
The title of Head of the Church, which Henry VIII. had
assumed, gave as much offence to the Papists and the
Puritans as to the English reformers. By ignorance or
malignity it is still applied by Erastians to the reigning
sovereign ; but the title was repudiated by the wisdom
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 165
or the piety of Queen Elizabeth.* But, in rejecting this chap.
profane title, Elizabeth had no intention to resign those . — i^-.
powers with which, even in spiritual affairs, the consti- p^LT
tution in Church and State had invested the sovereign. 1559-75.
It was declared, " that we give not to our princes the
ministry, either of God's word or sacraments . . . but
only the prerogative, which seems to have been given Royal su-
always to godly princes in Holy Scripture by God Preraacy*
himself; that is, that they should rule all states and
degrees committed to their charge by God, whether they
be ecclesiastical or temporal, and restrain with the civil
sword the stubborn and evildoer." f
* In a letter from Dr. Sandys to Parker, he says, "Mr. Lever wisely
put such a scruple in the queen's head, that she would not take the title
of supreme head." Corresp. p. 66. Jewel, in writing to Peter Martyr,
says, " The queen declines being styled Head of the Church, at which I
am certainly not much displeased." Zurich Letters, p. 24. Again, in
writing to Bullinger, Jewel informs his correspondent, " The queen is
unwilling to be addressed, either by word of mouth or in writing, as
the Head of the Church of England. For she seriously maintains that
this honour is due to Christ alone, and cannot belong to any human
being soever." Zurich Letters, p. 33.
■f This subject has been fully discussed in the introductory chapter
to this book, where Mr. Gladstone's argument against those who
apply the title of Head of the Church to the sovereign, is cited at
length. I add here a quotation from the Regulations of the Discipline
and Order of the Church, published by Queen Elizabeth immediately
after the passing of the Act of Uniformity. Having noticed the mis-
constructions of her claims to the temporal supremacy, she then proceeds
to say, " Her majesty neither doth, nor ever will, challenge any other
authority than what was challenged and lately used by the noble kings
of iamous memory, Henry VIII. and Edward VI., which is and tvas of
ancient time due to the imperial crown of the realm ; that is, under
God, to have sovereignty and rule over all manner of persons, born
within these her realms and dominions, so as no power shall or ought
to have any superiority over them." In the next Parliament this expla-
nation of the oath of supremacy received the sanction of the legislature.
It is generally called "Queen Elizabeth's admonition." An Act, which
166
LIVES OF Till-:
CHAP.
VIII.
The first point to which the commission had now to
* direct attention was to the Bill of Uniformity about to be
Parker, submitted to the Parliament. Several difficulties here
1659-75. presented themselves to the mind of Parker. To Jewel,
Book!r Sandys, Horn, Cox, Grindal, and others, to whom Porker
looked for at least a qualified support ; to the Earl of
Bedford, and to the queen herself, violent and intole-
rant letters were written by Bullinger, Peter Martyr, and
Weidner, denunciatory of the English reformation, and
calling upon them to resist, with all their might, those
men — the English reformers — by whose means the seeds
of popery were still retained among us. The principles
of several among the ecclesiastics were thus shaken at a
time when firmness was most required. The foreigners
had the sagacity to see, that many who held doctrinally
the Puritan principles were anxious to share in the
emoluments of the Church ; their great fear was, lest to
carry this object they should be induced to concede too
much. While the queen and her council desired to
conciliate the few Papists still retaining an influence in
the country, the object of the ultra-Protestants was to
exasperate them, and to form two parties which, as has
unfortunately been the case, would be in a perpetual
state of antagonism, the one against the other.
Liturgical Parker, from his antiquarian researches, was well cal-
reforms.
was passed in the fifth year of her majesty, directed that the oath should
be taken and expounded in this sense. The object of the acts passed in
Queen Elizabeth's reign, bearing upon the royal authority, is declared
by Sir Edward Coke to have been merely to restore to the crown the
rights it had always possessed by the common law of the realm. See
Comyn's Digest, art. " Prerogative." To the same effect see Judge
Blackstone, Comment, iv. 33. Bracton indeed, who was made a judge
by Henry III. in the thirteenth century, when popery was rampant,
expresses himself thus: Rex est vicarius et minister Dei, tarn in sjnritua-
libus quam in temporalibus. Lib. i. cap. 8.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 167
dilated to take the lead in what related to liturgical chap.
reform. The history of our liturgical offices — applying . __VHL_
the terra liturgy, not in its strict sense, to the Communion p^r
office, but in that larger sense in which the term is ap- 1559-75.
plicable to all that is contained in the Book of Common
Prayer — is one of peculiar interest. The very foundation
of our Church was laid in a liturgical discussion, settled
by the largeness of mind exhibited by Gregory the
Great, rather than by any general controversy bearing
upon theory instead of practice. The reader of these
volumes is aware, that our Prayer Book is to be traced
for its origin, not to Eome, but through the Gallican
Church to the Churches of Ephesus and Smyrna. When,
under Augustine, the missionary prelate, and Ethelbert
the king, the foundations of the Church of England were
laid, Augustine was astonished to find that the sacred
offices were not administered in the Church of Gaul —
by the bishops of which Church he was consecrated —
under those forms to which he had been habituated when
he ministered as a priest in Eome. The advice given to
him by Gregory, when Augustine was perplexed how to
act, was based on that principle on which our Eeformers
professed to proceed, as may be seen from the Preface to
the Book of Common Prayer. u You, my brother," wrote
Gregory to the first Archbishop of Canterbury, " are ac-
quainted with the customs of the Eoman Church in which
you were educated ; but I advise you, if you have found
anything either in the Eoman, or in the Gallican, or in
any other Church which may be acceptable to Almighty
God, that you carefully make choice of the same, and
sedulously teach the Church of the Angles, who are at
present new in the faith, whatsoever you gather from
the principal Churches. For things are not to be loved
for the sake of places, but places for the sake of good
1G8
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1659-75.
things. Select, therefore, those things which are pious,
religious, and orderly ; and when you have made these up
into one book, instil this into the minds of the English for
their use." *
It does not appear that Augustine collected the offices
of the Church into one book ; and we find it as a matter
of fact, after the age of Theodorus, that the Breviary, f the
Missal, and the Manual were generally kept in separate
volumes. Before the application of the* printing-press to
the purposes of literature, errors were certain to be in-
troduced by the carelessness of transcribers, or with the
object of meeting the crotchets of various divines, who
then, as now, would make the Church, if possible, con-
descend to their own extravagant fancies, instead of
forcing their private opinions to bend to the rule of the
Church.
* Gregory, Opera, ii. 1151. Ba?da, i. xxvii. The Eoman Breviary
was not used in France until after the Revolution ; nor was it intro-
duced into England until about a century and a half ago, when some of
the Romish priests, being Jesuits, were obliged, in accordance with the
principles of their sect, to use it. The Romish sect established in
England by Cardinal Wiseman has, I am informed, adopted all Roman
forms. For an account of our Prayer Book, see Sir William Palmer,
Archdeacon Freeman, Lathbury, Sparrow, Hardwick, Maskell, Buller,
Proctor, and Cardwell, compared with Bingham, Collier, Cosin, Heylin,
L'Estranpje, and Neal. These writers would be the first to express
their obligations to such works as Goar, Euchologium or Rituale
Greecorum ; Renaudot, Liturgiarum Orientalium Collectio; Mabillon,
De Liturgia Gallicana ; Muratori, Liturgia Romana ; Assemanni, Codex
Liturgicus Ecclesia? Universas.
■f Known in the Church of England as the Portiforium, or, as it was
translated, the Portuis or Portess. Its origin may probably be traced
to St. Benedict in the sixth century. It contained the daily services of
the Church, as distinct from the Liturgy properly so called. The
Missal contained the service for the Holy Communion, or Mass. The
Manual contained the offices for baptism, visitation of the sick, &c.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 169
" His fantasy, still working, CHAP.
Finds out another crotchet ; » r '-*
Then runs he to the bishop, ^^w
And rides upon his rochet." * 1559-75.
Of the great work of Osmund, Bishop of Salisbury, Use of
in the twelfth century, mention has been made in a 1078-99.
former volume, f His object was to introduce uniform-
ity throughout the English Church. " The Sarum Use,"
referred to in the Preface of the Book of Common
Prayer, was, to a considerable extent, successful. Al-
though the York Use, the Hereford Use, and the Lincoln
Use had all and each of them their several advocates ;
yet, even in the dioceses in which these Uses were
adopted in the cathedral, there were many churches
which preferred and adhered to the Use of Sarum. If
any one prayer book was to be adopted as national,
no doubt existed as to which "Use" should be selected.
Indeed, it will be within the memory of the reader, that
the first decided step taken in the direction of liturgical
reform consisted in an attempt to enforce the adoption,
throughout the Church of England, of the " Sarum Use."
So popular was the Sarum Use in the fifteenth century,
that it was adopted in Durham, in many of the churches
of Scotland, and even in some of the continental
churches.
From the fourteenth century onwards there grew up
a general desire, that, as Augustine, our founder, had
caused the Greek offices to be translated into Latin,
when Latin was the common language of educated men,
* Corbet
t It is sometimes said, that the Bishop of Salisbury being precentor
of the province, Osmund reformed the Liturgy in that character ; but, on
recurring to the subject, I found it cannot be shown that the Bishops of
Sarum held the office of precentor at so early a period.
170 LIVES OF Tin:
chap, so now, when English had become the only language
— , — - * generally understood in a country where men were
Parker, beginning to think for themselves, it would be expedient
1559-75. to translate the Latin offices into the vernacular. Among
the ecclesiastical authorities, an inclination to meet the
demand certainly prevailed. From the year 1390, when
I believe the first English Primer made its appearance,
an English version of certain portions of the Church
services had from time to time been made and sanctioned.*
"Indeed," says Mr. Maskell, a there never was a period
in the history of the English Church, when care was not
taken to enforce upon all priests the duty of teaching the
people the rudiments of the faith in the vulgar tongue,
and to provide books fitted for that purpose. Hence
it is, that we have so many short expositions in English
of the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the Ten Command-
ments."
The clergy had been fearfully negligent of their duty ;
but, from what has been said, it will be seen that the way
had long been prepared for the English reformers. We
may trace the first decided step taken in favour of litur-
gical reform to the year 1516, and to the publication,
under synodal authority, of a reformed edition of the
Salisbury Breviary. In this edition the rubrics were
simplified, and more ample provision was made for the
reading of Scripture. So much did this measure com-
mend itself to the judgment both of the clergy and of the
laity, that, in the year 1531, a reprint of the new edition
* For the history of Primers the reader is referred to Mr. Maskell.
With reference to the three Primers published at Oxford by my learned
friend the late Dr. Burton, Mr. Maskell observes, that the preface drawn
up by that " excellent man, to whose labour the Church is much
indebted, does not do justice to his acknowledged industry and
ability."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 171
issued from the press. This was followed in 1533 by a chap.
bolder measure, a revised edition of the Salisbury Missal. » — ,— -
'.n 1534, the clergy in convocation petitioned the king to Baker.
command a translation of the Scripture to be made, and 1559-75.
to authorize its perusal.
The demand was partially met by the publication of
the Primers, to which allusion has been already made j
and at length, in 1540, the " Great Bible," as it was called,
was set up in the churches — an English authorized version
of Scripture, the basis of all subsequent translations. In
1541 a further advance was made. Instead of the
various Uses which had hitherto prevailed in the differ-
ent dioceses of the Church of England, the Convocation
directed that a further revision should be made of the
Sarum Use ; and, when it was finished, directions were
given for its sole use throughout the province of Canter-
bury. In 1542, in the reign, be it observed, of Henry
VIII., and after the passing of the Statute of Six Articles,
the bishops, under the king's command, were again occu-
pied in the work of liturgical reform. It was signified
to the Convocation, by the Archbishop of Canterbury,
Dr. Cranmer, that it was the king's pleasure that all books,
Antiphoners and Portuises, should be examined, corrected,
and reformed.* Orders were issued to the bishops, re-
quiring them to direct the curate of every parish church,
on every Sunday and holiday throughout the year, after the
Te Deum and Magnificat, to read a chapter of the New
Testament in English, and when the New Testament had
been read through, to begin the Old. For one hundred
and fifty years the litanies used in processions had been
sung in English. These the Archbishop of Canterbury,
with the help of other prelates, undertook to revise ; and
they translated and re-arranged a litany almost identical
* Strype's Memorials, i. 580.
172 LIVES OF THE
°vm' W^T ^iat wn*cn *s st*^ m use-* It was published, by
"ZT7Z — ' command of the king, on the 11th of June, 1544. Soon
Parker, after the accession of Edward VI., the first Prayer Book,
1559-75. t0 wnic]a his name was attached, was finished, — a work at
which the commissioners had laboured long and diligently ;
and for which the sanction of Convocation was obtained
in November, 1548. The Book of Common Prayer was
accepted as the " Use " of all England. The synod found
that the book presented for their sanction contained all
the essential features of the former Uses, avoiding the
difficulties of which, in the complication of the services,
the less learned of the clergy complained. With the
dissolution of the monasteries the Eegulars may be said
to have ceased to have existence in the English Church.
The Breviary, therefore, was no longer required ; and the
difference between the Breviary and the Book of Common
Prayer was seen to consist in the fact, that the Prayer
Book was adapted to parochial rather than to monastic
purposes. The seven daily services observed in the
monasteries were, in the revised book, condensed into
matins and evensong. The lessons read in church were
to be taken no longer from questionable legends, but
exclusively from the sure word of Scripture. Many
festival services were omitted. Extravagant expressions,
relating to the Virgin Mary and other saints were dis-
continued, being regarded as interpolations of a date com-
paratively modern. What was primitive was retained ;
what was medieval was subjected to the test of Scripture.
The book was sent by Convocation to the king, and by
the king to Parliament. The Parliament declared their
pious belief that the Book of Common Prayer was com-
* Dr. Cranmer at that time retained addresses to the Virgin Mary
and some of the saints — " Ora pro nobis;" but this error he shortly after
renounced.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 173
pleted by the Inspiration of God the Holy Ghost ; and chap.
they readily passed the first Act of Uniformity. Thus, » .VI*L-,
gradually, was the work of the commission performed; bS^*
thus, cautiously, was drawn up a " Use " which, having 1559-75.
absorbed within itself what was scriptural and primitive
in preceding Uses, has been the solid basis of all the
subsequent proceedings of our Church in this direction.
In this Prayer Book, the queen, Parker, and Cecil
found all that they regarded as absolutely necessary.
What had been accomplished, had been done by the
bishops, under the sanction of the crown ; it had been
supported by the Convocation ; it had been submitted to
Parliament ; and it had been adopted by the Lords
Spiritual and the Lords Temporal without alteration.
The Book of Common Prayer being included in the Act
of Uniformity, became a law of the land. The acts of
Henry and of Edward bearing upon religion had been
repealed under Mary, by whom new acts of Parliament
had been obtained. These obnoxious acts being now
re-enacted, Elizabeth was in the position of her brother
at the beginning of his reign : she inherited the policy of
her father, and to his wisdom she and her advisers were
always accustomed to look back with respect. The
bishops could not consistently interfere, because all that
it was proposed to accomplish had already received their
approbation. Convocation would not have to be con-
sulted, for what was to be restored had been itself the
work of Convocation. All that was required was, that
the obnoxious acts of Mary should be repealed ; and that
the work of the bishops in a preceding convocation should,
by a new Act of Uniformity, be re-adopted by the laity.
On the other hand, the ultra-Protestants, even those who
were prepared to conform to the second Prayer Book of
Edward, raised a clamour against the book of 1549. The
174 LIVES OF THE
chap, country had declared its belief, that the first Prayer Bool
— , — * had been reformed under Divine Inspiration ; there coul
Parker, therefore be nothing wrong in its principles : but altera
1559-75. tions had nevertheless been made, and omissions tolerate
from a desire not to shock unnecessarily the prejudic
of certain parties, whose co-operation was desired. I
preparing the first book, the question had been simply,
What is the truth ? Parker and the English reformers,
in revising that book, desired to adhere to the principle
which had actuated their predecessors. The question,
however, as it was, unfortunately, brought to bear upon
the second book, was, How much can we, in charity,
concede to the prejudices of the extreme Protestant party
without absolutely cutting ourselves off from the Catholic
Church ? This was still the question with the returned
exiles. Those among them who were Episcopalians
were ready to conform, but on the condition that fur-
ther concessions should be made, if it should be foun
expedient to make them.
Thus in the committee, two parties, though maintainin
the most friendly relations with each other, were foun
to exist. One party was determined to render our fo
mularies more Protestant ; while the English reforme
foreseeing that they would be obliged to yield on som
points, were resolved to concede as little as possible.
The question was reduced to this, When we apply
Parliament for an Act of Uniformity, which Prayer Boo
shall we introduce into the bill ? Cecil and Parker found
it necessary to yield. It was difficult to persuade some of
the best and most learned of their contemporaries to con
form to the Church of England. The foreign Calvinis
were eager to receive them, if they again left their nativ
country. However unwilling the Puritans might be
leave their native land, they had given proof that the
!
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY, 175
would do so if necessary. If they would not come to chap.
terms, the government would be thrown upon the tender ^ V
i
mercy of the Papists. The country, though not Protes- p^rT
tant, was anti-Papistical, and in favour of a reformation ; 1559-75.
and it was absolutely necessary to make terms with those
among the Puritans who understood, that the continuity
of the Church depended upon its episcopacy ; and who,
in spite of the attempts made, with too much success,
to pervert the exiles, had still some English feeling left.
It was at length conceded that the Second Book of
Edward should be adopted. The difficulty was with the
queen. Elizabeth wTas not accustomed to yield with a
good grace. She had high notions of the prerogative,
and no slight opinion of her powers of fascination and
persuasion. Parker probably succeeded in persuading
the queen to allow the Second Book of Edward to be
adopted, by admitting, that although in that book there
were some things to which he and the English reformers
had serious objections, yet for the sanction of some
alterations an appeal to the prerogative might be made,
if not without observation, without causing offence.
The primate had to proceed with caution. Some of the
alterations received the unanimous approbation of the
commissioners ; but then arose the question, How were
these alterations to be effected? If they acted according
to precedent, these changes should be made to appear as
suggestions of friendly divines, appointed under the great
seal, to advise the crown ; and the suggestions adopted by
the sovereign ought to be submitted by her to the Con-
vocation. Convocation, having debated the whole sub-
ject, should authorize the alterations, and the sovereign
send the corrected book to Parliament, that the Parlia-
ment might enact what the Church had enjoined. But
the existing commission, not having been appointed under
17 G LIVES OF THE
chap, the great seal, could only, in the eye of the law, be
— . — * regarded as a committee of divines meeting privately to
Parker, advise the queen's ministers. For reasons already men-
ioo9-75. tioned, it would have been useless to offer the liturgical
question for discussion in the existing Convocation, of
which the upper house was under the influence of the
president, the Bishop of London, Dr. Bonner ; Archdeacon
Harpsfield being the prolocutor of the lower house. To
dissolve the present Convocation, and to convene another,
would consume so much time, even if there were not
constitutional objections to the proceeding, that it would
have been impossible to have a measure in readiness
for the meeting of Parliament.
Cecil and Parker approached the subject as politicians,
and the queen reluctantly acceded to the following pro-
posals : — that the second Prayer Book should be sent to
Parliament, to be embodied in the proposed Bill of Uni-
formity ; and that certain alterations, necessary to satisfy
the queen's conscience, and to meet the views of the
English reformers, should be made by an exercise of the
royal prerogative.
At the present time, in a new reign, certain alterations
are made in the Prayer Book, in accordance with the
common law of the Church and the statute law of the
realm, to adapt it to the altered circumstances of the
royal family. Between the statute law and the common
law, which invested the crown with certain prerogatives in
things spiritual and temporal, of which it has been sub-
sequently deprived, no distinction in Parker's time was
made. On neither side — neither on the side of the com-
missioners, nor on the side of the bishops — was any objec-
tion taken to this mode of proceeding. The second Prayer
Book, which had been reformed under the sanction of
Convocation, was now to be submitted to Parliament ; and,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 177
when an Archbishop of Canterbury should be appointed, chap.
it was left to him to have these proceedings endorsed . VIIL -
by Convocation. Whatever may be thought of Parker's ^AerT
conduct on this occasion, anyone acquainted with the his- 1559-75.
tory of the times, must admit that he evinced remarkable
sagacity and discretion. He laid it down as a rule through
life, that it was wisdom occasionally to save a principle
by sacrificing a detail. Whether he yielded too much
or too little ; whether we have lost by his occasional con-
cessions, or gained by his general firmness — these are
questions which every reader will decide for himself.
Parker was distinguished, not for his genius, but for a
very large share of common sense. In legislating for
the Church he was called to discharge the duties of a
statesman combined with those of a divine, and was often
compelled by circumstances to consider, not what was
best, but what wa^s most practicable.
The alterations made were few in number; To conciliate Alter-
, . -. „ ations in
one party, an intolerant expression was expunged from the Prayer
the Litany : " From the tyranny of the Bishop of Eome, ook'
and all his detestable enormities, good Lord, deliver us ; "
as was also the rubric, in which it was declared that no
adoration was intended by the posture of kneeling in the
Holy Sacrament ; at the same time, to win favour with
the opposite party, it was left to the discretion of the
Ordinary to permit the prayers to be offered in the body
of the church instead of the chancel. Proper lessons for
Sundays were now fixed, and prayers for the queen, the
clergy, and the people were introduced from ancient
offices. In their desire to preserve the notion of the
continuity of the Church, and to maintain external ap-
pearances, it was determined to rescind the rubric of
1552, and to retain, to a certain extent, the Catholic vest-
ments.
VOL. IX. N
178 LIVES OF THE
chap. Parker was both surprised and pleased to see how easily
— r-^— these alterations were admitted, when the Prayer Book
Parked was sent to parliament. In both houses they passed
1669-75. unnoticed, as being immaterial, and the book, notwith-
standing the alterations, was received under the general
designation of the Second Prayer Book of Edward VI.
The fact is, that by one party a strong opposition was
raised to the entire Bill of Uniformity, and the re-
forming party perceived, that if they would secure the
Eeformation, it was expedient to avoid a rupture among
themselves. The Puritan party was contented, general!
with the retention of the second Prayer Book ; the r
jection of which, on the part of the commissioners wh
were of the Puritan party, would have implied a censu
on the reformers of King Edward's reign, whom the;
claimed to represent, in opposition to the English refor-
mers, who wished to take their stand on the reformation
of Henry VIII. The English reformers were willing to
yield the victory on this point to their friendly opponen
in the commission, provided that they could secure t
recognition of certain principles, the assertion of whic
if not of vital importance, was due to their consistency.
Pariia- Before the commission had completed its work, par-
ment
to
meets. liament had met. One of the great difficulties with which
ill'921, the queen had to contend, was the exhausted state of the
finances. There were not funds in the exchequer to
meet the current expenses of the year, and the queen
had inherited a debt which it was not for the honour
of the crown to repudiate. The people were justly of-
fended by the profligate expenditure of King Henry ; by
the alienation, to private purposes, of the public treasure
on the part of King Edward's reformers ; and by the
alleged expenditure of English wealth for the furtherance
of the objects of Spanish ambition. With these feelings
they were impatient of taxation ; while from the clergy,
iw©«ri
U'.W
AKCHBISIIOPS OF CANTERBURY. 179
robbed and impoverished, the large subsidies formerly chap.
imposed on them could no longer be extracted. The v..VITnL
monasteries, which had been as banks, and the monks, PaSJer!
who had been as brokers, to the English kings, no longer 1559-75.
existed.
The clergy were still unpopular and alarmed, and it
was supposed that, for the protection of their persons,
they would not resist an attack upon their purses. The
first bill, offered to the house on the 30th of January, had
for its object the surrender to the crown of the first-fruits
and tenths of spiritual promotions. These had been ap-
propriated to the use of the sovereign, by the piety, or
the avarice, of Henry VIII. , and their restoration to the
clergy by Queen Mary was attributed to superstition.
An apology seemed necessary for what appeared to be
spoliation, and the government condescended to explain,
that an act, not entirely to be justified, was rendered
necessary by " the huge, innumerable, and inestimable
charges" to which the queen was exposed. The lords
spiritual nobly desired to defend the indisputable pro-
perty of the Church of England, but were compelled to
submit to a majority of the lords temporal. The conduct Loyalty
of the lords spiritual was at this time deserving of more bishops,
praise than it has received ; for although they bravely
opposed the crown when robbing the Church, they ten-
dered their loyal support to the second bill now introduced,
which had for its object the recognition of Elizabeth's
title to the throne, on the grounds of common and statute
law. They evinced the same loyal feeling when two
other bills were introduced against treasonable and sedi-
tious attacks upon the queen. The loyal conduct of the
bishops, while acting in opposition to the government,
was not forgotten by the queen. It may, indeed, be said,
that they exhibited, for the first time, an instance of a
N 2
180 LIVES OF THE
chap, constitutional opposition in parliament, by which it was
— ^-^ shown, that liberty of speech is not inconsistent with
Parker, clue deference to the powers that be. It is important
1559-75. to notice this conduct on the part of these diocesans,
for it clearly proves that their religion was quite distinct
from that of the seminary priests — to whom attention
will be presently called — who represented the assassin-
ation of an excommunicated heretic, though an anointed
sovereign, as a religious act.
Act of Su- The difficulty in passing the bill relating to the royal.
premacy. ... ,
1559. supremacy was great. It was opposed by the extremes
on both sides, both by the Puritans and by the Papists ;
and it was not until the title of Head of the Church was
repudiated by the queen, that, being opposed by the lords
spiritual to the last, it at length obtained the consent of
the lords temporal. The act, professing to restore to the
crown the ancient jurisdiction over the estates of the
realm, whether spiritual or temporal, declared that, what-
ever rights, privileges, or spiritual pre-eminences had been
formerly in use, arid established by any ecclesiastical
authority whatever, for visiting the clergy, and correct-
ing all kinds of error, heresy, and schism, with other
abuses and disorders, should remain for ever annexed to
the imperial crown of England. It was added, that the
queen and her successors might be empowered to give
their letters patent to some particular persons, for the
due exercise of that authority ; on this condition, how-
ever, " that they should not determine anything to be
heresy but what had been so defined, time out of mind,
either from canonical scripture, the four oecumenical
councils, or some other, according to the genuine sense
of holy writ." It was further required, that ecclesiastical
persons and magistrates, graduates in the university, and
others holding office under the crown, should, when re-
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 181
quired, make oath to acknowledge the queen to be the chap.
supreme governor of her kingdom in all causes, as well - AITIL-.
spiritual as civil. The act representing the Bishop of SI^T
Eome as a foreign prince and potentate excluded him 1559-75.
and the Eoman courts from taking cognizance of any
cause within the dominions of the queen ; and the way was
• unfortunately prepared for the High Commission Court.
The bill had been drawn up by Cecil with Parker's
aid, and with the unwilling consent of the queen. The
immense powers vested in the crown seemed neces-
sary to restrain the excesses on either extreme, though,
being wrong in principle, the act was afterwards fearfully
abused. Parker, together with the English reformers
under his influence, was reconciled to it, because it gave
royal and parliamentary weight to those church prin-
ciples on which they sought to reform the Church. The
extremes on either side were accustomed to appeal — the
one side to Eome, the other to Geneva : Parker and his
supporters could now set these appeals at defiance, for
their authority was the tradition of the primitive Church
as corrected by a reference to Holy Scripture. The
Papists deferred to the authority of the pope without
regard to Scripture. The Puritans accepted scriptural
authority, but interpreted it according to the opinions of
Calvin. The English reformers equally deferred to Scrip-
ture, but employed Scripture as the means of testing that
primitive tradition, which had been carefully guarded and
handed down from the first ages of Christianity. Other
enactments of this parliament, as bearing upon the reli-
gious questions of the day, reflect great credit upon. Cecil
and Parker. Provision was made for the election, con-
firmation, and consecration of the episcopate within the
realm, without any foreign interference, and for the
appointment of suffragan bishops. The law of marriage
182 LIVES OF THE
chap, was regulated so as to render dispensations no longer
> — , — > necessary; doctors of civil law were permitted, though
Parker, married, to hold ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Communion
1569-75. in both kinds having been restored to the laity, precau-
tion was taken against those blasphemous remarks upon
the Holy Sacrament which had been, to his shame, en-
couraged by Crumwell in the reign of Henry VIII., and
not repressed in the subsequent reign by Somerset.
Irreverent speeches against the Eucharist were rendered
punishable by statute law. Although the royal supre-
macy was asserted, yet, as is well observed by a writer
whose views incline to Erastianism,* no power was
claimed by any act in this parliament on behalf of the
crown, beyond its inherent right to the supreme regula-
tion of ecclesiastical affairs within the limits of its
ordinary jurisdiction. The Act of Uniformity came into
force on the festival of St. John the Baptist, June 24.
Spoliation Parker was at variance with the queen on one point,
for he resisted the passing of an unjustifiable and op-
pressive act, by virtue of which authority was given to
her majesty, on the avoidance of any archbishopric or
bishopric, to take into her hands any of the landed pro-
perty of the see, recompensing the party robbed with
parsonages impropriate or with tithes. Against this act
the diocesans also raised their voice in parliament ; and
Parker and the other bishops elect, even before their
consecration, protested.
Many of the sees were at this time vacant, and the
queen was enabled, through the provisions of this act,
to fill her own coffers very frequently, and to gratify
her least deserving courtiers with the best episcopal lands
and revenues throughout England. In lieu of what was
* Soames, iv. C41.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 183
taken from the bishoprics, parsonages, which had originally chap.
belonged to the monasteries, were made over to the sees ; - — <—
but many of them were burdened with decayed chancels parked
and ruinous houses, and with the payment of various 1559-75.
pensions. Archbishop Parker, in conjunction with four
other bishops, at a subsequent period, offered the queen
a thousand marks a year during their lives, not to
use the liberty granted under this act, but to no effect ;
for she appointed a commission to survey the property of
the bishops when any bishopric was vacant, to send cer-
tificates into the exchequer of the value of their several
lands and revenues, and to advise as to what she should
take into her own hands, and as to the impropriations and
tithes to be granted instead of them to the bishops.
Although a compulsory change may be the very highest
act of injustice, yet she chose to consider such exchanges
as no wrong or robbery. The estates of the Arch-
bishopric of Canterbury suffered so considerably, that
Parker was frequently distressed for want of money,*
and sometimes found it difficult to maintain his establish-
ment. It was by only a small majority that the bill
passed the Commons on the 17th of April ; for the
Commons had learned by experience, that although the
measure was commended to their notice, as a means of
diminishing the general taxation of the country, the only
persons who would be really benefited would be the queen
herself and her courtiers.
The speeches of those prelates who were members of Speeches
parliament when the various bills for the reformation of Lords
the Church were introduced have been preserved by Spiritual-
D'Ewes. Their arguments are easily refuted; but, in
saying this, we bring to our criticism of their rhetoric,
* Strype's Annals, I. i. 96 ; Fuller, iv. 315.
184
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1569-75.
rather than their logic, the experience and wisdom of
subsequent ages ; during which period arguments have
been duly weighed, and the stern realities of history
distinguished from ingenious conjectures of the imagina-
tion. In the sixteenth century, theology was nearly
confined to professed divines; and the divines in the
House of Lords being all on one side, the arguments
and historical misstatements of the lords spiritual were
met by a silent majority.
Under these circumstances the Protestants had just
ground for complaint ; and their complaints received the
more ready attention from the fact, that the conciliation
of their party had now become the policy of the govern-
ment. The report went forth, that right had been com-
pelled to yield to might, and that while all the votes
were on one side, the argument was on the other. In
modern times it may be supposed, that the Protestants
would have been heard by counsel at the bar of the
house ; but lawyers had ceased to be ecclesiastics, and,
as the object of the Protestant leaders was not to win a
cause, but to establish the truth, they desired to commit
the discussion to men mighty in the Scriptures, rather
than to skilful lawyers simply employed to win a cause,
not difficult to win when the judges had arrived at a fore-
gone conclusion. According to the opinions of the age,
there was justice in this plea ; and, at the same time, the
government could not advise the queen to convert the
House of Lords into an arena of religious controversy.
It was determined, therefore, that a theological debate,
assuming the form of a conference, should be held in
Westminster Hall. Such conferences, or public discus-
sions, are, in our days, worse than useless. Their ten-
dency is to add personal bit^rness to the acrimony of
polemics ; but at a time when the press was in its infancy,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 185
when public journals had scarcely come into notice,* and chap.
when among the people few could read, the government . VIIL ,
acted wisely in acceding to the proposal for a public dis- pj^T
cussion between the two great parties, the Eomanizers 1559-75.
and the ultra-Protestants ; and in so arranging the acces-
sories of the meeting, as to give it an important and
national character.
It was left to Archbishop Heath to select the divines
who were to argue on his side of the question, and the
Protestant disputants were chosen by Bishop Scory.
The questions to be brought under discussion were the
following : I. Whether the sacraments ought to be cele-
brated in the vulgar tongue ? II. Whether the Church has
authority to alter ceremonies, provided all be done to
edification? III. Whether the mass be a propitiatory
sacrifice ?
Dr. Parker did not take any prominent part in this
debate ; into a detailed account of which, therefore, I am
not called upon to enter. There can be little doubt, how-
ever, that the conference met with Parker's approbation ;
and probably it would not have been held if he had not
advised it. But Parker was not himself qualified to act
as a literary gladiator. He could supply arguments to
others ; but he was nervous : he was conscious of that
want of readiness of repartee, so important on such
occasions ; and to this we must acjd, that he was still an
invalid.
* It is generally supposed that the first printed newspapers in
England were published in 1588, when England was threatened with
an invasion by the Spanish Armada, and the government issued The
English Mercuria, published by authority, for the prevention of false
reports. But in Wright's History of Queen Elizabeth and her Times,
*a letter, written in 1564 by Cecil, refers to "a printed letter of truth."
The Mercury of 1588 was, as the editor remarks, the first adoption by
the government of a practice already become general.
186 LIVES OF THE
chap. On the 31st of March, the Colloquy was held in great
^- — <—* state in Westminster Hall. Lord Keeper Bacon preside
Parker, with the express understanding that he did not take the
1559-75. chair to overrule any point in the controversy; but
minster merely, under a royal commission, to take precaution that
(on- due order was preserved. Soon after Bacon's anpoin
ierenee. .
March 31, ment, the government, in order to show with what fair
ness it desired to act, associated with the lord keeper
the Archbishop of York. The proceedings occasioned
considerable excitement. " Great," says Bishop Jewel,
" were the expectations of the people ;" but due order was
observed. Certain regulations for the conduct of the
debate had been drawn up, it is supposed, by Cecil, and
to those regulations both parties gave their assent.
In this Colloquy, Home, afterwards Bishop of Win
Chester, distinguished himself, and laid down with grea
clearness the principles upon which the English refor-
mation had proceeded.
Bishop « Forasmuch" (he said) " as we have for our mother the true
Horn 6 b
speech. and Catholic Church of Christ, which is grounded upon the
doctrine of the Apostles and prophets, and is of Christ the
head of all things governed, we do reverence her judgment ;
we obey her authority as becometh children ; and we do
devoutly profess, and in all points follow, the faith which is
contained in the three creeds ; that is to say, of the Apostles,
of the Council of Nice, and of Athanasius.
"And seeing that we never departed, neither from the
doctrine of Grod, which is contained in the holy canonical
Scriptures, nor yet from the faith of the true and Catholic Church
of Christ, but have preached truly the word of Grod, and have
sincerely ministered the sacraments according to the institution
of Christ, unto the which our doctrine and faith the most part
also of our adversaries did subscribe not many years past
(although now, as unnatural, they are revolted from the same),
we desire that they render account of their backsliding, and
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
187
show some cause wherefore they do not only resist that
doctrine, which they have before professed, but also persecute
the same by all the means they can.
" We do not doubt but through the equity of the queen's
most excellent majesty, we shall in these disputations be en-
treated more gently than in years late past, when we were
handled most unjustly and scantly, after the common manner
of men.
" As for the judgment of the whole controversy, we refer
unto the most Holy Scriptures and the Catholic Church of
Christ, whose judgment unto us ought to be most sacred.
Notwithstanding by the Catholic Church we understand, not
the Romish Church, whereunto our adversaries attribute such
reverence, but that which St. Augustine and other fathers
affirm ought to be sought in the Holy Scriptures, which is
governed and led by the Spirit of Christ."
With the full concurrence of Archbishop Heath, if not
at his suggestion, it was arranged that each side should
tender their judgments in writing, and in the vulgar
tongue ; and that the Eomanizers were to begin the dis-
cussion, and the Protestants to answer.
The first day's debate was conducted with due
decorum, but the Eomanizing party soon discovered
their inferiority to the Protestants, both in learning and
in eloquence. On the second day, therefore, they re-
fused to abide by the orders that, with the full concur-
rence of the archbishop, had been previously agreed
upon. They asserted, that the multitude was prejudiced
against them ; and they complained that the lord
keeper was their avowed enemy, forgetting that the
Archbishop of York, their avowed friend, was the lord
keeper's assessor. In vain did the good Archbishop of
York entreat them to act reasonably and consistently.
They refused, on the second day, to be any longer
bound by the terms that, on the first day, had been con-
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew-
Parker.
1559-75.
Reference
to Scrip-
ture and
Catholic
tradition.
Conference
inter-
rupted.
188 LIVES OF THE
chap, sidered equitable. One of their number, indeed, mon
> — ■ — • candid than the rest, plainly confessed, that if the last
Parker, word should be with the Protestants, they would conclude
1559-75. with the applause of the assembly ; as if the public
applause of the meeting, instead of the maintenance oi
the truth, were their object — not verity, but party. The
Bishops of Winchester and Lincoln conducted themselves
on this occasion with so much indecorum, and even
violence, that the people, remembering the horrors of
the late reign, were exasperated against them to such
an extent, that it was found expedient, for their pro-
tection, to place these prelates for the remainder of the
week under surveillance.* " And so," says the quaint old
historian, Fuller, " in this disputation there was more
noise than fruit, more passion than reason, and more
cavils than argument." f
Eesuitof The result of the conference was to convince the
ference." government, that whatever might be the private opinion
of Archbishop Heath and the majority of his episcopal
coadjutors, they formed a party which, under foreign
influence, was determined to carry on, a toute outra?ice9
an opposition to Elizabeth's government, and to the mea-
sures devised for the reformation of the Church. They
knew not the firmness of Elizabeth and the wisdom of her
counsellors, for they had not yet been tested ; but they
might have understood, that the readiness of the govern-
ment to make concessions to their prejudices was not
the result of fear : it was rather the dictate of a sound
policy and a desire to conciliate. The conduct of these
* They were committed for contempt of court : this is expressly stated
in the declaration of the Proceedings of Conference in the volume
entitled Synodalia, in the Library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge,
No. cxxi. Art. 21.
| Fuller, iv. 271.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 189
diocesans, after their deposition, made it manifest that the chap.
differences between them and the English reformers were r— -
not so great as to render a reconciliation impossible ; pLker?
and this is a justification of the queen and her advisers, 1559-75.
Cecil and Parker, when they cherished, if not an expect-
ation, yet a hope, that the two parties, by mutual conces-
sions, might be induced to work together for the public
good. The hope was not extinguished in Elizabeth's
mind until the consecration of Parker rendered it no
longer possible for the two extremes to come to terms.
The condition of the hierarchy on the accession of
Elizabeth was very precarious. The plague, which was
raging in the last year of Queen Mary's reign, had caused
a remarkable mortality among the bishops. Four had
died just before her decease, and six immediately after ;
so that ten sees were vacant, and, among those that re-
mained, three were filled by prelates who might be
regarded as intruders. The predecessor of Dr. Heath, Condition
Archbishop Holgate, had been illegally deposed in March, hierarchy.
1553. Archbishop Heath, therefore, had no ground of
complaint when, on his refusal to obey the laws of the
realm, he was required by those upon whom the adminis-
tration of the laws devolved, to give place to another
prelate duly nominated and elected. Bishop Barlow also,
who afterwards presided at the consecration of Parker,
had been compelled to resign the see of Bath and Wells,
of which Dr. Bourne took possession. Other instances
might be produced of appointments more or less irregu-
lar, through the interference of the government in Queen
Mary's reign. This is said, not with a view of permitting
one party to retaliate upon another, but merely to show
that the circumstances of the times rendered some irregu-
larities, not in principle, but in detail, a matter of necessity.
In deposing certain diocesans politically opposed to
190 lives of tin:
chap, her, it will thus be observed, that Elizabeth was o
following the precedent which had been established
Parke*? her sister. They may both have been in error, but the
1559-75. one cannot be more censurable than the other ; and, after
all has been taken into consideration, we find it said by Sir
William Palmer, that, whether right or wrong, in every
nation the government has assumed the power of de-
priving diocesans, not of their episcopal orders, but oi
their temporalities and jurisdiction, when these bishops
have refused obedience to the laws of the realm.
Diocesans The surviving diocesans were summoned, soon after
before the the dissolution of parliament, on the 15th of May, to-
Councii. gether with some of the leading divines of their party, to
appear before the Privy Council. Great formality was
observed, for the purpose of marking the solemnity of the
occasion. At the head of the council table sat the queen
herself; and ridiculous as might be the airs assumed by
Elizabeth when she was surrounded only by her cour-
tiers, yet, on great occasions, her dignity of demeanour
and her presence of mind were such as to overawe the
persons who came into her presence, or who ventured to
The dispute her will. She called the attention of the prelates
speech^ to the Act of Supremacy passed in the late parliament ;
Sates ^ an^ sne Pomted out to them, that an oath to observe the
act was by that statute required of all functionaries
in Church or State. To the requirements of an act of
the legislature she now called upon them to yield obe-
dience. She urged them, as loyal subjects, to comply ;
and she invited them to co-operate with her in her deter-
mination " to abolish superstition from the worship of the
Church."
Reply of In the most respectful manner Archbishop Heath
bishop of replied, that, by several diocesans in both provinces, he had
been commissioned to move her majesty, that she would
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 191
be pleased to recollect the zeal towards the holy see of chap.
St. Peter shown by the late queen her sister. He pre- r-^— -
dieted that, unless the present government would adhere parkeT
to the engagements of that princess, the kingdom would 1559-75.
lie under perpetual ignominy and disgrace.
These great dignitaries of the Church stood before a
young woman, surrounded by untried counsellors, and
exposed to the threatened hostility of the great continen-
tal powers. They stood before one who could ill afford
to convert into opponents those prelates who commanded,
as it was well known, the good will of the continental
princes. But they also stood before one in whose nature
the fire of indignation was sure to be inflamed by a threat ;
who, although she did not hesitate to give play to her
passions, when she could do so with impunity, could
nevertheless command her temper when its control was
politically expedient, or when she had any great pur-
pose to accomplish. They stood before a master mind ;
and though they had not yet discovered her force of
character, this only made their own insignificance the
more apparent.
With firmness and dignity the Queen of England
replied : —
" As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Eesolved The
to act like King Josiah, who gathered together the elders of reply to
Judah that, under their advice, he might make a covenant with the Arch -
his Grod, I lately convened my clergy and my parliament. My York.
object was to bind myself and my people, not under the.Eoman
see, but to the Lord my God. My sister's power did not
extend to contract the obligations which have just been men-
tioned. Our records on this entry show, that the papal juris-
diction over this realm was a usurpation, and the statute which
has just been enacted they fully justify. It is by diving into
and following the proceedings, which have come down to me
from a long line of predecessors, that I mean to rule ; and I hope
192 LIVES of tin:
CHAP, that in this my successor will follow my example. To no power
VI1L ^ whatever is my crown subject, save to that of Christ the King of
^latrhow kings. I shall therefore regard as enemies, both to God and
Parker .
' myself, all such of my subjects as shall henceforth own any
foreign or usurped authority within my realm." *
The prelates were silent. The majority, if not all of
them, had already, in the reign of King Henry, subscribed
to the royal supremacy, and some had even written in
its favour against the pope. An instinctive feeling kept
them silent. In refusing to concede to the queen that
obedience to her law, which they had not hesitated to
render to her father, they had insulted her by implying
the comparative weakness of her government. If they
had said, that their opinions had undergone a change, the
answer would have been obvious, namely, that, if their
new principles were insisted on, their advice was not
worthy of attention. The queen indirectly challenged
them; and whether they should accept the challenge, or
in what manner they could do so, was to them a most
perplexing question. The pope had denied the right of
Elizabeth to the crown ; that right was assumed through-
out her address by the queen, and, in doing so, she only
claimed the rights she had derived from her ancestors.
If there had been a great man among the prelates, he
would have risked an answer, though it might have
placed his life in peril; but, without consultation with
one another, the prelates were afraid to speak ; and we
add that, as their subsequent conduct proved, they were
not all of them hearty in the cause they were made to
represent. They were silent, and were bowed out of the
royal presence.
On their return to their homes they were met by
more violent partizans, by whom they were urged to
* Strvne's Annals, I. i. 207 ; Bramhall, i. 116, 3 17.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 193
renew the attack, and to make one final appeal to the viii.'
youthful sovereign. A letter, the result of a consulta- "Matthew
tion, was presented to the queen, which was signed by Parker-
Heath, Bonner, Bourne, Tuberville, and Pool. In this Addresst0
letter her majesty was entreated not to permit herself the queen.
to be led astray by the advice of evil counsellors, from
the Catholic faith, "planted within this realm by the
motherly care of the Church of Eome." Once more
was she exhorted to follow the example of her sister,
Queen Mary, and to consider the supremacy of the
Church of Eome. It was a weak production, evidently
composed, not with any hope of convincing the queen,
but from a feeling, not to be censured, that it was fitting
on their part to address a last exhortation to their young
sovereign, before they were compelled to retire from the
high stations they had hitherto occupied.
In the reply the hand of Parker is legible. Elizabeth The
was not ambitious, like her father and brother, of the ?epiy.S
character of a theologian ; and she did not think it
necessary that every document published in her name
should be actually of her own composition. What she
commanded to be written, she made her own by revision.
The answer was firm and decided. " Our realm and sub-
jects," she wrote, " have been long wanderers, walking
astray, whilst they were under the tuition of Eomish
pastors who advised them to own a wolf for their head in
lieu of a careful shepherd ; whose inventions, heresies, and
schisms be so numerous, that the flock of Christ have
fed on poisonous shrubs for want of wholesome pastures.
And whereas you hit us and our subjects in the teeth,
that the Eomish Church first planted the Catholic faith
in our realms, the records and chronicles of our realms
testify the contrary." She asserted, that " when Austin
came from Eome, this her realm had bishops and priests
VOL. IX. o
104 LIVES OF THE
chap, therein as was well known to the wise and learned."
s — ,— - Descending to personalities, she showed how some of the
Parked very prelates who were now addressing her, received their
1559-75. appointments from Henry VIII. after he had withdrawn
from the supremacy of Eome ; and she contended, there-
fore, that on their present principles they were themselves
schismatical and heretical ; "and whereas," she continued,
" you would frighten us by telling how emperors, kings,
and princes have owned the Bishop of Home's authority,
it was contrary in the beginning. For our Saviour Christ
paid his tribute unto Caesar as the chief superior, which
shows your Eomish supremacy is usurped." She alluded
to the courage with which St. Athanasius withstood the
heresies which had crept into the Church of Eome, and
how he got the victory. " Do ye not acknowledge his
creed to this day ? Dare any of you say he is a schismatic ?
Surely ye are not so audacious? Therefore, as ye acknow-
ledge his creed, it shows he was no schismatic. If Atha-
nasius withstood Eome for her then heresies, then others
may safely separate themselves from your Church, and
not be schismatics. We give you warning that, for the
future, we hear no more of this kind, lest you provoke us
to execute those penalties enacted for the punishing
of our resisters, which out of our clemency we have
forborne."
Prayer When the Act for the Use of the Eevised Prayer Book
received, came into force, it became apparent that of the religious
parties neither extreme had any influence worthy of being
taken into consideration with the great body of the clergy
and laity of the Church of England. Among the leaders
on either side, among both Papists and ultra-Protestants,
there were men of learning, of zeal, and of piety ; but
while they waged controversy one with another, the bulk
of the clergy and of the people remained unmoved ; and
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 195
among them the question was, not whether alterations chap.
might lawfully be made, but how they were to be carried w^il^
out. Of 9,400 parochial clergy, not more than a hundred p^jj1®*
refused to conform to the Prayer Book. If, therefore, 1559-75.
an historian were to speak of the unanimity with which
the Prayer Book was received, his statement would be
much nearer the truth than such general statements
usually are. By the uncharitable, who look out for or
suspect, in the very best actions, the predominance of
base motives, the clergy are represented as so many
Gallios caring for none of these things. This is a hard
sentence to be pronounced upon more than 9,400 men,
set apart for the service of their Saviour and their God ;
and it is scarcely want of charity to conjecture, that it
is from a consciousness of wrong motives in themselves,
that these accusers of the brethren venture to suggest
charges for which it is impossible, in the nature of things,
that proof can be adduced. For these suspicions and in-
sinuations the impartial historian must be aware that
there can be no necessity ; for he cannot but know that,
from the condition of the Church at this period, what
really took place was precisely what might be expected
to occur. The regulars — admitting individual exceptions The ,
— had for a long time been the only clergy in England J" cl^gy
who were, as a body, adherents to the papacy or advo- catesofthe
cates of the papal supremacy.* As a body the regular premacy.
clergy had been, by the dissolution of the monasteries,
destroyed. Of the regulars, some were permitted to
expatriate themselves, others obtained admission into
* In those churches in which there are monasteries, the clergy
attached to the monasteries are called regulars ; the other clergy are
called seculars. Before the Reformation the number of regulars in our
Church was great ; since the Reformation we have only had secular
clergy.
o 2
L96
LIVES OF TIIK
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
aristocratic families as chaplains; where, being many of
them gentlemen and men of learning, they did essential
disservice to the cause of the Eeformation by sowing the
seeds of discontent among the nobles of the land. It is
thus that we may account for the fact, that, at the very
time when the people were becoming more Protestant, so
many of the aristocratic families were prepared to aid
the cause of Home. The regulars were ever ready to
take the lead in every insurrectionary movement ; and,
when the time came for the seminary priests to carry on
their iniquitous warfare against the life of the queen and
the peace of the realm, it was in these quarters that they
found their allies.
Among the secular clergy, on the contrary, the
monasteries had always been unpopular ; and to this cir-
cumstance, in part, may be attributed the little resistance
which was offered to their dissolution. An attack upon
the reformed Prayer Book, on the part of the regulars,
would have been a recommendation of it to the seculars.
It is, therefore, to other causes that we must attribute the
nonconformity of which, in the early part of Parker's
episcopate, complaint was sometimes made. In the
towns, the opposition was generally factious. In the
provinces, the non-observance of the new rites was owing
to stupidity rather than to perverseness. The seculars
were among the least learned of the clerical body. It
was difficult with them to break off old habits, and the
difficulty sometimes became the greater, from their being
unable to understand why an order was given, or what
it meant. They could obey, but they could not always
enter into the theory or principle which induced their
superiors to change one form or ceremony for another.
The secular clergy were thus, in some places, slow in
making those alterations in the service of the Church
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 197
which were occasioned by the introduction of the Prayer chap.
Book ; * but their hearts being with the Beformation, *_I^L,
they gradually became more regular in their conformity ; Parked
and thus the next generation became attached to the 1559-75.
reformed ceremonial to which they had been accustomed
from their early years. Before the death of Queen
Elizabeth, the tendency to Borne had, so far as the bulk
of tjie nation was concerned, disappeared, and the English
reformers found themselves thwarted by assailants from
the opposite extreme.
The time had now arrived when it became necessary Apos-
i *n i Aii tolical suc-
tO take measures to fill the vacant sees. And here we cession.
must pause to remark on the ignorance, or the wilful
misrepresentation, which would make it appear that the
fact which lies at the very foundation of the Church — the
Apostolical Succession — was regarded as a thing indifferent
by the English reformers. If such had been the case,
we may fairly ask, Why was there so much delay in
making appointments to the bishoprics ? If that conse-
cration, by which the grace of holy orders is handed
on from one generation to another, was not of vital im-
portance, why did not the queen at once, as is still done
in some parts of Germany, appoint superintendents
with the episcopal title? She might have invested
them with legal powers for the government of certain
ecclesiastical districts, and she might have placed them
under the dominion of a minister of state, with endow-
ments sufficient to enable him to conduct with dignity
the quasi- spiritual functions, which, by the will of par-
* This accounts for the fact that, until the suspension of the Church
at the Great Rebellion, various ceremonies were observed, which were
not resumed at the Restoration ; and this also accounts for the de-
ficiencies in our rubrics. It was taken for granted that, when it was
not otherwise enjoined, the clergy would continue to do as they had
done before.
108
LIVES OF TIIK
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
liament, might devolve upon him. The answer we possess
is the Ordinal itself, in which it is said : —
" It is evident unto all men diligently reading the Holy
Scripture and ancient authors, that from the Apostles'
time there have been these orders of ministers in Christ's
Church ; bishops, priests, and deacons. Which offices
were evermore had in such reverend estimation, that no
man might presume to execute any of them, except ne
were first called, tried, examined, and known to have
such qualities as are requisite for the same ; and also by
publick prayer, with imposition of hands, were approved
and admitted thereunto by lawful authority." *
* Ordinal, Preface. This office was drawn up in the year 1549, by
six archbishops and bishops, and six other divines. Upon this whole
subject see Bilson's Perpetual Government of Christ's Church, especially
chapters xii. and xiii. In this early and learned work the subject is
almost exhausted. Thomas Bilson, Bishop of Winchester, was born in
the year 1547. During a considerable portion of his life, therefore, he
was a contemporary of Archbishop Parker, and was one of the English
reformers. Among his contemporaries few are his equals, none his
superiors, in learning and eloquence. The work is well edited by the
Rev. Robert Eden, to whom we are indebted for the verification of the
numerous quotations. See also the works of Archbishop Bramhall, the
value of which has been much increased by the learned notes and appen-
dices of Mr. Haddan, the editor. He has judiciously summed up the
result of his labours in an original volume on the Apostolical Succession
of the Church of England, written in the spirit and with the learning
of Bilson. The work of Mr. Haddan is the more useful to the student,
from the fact of his being able to meet, and in the most satisfactory
manner to refute, objections which have been started since the sixteenth
century, and by those who consider that no credentials are necessary to
justify a man in assuming the office of an ambassador for God most
high. The reader may be referred to the Registrum Sacrum of Pro-
fessor Stubbs, of which Mr. Haddan affirms, that it is " the one complete
and thorough work upon the subject." Sir William Palmer, in his
treatise on the Church, states the fact and the doctrine with his usual
conciseness. All these writers are of course deeply indebted to Courayer,
whose Defence of Anglican Orders is the more valuable from the fact of
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 199
In composing the Ordinal, which forms a portion of the chap.
Prayer Book, the reformers could not have intended to >-VI,IL-
write nonsense ; and yet they would certainly have been parked
guilty of making an assertion without meaning, if, in 1559 75.
speaking of the episcopal office, they had not employed
the title of Bishop in the sense which has always been
attached to it in the Catholic Church ; of the doctrines
of which Church they professed to be the exponents.
The distinction to be made between a bishop and a
priest, or presbyter, has always been, that to the bishop
pertains, and to him exclusively, the right of ordination
to the Christian ministry ; so that anyone who is not
episcopally ordained, although the laws of the land may
his being a foreigner and a Romanist. In various treatises published
on this subject by Chancellor Harington, such a mass of learning has
been brought to bear upon it, that it is to be regretted that his Collec-
tanea has not been presented to the reader in one volume. In all that
bears upon Parker's consecration, the work lately published by Dr. Lee
is of great importance. Every writer upon this portion of ecclesiastical
history must acknowledge his obligations to Mr. Bailey, who, in his
Ordinum Sacrorum in Ecclesid Anglicana Defensio, has published the
various documents affecting the validity of English orders, which have
hitherto been only approachable after numerous journeys to the me-
tropolis and the two universities, with a facsimile of the record of
Archbishop Parker's consecration, photozincographed by permission of
his Grace the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury from the register in the
archiepiscopal library at Lambeth. I must not here omit the name *
of my late friend Mr. Arthur Perceval, who at my request com-
posed his treatise on the Apostolical Succession, and completed it wifh
that logical precision for which he was remarkable. Among the
numerous works which have appeared on this subject, I shall only
mention farther Mason's Vindiciae Ecclesige Anglicana?, Bishop Taylor's
Episcopacy Asserted, Hickes's Dignity of the Episcopal Order, and
Madox's Vindication of the Government, Doctrine, and Worship of the
Church of England. But the reader who would see the whole doctrine
stated with a conciseness only surpassed by its accuracy of statement,
and logical precision, may be referred to " The Apostolical Succession in
the Church of England," by Professor Stubbs.
200 LIVES OF THE
CHAP, permit him to assume the titles, which the Nonconformist
VIII.
— r— - Puritans of old repudiated and condemned, and of which
Parker, modern Nonconformists are inconsistently ambitious, is
1559-75. not a minister of the Catholic Church. In making this
assertion, it is our business, not to prove a doctrine, but
simply to state, as is now done, an historical fact. How
far that fact may be in accordance with scriptural prin-
ciples is another question, though a question which is
regarded by a Catholic as of easy solution.
We have, in the passage just quoted from the Prayer
Book, an exposition of the faith of the English reformers;
and that this was their faith may be shown still further
by a reference to the declaration made of the functions
and divine institution of bishops in the " Institution of a
Christian Man " and " The Necessary Doctrine." Parker
and the English reformers believed, as the Catholic
Church has always believed, that as the Lord Jesus
Christ was sent by the Father, so were the Apostles sent
by Him. " As my Father hath sent me," saith our Lord,
soon after his resurrection, " even so send I you." Now
how had the Father sent Him? He had sent Him to
act as his supreme minister on earth ; as such, to appoint
under Him subordinate ministers, and, to do what He then
did when his work on earth was done, to hand on his
-commission to others. The Apostles, in like manner,
were sent by Christ to act as his chief ministers in the
Church, to appoint subordinate ministers under them,
and then to do as He had done, to hand on their com-
mission to others.
The Church then incorporated became a society
which never dies, an immortal body, retaining for ever
the privileges and powers with which it was originally
invested by its founder. Its one object as a body, its
business as an incorporated society, is to prepare the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 201
world for the second coming of our Lord, by causing chap.
the Gospel to be preached to every creature as God - — ,— 1>
provides the opportunity. If the Church, in any of its p^ker*
branches, is not making converts by home and foreign 1559-75.
missions, it is not, in that place, answering the purpose
for which it was instituted.
Individuals are saved by Faith in the one and only
Saviour, our Lord Jesus Christ ; but the Church, or the
aggregate of believers, is a society incorporated to bear
a part in that mysterious scheme, devised in the counsels
of God, The Blessed Trinity, which, though only partially
revealed to us at present, is now in progress. The
Creator has designed the human family to answer some
unknown purpose in the government of the universe.
To this divine scheme, Satan and the demons of darkness
are opposed ; the dominion of Satan is to be put down,
and to be finally annihilated by the Messiah. This has
been partially done at our Lord's first coming, and is to
be completed at his second coming. For that second
coming, the Church is to prepare the world. We are,
as it were, on the spiritual battlefield ; and soldiers are to
be continually enlisted to fight under the banner of the
great Captain of our salvation. Whatever may be the con-
dition of others, those, and those only, who fight the Lord's
battles, and, like their Divine Master, endure hardship,
will sit with Him on his throne, and share his glory.
Between living and reigning, between life and glory, a
distinction can be made. Many, even among the heathen,
may live and be happy hereafter ; for He who died, a
propitiation for our sins, was a propitiation not for our
sins only, but for the sins of the whole world ; but they
who, having been admitted into the Church, shall escape
condemnation at the day of judgment, are predestined,
not to life only, but also to glory. When men regard
202 LIVES OF THE
CHAP. Christianity from a sectarian point of view, they think
— r— < only of the salvation of souls. Whereas the churchman,
Pwker. whether Anglo-Catholic, Eoman Catholic, or Greek, while
10,39-70. not disregarding the salvation of souls as one end, sees
also the necessity of supporting that one society which
has been divinely instituted for other not less important
purposes in the heavenly scheme.
To enter more into detail. The Apostles carried on the
Church divinely instituted, admitting their converts into it
by baptism. Baptism was necessary even for those who
already believed, because baptism is the means of admit-
ting believers and their children into the Church. To
officiate among the persons thus baptized, the Apostles
appointed subordinate ministers, priests, and deacons ;
and then of the kingdom of heaven thus constituted
they formed, as it were, colonies. These became na-
tional or provincial churches, under a Divine Omni-
present Head, and over these the Apostles exercised
episcopal superintendence ; either holding an occasional
visitation by summoning the clergy to meet them (as Saint
Paul summoned to Miletus the clergy of Ephesus) ; or
transmitting to them those pastoral addresses which,
under the name of Epistles, form so important a portion
of Holy Scripture. At length, however, it became
necessary for the Apostles to proceed yet farther, and to
do as their Lord had empowered them to do, to hand on
their commission to others, that, at their own death, the
government of the Church and its several branches might
not be extinct. Of this we have an instance in Titus,
who was placed in Crete by Saint Paul to act as chief
pastor or bishop ; and another in Timothy, who was in
like manner set over the Church of Ephesus. When
Timothy was thus appointed to the office of chief pastor,
he was associated with Saint Paul, who, in writing to the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 203
Philippians, commences his salutation thus : " Paul and chap.
Timotheus to the servants of Jesus Christ, who are at . ^_1_^
Philippi, with the bishops and deacons." Now we have p^rL^
here the three orders of the ministry clearly alluded to. 1559-75.
The title of Bishop is doubtless given to the second order ;
it is not, however, for words, but for things that we are
to contend. Titles may be changed while offices remain :
so senators exist, though they are not of necessity old
men ; and most absurd would it be to contend that, when
we speak of the Emperor Constantine, we can mean that
Constantine held no other office than that held under the
Eoman republic, because we find Cicero also saluted as
Emperor. So stood the matter in the first age of the
Gospel, when the chief pastors of the Church were
generally designated Apostles or Angels, i. e. messengers
sent by God Himself. In the next century, the office
remaining, the designation of those who held it was
changed, the title of Apostle was confined to the Twelve,
including Saint Paul ; and the chief pastors who succeeded
them were thenceforth called Bishops, the subordinate
ministers being styled Priests and Deacons. For when
the name of Bishop was given to those who had that over-
sight of presbyters, which presbyters had of their flocks,
it would have been manifestly inconvenient, and calculated
to create confusion, to continue the episcopal name to the
second order. Thus we see, as Christ was sent by the
Pather, so He sent the Apostles ; as the Apostles were
sent by Christ, so did they send the first race of bishops ;
as the first race of bishops was sent by the Apostles, so
they sent the second race of bishops ; the second the
third ; and so down to our present bishops, who thus trace
their spiritual descent from Saint Peter and Saint Paul, and
prove their divine authority to govern the churches over
which they are canonically appointed to preside. The
204
links o\- Tin:
CHAP.
VIII.
three orders of the ministry in the New Testament stai
thus : first order, Apostle ; second order, Bishop, Pre
third order, Deacon. Afterwards, tl
Matthew •,
Parker, byter or Elder
1559-75. office remaining the same, there was a change in the title,
and the ministers of Christ were designated thus : first
order, Bishop, formerly Apostle ; second order, Presbyter
or Elder ; third order, Deacon.*
Thus, in the opinion of the English reformers, the
apostolical succession was of vital importance to the
Primacy
offered to
Parker.
very existence of the Church universal and to its vario
branches. Without the apostolical succession, this co
tinuity of the Church, and the organic identity of th
present with the past, could not be preserved. The
authorities in Church and State concurred in their belief
that the continuity could not be sustained unless the
archiepiscopal throne were occupied by one who coul
trace his authority to act, in things sacred, up to Augustin
through Augustine to the Apostles, and through them t
the Divine Head, who breathed upon the apostolii
college, saying, "Eeceive ye the Holy Ghost."
The question, therefore, now raised, was not as to th
necessity of appointing a successor to Eeginald Pole, dul;
consecrated ; but as to the person on whose head th
mitre, now vacant by his death, should be placed. X<
doubt was entertained upon the subject by the queen o
by Cecil. It was felt, that no man was so well qualified
to fill the vacant post as Matthew Parker — a man not of
brilliant talents, but of sound judgment ; who, in a revo-
lutionary age, was opposed to rash innovations ; whos
* u Ab apostolis instituti sunt episcopi in ecclesiis, et successor
eorum usque ad nos." Irenasus, iii. cap. 3. " They did not accoui
it to be a church," says Hooker (Eccles. Polity, book vii. ch. v. p. 2.
" -which was not subject unto a bishop. It was the general receivec
persuasion of the ancient Christian world, that ecclesia est in episcopt
1 the outward being of a church consisteth in the having of a bishop."
;
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 205
principles were so firmly established that he could see chap.
how a matter of detail might be yielded for the conci- „ ^IIL
liation of opponents, without the sacrifice of anything p£j^w
essential to the cause he desired to maintain. 1559-75.
On the other hand, Parker's reluctance to accept the Parker's
archbishopric remained unaltered. But when he pleaded H accept0
ill health and insufficiency of means, he was evidently not lt-
assigning the real grounds of his refusal : he was only
seeking a pretext for declining a burden which he felt
himself to be unequal to bear. He was not wealthy, but
he had a competence, and was a member of a wealthy
family : he had not good health, but his health did not
prevent him from working, as we shall see, more perse-
veringly than most men. We gather from his diary
and letters that he was a domestic man, and that he did
not like to give up the comforts of a private home, or to
place his wife, a lady by birth and education, in a doubt-
ful position, which, so long as the queen was opposed
to the marriage of the clergy, was likely to be the case.
This difficulty, however, he overcame, and must have
perceived that it was never insurmountable.
While, therefore, we admit that these pleas had, and
had justly, their weight in his mind, we must look further
for the real grounds of his Nolo episcopari.
It is clear, that he almost despaired of the fortunes of
the Church. He saw Protestantism degenerating into
Puritanism, and perceived that even the men with whom
he would have to act, could not be depended upon.
The queen and Cecil were cordially with him in prin-
ciple and sentiment, but the queen was captious, and Cecil
was a politician. We obtain a clue to Parker's history
if we regard this despair of success as the cause of his
disinclination to the primacy ; and if we also bear it in
mind that, when he became primate, it was with a de-
206
LIVES OF Till:
( II. \1\
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
sponding mind, determined to save what he could fro
the genera] ruin with which the Church was threatene
His one grand object, let it be repeated, was to sav
1559-75. what he could ; and there was much that he could only
save by sacrificing, at the same time, some things he
would gladly have retained, but the retention of which
was not absolutely essential to the preservation of a
Church. We may illustrate his position by what occurre
at his consecration. He retained for us the apostoli
succession ; but he did so by curtailing the ceremoni
of consecration, and by not insisting upon the mitre, th
gloves, or the pastoral staff, the bestowal of which ha<
for several centuries formed part, though not an essenti;
part, of the Ordinal.*
Parker could not hide from himself the fact, that th
offer of the archbishopric woidd, in all probability,
made to him. He spoke on the subject to his friend S
John Cheke, and wrote upon it again to Sir Nicolas Baco
If their object was to benefit him, he repeated what
had said before, that his desire was a situation whe
he might enjoy literary leisure, and benefit the Church b
his writings. If they took higher ground, a younger m
was necessary to discharge duties so arduous as tho
which would be imposed upon the archbishop by the
circumstances of the times. He told Bacon, that the
government should look out for a man in the vigour of
his faculties ; not feint-hearted, for he would have
encounter a bitter opposition ; a man of fortune, for he
would have to maintain the dignity of his office, and to
* Menard, in his notes on the Sacramentary of St. Gregory, declares
that the mitre was not introduced until the tenth century. No men-
tion, according to this writer, is made of it in the ancient Pontificals.
Saussajus, in his Panoplia Episcopalis, lib. i., Joseph Vicecomes, Be
App. Missce, cap. xxix., claim for it a more ancient date ; but Maskel
seems to concur in opinion with Menard.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 207
exercise the virtue of hospitality with diminished means ; chap.
not an avaricious man, for such a one never wins his way _VIIL_^
to men's hearts. _ ££»
It was so evident that Parker was in earnest in his 1559-75.
desire to avoid the archbishopric, that the government,
urged by his friends, made the offer of the see of Canter-
bury to two other divines ; if to the title of a divine Dr.
Nicolas Wotton could lay claim.
The primacy was offered to Dr. Nicolas Wotton, the Primacy
Dean of Canterbury ; and the offer is a further proof of Dr. w0t-
tlie queen's disinclination to Protestantism, until she was 0f Canter-
compelled, as an act of state policy, to permit herself to bury-
be regarded as the Protestant queen. We here continue
the distinction formerly made between a Protestant and a
Eeformer. Both Henry VIII. and Queen Elizabeth were
Eeformers ; but neither of them inclined to Lutheranism ;
Elizabeth, moreover, had a special abhorrence of Cal-
vinism. Such were precisely the principles of Nicolas
Wotton. He declared, that the Church needed reforma-
tion in every department ; but this did not prevent him
from serving as a statesman under both Henry and his
son, under Queen Mary, and under Queen Elizabeth.
Neither Henry nor Mary would have tolerated a Protes-
tant, while, at the same time, Eeginald Pole, though not
a Protestant, professed to be a Eeformer. Wotton had
been in the privy council of the late sovereigns, and had
filled important diplomatic stations. This was the kind
of man that the queen would have liked to see at the
head of the Church of England. But Wotton was aware,
that more than administrative ability and knowledge of the
wQrld was, at this time, required in the primate. There
were many important theological questions to be settled ;
upon which a speedy decision would be demanded, owing
to the resumption of the sittings of the Council of Trent.
208
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
.M.iiiliew
Parker.
1559-75.
Primacy
offered to
Fecken-
ham,
Abbot of
West-
minster.
Wotton, though he held high ecclesiastical preferment,
was not a theologian, and Cecil saw the wisdom of ac-
cepting his refusal of the primacy.*
The next oiler astonishes us more. The primacy wj
offered to Feckenham, Abbot of Westminster, or at a]
events it was so reported and believed. Feckenham iwi
a popular character ; for there were many Protestants
who gratefully remembered that, in the reign of Mary,
he always pleaded on the side of mercy. He had been
chaplain to Bishop Bonner, and, as Fuller says, "he
crossed the proverb, ' like master like man ; ' the patron
being cruel and the chaplain kind to such as in judg-
ment dissented from him." Feckenham had himself expe-
rienced persecution under Edward, and was preferred by
Mary. After he was deposed, he was treated with much
indulgence by the ministers of King Edward. From the
beginning of Elizabeth's reign he had openly opposed
the chief measures of her government ; but the queen
evidently thought it possible that, through the offer of pre-
ferment, he could be brought to terms. She was mistaken.
He remained resolute not to accept the royal supremacy ;
and it is so unlikely that the Puritans would have tole-
rated such an archbishop, that we should probably be
correct in saying, that he was only "talked of for the
primacy." f
The failure of these negotiations brought that con-
viction to the queen's mind, at which her counsellors had
* Holinshed, p. 1403; Walton's Life of Sir Henry Wotton; Words-
worth, Biog. v. 11. See also Forbes, p. 112, and Hayne's State
Papers, p. 324.
"f Wood's Athenae, i. 500. The account of Feckenham in Wood is
taken chiefly from Eeyner's Historia Benedictorum. When Fecken-
ham was abbot of Westminster he planted the elms where they still
stand in Dean's Yard.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 209
already arrived, that, if her throne was to stand, she must chap.
make common cause with the Protestants. The queen « r-L-
would have preferred a Papist with reforming tendencies ; Parked
but she was prepared to accept a Protestant with Catholic 1559-75.
principles the more readily, when Dr. Parker, who had
been her friend from childhood, and had lately been her
adviser, was the person selected.
Parker remained unwilling to incur the responsibilities
of the primacy. He had, however, become less reluctant
to yield to the wishes of his friends, when he found that
the choice lay between himself and such men as Wotton
and Feckenham, both excellent persons, but certainly not
the functionaries required by the exigences of the age.
On the 17th of May it was notified to Parker, by Lord
Keeper Bacon, that it had been determined by the queen
in council, that he should become Archbishop of Canterbury
and primate of all England. Bacon wrote in terms compli-
mentary as well as friendly : " if I knew a man," he said,
" to whom the description made in the beginning of your
letter might more justly be referred than to yourself, I
would prefer him before you ; but knowing none so
meet, indeed, I take it to be my duty to prefer you
before all others, and the rather also because, otherwise,
I should not follow the advice of your own letter. The
rest, which is much, I defer till our next meeting. It is
like that, or it be long, you shall receive letters sub-
scribed by me and others jointly." *
On the 19th of May, the threatened mandate arrived, Parker
curt and decided :— " after our hearty commendations, primate.
these be to signify unto you, that, for certain causes,
wherein the queen's majesty intendeth to use your service,
her pleasure is, that you repair up hither with such speed
as you conveniently may, and at your coming up you
* Corresp. p. 68.
VOL. IX. P
letter to
the queen.
June, 1569
chap, shall understand the rest." The letter was signed " y
_IiHl* loving friends, N. Bacon, W. Cecill." It was addressed
"I'arker^ w To tlie right worshipful and our very friend Mr. Doctor
1559-75. Parker. Give these with speed." *
Whether this letter miscarried, or whether Parker still
hesitated as to the course to be pursued, no answer was
returned; and, on the 29th of May, another despatch
arrived, in which surprise is expressed at the non- arrival
of an answer to the preceding summons ; and a peremptory
order given, that Dr. Parker should repair without delay
to the court.
Parkers Parker determined to address the queen herself. His
friends had been zealous for his promotion, and had
placed his character before her majesty in too favour-
able a light. He desired, that the queen should exercise
her own judgment upon the subject. A man was re
quired for the primacy of more wit, learning, virtue, and
experience than himself. He attributed her majesty's
favourable estimate of his character, to the fact of his
having been chaplain to the queen's mother. This cir-
cumstance had constrained him to be the queen's bedes-
man through life ; 'and this only led him to regret the
more his inability, " inwardly in knowledge, and out
wardly in extern sufficiencies, to do her grace any mee
service," or such as would be answerable to the expecta
tion of him which she had formed.f
The object of the letter evidently was that, in an
future misunderstandings — and, in dealing with such
person as Elizabeth, they could not be avoided — he might
have it in his power to remind the queen, that the primacy
had not been sought by him ; that it was forced upon
him by her grace ; and that, if she should complain of his
incompetence, the blame would rest, not with him, bu
with her. He did not expect any longer to be able t
^orresp. p. G9. | Ibid. p. 70.
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 211
decline the post ; and therefore, after taking this precau- chap.
tion, he gracefully concludes by referring himself wholly *zrr: — -
to her grace's pleasure, rather than by just allegation Parker,
of his unworthiness, the loyal duty of his faithful heart 1559-75-
should, in any way, be suspected.*
The only notice taken of this appeal to her majesty, Parker
and probably the only answer expected, was an official monedto1"
summons to the court, accompanied by the following court*
kind letter from the lord keeper, which was intended to
be jocose, and was really quaint : —
" The former resolution concerning you is now con-
firmed by a second, and if you be not already sent for to
come hither, it will not be long or you shall. I meant,
before I understood thus much, to have had you this
night at supper at my house, for the matter of your letters
delivered to me by one that sued for a ne exeat regnum,
which at my return to London he shall have ; but being
countermanded by the queen, I must intreat you to take
pain with my wife to pass away a shrewd supper.
Written in haste from the court by your assuredly,
N. Bacon." f
Parker now prepared in earnest to yield to the solicit-
ations of his friends and the commands of the queen.
As often happens in such cases, when he girded on his
armour, and went forth into the battlefield, he found the
difficulties fewer and his own powers greater than, by his
timidity or his modesty, he had been led to expect or to
fear. He rose to his position.
On the 18th of July a conge oVelire was issued to the Congk
d'elire.
Dean and Chapter of Canterbury in the following form : juiy is,
1559.
" The Queen to her beloved in Christ, the Dean and Chapter
of the Metropolitan Church of Canterbury, greeting : On your
part a humble supplication has been made to us, that whereas
* Corresp. p. 70. t Ibid- P- 71*
p 2
212
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Election.
August 1,
the aforesaid church, by the natural death of the most reverend
father and lord in Christ, the Lord Reginald Pole, cardinal,
the last archbishop thereof, is now vacant and destitute of the
solace of a pastor, we would be graciously pleased to grant to
you our fundatorial licence to elect another archbishop and
pastor, We, favourably inclined to your prayers in this matter,
have thought fit to grant you this licence, requiring that you
may elect such a person archbishop and pastor who may be de-
voted to God and useful and faithful to us and our kingdom.
In testimony of which thing, &c. Witness the Queen at West-
minster, on the 18th day of July, 1559." *
Whether a letter missive was addressed on this oc-
casion to the dean and chapter in the queen's name is
doubtful ; but the dean and chapter were perfectly aware
that it was intended, that they should elect Dr. Parker ;
and they were careful to observe the ancient precedents of
the Church of England. It was reported that, proceeding
" according to the ancient manner and laudable custom
of the aforesaid church, anciently used and inviolably
observed," they elected Matthew Parker, D.D., for their
bishop on the 1st of August, 1559.
The archbishop elect was immediately involved in a
multiplicity of business. Before taking possession of the
see, he wished to have settled some questions relating to
the temporalities of the Church ; which, in the confusion
of the time and the unprincipled avarice both of the sove-
reign and of her courtiers, had become complicated and
endangered.
It was not till the 9th of September, that he heard
again from the lord keeper, who had been diligently
labouring in his friend's behalf. Bacon sent to Parker, as
he said, "the royal assent, sealed and delivered within
two hours after the receipt thereof, wishing unto him as
* Rolls, Patents 1 Eliz. p. 6. Fcedera, xv. 536.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 213
good success therein as ever happened to any that have cha
received the like." He wrote from Eedgrave, his country . J
house ; and he displays a poetical turn of mind, when, in PaA
allusion to his enjoyment of a brief holiday, and an escape 1559-
from the turmoils of the metropolis, he tells his friend :
" It fares by me as it doth by a bird that hath scaped
out of the cage, which tasting the sweets of liberty never
returns unforced." *
The congratulations of the lord keeper were premature.
Through the inadvertence of the official whose business
it was to draw up the letters patent, the commission
issued for the confirmation and consecration of the primate tl0n-
elect was found, through the omission of a sentence, to be
insufficient for its object. The commission was addressed
to six prelates : Cuthbert, Bishop of Durham ; Gilbert,
Bishop of Bath and Wells; David, Bishop of Peterborough ;
Anthony, Bishop of LlandafF; William Barlow, Bishop ;
and John Scory, Bishop. It stated, that whereas the
archiepiscopal see of Canterbury was lately vacant by the
death of the Lord Eeginald Pole, a licence had been
granted to the Dean and Chapter of Canterbury to elect
another archbishop and pastor to the see aforesaid, and
that their choice had fallen on Matthew Parker, as by
their letters patent, sealed with their common seal, it was
made evident and apparent. It went on to sa}^, "We,
accepting that election, have granted to the said election
our royal assent and also favour, and this by the tenour of
these presents we signify to you ; requiring, and strictly
commanding you, by the faith and affection in which you
are held by us, that you would effectually confirm the
said Matthew Parker, elected to be archbishop and pastor
as is before mentioned of the aforesaid cathedral and
metropolitan church of Christ at Canterbury, and that
* Corresp. p. 76.
214
LIVI-S OF THE
you would effectually confirm the aforesaid election, ;iik
consecrate the said Matthew Parker archbishop an<
pastor of the church aforesaid, and perforin all such an<
singular other things which belong in this matter to your
pastoral office, according to the form of the statutes in
this behalf set forth and provided." This was issued by
writ from the privy seal by order of the queen, who was
at this time paying a visit to the lord keeper at Ee(
grave.
The inadvertence alluded to was this, that the clause
" or at least four of you," was omitted. It followed,
therefore, that if one were absent, or if one refused to act,
the rest could not proceed legally to confirm or to conse-
crate. It so happened, that of the persons named in the
commission, three were either unwilling, or else from ill-
health were unable, to act ; but, being personal friends
of the primate elect, and having generally agreed to the
ecclesiastical reforms in the reign of Henry VIIL, it was
still hoped, that they would conform to the regulations of
the present reign ; and, notwithstanding the late acts of
Parliament, the government was in no hurry to deprive
them of their, sees.f
* Mason in his Vindicise, writes thus of the letters patent : —
" These royal letters patent which we produce, are so publicly and
openly passed in the face of the world, that it is utterly impossible
for them to be forged or counterfeited ; for, according to the statute
made in the twenty-seventh year of King Henry VIIL, in the first
place, the king's highness signs the same with his own hand. Secondly,
one of the king's clerks of his signet upon the right of the king's hand,
puts the king's signet thereto, and subscribing the same with his own
hand, transmits them to the lord keeper of the privy seal. Thirdly, one
of the king's clerks of the privy seal affixes the privy seal thereto, and
subscribing the same with his own hand, directs them to the lord high
chancellor of England, or lord keeper of the great seal of England,
who, at the sight of the privy seal, appends to them the great seal of
England."
+ It would seem that it was at first the intention to permit them
. ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 215
Whether the recusants were influenced by conscientious chap.
or by party motives, the result was the same, and another <.,_ ^lJ
commission was prepared. When the draft of the com- ^kerT
mission was submitted to Cecil, it appeared to his acute 1559-75,
mind, that the wording was not even then sufficiently Th<?se.cond
0 j com mis-
precise to prevent other legal questions from arising relat- sion for the
ing to the temporalities of the Church ; and the primate tion.
elect, with his usual caution, submitted the draft of the
proposed letters patent to the inspection of six eminent
lawyers, to obtain from each an opinion. These pre-
cautions having been taken, other letters patent were
granted by the queen on the 6th of December, having been
unanimously approved by the lawyers who had been
consulted. The letters patent ran thus : —
" Elizabeth, by the grace of Grod, of England, France, and Letters
Ireland, Queen, Defender of the Faith, &c, to the reverend Pateufc-
v 7 7 Decem-
fathersin Christ, Antony, Bishop ofLlandaff; William Barlow, ber 6,
sometime Bishop of Bath, now elect of Chichester : John Scory, ° '
sometime Bishop of Chichester, now elect of Hereford ; Miles
Coverdale, sometime Bishop of Exeter ; John, Suffragan of
Bedford ; John, Suffragan of Thetford ; John Bale, Bishop of
Ossory, greeting : Whereas the archiepiscopal see of Canterbury
being lately vacant by the natural death of the Lord Reginald
Pole, cardinal, last and immediate archbishop and pastor of
the same, upon the humble petition of the dean and chapter
of our cathedral, and metropolitan church of Christ at Canter-
bury, We, by our letters patent, have granted to the same,
licence to elect for themselves another archbishop and pastor
of the see aforesaid ; and the said dean and chapter, by virtue
of our aforesaid licence obtained, have elected for themselves
to retain their sees for a longer time, but difficulties appear to have
arisen, for Tunstall was deprived, or probably, we should say, resigned
his see, on the 28th of September, 1559. The Bishops of Bath and
Peterborough were deposed during the autumn. Knowing that they
would be ultimately deposed, they probably expedited the act.
21G
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
and the church aforesaid our beloved in Christ, Matthew
Parker, D.D., as archbishop and pastor, as by their letters
patent, sealed with the common seal, thereupon directed to us,
is more fully evident and apparent. We, accepting that
election, have granted to the said election our royal assent and
also favour, and this by the tenour of these presents we sig-
nify to you : requiring and strictly commanding you, by the
faith and affection in which you are held by us, that you,
or at least four of you, would effectually confirm the said
Matthew Parker elected to be archbishop and pastor, as before
mentioned, of the aforesaid cathedral and metropolitan church
of Christ at Canterbury, and would effectually confirm the
aforesaid election, and consecrate the said Matthew Parker
archbishop and pastor of the church aforesaid, and perform and
execute all and singular other things which belong in this
matter to your pastoral office, according to the form of ttie
statutes in this behalf set forth and provided, supplying never-
theless by our supreme royal authority of our mere motion and
certain knowledge, whatever either in the things to be done
by you pursuant to our aforesaid mandates, or in you, or
any of you, your condition, state, or power, for the performance
of the premisses, may or shall be wanting of those things which,
either by the statutes of this realm, or by the ecclesiastical
laws are required or are necessary on this behalf, the state of
the times and the exigency of affairs rendering it necessary.
In witness whereof we have caused these our letters to be
made patent. Witness ourselves at Westminster, the 6th day
of December, the second year of our reign."
Four
bishops
to offio'ate
at the con-
secration
of a me-
tropolitan.
On this mandate we may observe that, although a
consecration by three bishops would have been correct,
according to the principles of the universal Church, the
ministration, nevertheless, of four functionaries at least
was required by an Act passed in the reign of Henry VIII.
for the consecration of an English primate. If, under the
circumstances, a consecration had taken place, it would
have been a valid consecration, canonical, but not legal.
rcissioners.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 217
The person consecrated would not have ceased to be a chap.
• . v t t r
.bishop ; but the legality of the act might have been ques- < — — -*
tioned in the temporal courts, and the bishops consecrating Parker.
might have been subjected to legal penalties. We may also 1-359-75.
remark, that " the supplentes " clause, or the supplying by
the queen's authority what might be lacking in the com-
mission, refers to possible legal defects, and to these only.
The court of Eome, as Archbishop Bramhall and Mr.
Haddan clearly prove, in suchlike interests, has generally
such dispensation clauses for "more abundant caution."
Immediately consequent upon this commission, Bishop citation b
Barlow directed a citation to be published to all opposers ; th.e c.om-
calling upon them to declare any canonical objection, if
any such objection could be raised. It commences thus,
" William, sometime Bishop of Bath and Wells, to all and
singular the subjects of our lady the queen, wheresoever
they be throughout the whole kingdom of England,
greeting." He then proceeds, in the legal verbiage of
which we have already had a specimen, and with which,
in all public documents, we are still familiar, to repeat
what was said in the royal mandate : —
" That the see of Canterbury having become vacant by the
natural death of the Lord Keginald Cardinal Pole, last and
immediate archbishop thereof, and the dean and chapter, acting
under the royal licence, having duly elected the Eeverend
Matthew Parker, D.D.5 to be their archbishop, the queen had
given her royal assent to the said election of the person elected ;
had signified to him and his associates, by her royal letters
patent under the great seal of England, her commands to
confirm the person elected and the aforesaid election, and to
consecrate the said Matthew, Archbishop of Canterbury, with
all convenient speed."
He straightway affirms the willingness of the commis-
sioners to obey the royal mandate ; and they forthwith
218 lives of Tin:
chap, decreed that all and singular opposers, if such there were,
— ,— !-> who wished to speak against or oppose the said election,
Parkar the form thereof, or the person elected, should be "cited
1.350-75. and summoned to appear in the parish church of St. Mary-
le-Bow, in the city of London, but within the immediate
jurisdiction of the Church of Christ, Canterbury, on the
Saturday following, viz. the 9th day of December, between
the hours of eight and nine in the forenoon of the same
day, with continuation and prorogation of days then fol-
lowing if need should so require, to speak, except, pro-
pose, and do, and further to receive what justice should
require in the matter, and the quality and nature of the
said business demand and require of them."
To this document the seal of the Dean and Chapter of
Canterbury was affixed. It bore date at London, the 6th
day of December. Thomas Willet, notary public, made
affidavit, and certified to the said Lord William, sometime
Bishop of Bath and Wells, that on the 7th day of the
month, he had executed the mandate aforesaid in the
church of St. Mary-le-Bow.*
Confir- On the 9th of December, between the hours of eight
SecT' and nine, the lords commissioners took their seats in
ioo9. -qow Church. Before them appeared in person John
Incent, notary public, and presented the royal letters
commissary patent, which have just been laid before the
reader. He humbly supplicated the lords commissioners
to proceed to the business of the confirmation. The
commissioners desired the document to be read ; and
immediately signified their readiness, in obedience to the
royal mandate, to proceed according to the force, form,
and effect thereof. Incent exhibited his proxy for th<
* There are obvious reasons why certain processes, which in ordinal
cases may be taken for granted, should be particularized when we
noticing the consecration of Parker.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 219
Dean and Chapter of Canterbury, and made himself a party chap.
for them. In the procuratorial name of the Dean and . vnL ^
Chapter, he presented to the commissioners the worshipful pJ^JT
Nicholas Bullingham, doctor of laws, who exhibited his 1559-75
proxy for the worshipful and illustrious Matthew Parker,
elect of Canterbury, and made himself a party for the
same. Incent then exhibited the original citatorial man-
date, together with a certificate endorsed with the execution
thereof ; and prayed all and singular persons cited to be
publicly preconized. A public preconization having been
made three several times, of all and singular opposers, at
the doors of Bow Church, and no one appearing or op-
posing, the notary public accused of contumacy all opposers
who refused to appear when summoned ; and he prayed
that each of them should be reputed contumacious, and
in pain of such their contumacy, be precluded the means
of further opposing in this matter the said election,
form, or person elected. The lords commissioners pro-
nounced them contumacious, and granted the prayer
of the petition. Incent then exhibited the process of
election, which was inspected and examined by the lords
commissioners, who willed and decreed that the process
should be taken and considered as read. Witnesses having
been called and examined in confirmation of the attesta-
tions of Incent, and certain other forms having been gone
through, the commissioners confirmed the election, and
decreed that the said most reverend lord, now elected
and confirmed, should be consecrated and blessed. They
further committed to the said lord elected and confirmed,
the guardianship and administration of the spiritualities
and temporalities of the said archbishopric of Canterbury.
They also decreed him to be put into real, actual, and
corporeal possession of the said archbishopric, and all
rights, dignities, and honours pertaining and belonging to
220
LIVES OF THE
CRAP.
VIII.
Matthew-
Parker.
1559-75.
Form of
confir-
mation.
Parker
archbishop
elect.
-
it ; they gave directions, that after his consecration
should be enthroned by the Dean and Chapter of C
terbury, and any other or ever to whom by rig] it a
custom that office is known to belong, according to t
laudable custom at the church of Christ at Canterbury,
neither objecting to, nor opposing the modern laws and
statutes of this illustrious kingdom of England.'"
Such from time immemorial has been the form
confirming bishops in England ; and such the form which
still remains, varying merely in the necessary details.
But we must remark, that in Queen Elizabeth's time the
process was more than a mere form. Opposers in the
sixteenth century would have been heard, if they had any
objection to offer: whereas, in the nineteenth century,
when opposers in a memorable case appeared, they were
refused a hearing.
Matthew Parker was now lord archbishop elect of
Canterbury. Although he did not possess before his
consecration the potestas ordinis, he could exercise so
much of the potestas jurisdictionis as was, during the
vacancy of the see, until his election, confided to the Dean
and Chapter of Canterbury. Parker determined to put
in force the powers he thus possessed, aided also as he
was by the prerogatives of the crown, in order that some
temporal affairs dependent upon the ecclesiastical st
might be settled before his assumption of the full pow
* The deed of confirmation from which the statements in the U
are taken, still exists. It may be seen in Archbishop Parker's regist
preserved with minute care, in the archiepiscopal library of Lamb*
and a facsimile of it is given in the splendid work of Mr. Bailey,
which reference has been so frequently made. The deed is of consid*
able size, on a sheet of vellum ; the handwriting is the same as tl
which appears in Cranmer's register. So that the document we rei
to is a contemporary document, and the initials A. H., which occask
ally occur, prove the writer to be Anthony Huse, Cranmer's regist
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 221
of the primacy. Owing to the cessation of our inter- chap.
course with Rome, and our rejection of the papal su- . — ., , -,>
premacy, there wrere several legal matters which required Parker*
to be adjusted; in the adjustment of which Parker did 1559-75.
not wish to establish a precedent to be followed by
future metropolitans. Certain points required to be
settled, and to be settled once for all ; but, being in an
anomalous position, he desired to have some of his actions
regarded as exceptional.
Parker, lenient as he was to the Anglo-Catholics, was
now convinced that he must compel them to separate from
the extremes on their side of the Church — the papists ;
and he could listen to no further proposals on the part
of the deposed diocesans. Out of the moderate men on
both sides he formed a third party — a new man — and
this party he distinguished by the name of Protestants,
attaching thereto a new meaning.
The diocesans, after a time, perceived the mistake Letter
they had committed, and sought to regain their position ; E^eror
but Parker was firm. The attempt, on their part, was and Ger_
now simply for toleration ; and the Emperor, together princes,
with those of the German princes who co-operated with
him, and by whose advice the deposed diocesans had
ited, addressed the queen in their favour. They urged
ter, if she deposed these diocesans, to permit them to
officiate as "vacant bishops," and to assign to them cer-
tain churches in the large towns.
The queen's reply, under the advice of Parker, was The
consistent and dignified. A reference was first made to the ^ejen s
past history of these prelates. They had subscribed to
the royal supremacy in her father's reign, and why should
they withhold their subscription now ? Although their
inconsistent obstinacy was causing disturbance and dissent,
the queen wras ready to treat them with consideration
222 LIVES OF THE
chap, and gentleness ; but she could not venture, by granting
the Emperor's request, to give offence to the rest of her
Parked subjects. To grant to the recalcitrant prelates separate
1559-75. churches, and to permit them to keep up a distinct com-
munion, were things which neither the public interest nor
her own honour would permit. The request for such
indulgence was, she said, unreasonable, "for there was
no new faith propagated in England ; no religion set up,
but that which was commanded by our Saviour, practised
by the primitive Church, and unanimously approved by
the fathers of the best antiquity .... therefore, though
out of her own clemency, and especially at the request
of certain crowned heads, she was willing to connive a
little, in order to reclaim these prelates to better temper,
yet she was resolved not to be so kind as to feed their
disease, and cherish their obstinacy."*
Thus did the archbishop elect, through the advice given
to the queen, proclaim the intention of the government to
take the Protestant standpoint when acting against Papists.
The queen and her advisers had an opportunity of show-
ing their determination, on the other hand, to uphold
Catholicism, as distinguished from Eomanism, against the
ultra-Protestants or Puritans ; for a petition was soon
after addressed to the crown from the opposite extreme.
Petition of The Puritans persuaded their friends and supporters
tans to tie abroad, to urge the queen to give them full liberty to
manage their own affairs. In her reply to them, the
The queen pointed out that they petitioned for nothing less
queen's * * . . °
reply. than for permission to set at nought the canons of the
Catholic Church, and the statutes of her realm. It was
not consistent, she observed, with her interest and honoi
to allow diversity of practice.
* Camden, p. 40. Collier, vi. 263.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 223
In both these answers the tone and the spirit were ad- chap.
mirable. But the queen's conduct was the more to be -A , ' ^
admired in her reply to the Puritans, because by them she p^ker7
had of late been grossly insulted. By both the Papists 1559-75.
and the Puritans her government had been opposed ; but
hitherto she had met, for the most part, with courtesy
and kindness from those of her subjects who contended
for the papal supremacy. Up to this time it wTas by the
Puritans that she had been personally insulted ; and they
attacked her with bad feeling and bad taste. A large John Knox
number of the Puritans were under the influence of John f"™ a°
Knox, who was attempting to form a party against both Gainst the
the queen and the Church of England. Not only had <3ueen and
, . H , -.1 11. it., the Church
this fierce man sought to blast, by his maledictions, the of Eng-
government of females, advocating their destruction when-
ever the sceptre was wielded by woman's hand, but he
had lately threatened "death and damnation to such as,
either in their forehead or hand, bear the mark of the
beast." And a portion of his mark, he said, " are all
these dregs of papistry which are left in your great book
of England (viz. the Book of Common Prayer), such as
crossing in baptism, kneeling at the Lord's table, mum-
bling or singing of the Litany, 'afulgure et tempestate, fyc. :
any one jot of which diabolical inventions will I never
counsel any man to use. The whole order of your book
appeareth rather to be devised for upholding of massing-
priests than for any good instruction which the simple
people can receive thereof. Your sacraments were minis-
tered, for the most part, without the soul, and by those
who to Christ Jesus are no true ministers, and God grant
that so yet they be not," &c. &c*
* Collier, vi. 277. It is evident that John Knox had no reluctance
to the unchurching of the Church of England. Parker's abhorrence of
the man was often expressed.
224
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1659-7o.
Divisions
among the
Puritans.
The fact is, that the Puritans were already split into
two parties; and the divergence continued to increase.
The one party, to which the name of Puritans soon
became exclusively attached, was devoted to the prin-
ciples of the Calvinistic reformers, and as such was
opposed to the continuance of the episcopate. The
English reformers became aware, that this was giving up
the whole question of the continuity of the Church. The
question had come to this — shall we have the old Catholic
Church reformed, or shall we establish a new Protestant
sect ? Among the returned exiles there were many who,
although they were too much influenced by their foreign
correspondents in points of doctrine, nevertheless saw
clearly the advantage of adhering to the Church syste
Both Parker and Cecil recognized the policy of con
ciliating these persons. They became aware, that larg<
concessions would have to be made to their prejudices ;
but they would do for the Church the best they could
by securing their conformity. They felt, that omissions
might be supplied and corrections might be made by
future legislation ; and the very circumstances of their
position would lead the majority of the conformists to
right conclusions. The difficulties with which Parker,
at this period of his life, had to contend, related to the
amount of concessions which policy demanded, sometimes
at an apparent relinquishment of principle. The conform-
ing Puritans were violent on the subject of these con-
cessions ; but by degrees, as Parker expected, Church
principles even among them gained the ascendency.
Parker felt that it was very important, before entering
upon his sacred office, to ascertain the real condition o
the English Church ; he determined therefore, by callin
into action the royal prerogative, in conjunction with hi
authority as metropolitan elect, to appoint a lay com
aw
2e
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 225
mission to report to the crown on the state of the Church, chap.
In doing this he certainly invested the commission with < — , *->
powers scarcely consistent with those principles of the PaiLiT
Church, which he was labouring to uphold. But the 1559-75.
case was exceptional and temporary, and he was not
establishing a precedent. Neither he nor the queen ob-
jected to the exercise of despotic power, when the oppo-
sition they met with was organized by faction, not being
the mere result of an unenlightened conscience. It was Establish-
on this ground," we may presume, that he consented to the court°of e
establishment of the Court of High Commission. The H!^Com-
D_ _ mission.
powers of this court were at first judiciously employed
in upholding the laws of the state and the canons of the
Church, when in a revolutionary age extraordinary power
was required for these purposes ; but the commission in
the end, when it was enlarged and fully organized, became
as tyrannical in practice as it was unsound in principle.
The commissioners, though appointed by the queen, re- injunc-
ceived their instructions from Parker. These instructions toTh/1™11
were embodied in certain injunctions drawn up by the c?mmis-
° r " sioners.
archbishop elect, but enforced by royalty. In drawing
them up, Parker called in the advice of Cecil, and by him
the injunctions were carefully revised. The commissioners
were to require wherever they went, and from all func-
tionaries, a recognition of the royal supremacy. The
Puritans were conciliated by a denunciation of a super-
stitious reverence for images, relics, and miracles ; on
which point the commissioners were to make minute
inquiries. They were also to censure pilgrimages, the
setting up of candles, and praying upon beads. For
reasons before assigned, many of the clergy were unable
to preach or write their own sermons : they were to be
required to procure a sermon, each rector in his church,
at least once a quarter : upon other Sundays, unless a
VOL. IX. Q
226 lives of Tin:
chap, licensed preacher could be procured, a homily was to be
• — r-^— read. Every parish was required to procure a Bible, of
Parker, the largest volume, in English, together with the para-
15,59-75. phrases, also in English, of Erasmus. The policy of thus
authorizing the paraphrases of Erasmus is at once apparent.
Parker's desire was, whilst sanctioning a deviation from
practices which had been abused to superstition, and
whilst requiring men to search the Scriptures, like the
good Bereans, to see " whether these things be so,"
nevertheless, to make it apparent that in the interpre-
tation of Scripture, his teaching was in accordance with
that of a Catholic divine, who, though a friend of reform,
had never been a Protestant.
Although an affectation of skill in singing was not to
be carried too far, still the Common Prayer was to be
distinctly sung. Choirs were to be kept up, and lands
dedicated for their support were to be secured to the
church, while, for the satisfaction of those who had
taste for sacred music, an anthem was to be allowed.
During the performance of Divine Service all the cus
tomary marks of reverence were to be strictly observed.
The Litany was to be sung, and the people, when repea
ing the responses, were required devoutly and humbl
to kneel upon their knees ; and whensoever the name o
Jesus was pronounced, either in a sermon or in th
offices of the Church, due reverence was to be made b
all persons, young and old, "with lowness of courtesy
and uncovering of heads of the men kind." * Eegiste
* See Collier, vi. 256. Strype and Cardwell seem to think that the
injunctions were drawn up by the commission of divines which sat ii
Canon Row. It is more than doubtful, however, whether they, as
body, would have given their assent to all the injunctions. We ma]
with more confidence attribute them to Parker and Cecil ; the latt*
we know revised them.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 227
of weddings, christenings, and burials, as enjoined in the chap.
reign of Henry VIII., were to be carefully kept.
The commissioners were empowered, upon exami-
nation, to annul spiritual promotions, if they had not
been legally made ; and to call for an exhibition of let-
ters of orders — a power still retained by churchwardens.
Although these powers were ample, there was no desire
to see them applied to the purposes of persecution ; they
were permitted to discharge persons who had been com-
mitted to prison for their religion, and to restore such
as had been illegally displaced. They were to allow pen-
sions to those who, refusing the oath of supremacy, deter-
mined to quit their livings- — these were wise and merciful
provisions, which ought to be recorded to the credit of
Elizabeth and her advisers : and the wisdom of the regu-
lations was apparent in the fact, that very few of the bene-
ficed clergy refused to conform. The principle of Parker
and Cecil was not to oust the Catholics ; but to compel
the Catholics, being in possession, to tolerate Protestants.
The report of the commission was on the whole satis-
factory ; the temper, if not the learning, of the clergy
being such as was desired. It was reported, that the
commissioners found both clergy and laity " eager for the
abolition of foreign jurisdiction, both in spiritual matters
and in temporal." The general feeling was in favour
of the restoration of the crown of England to its rightful
supremacy, and to the administration of the Sacraments
and Order of Divine Service as set forth in the Book of
Common Prayer.*
There exists among the MSS. of the palace of Lambeth
a scroll of parchment containing a long list of the clergy
who subscribed to this statement in some of the dioceses,
and this may be regarded as a sample of the whole. It
* Strype's Annals, I. i. 255.
Q 2
228 lives of Tin:
chap, is not to be supposed, of course, that all who subscribed
did so with the same goodwill ; motives are at all times
varied and mixed ; but the fact was now made known to
Parker, that in many places, where he had not expected
support, he would not meet with opposition. From the
deprived diocesans he no longer had to fear an effective
opposition. Many of them he respected and loved for
their piety and virtue, and he retained their friendship
till the hour of their death ; nevertheless he had become
aware, that the regulars withholding their support, he must
depend for learning, zeal, and piety upon the Protestants.
Parker was now preparing for his consecration. It
is customary for the bishop elect, with the consent of
the metropolitan, to make choice of the prelates to
officiate at his consecration. In the present case, the
primacy being vacant, there were exceptional difficulties
to be encountered and overcome. By the cautious mind
of Parker, every step to be taken was carefully con-
sidered, and, whenever it was necessary, legal advice was
obtained. He felt that, while, on the one hand, he must
be particular in following precedent, from the peculiar
circumstances of the Church of England, and her repu-
diation of papal authority, he would, to a certain extent,
be establishing a precedent.
It might have saved some controversy, although it
would have prevented much profitable investigation, if
historians had always borne in mind, that what may be
necessary to render a consecration legal — that is, in ac-
cordance with the laws of a nation — may not, when
regarded from only an ecclesiastical point of view, be
absolutely necessary to render a consecration valid. We
have already remarked, but must here repeat, that in the
case of Parker, his consecration would not have been
legal, i.e. it would not have been in accordance with the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 229
enactments of the English Parliament, if he had been chap.
. VIII
consecrated by only three bishops, because the English * — r— ^
law, in its carefulness to preserve the apostolical succes- Parker,
sion, has determined, by way of extra precaution, that 1559-75.
while, for the consecration of a bishop, three prelates in
episcopal orders, the metropolitan being one, must offi-
ciate, not fewer than four must co-operate in the consecra-
tion of a metropolitan himself.* In any country in which
such a law is not in force, the consecration of a metropo-
litan by only three bishops would of course be valid, and,
in the absence of any law upon the subject, not illegal.
A consecration conducted by only one bishop, though Consecra-
contrary to the canons of the universal Church, which b7shop°ne
require the administration of this holy ordinance by three valid*
bishops at least, would be regarded as irregular, and un-
canonical, but not invalid. The reason why three bishops
are required to officiate, is to prevent clandestine conse-
crations ; and, in the old Eoman law, " tres faciunt colle-
gium.'" It was ordered therefore, in future times, that
consecrations should be performed by a college of bishops.f
* The statute 25 Henry VIII. requires the presence of the metro-
politan and two bishops ; or, without the metropolitan, four bishops.
■f The reader who would investigate this subject is referred to
Bingham, lib. ii. cap. xi. § 6. This learned writer establishes the fact,
that the consecration of a bishop by only one bishop was regarded
valid, if proof were brought before the church that the consecration
took place with the essential ceremonies ; although, to prevent scandal,
they would prohibit such a bishop from officiating until he had
obtained a special licence from the primate of his church. Bingham
also proves that the Bishop of Rome had no more privilege in this re-
spect than any other prelate. See also Con. Arelatensis, Can. i. et ii. •
Catalani Commentarius, torn. i. tit. xiii. 289-383 ; Bellarmine, De
Notis Ecclesiae, cap. viii. ; and Vasquez, In Disputationibus, pars iii,
ccxlviii. cap. vii. These are spoken of " as co-operators, or assistant
consecrators, in the ancient canons, and, together with the chief bishop
they convey the episcopal character." For the practice of the "Western
230
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parkor.
1559-75.
Vacant
bishops.
Suffragan
bishops.
Although among the bishops contemporary with
Parker, there could be no doubt as to the validity of
their orders, and of their having become, through their
respective consecrations, bishops of the Catholic Church,
there were several whose right to act, as diocesans in the
Church of England, might be disputed. Some there were
who had been unlawfully deprived of their sees, and
others who were never at any time called to preside over a
diocese. They might, as bishops of the Catholic Church,
discharge their episcopal functions, consecrate, ordain,
confirm, and administer the sacraments in any part of the
world ; but they may have had no diocesan jurisdiction
assigned to them ; and they might be subjected to legal
penalties for officiating in a diocese without the permis-
sion of the diocesan. They may have conferred the grace,
but, under the peculiar circumstances in which they stood,
they might have been punished for doing so.
The episcopate in England at this time consisted, to a
great extent, of what are technically called "vacant-
bishops," or, as they were styled in the Greek Church,
s7rl(rxo7roi <7£oAa£Ws£, — bishops who had resigned their
sees, or who had been unlawfully deprived of them, some
by King Edward, others by Queen Mary ; or who had
never been in possession of a see, as was the case, and is
still the case, with suffragan bishops.
We ourselves live at a time when the primitive system
Church it will be enough to refer to Sir William Palmer's Essay; i. 372.
The authority for " vacant bishops " to officiate in the church is shown
by Balsatnon and Zonaras on the eighteenth canon of Antioch. Tho-
massin (Eccles. Disc.) describes their origin and details their duties.
It is sometimes said that the Bishop of Rome, among his infringements
of the canons and canon law of the Church, claims to consecrate without
assistance. But this may be doubted. A consecration by the pope in
the Middle Ages was very rare. Consecrations in the Curia were
usually performed by the Bishop of Ostia, other cardinals assisting.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 231
has been partially revived, of having suffragan bishops to chap.
assist diocesan bishops.* The title of suffragan in this « ,— 1^
connection is an unfortunate one, because it leads to a Parker!"
confusion of ideas. All the bishops of a province are the 1559-75.
suffragans, and are so called, of the archbishop. In the
Eomish Church, a nominal diocese, in partibus injidelium,
is sometimes assigned to these " vacant bishops," the only
bishops the Romish dissenters had in England until the
time of Dr. Wiseman, who was himself consecrated to a
see he never saw, and of which few persons had ever
heard. There are also now, as in Parker's time, many
prelates who, like Bishop Maltby, Bishop Blomfield, and
Bishop Sumner, incapacitated by illness or old age, have
retired from diocesan duties, although they still retain all
the powers and prerogatives of the episcopate. Those
s7ri<rxo7roi <ryj>7^dfy>vTss who have retired from diocesan
duties in the colonies, still exercise their episcopal func-
tions ; and are often employed in rendering assistance to
their brethren whose dioceses in the mother country have
become so large that, without such assistance, they could
not adequately discharge the episcopal functions, beyond
that of general superintendence. f
It should be borne in mind that bishops were in Episcopal
existence before dioceses were established. The bound- £ over a
aries of dioceses were limits of convenience for the Partlcular
see, one
preservation of order in peaceful times. The powers thins;
that a man possessed as a bishop were, for the con- authority,
another
* For our permission to exercise this undoubted right of the Church, thing,
we are indebted to the wisdom and piety of the present prime minister,
Mr. Gladstone.
f For an account of the e-irtcrKoirot cr^oXa^ovrfc, see Suicer, 1204, and
also 1178. Useful as Suicer is, he is not to be compared to our
Bingham, and to the latter we may refer, i. 140. The student of
theology cannot begin his studies more profitably than by devoting
his attention to Bingham, verifying, as far as can be, his authorities.
232 LIVES OF THE
chap, venience of the Church, to be exercised under such re-
— ^_— gulations as the Church, in the aggregate or in its
Parked branches, might see fit to make. Without questioning
1559-75. the validity of his act, a prelate, if he were intentionally
to violate the canons enacted by the universal or by a
provincial Church, would, without any denial of his
orders, be subjected to ecclesiastical punishment. We
may understand this more clearly by reference to the
ministrations of the second order in the sacred ministry.
If a priest were to administer the Holy Communion to a
sick person in another man's parish, factum valet, so far
as the recipient of sacramental grace is concerned ; but
the officiating priest, having violated a law of the Church,
might be subjected to a fine or to censure. In like
manner, if a bishop were to confirm without permission,
in the diocese of another prelate, he might by the
metropolitan be called to account. In order, therefore,
to enforce the necessary discipline among men who, so
far as their orders are concerned, are equal, in every
provincial or national Church one of the prelates is
vested with the powers of primacy, to protect the
Church from confusion. The canonists are only carry-
ing out this principle when, having insisted on canonical
regulations, they remind us, that these regulations do not
interfere with that superintendence of the whole Catholic
Church, in which each bishop has an equal share, not as
to what concerns external polity and government, but as
to what relates to the prime essential part of religion —
the preservation, in its purity, of the Christian faith.
" Whenever," says Bingham, " the faith was in danger of
being subverted by heresy, or destroyed by persecution,
then [in the primitive Church, to which Parker looked for
his precedents] every bishop thought it part of his duty
and office [as opportunity occurred] to put to his helping
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 2)3
hand, and labour as much for any other diocese as for chap.
his own [if a diocese he had]." * ^_^
A bishop's power, including the power of ordination, parkerT
the potestas ordinis, is one thing ; the authority of a dio- 1559-75.
cesan, or the potestas jurisdictionis^ is another thing. The
diocesan powers are conferred to prevent the ordinary
episcopal power from being so exercised as to cause a
schism. In like manner a prisoner of war on parole may
walk where he pleases, if the question be simply as to his
power of walking ; but if he walks beyond a certain
given point, his captors have a right to punish him as a
perjured person. When a diocesan refused to exercise
the powers divinely conferred upon him for the good of
the people, then also, according to primitive practice,
another bishop might • interfere. For the better under-
standing of the practice of the primitive Church on this
point, Bingham refers us to a few particular instances.
It was a rule in the primitive Church, that no bishop
should ordain in the diocese of another without his per-
mission. Although this was a limitation of the episcopal
power to a single diocese, yet, for the sake of order, it
was canonically enforced and generally observed. But it
might happen that a diocesan would become a heretic,
and would ordain none but heretical clergy, persecuting
the orthodox and driving them away. In that case it
was noted, that any Catholic bishop, as being a bishop
of the Church universal, was in such diocese authorized
to ordain orthodox men. It was in one sense contrary
to rule ; but then it was in accordance with the supreme
rule of all — the preservation of the faith. When the
Church was in danger of being overrun with Arianism,
* The testimony of St. Augustine, of Cyprian, of Gregory Nazian-
zen, of St. Basil, St. Chrysostom and others, with their corresponding
conduct, may be seen, quoted or described, in Bingham, ii. cap. 5, § 1.
234 LIVES OF THE
chap, the great Athanasius, on his return from exile, did not
VIII .
— ^— ' hesitate, in the several cities through which he passed, to
Parker, ordain presbyters,* although those cities were not under
1559-75. his jurisdiction. The celebrated Eusebius of SamosciUi
acted precisely in the same manner in the time of the Arian
persecution under Yalens.f Although in peaceful times
he officiated in the episcopal vestments, yet now, according
to Theodoret, he went about Syria, Phoenicia, and Pales-
tine in a soldier's habit, ordaining presbyters and deacons,
and setting in order the things he found wanting in the
churches. Thus arrayed, he consecrated bishops also in
Syria, Cilicia, and other places, whose names Theodoret
has recorded* All this was contrary to strict rule ; but
was not in violation of the principles of the Church, when
to the strict rule the necessities of the Church demanded
an exception to be made* The Church might suspend a
regulation made for the sake of order, but it could not
exist without a clergy who could prove, through apostoli-
cal succession, their right to act as ambassadors from God
to man. In a similar case, Epiphanius J exercised the
same power, and asserted the like privilege. Having
ordained Paulianus, first a deacon and then a presbyter,
in a diocese of which he was not the diocesan, he was
reproached for having acted contrary to the canon, and
he vindicated his conduct on the principle now advanced,
viz. that in cases of pressing necessity, when the interest
of the Church was concerned, every bishop had authority
to exercise, when required, the potestas or dims conferred
upon him at his consecration.
To meet the various controversies started from opposite
quarters, relating to Parker's consecration, I have con-
sidered it expedient to refer occasionally to these facts,
* Socrates, ii. cap. 24. f Theodoret, iv. 13.
J Epiphan. Ep. ad Johan.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 235
well known as they must be to the student of ecclesiastical chap.
history. Several suggestions must have been presented
to Parker's mind, when, watched from two opposite
quarters, he was considering how he could best maintain, 1559-75.
under circumstances of peculiar difficulty, the Catholic and
primitive principles to which he professed a loyal adher-
ence. But to any extreme measures he had no occasion
to resort : he had only to follow precedent, except where
precedent, of a comparatively modern establishment, re-
cognized the papal usurpation. He had to reject the
tiara and to give its clue weight to the crown* and then
all was easy ; he passed at once from medieval corruption
to primitive orthodoxy.
A majority of the sees were vacant. The vacancies had vacancies
. , . . 111 the sees.
been occasioned in several instances, as we have seen,
by the deaths of the incumbents.* That the bishops who
were deposed for not taking the oath of supremacy,
were legally deposed on principles admitted by the
Church,f Parker entertained no doubt. There were at
* Although it is said by Hecker, that " the sweating sickness had
vanished from the earth in 1551," the country was certainly long
after in a very unhealthy state. At the time of Mary's death there was
undoubtedly some fearful epidemic prevailing, which was not extinct
in 1560, if we may judge from the cautions drawn up by Cecil for
Queen Elizabeth's apparel and diet. Among other things, he suggests
that she admit of no perfume on her apparel or gloves, and that she
take advice of her physicians for receiving twice every week " some
preservative contra pestem et venena" See Haynes's State Papers,
p. 368.
f Innumerable instances, says Sir William Palmer, occur in the
history of the primitive Church, in which schismatical, heretical, and
intruding bishops were expelled by the temporal power. Thus, the
Emperor Gratian made a law expelling the Arian prelates, and restoring
the orthodox to their sees. — Theodoret, v. 2. The usurper Theodosius
and Peter the Fuller were expelled from the see of Jerusalem and
Antioch respectively by the Emperors. See other instances in Episcopacy
Vindicated.
236 LIVES OF THE
chap, this time seven bishops in England who favoured
- Keformation. There were ten who were opposed to it,*
Matthew-
Parker.
I
Of
s
but the number of the Eeformation prelates was increased
1559-75. by t]ie irisn bishops, of whose services, since they ac
ceded to the Eeformation, Parker might have availe
himself. He had, therefore, a sufficient choice, and
was his wish at first to have each branch of the Church
in the queen's dominions represented — English, Irish, and
Welsh.f
William After due consideration he selected the late Bishop of
B^hop- Bath and Wells, now about to be translated to Chiche
^ °f ter, to preside at his consecration, and to take that pa
ter, chosen in the ceremonial which, under ordinary circumstanc
at Parker's would have devolved upon the metropolitan.
consecra- Parker was not above the consideration of worldly
influences, and in selecting Bishop Barlow, at a time when
the courtiers were doing what in them lay to bring the
clergy into contempt, he made choice of a man who held
a high position in society. Bishop Barlow was a privy
councillor, and had been eminent as a statesman and
diplomatist ; having been employed in the reigns of
Henry VIII., of Queen Mary, of Edward VI., and
Queen Elizabeth, in affairs of great importance.
Of Barlow's early history we know but little.
Welsh extraction, he was born in Essex. He received
his primary education at St. Osyth's, a monastery in his
* Parker had ample precedent for his proceedings, several of his
predecessors having been consecrated by their suffragans, as was th
case with his immediate predecessors, Pole and Cranmer.
f Seven bishops, including Bale, Bishop of Ossory, were named in
the second commission for Parker's consecration. Omitting the Bishop
of Ossory, who did not obey the summons, or was prevented from
poming by Parker, and adding the name of the Bishop of Sodor and
Man, who, like the Bishop of LlandafF, Dr. Kitchin, conformed, there
remained seven bishops who acquiesced in the Elizabethan reformation.
See Haddan, p. 222.
:
"
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 237
native county, and completed it at the University of chap.
Oxford, where he became a Doctor of Divinity. Return-
ing to Essex, he became a canon regular at St. Osyth's,
and held various official appointments in connection with 1559~75.
that house, until we find him, in 1527, prior of Bisham
in Berkshire.
He declared himself on the side of the Eeformation in His favour
the reign of Henry VIII. ; and when Crumwell had deter- ciumweii.
mined on the dissolution of the monasteries, that minister
found an able, zealous, and generous supporter in Barlow,
who not only resigned his own monastery, but procured
several abbots and priors, his neighbours, to follow his
example. A man so energetic in action, and possessing
the important talent of being able to influence other men,
was not likely to be neglected by Crumwell ; and when,
through his instrumentality, Barlow was introduced at
court, he soon commended himself to the notice of the
king. He was sent by King Henry, early in 1536, with
Lord Robert Howard into Scotland as ambassador, and
from a letter now before me, sent to Crumwell, we learn
that the object of his mission was to amend, if possible,
" the disordered state of the border." In a letter
from Henry VIII. to James V., the king speaks of Barlow
as his " well-beloved counsellor, Win. Barlow, suf-
ficiently instructed in the specialities of certain Weighty
cases."
The reader of these volumes will remember, that it was
by the bestowal of ecclesiastical preferments that lawyers
sought to remunerate their servants, and the system was
not yet superseded. Accordingly, Barlow's remuneration Bariow j8
came in the shape of a nomination to the see of Saint ^fec^d of
Asaph. He was elected Bishop of Saint Asaph by author- Saint
ity of a conge d'elire, dated the 7th of January, 1535-6.* Jan. 1536.
* Bramhall, Pref. Foedera, xiv. 558. There is an account of
Barlow in Wood's Athenae. Several letters from liim and to him are
238 LIVES OF THE
chap. Being at this time detained in Scotland by his diplomatic
VIII. .
- « ' - duties, he was necessarily confirmed by proxy on the
Parker. 22nd or 23rd of February.* While Barlow was sti
i
1569-75. jn Edinburgh he received intelligence of the death
Eawlins, Bishop of Saint David's, and he applied, or hi
friends for him, that he might be translated to the more
Elected lucrative bishopric. He was elected to Saint David's on
spcraTed" tne l^tn °f April* an(l the royal assent to the election was
Bishop of granted on the 25th of the same month. f On the 26th
Saint & , '
David's, he was invested with the temporalities of the see. J He
had evidently hastened from Scotland, in furtherance of
his object, and on the 21st of April he was confirmed in
person in Bow Church.
Immediately afterwards he resumed his secular duties,
and he remained in Scotland till the month of June.§
On the 30th of June he took his seat in the House of
Lords, and in the upper house of Convocation.
Translated On the 3rd of February, 1548-9, Barlow was translated
of Bath66 to tne see °f Bath and Wells. Besides being eminent as a
statesman, Bishop Barlow was respected by his brothers
on the episcopal bench as a theologian and divine. Arch-
bishop Cranmer complained of him as being too jocose,
and apt to bring serious matters to the test of ridicule ;
but he could not have been a light-minded man who was
consulted on the composition of one of the most important
books of the age. Bishop Barlow was concerned in the
to be found in the State Papers, and others in the Suppression of the
Monasteries, published by the Camden Society.
* The archbishop's commission to confirm is dated the 22nd of
February, and his certificate to the king of confirmation, the 23rd. Th(
date of the confirmation itself is omitted. — Cranmer's Eegist.
t Cranmer's Eegist. J Mason, iii. 10, § 2.
§ Owing to the loss of the registers the exact day of Barlow's coi
secration is not known. Professor Stubbs, whose authority few will be
found to question, places it on the 11th of June.
and Wells.
1549.
-
>n-
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 239
authorship of The Godly and Pious Meditations of a °MjF-
Christian Man, which is commonly called the Bishops' ^rr-^ — '
J L Matthew
Book. Moreover, in the translation of the Scriptures, he Parker.
was considered so good a scholar, that to him the Church lo59~7°-
was indebted for a revision of the apocryphal Book of
Wisdom.
On the accession of Queen Mary, Bishop Barlow gave Resigns his
proof of his sincerity by resigning his bishopric of Bath on the ac-
and Wells. Being a married prelate, he anticipated de- q*™™ °
privation under the new law ; and he thought it expe- Mary-
dient not to involve himself in unnecessary difficulties
by offering an unavailing opposition.* He determined to
quit the country, and availed himself of the facilities of
self-exile offered at the beginning of Mary's reign, to
persons who declined to conform to the ecclesiastical
regulations then introduced.
Barlow chose a residence in Germany, for he had no He is ap-
sympathy with Calvinism. By this circumstance he was the see of
commended to the notice of the queen and of Cecil, when, i559.esteE
on the death of Mary, the exiles returned to their native
land. Instead of seeking, however, a restoration to the
bishopric of Bath and Wells, he sought for and obtained
a translation to the see of Chichester.f
* Dr. Lingard says he was thrown into prison, and sarcastically
remarks that, " feeling no desire of the crown of martyrdom, he
professed himself a sincere penitent, and resigned his bishopric." He
gives no authority for this statement, and, judging from what we know
of Barlow's history, we should doubt his expressing his penitence — if
it is meant that he repented of the part he had taken as a bishop in
the Reformation. Unless proof be adduced, we should even doubt the
accuracy of the statement that he was imprisoned. The policy of
Mary's government at the beginning of her reign was to try lenient
measures before resorting to persecution.
f Eighty years after these events, it was discovered that in Cranmer's
registers, through the carelessness of the registrar, several entries were
omitted. The same fact is to be predicated, and for the same cause,
240
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
The three
bishops
who joined
with Bar-
low in
consecrat-
ing Parker.
Co-operating with Bishop Barlow, formerly Bishop
Bath and Wells, now elect of Chichester, were John
Hodgkins, Suffragan Bishop of Bedford ; Miles Coverdale,
late Bishop of Exeter ; and John Scory, Bishop elect of
Hereford*
Pi
with respect to the registers of Archbishop Warham, the predecessor,
and of Cardinal Pole, the successor, of Archbishop Cranmer. Cranmer'*
register is a collection of various parchment documents, different in
kind, size, and character, all bound together long after the legal murder
of the archbishop. They are in several respects imperfect — the very
opposite in every respect to Parker's register. Out of the record of
eleven translations in Cranmer's register, five are wanting. Of forty-
five consecrations at which Cranmer presided, the records of no less
than nine are not to be found. Of these nine which are wanting,
there is no reference whatever of any kind to three. Five of them, of
which Barlow's is one, have the records preserved up to the act of con-
firmation, the actual consecration being omitted, or taken for granted.
The register of Saint David's has also been destroyed. Owing to the
loss of the register, certain Roman controversialists have questioned
the consecration of a bishop who occupied four sees in the Church of
England, two before and two after the Reformation. The subject of
Barlow's consecration has been carefully investigated by many men
of learning, both Protestants and Papists. We may mention Courayer,
Mason, Bramhall, Haddan, and Stubbs ; but the case is most con-
cisely and clearly stated by a Romanist, eminent as an historian, and
one who, when there is a doubt on any question, is accustomed to give
the benefit of the doubt to the Roman side. Dr. Lingard had a
character to sustain or to lose, and he was justly indignant when,
by fanatics of his own party, he was attacked and reviled for not
falsifying facts when those facts supported conclusions to which
Romanists were unwilling to submit. I prefer his statement, as that
of a theological opponent, and although there are some expressions to
which we must demur, as conveying insinuations of which we cannot
admit the force, this very circumstance adds value to the document,
for it shows that he would have taken the opposite side if it were pos-
sible to do so. The passage about to be quoted appears in a letter to
the editor of the Birmingham (Roman) Catholic Magazine in the year
1834. He had been attacked for permitting himself to be misled by
false and spurious documents with respect to the consecration of
Barlow. As I shall have occasion to refer to the letter again, I shall
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 241
Hodgkins had been consecrated in St. Paul's Cathe- chap.
VIII.
dral as Bishop of Bedford, by John Stokesley, Bishop of ^7—^ — '
London, Eobert Wharton, Bishop of St. Asaph, and John Parker.
Hilsey, Bishop of Eochester. As in the case of Barlow, 1559~75-
Hodgkins,
in this note confine myself to his vindication of himself on this point, suffragan
He demands of his accuser, — " Why, I will ask, are Ave to believe that 0fBedford.
of all the bishops who lived in the long reign of Henry VIII., Barlow
alone held and exercised the episcopal office without episcopal conse-
cration ? He was elected, and his election was confirmed in conformity
with the statute of the twenty-fifth of that reign. Why should we
suppose that he was not consecrated in conformity with the same
statute ? Was Cranmer the man to incur the penalty of a praemunire
without cause, or was Henry a prince to allow the law to be violated
with impunity? The act had been passed in support of the king's
supremacy, and to cut off all recourse to Rome. Most certainly the
transgression of its provisions would have marked out Barlow and
Cranmer as fautors of the papal authority, and have exposed them to
the severest punishment.
" For ten years Barlow performed all the sacred duties, and exercised
all the civil rights of a consecrated bishop. He took his seat in
Parliament and in Convocation as lord bishop of St. David's. He was
styled by Bishop Gardyner, ' his brother of St. David's ;' he ordained
priests ; he was one of the officiating bishops at the consecration of
Dr. Buckly. Yet we are now called upon to believe that he was no
bishop, and consequently to believe that no one objected to his votes,
though they were known (on the hypothesis) to be illegal ; or to his
ordinations, though they were known to be invalid ; or to his perform-
ance of the episcopal functions, though it was well known that each
such function was a sacrilege !
" But why are we to believe these impossible — these incredible
suppositions ? Is there any positive proof that he was no bishop ?
None in the world. All that can be said is, that we cannot find any
positive register of his consecration. So neither can we of many others,
particularly of Bishop Gardyner. Did any one call in question the
consecration of those bishops on that account ? Why should we doubt
the consecration of Barlow, and not that of Gardyner? I fear the only
reason is this — Gardyner did not consecrate Parker, and Barlow did."
The whole argument is so concisely stated by the great Roman
Catholic historian, that I have thought it due to the reader to afford him
an opportunity of reading it. As to the fact whether Barlow were duly
VOL. IX. R
242 LIVES OP THE
chap, he was consecrated under the old form, in accordance
VIII.
— _* with the rites of the Salisbury pontifical, ten years before
Matthew . _ ,.,,,, . , TT . t
Parker, any revised ordinal had been appointed. He assisted at
1559-75. the consecration of Thomas Thirlby, Bishop of West-
minster, when Bishop Bonner presided, under commission
from Archbishop Cranmer ; again at the consecration of
William Knight, Bishop of Bath and Wells, when Arch-
bishop Heath, then Bishop of Eochester, officiated for
Archbishop Cranmer ; again at the consecration of Paul
Bush, Bishop of Bristol ; and yet again at the consecration
of Henry Man, Bishop of Sodor and Man, and at that of
Nicolas Eidley, Bishop of Eochester.* Of the validity
of Bishop Hodgkins' consecration there could not be,
therefore, the possibility of a doubt.
consecrated or not, it is of less importance when we bear in mind that
the episcopal character was conveyed by three other bishops also, of
whose consecration a doubt was never raised. The Church requires
more than one bishop to consecrate, for the very purpose of meeting the
difficulty here supposed, and so clearly refuted by Dr. Lingard. The
episcopal character is conveyed, not by the archbishop or the presiding
bishop alone, the other three or four being present only as witnesses;
they are all and each the channels of the grace then given, so that if it
were that the chief consecrator were canonically disabled, each and all
of the others, by joining in the act, would prevent the proceeding from
being invalid. This is clearly asserted by a writer whose authority
will be disputed by no one. Martene expressly says, " Omnes qui
adsunt episcopi non tantum testes sed etiam cooperatores esse, citra
omnem dubitationis aleam asserendum est." — Martene, De Antiq. Rit.
lib. I. pars. vi. cviii. In the case of Parker, it was remarked that all
the bishops joined, not only in the laying-on of hands, but in the
words of consecration, " Take the Holy Ghost," a practice not usual at
the present time, because not considered necessary, the laying-on of
hands with the archbishop being deemed sufficient. The bishops at
Parker's consecration followed, perhaps, the mediaeval custom, for in the
Exeter pontifical the assistant bishops are directed, not only to lay their
hands on the '' electus," but each of them, with the presiding bishop,
to say, " Accipe Spiritum Sanctum."
* See Stubbs, who gives the authorities.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 243
Miles Coverdale was consecrated Bishop of Exeter, and chap
John Scory Bishop of Rochester, on the 30th of August, >rr— : — '
1551, at Croydon, by Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Parker.
... 1 5 *>9 75
Canterbury, Nicolas Ridley, Bishop of London, and John Mi'les Co_*
Hodgkins, of whom we have just spoken, Bishop of verdaie,
Bedtord. of Exeter.
Dr. Parker, in selecting his consecrators, evidently de- johnScory,
sired to have the pre-Reformation Church represented, eiectof
while appointing, according to law, that the revised Hereford-
ordinal should, now and henceforth, be the formulary
adopted in the English Church.
The eventful day approached, and, as we should expect, Prepara-
every detail was carefully regulated under Parker's eye. thTconse-
It was determined that the consecration should take place ^ati(J°-
^ Dec. 17,
in the chapel of Lambeth House. The Prior and Convent, ^59.
as afterwards did the Dean and Chapter, of Canterbury,
had always claimed it as a right that the episcopal conse-
crations in the province of Canterbury should take place
in their cathedral, and that consequently, if consecrations
were to take place elsewhere, it would be under a dis-
pensation granted by them. But in looking over the list
of consecrations in the preceding century, as given by
Professor Stubbs, I cannot find any bishop consecrated at
Canterbury ; and among the different places chosen, evi-
dently to meet the convenience of the primate for the
time being, the majority of consecrations took place at
Lambeth.* The chapel still remains, very little changed
from what it was in Parker's time ; and for its decora-
tion the archbishop had taken due care. The east end
was adorned with tapestry ; and the floor was covered
with crimson cloth. Four sedilia on the south side of
the chancel were assigned to the bishops about to take
part in the consecration ; before each seat was a faldstool
* See Ducarel's Lambeth.
B 2
244
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1669-75.
Matthew
Parker's
friends as-
semble at
Lamboth.
covered with a carpet, and with cushions to match. A
throne, with a faldstool before it, adorned with hangings
and cushions, was placed on the north side of the sanc-
tuary, to be occupied by the archbishop as soon as he
was consecrated.
It is expedient to note these things, as it is the pleasure
of some writers to represent the whole proceeding as
done in a hole and corner, in a careless and slovenly
manner. We may very much doubt whether so much
care has been expended in the decoration of the chapel
at any subsequent consecrations.5*
On the morning of the 17 th of December, 1559,
the friends, official and personal, of Matthew Parker
assembled at Lambeth, where he had some time before
taken up his abode. Edmund Grindal, Eichard Cox,
and Edwin Sandys, divines already designated to bisho-
prics, were doubtless there ; together with Anthony Huse,
Esq., principal and head registrar to the archbishop ;
Thomas Argall, Esq., registrar of the Prerogative Court
of Canterbury ; and Thomas Willett and John Incent,
notaries public. Parker's half-brother, John Baker, is
mentioned as having been present, and with him we find
associated Thomas Doyle and John March. Among his
private friends was his kinsman, the Earl of Nottingham,
to whom we are indebted for some interesting particu-
lars with reference to the ceremonial. f The earl, as
* Complaint is often made of the disregard of solemnities of the
sanctuary too often maniiested by English bishops in the exercise of
their episcopal functions. Humility is a virtue, but the pride that
apes humility is offensive.
t For Parker's pedigree, see ante, p. 5. This Earl of Nottingham,
who was born in 1536, was present, at the age of twenty-three, at the
consecration of Archbishop Parker, and, though himself a Roman
Catholic, he afterwards testified to the fact in his place in parliament.
The truth of the statement made in the text is fully established by a
letter, the original of which, through the kindness of Mr. Dickenson of
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 245
we have said, claimed a distant relationship with the chap.
archbishop through his mother. They assembled at an — -— -
iii*. i ■• • i • n Matthew
early hour — between live and six in the morning — tor Parker,
it was customary, not only in the Church of England, 1559-?5-
but in the Churches also of France, Spain, and Italy, for
the consecration of a bishop to take place at a very
early hour in the morning, because, as the celebration of
the Holy Communion forms part of the service, and the
Holy Communion was received fasting, a service so long
as the consecration service undertaken by elderly men
might have produced exhaustion.*
With the exception of Coverdale, who, for some reason
not given, appeared only in his cassock, such as the Eng-
lish clergy were accustomed to wear, the bishops appeared
in their episcopal vestments ; and the archbishop elect in
his scarlet robes, such as are now worn in Convocation.
As they drew near the chapel the west door was thrown
open, and they were received by vergers carrying lights
before them. When the congregation had taken their
places, morning prayer began, the archbishop's chaplain,
Andrew Pearson, officiating. The sermon was preached,
as the reporter gave judgment, not inelegantly, by John
Scory, Bishop of Chichester, about to be translated to
Hereford, to which see he had already been elected. His
Norton House, has been placed in my hands, and which I do not print
in extenso, as it has been already published by Mr. Pocock, in the year
1865, in his valuable edition of Burnet's Reformation, to which I make
frequent reference in the text. It was written by Mr. Hampton, chap-
lain to the Earl of Nottingham and an ancestor of Mr. Dickenson, and
it shows that he frequently repeated, in private conversation, the state-
ment he publicly made.
* See Martene, De Antiq. Eccl. Eit. lib. I. c. 8, Art. 10, § 13.
In the primitive Church the third hour was appointed, in memory of
the descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles at Pentecost. It was
so ordered in the Middle Ages by Pope Anacletus. — Gratian, Dist.
lxxv. ; Honorius, lib. I. cap. clxxxix.
246
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VI 1 1.
Bfiatthew
Parker.
1. 559-75.
Consecra-
tion ser-
vice.
lordship certainly selected an appropriate text, 1 Peter
v. 1 : — " The elders which are among you I exhort, who
am also an elder."
The sermon ended, the bishops and their attendants
retired to the vestry to array themselves for the Holy
Communion. Bishop Barlow, being the celebrant, returned
to the chapel, wearing over him a silk cope ; and in silk
copes appeared also Archdeacon Bullingham and Arch-
deacon Gheast, the chaplains to the archbishop, who were
to be assistants.
The consecration was conducted strictly in accordance
with the second ordinal of Edward VI.* This ordinal is
nearly identical with that which is now in use. The only
point we should remark is, that there is a slight mention
in the form of the special office for which, and of the
mode through which, the offered grace is conveyed.
The archbishop or presiding prelate is now directed to
say, when the elect is kneeling on his knees before him,
and all the bishops present are laying their hands on
his head, " Eeceive the Holy Ghost, for the office and
work of a bishop in the Church of God, now committed
unto thee by the imposition of our hands ; in the name
of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
Amen. And remember that thou stir up the grace of God
which is given thee by this imposition of our hands ; for
God hath not given us the spirit of fear, but of power, and
love, and soberness." At the consecration of Archbishop
Parker, all the bishops who laid their hands upon him,
* The Earl of Nottingham says that he was ordained by the form in
King Edward's Common Prayer Book. " I myself," he says, "had the
book in my hand all the time, and went along with the ordination ;
and when it was over I dined with 'em, and there was an instrument
drawne up of the form and order of it, which instrument- 1 saw and redd
over." The letter is given by Pocock, Burnet's Keform. v. 554.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 247
said, as with one voice, " Take the Holy Ghost, and re- chap.
member thou stir up the grace of God which is in thee
by imposition of hands ; for God hath not given us the Parker.
spirit of fear, but of power, and love, and soberness." 1559-75.
The service ended, the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury,
accompanied by the four bishops, now his suffragans, re-
turned by the north door into the vestry, there to unrobe.
When he reappeared, he was vested in a white rochet
and a chimere of black silk, wearing " round his neck a
collar or scarf made of precious sabellina furs, commonly
called sables."*
At the west door the archbishop paused. His half-
brother, John Baker, was there to congratulate him, and
to him the archbishop gave a staff, by which he was con-
stituted treasurer ; to John Doyle another staff was given,
which he received as steward of the household ; John
March e was, by a similar process, made the controller.
The archbishop then proceeded to the hall, " the gentle
people" of his family related by blood preceding him, the
rest following him. Lord Nottingham states that there
was " a great deal of company." Certainly there was no
lack of ceremony, and no desire to conduct business
privately.
The day closed. The company departed. The arch-
bishop was at his desk in his private apartment. Before
" kneeling on his knees " he wrote : — " On the 17th of
December, 3 559, I was consecrated Archbishop of Can-
terbury. Alas ! alas ! 0 Lord God, for what times hast
Thou kept me ! Now I am come into deep waters, and
* The reader will probably remember the occasional disputes among
the cathedral clergy as to the right to wear scarves. The scarf has, of
late, been confounded with the stole. The object in wearing the scarf
was not to add an ornament to the ministerial dress, but simply to keep
off cold. Fur scarves are seen in the portraits of Warham, Cranmer,
Parker, and many others.
248 lives of Tin:
chap, the flood hath overwhelmed me. 0 Lord, I am op-
- — r— - pressed! Answer for me and 'stablish me with thy free
Matthew L . . - . J
Parker, spirit, for I am a man tliat hath but a short time to live,
1559-75. &c Give me thy sure mercies, &C."'*
These were words not intended to meet any eye but
his own, and the hasty conclusion of them shows that he
was impatient to .throw himself upon his knees before
his Saviour and his God.
Parker's presence was required in London, and he could
spare neither the time nor the money which would have
Enthroned been consumed if he had been enthroned in person. He
was therefore enthroned by proxy, but was careful that
all things should be done strictly in accordance with
ancient precedent. The restitution of the temporalities
of the see was made on the 1st of March, decayed and
diminished as they had undoubtedly been, during the
vacancy, by the avarice of the queen, and the rapacity of
her favourites. The queen's conscience seems, however,
to have reproached her, and some allowance was made to
Parker to enable him to encounter the great expenses
of taking possession of his plundered see. In a MS.
memorandum at Lambeth, it is said, " there was taken
from the see of Canterbury, of the temporalities, con-
sisting of manors, sites of priories, dominical lands, parks,
&c, in Kent, Sussex, and Salop, to the clear yearly value
of 1,282/. 6s. 8d., for which was returned now, in re-
compense, the tenths of the diocese of Canterbury,
of 478/. 10s. blzd., and in parsonages impropriate,
357/. lbs. ll±d., and in annual rents, 447/. 9s. 6^., so
that by these valuations the recompense was set down to
exceed the lands taken by Ms. b\d., as before in par-
ticulars is written. The queen of her favour gave unto
him in Michaelmas rents, a.d. 1559, 1,235/. 9s. 7d."
* Corresp. p. 484.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 249
It is worthy of remark, that it is seldom that really chap.
ambitious men reach the height at which they aim ; and - — <— —
that honours are frequently thrust upon others who, Parked
though alive to the advantages of their position, would, ififl*-7*»
under a deep sense of the attendant responsibilities, have
chosen for themselves the second place rather than the
first. So was it with Matthew Parker.
Of his consecration a record is preserved in his register.
It is written in Latin, but has been frequently translated ;
it is hastily drawn up, and is only so far valuable, as it is
a contemporary and anticipatory refutation of the false-
hoods many years afterwards invented and propagated by
certain unprincipled Romanists.
250
LIVES OF THE
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER VIII.
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
1 can scarcely condescend to notice the Nag's Head fable. It
reflects eternal disgrace upon some modern Komanists that
they persevere in propagating the falsehood among the igno-
rant, when they are aware that we find its best refutation in the
writings of some distinguished men of their own communion,
such as Charles Butler, Canon Tierney, and, above all, Dr.
Lingard. A disregard of truth is often brought as a general
charge against the Eomanists ; they ought, therefore, to be
especially careful about the statements made. The story is
easily told. In the year 1604, forty-four years after Parker's
consecration, an exiled Romanist priest, of the name of Holly-
wood (or Asacrobosco), brought forward the story in a contro-
versial book printed at Antwerp. The story, which has long
since been abundantly refuted, and which, as has just been
said, is given up by learned Eomanists, was to the following
effect : — The queen, it is alleged, issued her warrant, directed
to the Bishop of Llandaff, to Dr. Scory, Bishop elect of Here-
ford, to Dr. Barlow, elect of Chichester, to Dr. Coverdale, some-
time Bishop of Exeter, to Dr. Hodgkins, suffragan of Bedford,
to consecrate the archbishop. These persons, it is said, met at
the Nag's Head Tavern, where it had been usual for the Dean
of Arches and the civilians to refresh themselves after the con-
firmation of a bishop ; and there one Neale, who was Bonner's
chaplain, peeped through a hole in the door. There he is
reported to have seen the other bishops very importunate with
Llandaff, who had been dissuaded by Bonner from assisting in
this consecration. When the Bishop of Llandaff adhered to
this determination, and obstinately refused to assist in the pre
ceedings, Dr. Scory desired the others to kneel, and he laid the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 251
Bible on each of their shoulders or heads, and pronounced CHAP.
these words, " Take thou authority," &c, and so they stood up < ,— ^
all bishops. By the propagators of this ridiculous story, it is p!^^7
forgotten that, if it had been true, there were controversialists 1559-75.
on their side who would certainly not have left it unheard-of
for five-and-forty years. But on this subject the reader shall
be referred to Dr. Lingard, whose vindication of Barlow we
have before quoted in response to a letter addressed to the
Birmingham (Roman) Catholic Magazine of 1834. He says to
the editor : — " In your last number a correspondent, under the
signature of T. H., has called upon me to show why I have
asserted that Archbishop Parker was consecrated on the 17th
of December, 1559. Though I despair of satisfying the in-
credulity of one who can doubt after he has examined the
documents to which I refer, yet I owe it to myself to prove to
your readers the truth of my statement, and the utter futility'
of any objection that may be brought against it.
"I. The matter in dispute is — whether Parker received,
or did not receive, consecration on the 17th of December ;
but the following facts are and must be admitted on both
sides : — That the queen, having given the royal assent to the
election of Parker by the Dean and Chapter of Canterbury, sent*,
on the 9th of December, a mandate to six prelates to confirm
and consecrate the archbishop elect, and that they demurred,
excusing, as would appear from what followed, their disobe-
dience by formal exceptions on points of law. 2. That on thf>
6th of December she issued a commission to seven bishops,
ordering them, or any four of them, to perform that office,
with the addition of a sanatory clause, in which she supplied,
by her supreme authority, all legal or ecclesiastical defects on
account of the urgency of the time and the necessity of the
things, temporis ratione et rerum necessitate id postulante,
which prove how much the queen had the consecration at
heart. Certainly not without reason, for at that time, with
the exception of Llandaff, there was not a diocese provided
with a bishop, nor, as the law then stood, could any such pro-
vision be made without a consecrated archbishop to confirm
and consecrate the bishops elect. 3. That four out of seven
bishops named in the commission — (they had been deprived
252 LIVES OF THE
*££?' or disgraced under Queen Mary, but had now come forward to
— — r— '-^ offer their services and solicit preferments in " [what Lingard
Pariter* *s pleased to call] "the new Church) — having obtained a
1559-75. favourable opinion from six counsel learned in the law, under-
took to execute the commission and confirm Parker's election
on the 9th of December.
" II. Now, these facts being indisputable, what, I ask, should
prevent the consecration from taking place ? The queen
required it ; Parker, as appears from his subsequent conduc
had no objection to the ceremony, and the commissioners wer<
ready to perform it, or rather were under an obligation to do s<
for by the twenty-fifth of Henry VIII., revived in the last par
liament, they were compelled, under the penalty of praemunire,
to proceed to the consecration within twenty days after the
date of the commission. Most certainly all these preliminary
facts lead to the presumption that the consecration did actually
take place about the time assigned for it, the 17th of December,
a day falling within the limits I have just mentioned.
"III. In the next place, I must solicit your attention
certain indisputable facts subsequent to that period. The
are, first, that on the 18th — and the day is remarkable — the
queen sent for Parker no fewer than six writs, addressed to him
under the new style of Matthew, Archbishop of Canterbury,
and Primate and Metropolitan of all England, and directing
him to proceed to the confirmation and consecration of six
bishops elect for six vacant sees. This was the first time
during the six months which had elapsed since his election
that any such writ had been directed to him. What, then,
could have happened just before the 18th to entitle him to this
new style, and to enable him to confirm and consecrate bisho
which he could not do before ? The obvious answer is, that h
himself had been consecrated on the 17th. 2nd. That on
21st he consecrated four new bishops, on the 21st of Janua
five others, two more on the 2nd, and two on the 24th o
March. Can we suppose that as much importance would
attached to consecration given by him if he had received
consecration himself, or that the new Church " [so, as a con
troversialist, Lingard designates the reformed Church] " woul
:
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 253
have been left so lonp; without bishops at all if it had not been CHAP.
VI] I
thought necessary that he who was by law to consecrate others v. , !_.
should previously receive that rite ? 3rd. That afterwards, at ^:ltthew
the same time with the new prelates, he received the restora- 1559*$
tion of his temporalities, a restoration which was never made
till after consecration. 4th. That he not only presided at the
consecration, but sat in successive parliaments, which privilege
was never allowed to any but consecrated bishops. In my
judgment, the comparison of these facts with those which pre-
ceded the 17th of December, form so strong a case that I
should not hesitate to pronounce in favour of the consecration,
if even all direct and positive evidence respecting it had
perished.
" IV. But there exists evidence in abundance. That Parker
was consecrated on the 17th of December is asserted first by
Camden (i. 49), second by Godwin {Be Prcesul. p, 212), third
by the archbishop himself in his work De Antiquitate Britannise
Ecclesiae, published in 1572, three years before hie death; or,
if that book be denied to be his, in his Diary, in which occurs
the following entry in his own hand : — ' 17th Dec. ann. 1559.
Consecratus sum in Archiepiscopum Cantuariensem. lieu,
heu, Bomine Beus, in quce tempora servasti me ! '— Strype's
Parker (App. ix.) ; and, fourth, by the archiepiscopal register,
a record which details the whole proceedings, with the nameg
of the bishops, of their chaplains, and of the official witness.
"V. Now to this mass of evidence, direct and indirect,
what does your correspondent oppose ? " Having alluded to
the opinion oppugning the validity of the consecration, from
the Eomish point of view, he says, that if Dr. Milner has
expressed a doubt as to the fact of the consecration, he must
have written hastily, and without consideration, "i" am not
aware" he continues, " of any open denial of the facts, till
about fifty years afterwards, when the tale of the foolery sup-
posed to have been played at the Nag's Head was first pub-
lished. In refutation of that story, Protestant writers applied
to the register ; their opponents disputed its authority, and
the consequence was, that in 1614 Archbishop Abbot invited
Colleton, arch-priest, with two or three other [Roman] Catholic
254
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
VIII.
Matthew
Parke*.
1550-75.
missioners, to Lambeth, and submitted the register to their
spection, in the presence of six of his own episcopal colleagues.
The details may be seen in Dodd, ii. 227, or in Godwin, p. 219.
" VI. Your correspondent assures us that the register contains
so many inaccuracies and points at variance with the history of
the tfmes, as manifestly prove it a forgery. Were it so, there
still remains sufficient evidence of the fact. But what induces
T. H. to m&ke this assertion ? Has he examined into all the
circumstances of the case, or does he only take for granted the
validity of several objections, which are founded on miscon-
ception or ignorance that the register agrees in every particular
with what we know of the history of the times, and there exists
not the semblance of a reason for pronouncing it a forgery ? "
Thus wrote Dr. Lingard to the editor of the Birmingham
(Roman) Catholic Magazine in 1834; and in the rejection of
a statement so absurd he is supported by Canon Tierney in his
notes on Dodd, and by Mr. Butler in his fourth letter to Bisho]
Philpotts. The whole subject is more concisely, and with mon
accurate learning, investigated by Professor Stubbs, in his lettei
to a Russian friend, ' On the Apostolical Succession in th(
Church of England.' But for obvious reasons I have preferred
the refutation of the fable by a divine of the Church of Rome.
It is not my business to investigate every absurd invention
suggested by party rancour, in ignorance or in malice, and
produced half a century after the occurrences to which they
refer had taken place. I have simply to state the historical
facts as they are rendered to us by public documents or private
correspondence ; but the Nag's Head fable is still so often
asserted among the ignorant as an historical fact, that I have
thought it right to notice it in this place ; and it is to the
credit of the Roman Church that I have been enabled to ex-
pose the fiction by the letter of a Roman Catholic historian,
to whose learning persons of every communion are willing to
do honour.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 255
CHAPTEE IX.
PROCEEDINGS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PARKER'S CONSECRATION.
Parker's position as Primate. — Archbishop Heath's letter of remonstrance. —
Parker's reply. — Treatment of the non-juring bishops. — Change of policy
at Rome. — Death of Paul IV. — Pius IV. and Queen Elizabeth. — Invi-
tation to the Council of Trent. — Elizabeth an avowed Catholic. — Con-
secration of bishops. — Correspondence with John Calvin. — Rules for
ordination. — Lay help. — Disagreement among the bishops. — -Fire at St.
Paul's. — The episcopal assessors. — John Jewel. — His sermon at Paul's
Cross. — Apology for the Church of England. — Sketch of the condition
of the English Church.
It is purposed in this chapter to confine our attention to chap.
he external affairs of the Church ; the doctrinal reforms — ^ — -
in which Parker was concerned will come under our Parker,
notice in a subsequent chapter. 1559-75.
Upon the labours of Queen Elizabeth and her advisers,
we have already had occasion to offer a few remarks.
When we consider what was accomplished, within the
brief limits of one year, in rendering her government firm
at home and respected abroad, we cannot but feel indig-
nant at the attempt made, in modern times, to rob the
distinguished statesmen of this reign of the approbation
so justly accorded to them by their contemporaries, ajid
by the succeeding generation, who enjoyed the prosperity
their labours had effected.
What may fairly be predicated of the great statesman-
of the day, William Cecil, Lord Burghley, may with equal
fairness be said, with reference to ecclesiastical affairs, in
praise of Matthew Parker. The difficulties with which he
256
LIVES OF THE
CITAP.
IX.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Arch-
bishop
Heath's
letter of
remun-
Btrance to
Arch-
bishop
Parker.
1560.
had to contend were many and great, and the support
he received was precarious and insufficient. In Cecil
our primate found a constant friend; but, even with his
friendly intentions, political considerations were sometimes
permitted to interfere. Bacon was, in some measure,
brought under the influence of the Puritans, and upon his
support Parker could not always calculate beforehand.
The queen's conduct was capricious and irritating. She
entirely agreed with Parker in his principles ; she was
fiercely indignant if, at any time, he seemed to deviate
from them, or to yield to his opponents ; but through
temper, through the influence of favourites, or, as we have
suggested, through mere caprice, her support was not un-
frequently withheld at the very time when Parker stood
most in need of it. She seemed occasionally to take a
malignant pleasure in adding to the difficulties of her
servants, although they were confident that, in any
extreme case, she would come powerfully to their aid.
An opportunity was soon offered to the primate, by the
non-juring bishops, for declaring himself to be so strongly
in favour of the Eeformation, as to satisfy his opponents
on the Protectant side, with the exception of those only
who would be satisfied with nothing short of the sur-
render of all Church principle. Archbishop Heath was
inclined to regard the considerate kindness he had
experienced as a sign of weakness as well as of friend-
ship ; and acting under the influence of foreign pressure,
he, in concurrence with his brethren, addressed a remon-
strance and reproof to their new metropolitan. Nothing
could be more opportune for Archbishop Parker. He
availed himself of the occasion to inform Archbishop
Heath, and the prelates who had adhered to him, that
the time for conference and reconciliation had passed.
The dissenting prelates had taken one line, the Puritam
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 257
another : Parker was determined thenceforth to take a chap.
line of his own. Opposed to Papists and Puritans, his ^ I
object was, as we have in a former chapter remarked, to p^L^
create out of the moderate men a school of thought, 1559-7&
which was soon, under Hooker and his followers, to be
developed into what is now called Anglicanism. In his Parker'
reply to the address of Archbishop Heath and his co- repy*
religionists, Archbishop Parker began by affirming, that
it was the pride, the covetousness, and the usurpations of
the Bishop of Eome and his predecessors, that had com-
pelled the princes of the earth to defend their territories
and their privileges from that wicked Babylon and her
bishop. Then addressing himself directly to his corre-
spondents, he said : —
"Whereas you and the rest of the late expulsed
bishops have scandalized our reformed clergy within
these her majesty's realms, that we yield no subjection
unto Christ and his Apostles, we yield more than the
fathers of the Eomish tribe do ; for we honour and adore
Christ as the true Son of God, equal with his Father, as
well in authority as in majesty, and do make Him no
foreigner to the realm, as you members and clergy of the
Church of Eome do ; but we profess Him to be our only
Maker and Eedeemer, and ruler of his Church, not only
in this realm, but also in all nations, unto whom princes
and preachers are but servants ; the preachers to pro-
pose, the princes to execute, Christ's will and command-
ments, whom you, and all that desire to be saved, must
believe and obey, against all councils and tribunals who
do dissent from his word, whether regal or papal."
The archbishop went on to declare, that the like reve-
rence was paid to the Apostles by the friends of the
Eeformation, as they received their writings "with exacter
vol. ix. s
258 lives of Tin:
chap, obedience, than Eomanists do," and never allowed the
TV
Scriptures to be superseded by the will of men. He.
Parker, remarked, that our Keformation detested those false
1559-75* principles, by which popes and papal writers added,
altered, and diminished, yea, even dispensed with not
only the writings of the Apostles, but also the very
words of our Lord himself; that we acknowledged as
lawful councils of the Church, whether provincial or
oecumenical, those only which had been convened by
religious princes in conjunction with their prelates ; but
that we owned no subjection to popish tribunals. He
quoted Saint Cyprian to show that Saint Peter claimed
no subjection to himself, and he begged them to observe
« — " how we of the Church of England, reformed by our
late King Edward and his clergy, and now by her
majesty and hers reviving the same, have but imitated
and followed the examples of the ancient and worthy
fathers." He appealed to Saint Augustine, as well as to
Saint Cyprian, affirming that we had the authority of
these and other fathers for our denial of the proud
demands of Eome ; and he proceeded to show that they,
as bishops, were treading in the steps of their predeces-
sors— those British bishops who, of old, held authority
independent of Eome within this realm. " I, and the rest
of our brethren," he continued, " the bishops and clergy
of the realm, supposed ye to be our brethren in Christ ;
but we be sorry that ye, through your perverseness, have
separated yourselves not only from us, but from these
ancient fathers and their opinions ; and that ye permit
one man to have all the members of your Saviour Christ
Jesus under his subjection; this your wilful opinion is not
the way to reduce kings, princes, and their subjects to
truth, but rather to blindfold them into utter darkness."
He ended with saying : " Consider, therefore, of these
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 259
things; and it shall be the continual prayers of our re- chap.
formed Church to convert ye all to the truth of God's --
word, to obedience to your sovereign Lady Elizabeth parked
our queen, which in so doing ye glorify Christ and the 1559-75^
Eternal God, which is in heaven, and is solely the chief
and absolute ruler of princes." He signed himself " your
faithful brother in Christ, Matthew Cantuariensis."*
Controversy on this side now ceased. Parker was
given to understand, that there would be no factious
opposition on the part of the non-jurors to the new
primate, and it has been even asserted, although I have
seen no proof of the fact, that Heath and Tunstall had
sent in their adhesion to the government. It reflects Generous
, . , . , treatment
great credit upon the primate, and upon Elizabeths of the non-
government in general, that notwithstanding their dis- bishops,
sent, the deprived prelates were treated with the greatest
consideration and kindness. Parker was very lenient in
pressing the oath of supremacy, f Heath, the Arch-
bishop of York, being a man of fortune, lived at his
own private house at Chobham, within four miles of
Windsor,^ and at his residence he frequently received
visits from the queen. Bishop Thirlby lived with Parker,
both at Lambeth and at Bekesbourne, the archiepis-
copal residence near Canterbury. He did not die till
August 26, 1570 ; and, according to Bishop Godwin, he
found more happiness, though nominally under restraint,
during this period of his life, than he had done heretofore
in the midst of the fullest stream of his highest honours. §
On his death, the archbishop had him decently buried
within the chancel of the parish church of Lambeth,
where a fair stone was laid upon his grave. Dr. Tunstall,
* Corresp. p. 109-113. t Collier, vi. 368.
X Not Cobhara : Bee Zurich Letters, ii. 182. § Godwin, p. 334.
s 2
260 LIVES OF tiii:
chap, the ex-Bishop of Durham, and Parker had long beei
- — ^ — » friends, and the friendship was not disturbed by differ-
Parker. enees of opinion. Of Feckenham, the deposed Abbot of
1559-75. Westminster, we have had occasion before to speak. The
plan adopted with the recusant bishops was to quartei
them upon one of the conforming prelates ; and, as was
the case with Parker, the prelate upon whom this duty-
was imposed permitted his prisoner, if he was to be so ac-
counted, to live as one of the family. The custodian was
only responsible for the prelate under his care, that he
should not leave the country. " These prelates," says
Fuller, " had sweet chambers, soft beds, warm fires, plen-
tiful and wholesome diet, each bishop faring like an
archbishop, differing nothing from their former living,
saving that was on their own charges, and this at the
cost of another." Something must have depended, of
course, upon the temper of the host, and something also on
that of the compulsory guest. Feckenham was quartered
on Horn, Bishop of Winchester, a learned, but disputa-
tious narrow-minded man, and on both sides a contro-
versial spirit betrayed itself; so that, after a time, they
came to an agreement, that Feckenham should have
private apartments in the palace, and live independently,
no longer as one of the family, though he sometimes
mingled in it. Bishop Bonner was a low, coarse, vulgar
man : he was at first quartered on the Bishop of Lincoln,
but made himself so disagreeable, that, at last, he was
placed within the rules of the Marshalsea prison ; that is,
he was permitted to occupy within a prescribed circuit a
house of his own, being restrained from passing beyond
certain boundaries. The bishops thus accommodated
conformed more or less to the new order of things ; but
to this Dr. White and Dr. Watson could not conscientiously
submit. Watson was at first committed to the custody of
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 261
Grindal, Bishop of London, and afterwards to that of Cox, chap.
Bishop of Ely. Instead, however, of meeting courteous
treatment with courtesy, Watson was found " preaching parked
against the State," and it was deemed necessary to place 1559-75.
him under closer restraint. Wisbech Castle* was assigned
to him for a residence, and there, in 1584, he died.
In short, as is stated in a contemporary pamphlet,f
" most of them, and many other of their sort, for a great
time, were retained in bishops' houses in a very civil and
courteous manner, without danger to themselves or their
friends ; until the time that the pope began, by his bulls
and messages, to offer trouble to the realm by stirring up
rebellion." When assassination — the assassination of the
queen — was preached as a virtue by the followers of the
pope, the papists could no longer expect toleration. But
some years were to elapse before a popish sect, with such
a principle, was established in England.
When the authorities at Eome became gradually aware change of
of the strength of Elizabeth's government, and of her 5j°0mJ.at
resolution, while maintaining her own views, to make the
necessary concessions to the Protestants, the policy of the
papal court was suddenly changed. Even Paul IV., Death of
who died August 18, 1559, had arrived at the con- isthof"
viction, that Elizabeth was not to be terrified into sub- JjSJ*
mission ; and when the aged John Angelo dei Medici
succeeded to the papal office, it became quite clear, that
specific measures would be adopted. Known in papal
history as Pius IV., he addressed a letter to the queen, Letter ad-
dated the 5th of May, 1560. He sent her his apostolical piussseiv.by
to Queen
Elizabeth*
* Godwin, p. 361. 1560.
t Printed in Somers's Tracts, i. 193. When party feeling ran high,
occasional instances of harshness must have occurred, but the desire to
treat with kindness and consideration all except political offenders ia
undeniable.
262 LIVES OF THE
chap, benediction, saying, that in his desire to provide for
s^_^! — . salvation and the establishment of her kingdom, he had
frirker. determined to forward to her certain instructions by the
1559-75. hand of a nuncio, Vincentio Parpaglia, a prelate well
known in England in the time of the late archbishop,
Cardinal Pole. He entreated her to put away her evil
counsellors, men who sought to further their own objects,
instead of labouring for her cause. He promised her the
support of the papal court, if she would act on his advice
and dismiss her ministers* At the same time, he uncon-
sciously betrayed his haughtiness, by saying, that he — the
poor old pope — was ready to receive the Queen of
England into favour on her penitence, even as the parent
in the gospel received his prodigal child. He hoped to
be able to communicate to the fathers about to be re-
assembled in an cecumenical or general Council, an account
of her repentance ; an account which, he informed her,
could not fail to add to the joy of heaven itself. Other
matters he left to be more fully explained by Vincentio,
whom he entreated her to hear.
This letter is given in Camden ; and, if it is authentic —
a fact which has been questioned — it must have been
intended simply to supply the credentials to Vincentio.
It was in another letter, of indisputable authenticity, that
a formal overture was made to the queen, on the part of
the pope, to the effect, that on condition of her adhesion
to the see of Eome, the pope would approve of the Book
of Common Prayer, including the Liturgy or Communion
Service, and the Ordinal. Although his holiness com-
plained, that many things were omitted in the Prayer
Book which ought to be there, he admitted that the book,
nevertheless, contained nothing contrary to the truth,
while it certainly comprehended all that is necessary for
salvation. He was therefore prepared to authorize the
AKCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 263
Book of Common Prayer, if her majesty would receive chap.
IX.
it from him and on his authority.*
The letter containing this proposal was probably de- parLT
spatched from Brussels ; for it is certain that Vincentio 1559-75/
Parpaglia waited there for permission to appear in Eng-
land ; and that he continued to abide there until he
received an official notification, that the English govern-
ment could not, without a transgression of the ancient
laws of the land, sanction the presence in the realm of a
papal nuncio.
In this refusal to receive the papal nuncio, the govern- Elizabeth
ment acted according to precedent, and no incivility was receive the
implied. It had long been the law of the land that no
legate or nuncio from Borne could land in this country
until the consent of parliament had been obtained. As
an unfavourable answer would be returned, it was an act
of civility to offer the suggestion, that it would be better
not to put the question.
In fact, the papal offer had come too late. The queen
had been obliged, by the insulting and impolitic conduct
of the preceding pope, to take her stand with the Pro-
testants ; and she would not condescend " to play fast and
* Lord Justice Coke, at the Norwich assizes, in 1606, only three
years after the queen's death, made publicly the statement as given in
the text, adding, " I have often heard from the queen's own mouth, and
I have frequently conferred with noblemen of the highest rank of the
State who had seen and read the pope's letter on this subject, as I have
related it to you. And this is as true as I am an honest man." —
Charge 28. See The Defence of the Dissertation of the English
Ordinations, p. 260. Sir Roger Twysden, in his Historical Vindication
of the Church of England in point of Schism, p. 176, being well
acquainted with Coke's charge, adds, " I myself have received it [the
story] from such as I cannot doubt it, they having had it from persons
of nigh relation unto them who were actors in the managing of the
business." The subject is discussed by Mr. Chancellor Harington and
by an anonymous correspondent in Notes and Queries.
264
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
IX.
S. , — '
Matthew
Parker.
1659-75.
Invitation
to the
Council of
Trent.
Elizabeth
an avowed
Catholic.
loose." If the proposal had been made sooner, the whole
character of the English Eeformation would probably
have been changed, — whether for the better or for the
worse, who can say ? But now the die had been cast ;
and when, soon after, it was notified to the English
government that Jerome Martinengo, under a commission
from the pope, was on his way to England, he was
warned not to proceed further than Flanders.
It had been determined at Eome, after much discussioi
and doubt, to resume the sessions of the Council of Trent ;
and the determination was formally announced by Pope
Pius IV. to the princes in connection with the see of
Eome. It was communicated also, but in different terms,
to the * Protestant princes: Protestants were invited to
attend, but not on terms of equality with other po-
tentates. To the Queen of England an invitation was
despatched, but Elizabeth would not consent to be herded
with the various sects of Protestantism ; and she declared
herself to be, notwithstanding her reforms — or, all the
more, on account of her reforms — a Catholic sovereign.
Unless she were thus approached, she would not be ap-
proached at all. She was prompted by Parker, and the
ground they took was intelligible to her contemporaries,
however difficult it may appear to the comprehensions of
those readers or writers who are ignorant of the principles
of the English Eeformation, and of the tenets of our great
divines. When the ambassador of Philip urged upon the
queen the propriety of receiving Martinengo, she replied :
" An invidious distinction is made between me and such
other Catholic potentates as have been invited to this
council some time ago. The proposed assembly will also
not be free, pious, and christian. Were it likely to pos-
sess these characters, I would send to it some religious
and zealous persons to represent the Church of England.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 265
Any permission of the nuncio's entrance into my do- chap.
minions is not to be expected from me. His employ- 5l- -
ment here would be, under cover of the council, to Parked
foment seditions among a party of my subjects." 1559-75.
When the Spanish ambassador remonstrated with the
queen, and represented such an answer as unusual and
discourteous, the queen's reply was : — " To refuse such
messengers is no new thing in England. Eecently, my
sister Mary denied admittance into her territories to the
late pope's envoy, who brought a cardinal's hat for
William Peto."
From this time friendly intercourse has ceased between
England and Some. The Eubicon was passed. The
Church of England, though continuing to be, what she
had always been, the Catholic Church of this country,
now became Protestant also ; Catholic through the apos-
tolical succession, yet Protestant in the sense of protesting
against the errors of Borne.* Her history from this time
* In the opinion of an Anglican, Protestantism stands opposed, not
to Catholicism, but to Popery. It is quite of late years that a party in
the English Church disclaimed a title of which some of the highest An-
glicans in former times, such as Andrewes, Jeremy Taylor, Ken, and
Laud himself, expressed themselves proud. Until the time of the Revo-
lution, Protestant in England was the term used to designate a Church of
England man ; his opponents were Puritans, Calvinists, Presbyterians,
and persons of other denominations. At the Revolution it was desired
to find a term to designate all who made common cause against the court
of James and the Church of Rome. The term chosen was that of Pro-
testant, which thenceforth was not applied exclusively to members of
the Church of England. The confusion occasioned by this proceeding
was great, but it becomes worse confounded when the term is repu-
diated by the representatives of those who for a long period in our
history made it their boast that, though they had never ceased to be
Catholics, they were, nevertheless, as protesting against Rome, true
Protestants. On the Continent, the Anti-Romanists are still divided
into Protestants, a term there synonymous with that of Lutherans, and
the Reformed, or the disciples of Calvin.
266
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
IX.
Matthew
Parker.
1559 75.
Consecra-
tion of
bishops.
December
21, 1560.
Parker's
difficulties
with re
gard to the
episcopate.
is a succession of struggles for independence, for she
hated by Eomanists for her Protestantism ; and her claim
to Catholicism exasperates against her the ultra-Protestant
sects. There is, at the present time, a call for union between
the Anglo-Catholic and the Eoman Catholic teachers of
the Church. Those who adhere to the English Eefor-
mation have no objection to urge against this, if Kome
will yield to England ; but when England is exhorted to
become a blind follower of Eome, the Unionists are
opposed, and must be opposed to the last.*
Upon the archbishop now devolved the duty of continu-
ing the episcopal succession, by consecrating bishops for
the vacant dioceses. Before Parker's own consecration,
it had been determined that Edmund Grindal should be
consecrated for London, Eichard Cox for Ely, Edwin
Sandys for Worcester, and Eowland Meyrick for Bangor.
They were all Episcopalians, and advocates of that revi-
sion of the old services of the Church, which came down
to them in the form of the Book of Common Prayer ;
but how far they would defend the Prayer Book from the
attacks incessantly made upon it, by those who contende(
that our Eeformation had not gone far enough, remain<
to be proved. On the 21st of December, being St
Thomas's Day, these four divines were consecrated b;
Parker in Lambeth Chapel. And so the Anglican bisho]
trace their succession up to Parker, through Parker to
Augustine, through Augustine to the Apostles, througl
the Apostles to Christ.
The primate had soon to encounter difficulties in anothei
direction. The distinguished men who conformed to th<
* In reference to our relation to Rome, it has been observed, that
we may continue to be members of the same family, although tw<
branches of the family may not be on speaking terms the one with the
other.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 267
English Eeformation, were not all of them prepared to chap.
separate, on doctrinal points, from their friends on the > ? ' -*
Continent ; or even from those with whom they had' Parked
hitherto acted at home. The first question raised had 1559.75.
reference to the episcopate. It was objected, that the
episcopate connected the Church of England with the
Church of Eome ; and, in the opinion of the ultra-Pro-
testants, the Church of Eome was Antichrist. The con-
forming Puritans, therefore, appealed to an authority to
which every Puritan would defer as to a pope; they
referred at once to one of Calvin's works, in which, with
respect to episcopacy, that celebrated man had said:
"Let them give us such a hierarchy in which bishops
may b.e so above the rest as they refuse not to be under
Christ, but depend upon him as their very head ....
and then if there be any who do not behave themselves
with all reverence and obedience towards them, there is
no anathema but I confess them worthy of it." *
Calvin had, indeed, in the year 1549, as Archbishop
Parker discovered among the muniments of his see, offered
to make King Edward * VI. u the defender of his sect, and
to invest some of his ministers with quasi-episcopal powers,
for the promotion of unity and concord." This letter had
been intercepted by Bishops Gardyner and Bonner, who
returned an answer as coming from the reformed divines ;
" wherein," continues Parker, " they checked him and
slighted his proposals : from which time John Calvin
and the Church of England were at variance in several
points, which otherwise, through God's mercy, had been
qualified if those papers of his proposals had been dis-
covered unto the queen's majesty during John Calvin's
life. But being not discovered until or about the sixth
* Strype's Parker, p. 140.
268
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
IX.
Matthew
Parker.
1569-75.
year of her majesty's reign, her majesty much laments
they were not found sooner."*
The non-conforming Puritans — their wits now sharp-
ened by faction — were not, however, to be imposed upon.
They clearly understood, that Calvin merely meant, that
he would grant to the moderator of a Presbyterian synod,
the style and title of a Bishop, if, by so doing, he could
put an end to a controversy which — if it related merely
to the question of Church government — would be re-
garded by himself, and by the generality of serious men,
in the light of a dispute insignificant and puerile. They
could perceive, that Calvin purposely avoided the vital
question of apostolical succession ; and thenceforth, until
the time of Bilson, Whitgift, Hooker, and the great divines
who adorned the close of Elizabeth's reign, the question
of episcopacy, as involving the continuity and perpetuity
of the Church, was tacitly admitted. Neal, the Puritan
historian, simply states, that "it was admitted by the
Court reformers " — (so he designates the reformers of the
Church of England) — " that the Church of Eome was a
true Church, though corrupt in some points of doctrine
and government ; that all her ministrations were valid,
and that the pope was a true Bishop of Eome, though
not of the universal Church. It was thought necessary
to maintain this," he continues, "for the support of the
character of our bishops, who could not otherwise derive
their succession from the Apostles.'" He goes on to say,
"that the English reformers maintained, that the prac-
tice of the primitive Church for the first four or ^.\e
centuries, was a proper standard of Church government
and discipline, and in some respects better than that of
the Apostles, which, according to them, was only accom-
* For further quotations to this effect, see Durel's View of the
Government and Worship of Almighty God in the Reformed Churches
beyond the Seas.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 269
inodated to the infant state of the Church, while it was
under persecution, whereas theirs was suited to the gran-
deur of a national establishment."* Allowing for the PaJkerW
party colouring of the Puritan historian, this statement is 1559-75.
in the main correct.
Upon Parker everything now depended, and he threw
himself heartily into his work. Other prelates were con-
secrated at Lambeth on the 21st of January ; but his
troubles were not confined to a selection of fit persons to
occupy the higher offices in the Church. The plague,
which, as we have seen, at the close of Queen Mary's
reign carried off so many of the bishops, was equally fatal
among the parochial clergy. Many parishes were now Vacancies
vacant, and not a few of them had been despoiled and parochial6
robbed during the vacancies. The archbishop issued to clevsy-
his suffragans, through the Bishop of London, certain
questions to be answered relating to the state of their Rules for
dioceses. He found it difficult to procure, as he desired, ^na"
a sufficient number of clergymen, well instructed, not
violent controversialists, or fanatics, to serve among the
parochial clergy ; but, great as the difficulty was, he
warned the bishops against yielding to the temptation of
admitting to the vacant cures men not sufficiently in-
structed to discharge, with credit to themselves and profit
to the people, the functions of the sacred ministry. In Letter
a letter addressed to the Bishop of London, and dated primJteto
August 15, 1560, the archbishop observes that, " now by ^j^JJf
experience it is seen that such manner of men, partly by
reason of their former profane arts, partly by their light
behaviour otherwise, and trade of life, are very offensive
unto the people ; yea and to the wise of this realm are
thought to do great deal more hurt than good, the
Gospel there sustaining slander. "f The truth is, that
* Neal, i. 101, 102. t Corresp. p. 120.
270 lives op Tin:
chap, several of the bishops were willing to lay hands upon
» — ^— * any persons who exhibited the enthusiasm of piety. The
Parker, danger of such a proceeding arises from. the ease with
1559-75. which such a condition is simulated ; as well as from the
fact, that devotional fervour is apt to subside, leaving
sometimes a residuum of worse than lukewarmness. A
man may begin as an enthusiast, and end as a hypocrite
or a worldling. The archbishop charged his suffragans,
therefore, " to be very circumspect in admitting any to
the ministry, and only to allow such as, having good
testimony of their honest conversation^ had been traded
[i.e. trained] and exercised in learning, or at the least
had spent their time with teaching of children ; excluding
all others which have been brought up and sustained
themselves either by occupation or other kinds of life,
alienated from learning."
Lay help. The primate wisely concluded, that it would be prefer-
able to have recourse to lay help, than to give encou-
ragement to these Jeroboam ordinations.* He drew up
uAn order for serving cures novo destitute; " together with
certain regulations, such as could only be drawn up by
a man whose Church principles were firmly established.
He regarded the distinction between the clergy and the
laity as consisting chiefly in this, that the clergy alone were
authorized to preach in church and to administer the
sacraments. He proposed, therefore, in the present emer-
gency, and not as bearing upon the permanent regulations
of the Church, that certain lectors or readers should be
licensed by the bishop or his chancellor ; honest, sober,
* For this mode of proceeding he had a precedent in the primitive
Church. The regulations laid down for Readers in the Eastern Church
may be seen in Bingham. It is to be borne in mind, that it was only
now that the fact began to be recognized, that the clergy are to be
employed, not only in the various offices of prayer and praise, but also
as instructors of the people.
AECHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 271
and grave laymen, who should be permitted in destitute chap.
churches to say the Litany and to read a homily ; but not « — A-*
of course to baptize, to marry, to minister the Holy Com- parked
munion, or to preach. He proposed, moreover, that 1559-75.
parishes for which no incumbent could be provided should
be held in commendam by a neighbouring rector, whose
duty it would be periodically to visit those parishes to
preach the word, to minister the Holy Communion, and to
baptize the children. The priest was also to catechize
the children, and to ascertain whether they were properly
instructed by the lay helper ; and he was to refer all
causes of great importance to the bishop.
Although the archbishop was supported by several of Disagree-
the prelates whose principles were in accordance with his among the
own, yet with some other of his suffragans he could not ls ops*
avoid occasional misunderstandings. This, however,
afforded him an opportunity for evincing a union of firm-
ness with good temper, such as is sure* in the long run,
to give weight to authority. He complained of the
" Germanical natures " which some of the bishops had
brought with them from the Continent, and of his meeting
opposition where he had a right to expect support. In
the disagreements among the bishops, as shown in their
letters, and especially in the letter of Parker himself, we
find more divergences of opinion than we should have
anticipated, but a display of Christian temper which is
truly gratifying and instructive.
Parker's difficulties were rendered greater by the un- Differences
certainty of the queen's temper ; and by the impossibility ^een. e
of calculating from antecedents, what under given circum-
stances her line of conduct might become. Although she
deferred to the judgment of the archbishop, and was even
enraged if at any time he seemed to deviate from the
principles he had laid down for her guidance, yet from
>e-
i
272 lives of tiii:
chap, her perverseness and caprice he suffered so much as
v — ,J — < be sometimes driven almost to the borders of despair.
Parker. On one point she was especially perverse — the marriage
1559-75. of the clergy. Her desire was that, as before the Eefor-
mation, so now, the marriage of the clergy should be
an exception to the rule of celibacy, and should be con-
tracted only under a dispensation from the crown. Here
Parker's private feelings made him resolute, and she be-
came sure that she would lose her primate if she did n<
yield. Throughout the middle ages, as we have seen
preceding volumes, the dispensations to marry could b(
obtained by the clergy on application to the crown ; but
the clergy who acted on such dispensations were regarded
" as black sheep." Parker demanded the recognition of
clerical marriages as a right ; marriage to them, as to all
men, was to be a holy and an honourable estate.
Of the visitations held by Parker, on his re-endowment
and reform of hospitals and schools, and on his care to
remove the scandals still existing in the ecclesiastical
courts, we shall have occasion to give a more minute
account in a subsequent chapter. He was glad to avail
himself of opportunities as they occurred of refreshing
his spirits and restoring himself to health by an occa-
sional visit to his country houses ; but business required
him to be so often in London, that at the commencement
of his career he was much in Lambeth ; and looking down
Fire at St. the river on the 4th of June, 1561, he beheld the magnifi-
4th June, cent cathedral of St. Paul's in flames. It had been struck
156L with lightning. The fire was at last overcome, but not
until the lofty spire, together with the upper roof of the
church and aisles, was entirely consumed. The archbishop
immediately conferred with the queen as to the measures
to be adopted for the restoration of the cathedral, and a
public letter was addressed to him, in the usual fori
AHCHBISIIOPS OF CANTERBURY. 27 ')
trough which he was authorized, after consultation with
the bishops and the principal members of the clergy, " to
devise upon some contribution of money and relief to be ^ife*
levied and collected of the same clergy." The queen, in 1*59-7$.
her letter to the archbishop, adds : — " Wherein we mean
neither to prescribe to you the manner of levying, nor
the sum to be contributed, but refer the same to your
wisdom and the consideration of so great a work. And
if you shall think meet to be informed therein, upon any
special doubt, then to resort to our Council, who in that
behalf shall give you knowledge and advice of that which
shall be convenient."*
In those days, no one was permitted to raise money of
the queen's lieges, except through parliament, or through
Convocation ; through the offertory, or by means of letters
patent from the crown. The present system of making
public collections at the church doors, or otherwise than
in the offertory, was seldom, if ever, resorted to before
the Revolution. At that time, the dissenters commenced
the system of charity sermons. It was at first regarded
as an invasion of the royal prerogative ; but when the
authorities did not interfere with the new system, the
Church gradually followed the example, until at length
charity sermons have become, in many places, a burden
hard to bear. As in the case before us, neither parlia- Money
merit nor Convocation was sitting, and as the necessity [h^rlto^
was urgent, the archbishop was permitted, under a royal gfp1 *f
mandate, to raise the money necessary for the restoration
of the cathedral of London.
Owing to the impossibility of immediately convening
Convocation, the archbishop had recourse to another
irregularity. He invited a committee of bishops to con-
* Corresp. p. 142.
VOL. IX. T
kJ74 LIVES OF THE
chap, suit with him at Lambeth ; and to make such regulations
*_ — . in ecclesiastical affairs, as would admit the plea of urgency.
Raker. As a^ spiritual authority emanates from the bishops, thougl 1
i5.r)9-7r>. in national or provincial churches they have delegated a
portion of their authority to the second order of the
ministry, there could be no objection to this measure
as inconsistent with Catholic principles. But authority
once granted to, or exercised by the presbyters of a
national Church could not be capriciously ignored or
tyrannically withdrawn. As the lawswrf the land, as well as
the canons of the Church, protected the second order of
the clergy in the exercise of their rights, Parker armed
himself with the royal authority before proceeding to act.
On the authority of a late act of parliament, consistently
with the principles of the Church, he convened a meeting
of the bishops, not to create new laws, but to consider how
best to carry into effect the laws and the statutes already
in existence.
The epis- This meeting, to which was modestly assigned the title
of an assessus, was held in April, 1561, and at its first
session eleven articles were agreed upon. The doctrine
of the Holy Trinity was asserted ; as were the sufficiency
of holy Scripture ; the three creeds ; the power of the
keys as exercised in the Church ; the necessity of ordina-
tion ; the fact, that the authority lately exercised by the
pope in England was a usurpation ; the agreement of the
Book of Common Prayer with Scripture ; the lawfulness
of omitting the application of oil, salt, and spittle in the
administration of holy baptism ; the distinction between
the Mass and the Communion ; the necessity of adminis-
tering the Holy Communion in both kinds ; the rejection
of images, relics, and counterfeit miracles.*
* These superstitious practices would have remained in our Church,
if they had not been specially abolished. It is to be remembered, al-
copal as
sessus
1561.
AECHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 275
At a second session, on April 12, the Archbishop of chap.
York attended. He gave his assent to the articles ; and _^El>_-
orders were issued that they should be subscribed by the p^k1^
clergy licensed to officiate in the dioceses of either pro- 1559-75.
vince. Other arrangements were suggested by Parker for
the discipline of the Church, and sanctioned by his suffra-
gans. An examination of the Scripture readers was to be
instituted by the ordinaries ; certain cautions were to be
taken against simoniacal contracts ; the popish service
books were to be abolished ; marriages within the Levi-
tical degrees were to be disallowed ; the archbishops and
bishops were to contribute, according to the proportion of
their revenues, towards the expenses of learned strangers
at Oxford and Cambridge.*
The primate was agreeably surprised to find, that the Cordial
bishops were prepared to act cordially with him, in all between
that related to the discipline of the Church ; and in f^the
regard to doctrine, he wisely confined attention to the bishoPs-
essentials of religion ; avoiding, as far as possible, con-
troverted doctrines or subjects likely to promote dissen-
sion.
Parker now felt, that the time had arrived when, not
only to England, but to the whole Western Church,
should be clearly announced the ecclesiastical position
which had been assumed by the English primate and his
suffragans, under the supremacy of the queen ; her
supremacy extending to things temporal, and not, as had
ways, that the Catholics were in possession of our churches ; and the
Reformation was effected by obtaining concessions from them. Nothing
can be further from the truth than the supposition that the Protestants
were in possession, and that it was to Catholics, not to Protestants, that
concessions were offered. Some of the decisions of the modern Privy
Council are to be traced to the fact of the judges not being historians also,
* Wilkins, iv. 224.
t 2
27G
LIVER OF THE
CHAP.
IX.
Matthow
Parker.
1669-75.
been wickedly misrepresented, to the discharge of any
- spiritual functions. The determination of the pope to re-
sume the sessions of the Council of Trent made some
such measure the more important, if not absolutely neces-
sary. On this point there could not be two opinions, but
the question was, who was to undertake it ? Parker him-
self had not the time to engage in a work of such learning
and labour. He was not a man who overestimated his
powers. Competent though he knew himself to be, from
hispatristic learning, for such an undertaking, he was, at the
same time, conscious that he did not possess the vivida vis
animi, the glowing enthusiasm of genius, by which to
make such a work interesting as well as instructive. The
same might be said of those among the English reformers
who concurred in the principles of the Eeformation. He
was admirably adapted to criticise and revise, but not to
compose.
Among the returned and conforming exiles there were
some who might have been equal to the task, from their
talents and their piety ; but they were warped in their
principles by their intercourse with foreigners, or else were
not sufficiently learned for such an undertaking.
At length the man was found.
On June 18, 1559, John Jewel preached a sermon
at Paul's Cross which excited general attention and
some surprise. He dared the opponents of the English
Eeformation to defend their opposition on scriptural
principles, or on the principles of the primitive Church.
Parker knew Jewel to be a man of real and substantial
learning, and of a nature modest and malleable ; and that,
although his principles were not as yet quite fixed, he was
open to conviction. His antecedents proclaimed him to be
a sincere, though a weak man. When, on the accession of
Queen Mary, he was called to account for his principles,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 277
he, under fear of torture and the stake, renounced all
that laid him open to a suspicion of Protestantism ; but
soon after, repenting and recanting, he fled abroad. When parkerW
first he went to the Continent he was regarded as a 1559-75.
representative of the principles of the English Eeforma-
tion, as maintained by such men as Eidley and Parker ;
but open to flattery, and peculiarly sensitive of kindness,
he returned to England with an inclination to Calvinism,
so far as Calvinism was at that time developed. Although
he was prepared to argue for the continuity of the Church,
or the identity of the existing Eeformed Church with the
pre-Eeformation Church, he desired to conciliate his old
friends by not contending for the retention of the ancient
vestments ; although on this point, also, his judgment was
not decided.
Of Parker himself we have already remarked, that he
possessed one great qualification as a leader ; he was a
large-hearted, and not a narrow-minded man. He saw
what was excellent in Jewel, and brought his stronger
mind to influence Jewel's flexible judgment ; he led him
on to compose a work which, if not all that he could
wish, was, like the Homilies, well adapted to the exi-
gencies of the time.
Jewel had been again appointed to preach at Paul's
Cross ; when, to the satisfaction of the archbishop, and to
the astonishment of many among his hearers, he took very
high ground. He maintained the Catholicism of the
Church of England. He declared that where the Church
of Eome differed from the Church of England, Eome was
medieval, and England primitive. What was purely
medieval was comparatively novel ; what was novel could
not be primitive. The Church of England was so de-
cidedly scriptural and primitive, interpreting Scripture
according to the light of primitive tradition, that he was
278
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
IX.
Matthew
Parker.
1-359-75.
content to give up her cause, if her opponents could Bhow,
that they had the authority of the fathers or of the tradi-
tion of the primitive Church, in favour of any of those
doctrines on which the reformed Church of England
differed from the Church of Borne. His assertion, re-
peated in his Apology, was : " We are come as near as
we possibly could to the Church of the Apostles and the
old Catholic bishops and fathers ; and have directed
according to their customs and ordinances, not only our
doctrine, but also the sacraments and the form of common
prayer." *
Here was his principle. This is the principle of Angli-
canism as distinguished from the foreign reformations :
not Luther, not Calvin, but the primitive Church.
The archbishop sought Jewel. He gained influence
over him ; and to what extent may be shown by one fact
connected with Jewel's history. From an unwillingness
to separate from Puritans at home, and from a desire to
stand well with his foreign correspondents, Jewel had,
as we have remarked, at one time written with indiscreet
zeal against the clerical vestments ; but when he became
a bishop, few prelates insisted more strongly than he
upon obedience to the law in this respect. He was one
with Parker ; and the archbishop suggested the appoint-
ment of Jewel to the see of Salisbury : having been
duly elected, he was consecrated at Lambeth on January
21, 1560.
On the 18th of June, properly vested, and attended by
all those decent ceremonies which pertained to his office,
and which folly only will despise, the Lord Bishop
of Salisbury ascended again the pulpit at Paul's Cross.
Thus arrayed, his appearance was itself a sermon. He
* Jewel's Works, p. 614.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 279
took his text from 1 Cor. xi. 23-25 : — " For I have chap.
received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, < — ^ — -
That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he teas parked
betrayed took bread: and when he had given thanks, he 1559-75.
brake it, and said, Take, eat : this is my body, which is
broken for you : this do in remembrance of me. After the
same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped,
saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this
do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me" He
reiterated the challenge he had in substance pronounced
on a former occasion. He did so, because it had been
rumoured that he had given utterance to more than he
was able to maintain.
" I then said, perhaps boldly, as it might then seem to
some men, but as I myself and the learned of our adver-
saries themselves do well know, sincerely and truly, that
none of all them that this day stand against us, are able,
or shall ever be able, to prove against us any one of all
those points, either by the Scriptures, or by example of
the primitive Church, or by the old doctors, or by
the ancient general councils The words that I
then spake, as near as I can call them to mind, were
these: If any learned man of all our adversaries, or if
all the learned men that be alive, be able to bring any
one sufficient sentence out of any old Catholic doctor
or father, or out of any old general council, or out of
the holy Scriptures of God, or any one example of the
primitive Church, whereby it may be clearly and plainly
proved,
" That there was any private mass in the whole world
at that time, for the space of six hundred years after
Christ ;
" Or that there was then any communion ministered
unto the people under one kind ;
280
LIVES OF tin:
CHAP.
IX.
M ittlu'w
Parker.
15 5 £-7. 3.
" Or that the people had their common prayers then ii
a strange tongue that they understood not;
" Or that the Bishop of Home was then called an uni-
versal bishop, or the head of the universal Church ;
"Or that the people were then taught to believe that
Christ's body is really, substantially, corporally, carnally,
or naturally in the sacrament ;
" Or that his body is or may be in a thousand places
or more at one time ;
" Or that the priest did then hold up the sacrament
over his head ;
" Or that the people did then fall down and worship
it with godly honour ;
" Or that the sacrament was then, or now ought to be,
hanged up under a canopy ;
" Or that in the sacrament after the words of conse-
cration, there remaineth only the accidents and shews
without the substance of bread and wine ;
" Or that the priest then divided the sacrament into
three parts, and afterwards received himself all alone ;
" Or that whosoever had said the sacrament is a figure,
a pledge, a token, or a remembrance of Christ's body,
had therefore been judged for an heretic ;
" Or that it was lawful then to have thirty, twenty,
fifteen, ten, or five masses said in one church, in one
day ;
" Or that images were then set up in the churches, to
the intent that the people might worship them ;
" Or that the lay people was then forbidden to read
the word of God in their own tongue ;
" If any man alive were able to prove any of these
articles by any one clear or plain clause or sentence,
either of the Scriptures or of the old doctors, or of any
old general council, or by any example of the primitive
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 281
Cliurch, I promised then that I would give over and sub- chap.
scribe unto him." « — -r— ;
He declared himself ready not only not to retract any- Parker,
thing that he had said on this matter, but also to assert 1559-75.
more to the same effect.
" If any one of all our adversaries ,"" he continued,
" be able clearly and plainly to prove, by such authority
of the Scrip tures, the old doctors and councils as I said
before,
" That it was lawful for the priest to pronounce the
words of consecration closely and in silence to himself ;
" Or that the priest had then authority to offer up
Christ unto his Father ;
" Or to communicate and receive the sacrament for
another, as they do ;
" Or to apply the virtue of Christ's death and passion
to any man by means of the mass ;
"Or that it was then thought a sound doctrine to teach
the people, that the mass, ex opere operate, — that is, even
for that it is said and done, — is able to remove any part
of our sin ;
4t Or that then any Christian man called the sacrament
his Lord and his God ;
" Or that the people was then taught to believe, that
the body of Christ reinaineth in the sacrament as long-
as the accidents of bread remain there without corrup-
tion ;
" Or that a mouse or any other, worm or beast, may
eat the body of Christ (for so some of our adversaries
have said and taught) ;
" Or that when Christ said Hoc est corpus meum, this
hoc pointeth ndt the bread, but individuum vagum ; as
some of them say ;
" Or that the accidents, or forms, or shews of bread
u\i:s <>r tin-;
CHAP
IX.
Matthew
Parker.
and wine, be the sacraments of Christ's body and blood,
and not rather the very bread and wine itself ;
" Or that the sacrament is a sign or token of the bod1
1559-75. of Christ that lieth hidden underneath it ;
" Or that ignorance is the mother and cause of true
devotion and obedience — these be the highest mysteries
and greatest keys of their religion, and without them
their doctrines can never be maintained and stand up-
right ;
" If any one of all our adversaries be able to avouch
any one of all these articles, by any such sufficient autho-
rity of Scriptures, doctors, or councils as I have required,
as I said before, so say I now again, I am content to
yield unto him and to subscribe. But I am well assured
that they shall never be able truly to allege one sentence.
And because I know it, therefore I speak it, lest ye hap-
pily should be deceived."*
We are not in these pages concerned with the contro-
versies to which this celebrated challenge gave rise ; but
we may be permitted to remark, that Jewel proved him-
self to be equal to the emergency, and rose to the occa-
sion. He had, as a polemic, opened, it must be admitted,
a prodigious length of line to the attacks of his opponents ;
but he confidently defied the enemy to find one assailable
point throughout the whole of it ; and we can truly say of
this distinguished writer, that, in all essentials, he main-
tained his defences against the combined forces of an
enemy not over scrupulous in assertion*
Parker and Jewel were now brought into close alliance ;
find the former rejoiced to find in his protege the very
* The whole sermon may be seen in the Works of Bishop Jewel
(ed. Parker Soc., first portion, p. 3), with an account of the contro-
versies which arose therefrom. 1 have followed in the above statement
the copy of the sermons in Jewel's works, published in 1611.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 283
qualifications for the post he had assumed, and in which chap.
the metropolitan was conscious that he was himself de-
ficient. We shall hereafter have occasion to remark ParkerT
on the carelessness with which Parker permitted his 1559-75.
patronage to be given to works which he could not have
examined in detail, but in whose authors he had confi- Apology
dence. Among the opinions advanced in the well-known church of
Apology for the Church of England, there were some Ensland-
which could not have been in accordance with those of
Parker; nevertheless, the primate not only patronized
the work, and caused it to be circulated, but, acting in a
manner not to be justified, he endeavoured to invest it with
a quasi-ecclesiastical authority. This the Church repelled ;
yet, considering the age and circumstances when and
under which the Apology was produced, it may justly
be styled a great work. It was in the year 1562 that
the celebrated Apologia Ecclesias Anglicame made its
appearance. How far Parker was concerned in its com-
position we know not ; but some share in the work he
claims for himself in the Prefatory Epistle, in which his
sanction to Lady Bacon's English version is conveyed.
Versions of the Apology appeared almost immediately
after its publication, in Italian, French, and Spanish, in
German and Dutch, and lastly in the Greek language.*
An English version of the Apology was printed almost
contemporaneously with the original Latin. It was at-
tributed to Archbishop Parker ; but probably, as in some
of his other works, he employed a chaplain or a secretary
to make the translation, while he himself superintended
aiid corrected it. He certainly did not evince the jealousy
of authorship when, in 1564, this version was superseded
by a translation by Lady Bacon,f the wife of his friend the
* Wordsworth, iv. 49. In 1571 it was translated into Welsh.
f Lady Bacon was one of the five daughters of Sir Anthony Cook, of
284
LIVES OF T1IK
CHAP.
IX.
lord keeper, and the mother of the renowned Lord Bacon
- The archbishop received a copy of Lady Bacon's trail
.Matthew , . . ,__,
Parker. latlOll 111 MS.
This learned and accomplished lady hac
ioo9-75. at the same time, sent a copy of it to Jewel; and, nc
content with having translated a Latin book into English,
she accompanied her performance with a letter in Greek,
to which the bishop responded in the same language.
The primate examined the version carefully, and both Ik
and Jewel himself found it to be so admirably executec
that they would not suggest the alteration of a single word.
The archbishop, with singular good taste, instead of re-
turning her the MS., sent her the work in print. It was
accompanied by a letter which was prefixed to the trans-
lation when published, and which served as the imprimatur
of the archbishop. It was a delicate compliment. It might
have been, he hinted, a violation of confidence to print
the book without first consulting the author ; but she
would, doubtless, pardon the liberty taken, since it secured
for the public the perusal of a work so much desired for
general use, and at the same time spared her the pain
of a conflict with her own scrupulous humility.
The Apology was published with the sanction of the
two primates and their suffragans, and under the authority
of the queen. To the English version Parker attached,
as drawn up by himself, or under his direction, an appendix
which contains a brief sketch of the Church of England
as it then existed, " with a list of the bishoprics and an ac-
count of the lllliversities.,' Although this tract is lon<
yet* as it conveys important information, and as it was aL
Sketch of
the con-
dition of
the Eng-
lish
Church.
Gidea Hall in £ssex. Sir Anthony had been preceptor to Edward VX
All his daughters were women of learning. They were good Latin and
Greek scholars ; one of them, Mildred, was the wife of Queen Eliza-
beth's great minister Cecil. In the illustrious family of Salisbury tin
name of Mildred is still retained, and held in honour.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY
285
the composition of Parker, it shall be presented to the
reader. The primate desired to convey the information
contained in the tract to his contemporaries on the Con-
tinent ; and to us, after an interval of more than three
hundred years, it must be interesting to see how the
Church of England stood at this period.
" The manner how the Church of England is adminis-
tered and governed.
" The Church of England is] n , -, xr ,
... . _ _ . .to Canterbury and York,
divided into two provinces. j
" The province of Canterbury hath
" The archbishop of the same, who is primate of all
England, and metropolitan*
CHAP.
IX.
MattTieW
Parker.
1558-75.
" The Bishop of London,
-Winchester.
Ely.
Chichester.
Hereford.
Salisbury.
Worcetor.
Lincoln.
The Bishop of <j Coventry and Lichfield.
Bath and Wells.
Norwich.
Exeter.
Eochester.
Peterborough.
St. Davies.
LSt. Asaph.
« The Bishop of {
LlandafT.
Bangor.
Oxford.
Gloucester, and
Bristowe.
286
LIVES OF Till-:
CHAP.
IX.
^■ii i ■ ■ *
Matthevr
Parker.
1559-75.
" The province of York hath
" The archbishop of the same, who is also primate oi
England and metropolitan.
[Durham.
" The Bishop of \ Carlisle, and
(Chester.
" Amongst us here in England no man is called or pre-
ferred to be a bishop, except he have first received the
orders of priesthood, and be well able to instruct the
people in the holy Scriptures.
" Every one of the archbishops and bishops have their
several cathedral churches ; wherein the deans bear chief
rule, being men specially chosen both for their learning
and godliness, as near as may be.
" These cathedral churches have also other dignities and
canonries, whereunto be assigned no idle or unprofitable
persons, but such as either be preachers, or professors of
the sciences of good learning.
"In the said cathedral churches, upon Sundays and
festival days, the canons make ordinarily special sermons,
whereunto duly resort the head officers of the cities and
the citizens; and upon the workendays, thrice in the
week, one of the canons doth read and expound some
piece of holy Scripture.
" Also the said archbishops and bishops have under them
their archdeacons, some two, some four, some six, accord-
ing to the largeness of the diocese; the which arch-
deacons keep yearly two visitations, wherein they make
diligent inquisition and search, both of the doctrine and
behaviour, as well of the ministers as of the people.
They punish the offenders ; and if any errors in religion
and heresies fortune to spring, they bring those and other
weighty matters before the bishops themselves.
"There is nothing read in our churches but the
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
287
canonical Scriptures, which is done in snch order as that
the psalter is read over every month, the New Testament
four times in the year, and the Old Testament once every
year. And, if the curate be judged of the bishop to be
sufficiently seen in the holy Scriptures, he doth withal
make some exposition and exhortation unto godliness.
" And, forasmuch as our churches and universities have
been wonderfully marred, and so foully brought out of
all fashion in time of papistry, as there cannot be had
learned pastors for every parish, there be prescribed
unto the curates of meaner understanding certain homilies
devised by learned men, which do comprehend the prin-
cipal points of Christian doctrine, as of original sin, of
justification, of faith, of charity, and such-like, for to be
read by them unto the people.
" As for common prayer, the lessons taken out of the
Scriptures, the administering of the sacraments, and the
residue of service done in the churches, are every whit
done in the vulgar tongue which all may understand.
" Touching the universities,
"Moreover, this realm of)^ n .-, i r\ r j
„,,,, . . . [Cambridge, and Oxford .
England hath two universities. J
" And the manner is not to live in these within houses
that be inns or a receipt for common guests, as is the
custom of some universities ; but they live in colleges
under most grave and severe discipline, even such as the
famous learned man Erasmus of Eoterodame, being here
amongst us about forty years past, was bold to prefer
before the very rules of the monks.
" In Cambridge be xiiii colleges, these by name that
follow : —
CHAP.
IX.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Trinity College, founded by
King Henry the Eight.
The King's College.
St. John's College.
CHAP.
IX.
i. . , «*
Matthew
Parker.
1559-70.
Christ's College.
The Queen's College.
Jesus College,
Rennet College.
Pembroke College, or Pem-
broke Hall,
Peter College, or Peter
House.
(1 unwell and Cains Collei
or Hall.
One other Trinity Collegf
or Trinity Hull.
Clare College, or Clare Hall,
St. Katherine's College, or
Katherin Hall.
Magdalene College.
" In Oxford likewise there be colleges, some greater,
some smaller, to the number of four and twenty, the
names whereof be as followeth : —
The Cathedral Church of
Christ, wherein also is a
great company of students.
Magdalene College.
New College.
Marten College.
All Souls1 College.
Corpus Christi College.
Lincoln College.
Auriell College.
The Queen's College.
Baylie College, or Bailioll
College.
St. John's College.
Trinity College.
Exeter College.
Brazen Nose College.
The University College
Gloucester College.
Brodegate Hall.
Heart Hall.
Magdalene Hall.
Alborne Hall.
St. Mary Hall.
White Hall.
New Inn.
Edmoncl Hall.
" And besides these colleges that be in the universities,
this realm hath also certain collegiate churches, as West-
minster, Windsor, Eton, and Winchester. The two last
whereof do bring up and find a great number of young
scholars, the which, after they be once perfect in the rules
of grammar and versifying, and well entered in the prin-
ciples of the Greek tongue and of rhetoric, are sent from
thence unto the universities ; as thus : out of Eton College
they be sent unto the King's College at Cambridge, and
out of Winchester into the New College at Oxford.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 289
" The colleges of both the universities be not only very Cj^P*
fair and goodly built, through the exceeding liberality of ^ — '
the kings in old time and of late days, of bishops and of Parker.
noblemen, but they be also endowed with marvellous 1559~75-
large livings and revenues.
"In Trinity College at Cambridge, and in Christ's
College at Oxford, both which were founded by King
Henry the Eight of most famous memory, are at the least
found four hundred scholars, and the like number well
near is to be seen in certain other colleges, as in the
King's College and St. John's College at Cambridge ; in
Magdalene College and New College of Oxford, besides
the rest which we now pass over,
" Every one of the colleges have their professors of the
tongues and of the liberal sciences (as they call them),
which do train up youth privately within their halls, to
the end they may afterward be able to go forth thence
into the common schools as to open disputation, as it were
into plain battle, there to try themself.
" In the common schools of both the universities there
are found at the king's charge, and that very largely, five
professors and readers, that is to say, —
The Reader of Divinity,
The Reader of the Civil Law,
The Reader of Physic,
The Reader of the Hebrew tongue, and
The Reader of the Greek tongue.
And for the other professors, as of philosophy, of logic, of
rhetoric, and of the mathematicals, the universities them-
selves do allow stipends unto them. And these professors
have the ruling of the disputations and other school
exercises which be daily used in the common schools,
amongst whom they that by the same disputations and
exercises are thought to be come to any ripeness in
VOL. ix. u
290 lives of tup:
chap, knowledge, are wont, according to the use in other uni
» — .- — ' versities, solemnly to take degrees, every one in the sai
Parker, science and faculty which he professeth.
1559-75. " We thought good to annex these things, to the end we
might confute and confound those that spread abroad
rumours, how that with us nothing is done in order, and
as ought to be done, that there is no religion at all, no
ecclesiastical discipline observed, no regard had of the
salvation of men's souls ; but that all is done quite out of
order and seditiously, that all antiquity is despised, that
liberty is given to all sensuality and lewd lusts of folks,
that the livings of the church be converted to profane
and worldly uses ; whereas in very truth we seek nothing
else but that that God above all most good may have
still his honour truly and purely reserved unto him ; that
the rule and way to everlasting salvation may be taken
from out of his very word, and not from men's fantasies ;
that the sacraments may be ministered not like a masquery
or a stage-play, but religiously and reverently, according
to the rule prescribed unto us by Christ, and after the
example of the holy fathers which flourished in the primi-
tive Church ; that that most holy and godly form of dis-
cipline, which was commonly used amongst them, may be
called home again ; that the goods of the church may not
be launched out amongst worldlings and idle persons, but
may be bestowed upon the godly ministers and pastors
which take pain both in preaching and teaching ; that
there may from time to time arise up out of the universi-
ties learned and good ministers, and others meet to serve
the commonwealth ; and finally that all unclean and
wicked life may be utterly abandoned and banished, as
unworthy for the name of any Christian. And, albeit we
are not as yet able to obtain this that we have said, fully
and perfitly (for this same stable, as one may rightly call
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY.
291
it, of the Eomish Augias, cannot so soon be thoroughly
cleansed and rid from the long grown filth and muck) ;
nevertheless this is it whereunto we have regard ; hither
do we tend; to this mark do we direct our pain and
travail, and that hitherto (thorough God his gracious
favour) not without good success and plenteous increase,
which thing may easily appear to everybody, if either we
be compared with our own selves, in what manner of case
we have been but few years since, or else be compared
with our false accusers, or rather our malicious slanderers.
" The Lord defend his Church, govern it with his Holy
Spirit, and bless the same with all prosperous felicity.
Amen.
" *
CHAP.
IX.
» , — — »
Matthew-
Parker.
1559-75.
Jewel's Works, ed. Parker Soc., p. 109.
u2
292 lives of Tin:
CHAPTER X.
PREPARATIONS FOR CONVOCATION.
Authority of a Metropolitan. — Powers of Convocation. — Prohibited
degrees of marriage. — Lax notion among Protestants on the subject
of marriage. — Latin version of the Prayer Book. — Office in behalf
of benefactors. — Communion office at funerals. — Re-introduction of
the Catholic Calendar, and its reformation. — The Lectionary. —
Second Book of Homilies. — The Great Bible. — The Geneva Bible. —
Bishops' Bible. — Parker's selection of translators. — Thirty-nine
Articles. — Articles as much opposed to ultra-Protestantism as to
Popery.
chap. To the approaching Convocation the primate looked
_^ - forward with considerable anxiety, and he desired to
Parked settle by his metropolitan authority, beforehand, some
1559-75. questions which, if left open for discussion, would give
rise to angry debates, and to controversies in which he
could not calculate with certainty upon obtaining the
support of friends whose undoubted wisdom was equalled
by a timidity not less indisputable. If among the leading
statesmen he had secured a majority in favour of the
English principles of Eeformation, he had not been
successful in enkindling an enthusiasm in his supporters,
while his Calvinistic opponents were able, not only to
produce among their numbers men of unquestioned and
unquestionable learning and piety, but men of erudition
whose enthusiasm amounted not unfrequently to fana-
ticism. He was, like his royal mistress, opposed to the
Calvinism which had in this country triumphed over
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 293
Lutheranism ; but no man can extricate himself entirely chap.
from the predominant feelings of the age in which he * %i -
lives ; and we shall find Parker, in his hostility to popery, patkerT
sometimes the unconscious advocate of ultra-Protestant 1559-75.
notions, to which in his deliberate actions he was hostile
to the last.
Supplemented by the royal prerogative, his powers Powers of
were unquestionably great, and what they were I shall p0?ittn°.~
state in the language of one who, if his logic be not
always correct, is scrupulously accurate in his statements
of fact.
The powers of the archbishop, Dr. Cardwell observes,
" great in themselves, and still greater when viewed in
his high station, as president of a synod, had recently
been augmented in the eyes of true churchmen by the
rejection of the pope, and the supposed transfer of the
most sacred elements of his office to the primate. To
aid this impression there was a tradition in the Church,
that, in ancient times, he was invested with the authority
of a patriarch ; and it was a natural consequence, that
when the Eoman pontiff had been stripped of this, as well
as other usurpations, it would revert, whatever might
be the amount of it, to its original possessor. In the
earlier periods, accordingly, that followed the Eeforma-
tion, when the conditions of the visible Church were
generally understood, and the necessity of a spiritual head
to preside over it was distinctly acknowledged, the power
of the archbishop was a most effective instrument for
Church government."* This writer refers to the Canons
* Cardwell, Synodalia, xi. xvii. The powers of the metropolitan
remain in theory as they were originally ; but they have ceased to be
exercised. So many among our later primates have suffered themselves
to succumb to the civil power, that they have lost much of the moral
influence over the minds of the clergy which they did at one time
Convoca
tion.
294 LIVES OP THE
chap. °f 1571, " upon which it was fully agreed in the Synod
x- „ by the Lord Matthew, Archbishop of Canterbury, and all
Bu&eW ^ie rest °^ tne ^snoPs °f ^U8 province — that constitutions
1559-75. might be made by the sole authority of the archbishop
and his commissioned bishops."
Powers in The primate retained for himself, when a Convocation
was called, the right of placing a veto on its proceedings ;
a power which he did not delegate to his locum tenens,
when, unable to preside personally at a Convocation, he
appointed a deputy. He exercised also the sole right to
give leave of absence to a member of either house ; and as
this might easily be obtained where there was a reasonable
cause, a neglect of attendance without leave first obtained
deprived the offender of any reasonable excuse. It
rested with the primate to call for proxies or to refuse
them, and to decide upon controverted elections.
The House of Bishops, we are told, uniformly asserted
and maintained their superiority over the Lower House.
The lower clergy, however, could present petitions contain-
ing complaints and suggestions, could offer amendments
on the propositions of bishops, or render them of no effect
by finally dissenting from them. This disparity, it was
affirmed, resulted naturally from the authority possessed
by the bishops individually over their respective pres-
byters, from the higher kind of sacredness attaching to
their order, which, to the disgust of the non-conforming
Puritans, was one of the constant principles of Elizabeth's
conduct
possess. The suffragans have gradually assumed an independence
which they did not formerly possess, and have become what the
ancients called some among their contemporaries, avroKecpaXoi. In the
United States of America, the senior among the bishops acts as president
when the Church assembles in council. Already that important branch
of the Church is feeling its way for remedying this defect.
• ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 295
The same author, writing under the influence of the chap.
liberal notions of the nineteenth century, but prepared as -
x.
an archaeologist and historian to state the facts of history Parker.
as he finds them, concludes his preface to the Synodalia 1559-75.
by reminding his readers, that " the power of a bishop
over his clergy is great in itself and in its judicial
functions ; but it is still greater in their estimation of
it, when they think of him and of themselves in their
spiritual character ; of him as the depositary of sacred
influence, and of themselves as under him the ministers
and dispensers of it. And if there are any among them
with whom such motives make no impression, and the
strong arm of the law is the only valid argument,
the bishop is supported by the acts of the legislature,
and the civil sword is placed in his hands for the
punishment of evil-doers. And whatever considerations
of the kind apply to any single bishop, they apply
with increased effect to the primate, than whom we
acknowledge no higher spiritual person upon earth. If
then, apart from the wide range of his judicial powers,
we suppose him to have taken counsel with his suffragans,
and to express his opinion on a question on which any
members of the Church have honestly been seeking for itj
there can scarcely be desired an authority more conclusive
with the parties themselves, or more closely in accordance
with the primitive pattern. In a Church indeed — or
rather a branch of the Church — united with the State,
such opinions are not of the nature of decrees and ordi-
nances, and cannot be enforced by penances and excommu-
nications ; but they carry with them a moral and spiritual
force which would be decisive to all reasonable minds,
and to a Christian temper would be irresistible." *
* Synodalia, p. xxvii.
296 LIVES OF THE
chap. I have been desirous of placing before the reader the
_J^ — * principles which were recognized to their full extent by
Parked Archbishop Parker, by Queen Elizabeth, by her great
1559-75. minister Cecil, afterwards Lord Burghley, and, though
with less intelligence, by others of her Council. I do
this the rather, because, in the course of this narrative,
it will be my painful duty to record very frequent de-
viations from this and from other recognized principles,
not only on the part of professed politicians such as the
queen and Lord Burghley, but even on the part of Parker
himself. For reasons of state, from motives of expe-
diency, with a view to conciliation, great principles were
sometimes set aside, although the unhappy individual who
should refuse to adhere to them theoretically would be
subjected to the higher penalties enacted by the law, of
which they were regarded as a foundation. We have
thus exhibited various apparent inconsistencies between
our theory and our conduct ; and we have sometimes to
refer to our great English reformers, to ascertain what
they said, or what they attempted, rather than what they
did.
Before the meeting of Convocation, Archbishop Parker
carefully reviewed his position. There were certain
principles to be enforced, and rules of conduct to be laid
down, which, if brought under discussion before a pro-
miscuous and disunited assembly, would, while provoking
debate, be scarcely conducted to an amicable conclusion
or a satisfactory arrangement.
Laxity of One subject there was of great importance and peculiar
marriage, delicacy, upon which it was desirable to avoid a dis-
cussion if possible ; and by the joint exercise of the
temporal and spiritual powers vested in the crown and
the mitre, to forestall debate by enactment. The course
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 297
Parker pursued did not provoke the opposition which
might have been anticipated, from the conviction which
prevailed in every class, that the very existence of society
was endangered by the lax state of the law of marriage,
and the yet greater and more unprincipled laxity in its
administration.
In the medieval Church the laws relating to matrimony
had never been sufficiently stringent ; or we ought, per-
haps, to describe them as being so stringent as to render
the strict observance of them a thing impossible. As
regarded the degrees of consanguinity and affinity within
which matrimony might be contracted, the prohibitions
extended to persons so remotely connected, that it was
scarcely possible to avoid a lawsuit, if it became the
interest of any persons to dispute the legitimacy of a
marriage.
The wealthier classes made security doubly sure by
having recourse to dispensations which would cover all
objections ; and which, in their appetence for fees, the
authorities at Kome or their delegates in the provinces
were not slow to grant. We have had occasion to show,
in the Introductory chapter to this Book, that among the
indirect causes of the Eeformation in this country, we
have to mention the irritating prosecutions carried on or
threatened in the lower ecclesiastical courts, which had
reference chiefly to an evasion or an ignorance of those
laws upon an observance or upon a neglect of which the
peace of families might be disturbed.
We are not surprised to learn that, owing to this
mystification of the law of marriage, as well as to the
depreciation of the holy estate implied in the enforced
celibacy of the clergy, a great demoralization of society
prevailed. Of this demoralization we have a fearful ac-
1559-75.
298
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
X.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-7-3.
Loose
notions of
matrimony
among the
Protes-
tants.
count in the preamble of a statute introduced in the
year of the reign of Henry VIII., with the object i
view of providing a remedy for an evil, of which th
existence could not be denied. In this preamble there is
allusion to " the many inconveniences occasioned by
reason of marrying within the degrees proliibite
by God's laws ; that is to say, the son to marry
the mother or stepmother ; the brother the sister ; the
father the son's daughter or his daughter's daughter ; or
the son to marry the daughter of his father procreate
and born by his stepmother ; or the son to marry his
aunt, being his father's or mother's sister ; or to marry
his uncle's wife, or any man to marry his wife's daughter,
or his wife's daughter's daughter, or his wife's sister."
I have quoted this passage to show the demoralized
state of society, as admitted in an authoritative statement
made by the legislators of that period. They admitted
the evil. They proposed a remedy. But nothing was
done. The act proposing measures to meet the evil was
soon after repealed.
The case, therefore, came before Parker, thus : — There
was a law upon the subject, but the law was in itself so
strict, that it was brought under the control of another
law, and dispensations for its infraction were easily ob-
tained. But these dispensations, which gave a practical
efficacy to the law, were granted on the authority of the
Eomish courts ; and when an application to the court of
Borne for a dispensation involved the plaintiff in the
penalties of a praemunire, such dispensations were not to
be obtained, and every one did, as we have just seen,
what appeared right in his own eyes, or in accordance
with his unrestrained passion.
Among the continental reformers, very loose notions on
the subject of matrimony prevailed ; as Parker must have
7
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 299
been made aware in the conversations he held with his chap.
friend Martin Bncer, for Bucer had borne a part, and __i .
not a very reputable part, in the controversies on this p^oT
subject, in which his friends Luther, Melancthon, and 1559-75.
other Protestants were involved. Luther, Melancthon,
and other reformers of that school, including Bucer
himself, had even gone to the length of admitting, that
polygamy, under certain circumstances, might be regarded
as lawful ; and they seemed to have been only restrained
from asserting their opinion by an intuitive perception,
that it would shock the public opinion of Europe, and
strengthen the hands of their opponents.
To a certain extent they came to the same conclusion,
or nearly so, with the Eomanists. In a celebrated cause
they were hard pressed to permit a German prince to
marry a second wife while his first wife was still living : it
was asserted, that the law of God did not prohibit po-
lygamy; the prohibition resting, not on divine command,
but on human law. It was argued, that what was enacted
by man might be by man repealed : so that the question
was, not merely whether a dispensation might be granted,
but simply, from whom the dispensation was to emanate.
The Eomanists said from the pope, the Protestants from
the Emperor.*
* The learned reader will understand that I am alluding to the case
of Philip Landgrave of Hesse, a case which reflects disgrace upon all
who were concerned in it. The Landgrave was himself a coarse,
vulgar, bloated Sybarite, and in language the more offensive from the
fact that he did not himself perceive the offensiveness of it, he demanded
of the German reformers permission to take unto himself a second
wife — because he had ceased to regard his first wife with affection,
though she was still living, and had been the mother of many children.
He employed Martin Bucer to negotiate with Luther, Melancthon, and
other great foreign reformers on the subject. His patronage and pro-
tection they could retain on no other terms. His plea is almost comical.
300 LIVES OF THE
chap. To this case and to these circumstances allusion
1, . made, in order that the reader may clearly understand the
Parked extreme difficulties of the case, through sophistry am
1559-75. argument, and laxity in morals, when Parker was re-
quired to legislate. One thing was certain, the time had
come when something must be done. The controversial
temper with which the question had been met, was sucli
as to render it advisable not to submit it to a discussion
in parliament or in Convocation. There was, however,
sufficient authority, as we have already pointed out, to
create and enforce a law upon the subject ; and the arch-
bishop saw his way. The political difficulties which the
continental reformers had to meet were not in the way
of Parker. His opponents were the Puritans. Church-
men were ready to support him when he laid down the
law, provided that he did not run counter to Scripture and
the primitive Church. Puritans, on the other hand,
cared nothing for his metropolitan authority ; they must
have the Bible, and the Bible only. When reference was
made to the Bible, the New Testament was silent upon
the subject ; but the Puritans accepted the Old Testament
as the word of God ; and by this authority, although the
He ought to set an example to his people to receive the Lord's Supper;
but he could not receive the Lord's Supper if he was living in open
violation of the laws of morality — therefore the laws of morality should
be changed, at all events, so far as he was concerned. He quotes in
favour of polygamy the fathers of the Old Testament, and he states
undoubtedly that both Luther and Melancthon had advised Henry VIII.
not to put away his wife Queen Katharine, but to make Anne Boleyn
also his wife. The Landgrave threatened, if the reformers would not
accede to his wishes, to seek through the Emperor a dispensation
from the pope, though his hatred of the pope was unabated. Luther,
Melancthon, Bucer, and others, in an able document, refuted the argu-
ments of the Landgrave; but they concluded, if they could not persuade
him to be contented with one wife, by promising him a dispensation,
on the condition that he should keep his second wife a secret.
AECHBISIIOPS OF CANTERBURY. 301
Mosaic law is no longer in force, Archbishop Parker pro-
posed to be ruled.
Considered abstractedly, this was not the wisest course ^rkeT
that could have been pursued ; but under the given cir- 1559-75.
cumstances it is difficult to surmise a safer mode of pro-
ceeding ; and it must be admitted that fewer difficulties
have resulted from Parker's legislation than lawyers were,
at one time, inclined to anticipate and predict. The
archbishop professed to adapt to the exigences of the
existing Church the scriptural principles as laid down in
the eighteenth and twentieth chapters of Leviticus. He
assumed that the degrees which are laid down as to men
will hold equally as to women in the same proximity ;
that the husband and wife being but one flesh, he who
is related to the one by consanguinity is related to the
other by affinity in the same degree.
The table, when drawn up, was issued by the sole au-
thority of the archbishop. It has been slightly altered
by subsequent legislation, but remains, substantially, to
the present time, the law of the Church and realm. Par-
ker published contemporaneously, " An Admonition for
the Present Time, with a still further Consultation of all
such as intend hereafter to enter into the Estate of Matri-
mony godly and agreeable to Law." *
* The case of marrying a wife's sister has occasioned some dispute,
although, as Bishop Jewel observed, if we are forbidden to marry a
brothers wife, it follows that we are forbidden to marry a wife's
sister : " For between one man and two sisters, and one woman and
two brothers, is the like an analogy or proportion." Such marriages,
however, not being void db initio, but voidable only by order of
separation to be made in an Ecclesiastical Court, they were esteemed
valid to all civil purposes, unless separation was actually made during
the life of the parties. Such was the law until the year 1835, when
an act was passed, which, after legalizing certain former marriages,
enacted that all marriages that shou'd hereafter be celebrated between
302 LIVES OP THE
chap. This admonition was duly printed, and an order was
« r. — . given for its being set up in every church. A copy is pre-
Pa,k^ served in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge,
1559-75. with the archbishop's marks of revision made by his well-
known red pencil ; and it exists as a perpetual monument
of his industry and caution.
Latin The performance of Divine Service in the Latin lan-
Frayer L
Book. guage having been permitted in the chapels of the uni-
versities and of the two great public schools of Winches-
ter and Eton, it became necessary to prepare and autho-
rize a Latin version of the Liturgy and other offices of
the Church. Of the first Prayer Book of Edward a
translation was in existence, and instead of making a ver-
sion of the " Use " which had just been accepted by par-
liament and embodied in the Act of Uniformity, the
archbishop determined on a revision of the existing Latin
Prayer Book, and he intrusted the work to one of the
learned men of the day most competent for the task,
Walter Haddon. The former translation had been made
by Alexander Aless, a canon regular of St. Andrew's, in
Scotland, of whom notice has been taken in the life of
Cranmer. It was not the work of an accomplished scholar,
and if Haddon, a man of learning as well as a divine,
had wished to save himself trouble, he would have found
it easier to make an entirely new translation than to
revise the old one ; but this was not what his employers
desired.
The object of the archbishop and his associates was to
give a quasi-authority to the first Book of King Edward.
Although, by the Act of Uniformity, another " Use " had
been adopted for the public services of the Church, yet
persons within the prohibited degrees of consanguinity and affinity
should be " absolutely null and void to all intents and purposes what-
soever."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 303
no valid objection could be produced against the con- chap.
temporaneous use of the first Prayer Book by learned . ^ — *
men. The queen and her advisers would have esta- parked
blished that Book, but yielded, as an act of policy, to 1559-75.
the Puritans, who complained that practices were there
enjoined which might generate superstition in the minds
of the uneducated ; but the Prayer Book itself they could
not venture to decry, because by this Church and realm
it had been accepted as the inspired work of God the
Holy Ghost ; and the objection before noticed would not
be applicable to the men of learning for whom alone the
Latin version was designed.
The Church had been long accustomed to various
" Uses," or different Prayer Books, of which it could be
said with reference to each,
Facies non omnibus una
Nee di versa tamen, quales decet esse sore-rum ;
and consequently there was no reason why there should
not be one " Use " for the parishes, and another for the
Universities. The archbishop went further. The clergy
were required to repeat daily the matins and the even-
song. If this were done in the congregation, they were
under an obligation to use the new Prayer Book ; but if
there were no congregation, then, in repeating the offices,
they were authorized to use the Latin form to which
they had been accustomed, when pursuing their early
studies at school or college.
Parker and the English reformers, though to the last
approving of the revision of the Prayer Book, published
in the first instance on their own authority, regretted,
nevertheless, the omission of certain Catholic practices,
upon which, in their superstitious dread of superstition,
their Puritan coadjutors had insisted. And knowing the
:
304 LIVES OP THE
chap, truth involved in the saying, legem credendi lex statuat sup*
-. — ,- — • plicandi, they seized the present opportunity, not t(
Parked supersede the last Prayer Book, but to attach also
15,39-75. quasi-authority to the first Book of Edward VI.*
On the same principle Parker introduced a formulary, i
which our communion with holy ones departed appear
to be recognized. Prayers and thanksgivings continued
to be offered in the colleges, in grateful recollection of
Prayer for founders and benefactors ; but since the Eeformation n
tors. particular form had been prescribed. Eecourse, unde
these circumstances, was had to the ancient forms, objec-
tionable on account of their reference to purgatory ; while
the Puritans were not without hope that the office would
be discontinued. Parker adopted the middle course, and
gave to the Universities a reformed formulary, under th<
title of In Commendationibus Benefactorum .
Commu- The Latin Prayer Book contained also a Celebratio
the^ead. coence Domini in funeribus, si amiciet vicini defuncti com-
municare velint.
Other works were also sanctioned by Archbishop
Parker, and were issued by his authority as the metro-
politan, with the imprimatur of the sovereign ; namely, a
Primer or Orarium, and a Latin Book of Devotions :
JPreces Privates in Studiosorum gratiam collectce.
The English Prayer Book had been remodelled to meet
the demands of the middle class — a class now indulging
in theological discussion without sufficient learning to
arrive always at a right conclusion. The Latin works
were an appeal to the more learned, in the hope that, if
further alterations should be required (and that such
* By modern writers surprise is expressed at Haddon's contenting
himself with correcting an imperfect version of the Prayer Book, and
he is accused of indolence or carelessness. He is acquitted, however,
when the circumstances mentioned above are taken into considerate
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 305
would be the case there was little doubt), the alter- chap.
ations would take a Catholic direction, and not be a < — A—"
concession to ultra-Protestant prejudices. ParkerT
To avoid any discussion in Convocation on these and 1559-75.
similar topics was assuredly a wise and politic measure.
There was also connected with the Latin Prayer Book
another subject which Parker had much at heart, and in
carrying which he might have anticipated a strong
opposition. In the Latin Prayer Book the Calendar Restora-
1 tion. of the
re-appeared. Catholic
In the Calendar in 1549, the only days appointed for Calendap*
observance were what are described as Bed Letter daySj
to which are appointed certain collects, epistles, and
gospels. In 1552, the names of St. George, St. Lawrence,
and St. Clement were added ; and, by a mistake, probably,
the name of St. Mary Magdalene was omitted. The En-
glish Calendar of 1559 had no Black Letter days, except
the festivals of St. Lawrence and St. George ; but in the
Latin Prayer Book the name of some saint is attached to
almost every day.
This was probably intended as a feeler* and the arch-
bishop prepared to introduce a reformed Calendar into the
English Prayer Book. To effect his purpose three courses
were open to him : he might bring the subject before
Convocation ; he might make the order by his own
authority ; or, by reference to a statute passed in the last
parliament, he might call upon the queen to appoint a
Commission. By not consulting Convocation, he avoided
a party battle; and he hoped, by uniting the metro-
politan with the royal authority, to silence all gainsayers.
To those who would regard the royal interference as an
Erastian movement, he could present his mandate as
archbishop ; and if there were any who cared little fot
his spiritual authority, he could urge upon them the royal
VOL. IX. x
306 LIVES OF TIIH
CHAP, injunction. He determined, therefore, to ask for a Com-
- — il— - mission, at the head of which he took his place; and
ParkeyT thus he established a precedent, the consequence of which
1559-75. was most pernicious. The crown exercised from this
time extraordinary power, for the misuse of which the
hierarchy had to bear the blame.
Revision The apparent object of the Commission was to establish
Lection- & Lectionary, for which a demand was made by the Pur;-
ary* tans ; but the formation of a Lectionary was certainly
not the primary intention of Parker when he suggested
the Commission. It is true, that some changes were made
in the selection of proper lessons for Sundays and Holy-
days, yet they were so few, and of such little significance,
that we may doubt whether any one would have com-
plained, if the metropolitan and his suffragans had taken
it upon themselves to make the necessary alterations.
The powers of the Commission were more extensive, and
it was for the exercise of those extraordinary powers that
it was called into existence.
Eoyai The Commission was addressed to the archbishop
himself, to the Bishop of London, to William Bill, the
queen's almoner, and Walter Haddon, one of the Masters
in Chancery, of whom notice has just been taken. It
was thus entirely under the control and direction of the
archbishop, both Bill and Haddon agreeing with him in
all the great principles of action ; and the Bishop of
London, who could scarcely be passed by, though inclined
to the Puritans, and regarded as their representative in
the Commission, was not a man to offer unnecessary oppo-
sition to the primate.
The Commissioners were directed to make such changes
in the Lectionary as they might think conducive to the
greater edification of the people.
Eemarks being made on the neglected state of the
Commis
sion
1
s
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
307
CHAP.
X.
Matthew
Parker.
churches and chapels, and especially of the chancels, it
was observed that this neglect was the more disgraceful
when compared with the expensive care exhibited by all
classes of the community upon their private houses. The 1559-75.
queen, in consequence, directed the Commissioners to take
steps for counteracting the evil complained of. Among
other things, they were required Ci to order that the Tables
of the Ten Commandments might be comely set up, or hung
up at the east end of the church, to be not only read for
edification, but also to give some comely ornament and
demonstration that the same is a place of religion and
prayer."
In this injunction we find perhaps an excuse for the
Commission. The chancels and churches were chiefly
those which had been formerly repaired at the expense
of the monasteries ; when the monasteries were destroyed,
and the property passed into lay hands, the parties pur-
chasing the rights of the former possessors succeeded to
their responsibilities, and if they neglected duties while
they availed themselves of the advantages of their position,
they were justly amenable to censure. Of these offenders,
it was to be feared that the majority would not have
amended their ways on a mere remonstrance from the
archbishop, and it was important, therefore, to support
the remonstrance by a royal command. Even this, how-
ever, did not meet the evil to its full extent, because,
although the repairs of the chancels devolved on the lay
rector, the expense of keeping the church in order was
incurred by the parishioners.
The archbishop received the royal mandate on the pubiica-
22nd of January, and on the 15th of February he issued J^wcl?9
a pastoral address to his suffragans, through the Bishop endar and
of London. While the prelates were engaged in carrying
into effect the directions of their metropolitan, the arch-
x2
308 LIVES OF THE
chap, bishop was himself employed in reforming the Calendar,
- — r- — - a duty in his mind closely connected with the establish-
Parker. ment of a Lectionary, the character of the lessons being
1559-76. dependent, in a certain measure, upon the festival or fast-
day, for which the perusal of them was appointed.
The main object of Parker and of the queen was to
exhibit the connection of the existing Church, which they
were reforming, with the Catholic Church of former times,
of which it was not the successor, but a development.
The holy men of old were to be revered for their godli-
ness, even though they held some doctrines which were
now repudiated ; and performed certain acts of devotion
which the present Church no longer observed. Two men
may not be on speaking terms with one another at the
present time, and yet they may be members of the
same family. In the United States of America, we often
find a man, who prefers his republican to our monarchical
institutions, and yet claims a kind of family share in
the minds and homes of Englishmen who nourished
before the separation of the North American colonies
from the mother country. In these remarks we find an
explanation of Parker's feelings, and of those which are
still predominant in the Anglo-Catholic mind. In the
hagiography of the Church there are presented to us ex-
amples of peculiar excellence achieved under the most
difficult and trying circumstances, and the study of the
lives of such heroes would, in Parker's judgment, be con-
ducive to the spiritual advancement of men who are
influenced by example more than by precept.
To a revival of the Calendar, opposition was sometimes
offered by the statesman as well as by the Puritan, and,
to a certain point, with justice. As the world became
busy, and enterprise was encouraged among the com-
mercial men of England, the observance of the many
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 309
holydays which existed before the Eeformation was felt
to be a grievance — it encouraged idleness, and promoted
in many instances that licentiousness which is of idleness
the invariable consequence. The evil might be corrected
by correcting the abuse, which consisted in the useless
multiplying of those days. That the Church was right
in demanding leisure for the working population is proved
by what we witness in these days, when for worldly
enjoyment the working classes are insisting upon the
concession, on the part of their employers, of more days
for recreation and fewer hours for actual labour.
Parker admitted the grievance, and was quite ready to
diminish the number of idle days by only requiring the
absolute observance of the Eed Letter days. But for those
who possessed the leisure, he provided study and employ-
ment by retaining some, at least, of the Black Letter days.*
That he failed in sustaining an observance of these
days among the great body of the Church may be regretted,
but cannot be denied. For a long period they were
observed in all the public courts and proceedings of the
nation ; and, at all events, it was a fair experiment to be
made ; one of the experiments designed to resist the
sectarian tendency of the Puritans, who thought that no
man was religious before the coming of Calvin, and who
anathematized all except those in whom latent Calvinism
might at least be detected or supposed.
From the earliest period of the Church's history, Calen-
dars have existed ; they may be dated from the martyr-
* In pity for the laborious, the primitive Church established holi-
days ; by the multiplication of which the medieval Church erred ; by an
almost entire renunciation of them the error of Protestantism has been
still greater. It is a circumstance worthy of notice, that Plato regarded
the appointment of holidays as divine: deal <je olicrelpuvTtq to ru)r
avQpioiriov k-Ki-Kovov irztyvKoq yirog dvairavXai, re ah; oIq tGjv tt6) wv
iriiL,avTO rag ruif eoprwv a'/jot/3ct£ roig dsolg. — Leg. ii. 1.
310 LIVES OF THE
chap, dom of St. Polycarp in the year 168. We have them in
the Diptychs of the primitive Church. When the Dip-
tychs developed into the modem Calendar, we perceive
the Calendar to consist of a table in which are stated
days, and weeks, and months, with the fasts and festivals
of the Church.
The Jesuit Boucher, in his commentary on the Paschal
Calendars. Cycle, gives a Calendar which bears the date of a.d. 336-
This is, I believe, the earliest Calendar that has been
printed.* Another Calendar of the Church of Carthage,
bearing date a.d. 483, is to be found in Mabillon's
"Analecta." In our own Church the Calendar was
largely illustrated by the Venerable Bede, in the eighth
century. To this Calendar the names of saints were
added from time to time, at the option, it would appear,
at first, of the several diocesans, until the pope reserved
to himself the right of canonization. To the latter
circumstance we may attribute the fact, that for two
hundred years before the accession of Henry VIII.
the English Calendar had remained stationary. In the
year 1536, that king issued his injunctions to restrict
the number of holydays, a complaint having been made
that they had become so numerous as to encourage
idleness and interfere with business. It is said in the
proclamation, that scarcely sufficient men were left of the
agricultural population to gather in the harvest ; though
the real complainants were the merchants and men
of commerce. The injunction was issued in the king's
name, with the assent and consent of the prelates and
clergy assembled in Convocation. The alterations were
of a practical nature, and as few as was consistent with
the purposes of the injunction. The feasts which fell at
the harvest time or in term time, were discharged, so that
* Boucher's Commentary was published at Antwerp, a.i>. 1634.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 311
every man was at liberty, at his own discretion, to work
or refrain from working. To the state of things as they
existed in King Henry's reign, Parker and the queen parked
desired to restore the Calendar. 1559-75.
In considering the names of saints to be retained in the
Calendar, and whom to omit, Archbishop Parker did not
possess the assistance from books which a modern scholar
can command. The " Acta Sanctorum" were not as yet in
existence, and there was no Bollandist to consult. Be-
tween the death of Parker and the birth of John von
Bolland, more than twenty years were to elapse. Even
the very learned precursor of his yet more learned labours,
Herbert Eosweyd, was only two years old when Arch-
bishop Parker breathed his last. Parker had before him,
it is true, the hagiologies of Surius and Lippomanni, but
so full of errors were these volumes, that a portion of the
labours of the lenient Bollandists consisted in the correc-
tion of their fables.*
The conjecture that the adoption of a corrected Calen-
dar was the first object with the archbishop and the
queen, and that in establishing it they did not think it
expedient to provoke opposition more than was necessary,
is confirmed by the injunction given to the Commissioners,
* It is said of Bollandus, that he laboured on the Acta Sanctorum
for thirty-four years ; and to the same work fifty-five years were
devoted by Daniel Papebrock. The work, which is not yet completed,
must be regarded among the wonders of literature. It is of course of
unequal merit. We have occasionally to pass from an instructor, at
whose feet the highest intellect would be proud to sit, to marvel at the
absurdities of a writer inferior as a critic and offensive in his credulous
superstition. The names of the distinguished men who began the work
are to be found in the following lines —
Quod Rosweydus prepararat,
Quod Bollandus inchoarat,
Quod Henscheinus formarat,
Periecit Papebrochius.
312 lives of thi:
chap, to proceed with as little noise as possible. The
■ — r — • missioners did not venture to insert in the English Prayer
Parked Book all the names that appeared in the Latin version.
1559-75. The moderation of the English reformers was shown
in this transaction. No one was compelled to observe
the Black Letter days ; although for those who find
pleasure in celebrating the triumphs of grace over fallen
human nature, the Calendar was convenient as a table of
reference ; and if they were accused of superstition for
doing in the church what many do in private families,
when they have days set apart to commemorate great
blessings, or to humble themselves for deep domestic
sorrow, the archbishop might quote the authority of
Scripture : " One esteemeth one day above another,
.another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be
fully persuaded in his own mind."
Lay help. While thus acting on his own authority, assisted by
the powers of the crown, in matters that he did not think
it expedient to bring before Convocation, the archbishop
was, at the same time, preparing subjects for the discussion
of the synod. It will be remembered that, in order to meet
the exigencies of the Church, when candidates for orders
were few, or when those who aspired to the clerical
offices proved upon examination to be incompetent to
discharge the duties pertaining thereto, the archbishop
had instituted an order of lectors, readers, or lay helpers.*
Their duties were clearly defined ; and while they were
excluded, of course, from the discharge of sacerdotal
functions, or the ministration of the Sacraments, while
they were not even permitted to preach, they were re-
quired to read certain Homilies to the people, and com-
plaint was made that the Homilies were so few that
* Strype, Annals, I. i. 315.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 3L3
repetition of them, in many cases, became wearisome, chap.
To provide fresh Homilies would thus become the • — ^ — -
business of the next Convocation. Parker.
Twelve Homilies had been published by authority in 1559-75.
1547, and, with the exception of the five years of Queen Homilies.
Mary's reign, had been very generally used, not only by
the lay helpers, but also by the non-preaching clergy.
They were composed upon a principle, which, from
the time when he first began to give his mind- to
theological studies, had commended itself to the judg-
ment of Archbishop Parker. In the Homilies the
old Catholic doctrines were maintained, and they are
stated with a fullness which surprised those who, a few
years since, found them circulated and quoted as authori-
tative by the Puritans of the present age. They must
have been circulated by many who had not taken the
trouble to peruse them, but were carried away by a re-
ference to a few passages which savour of Protestantism.
For instance, in the Homilies we find maintained the
great doctrine of justification by faith only ; a doctrine
which, true in one sense, is not inconsistent with the
doctrine of justification by works, which is true in another
sense. The object of those who hold the doctrine of
justification by faith is to induce men to rely for salvation
from first to last on the merits of the Saviour ; and on
this account it was received by Cardinal Pole, and by
some others as resolute as he was in maintaining the
papal hierarchy, until they were deprived of their liberty
of thought in that direction by the Council of Trent.
The leading members of that synod discovered what had
previously been maintained by Luther, viz., that, where the
doctrine of justification by faith is held, there no place
can be found for works of supererogation, with the re-
nunciation of which tenet almost all that is objectionable
in Neo-Bomanism falls to the ground.
314 LIVES OF THE
chap. The writers of the Homilies held the doctrine of justfc
> — -^ — . fication by faith only, but they also held, as consisted
Parker, with this dogma, a belief in the authoritative teaching
1559-75. and sacred tradition of the primitive Church, regarded nol
tothe n°e as co-ordinate in authority with the holy Scripture, but
Pal hers by explanatory of the same. In the Homilies we find en-
the writers x J
of the # forced a deference to the first four general councils
and the sacramental character of several ordinance*
of the Church, besides baptism and the Holy Eucharist.
The actual title of a Sacrament, for example, is given to
Matrimony, but then, it is to be remembered, that this was
done by persons who made a broad distinction between
all other means of grace, and the two distinguishing or-
dinances of the Catholic Church — Baptism, and the Supper
of the Lord. The two ordinances last named are not only
means of grace ; they are means of the special grace of
uniting the souls of the faithful to the Eedeemer.* The
Homilies teach regeneration in holy baptism, the Eeal
Presence in the Eucharist, and the inspiration of the
Apocrypha, though in a sense, of course, different
from that in which the term inspiration is applied
to the canonical Scriptures. This was all in accord-
ance with the views of Archbishop Parker, whose
principles were embodied in the decree De Concio-
natoribus, passed in the Convocation of 1571. This
canon contains rules for the guidance of all preachers of
the Church of England. The words are as follows : —
* The Reformers refused generally the title of Sacraments to many
important ordinances, because they were jealous of the dignity of
Baptism and the Supper of the Lord : a modern Puritan would denounce,
in words of flame, any one who should speak of seven Sacraments;
but one can scarcely guess why. They do not regard Baptism and the
Lord's Supper as special means of grace, or means of grace at all.
The dispute about the number of the Sacraments is mere logomachy,
and therefore a sin.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 315
In the first place, they [the preachers] shall see that chap.
Ley never teach anything for a discourse which they -_ — r — •
wish to be religiously held and believed by the people, parked
but what is agreeable to the doctrine of the Old and 1559-75.
New Testament, and what the Catholic fathers and
Indent bishops have collected out of that same doctrine."
t has been suggested, that if there be one feature
iroughout the whole of the Homilies more remarkable
ban another, it is the exhibition of a principle of defer-
nce to the ancient Church. In a moderate-sized volume,
the archbishop found the names of Anselm, Athanasius,
Arnobius, Augustine, Basil, Bede, Bernard, Chrysostom,
Clemens, Cyprian, Cyril, Epiphanius, Eusebius, Fulgentius,
Gregory, Hilary, Ignatius, Ireneeus, Jerome, Isidore,
Justin, Lactantius, Origen, Optatus,Theophylact,Tertullian,
and others whom I have passed over for want of space.
That the writers must have been well versed in patristic
learning we shall be the more easily persuaded, when we
add, that these were not mere partial allusions to the old '
writers, but sometimes they were citations from their
works. There are enumerated, indeed, not fewer than forty
citations from the works of St. Augustine ; and the fathers
thus quoted are spoken of in terms of profound respect ;
such as, " The great clerk and godly preacher ; " " the
learned and godly doctors ; " " the holy fathers and
doctors ; " " you see that the authority both of Scripture
and also of Augustine ; " " it is already proved both by
the authority of Scripture and by the authority of
Augustine ; " " ye have heard how earnestly both the
apostles, prophets, holy fathers, and doctors do exhort
us ; " " but before all things," it is said in one place where
there is reference to the Eucharist, " this we must be sure
of especially, that this supper be in such wise done and
ministered as our Lord and Saviour did and commanded
316 lives of Tin:
chap, to be done, as his apostles used it, and the good fathers
^V— - of the primitive Church frequented it."
Parker. Parker desired to be regarded as both Protestant and
1559-75. Catholic, for he regarded the title of Protestant as being
opposed, not to Catholicism, but to Eomanism. Opp<
to papists such as Bonner, Sanders, and Allen, he took
his place among the Anglo-Catholics, and with them he
endeavoured to conciliate the reformers on either side,
and to form a great Protestant school. He was glad to
bring into combined action, the " new learning " and " the
old ; " and he was well pleased in the Homily of Matri-
mony to point to half of it as the work of St. Chry-
sostom, and to the other half as that of Veit Dietrich
of Nuremburg. He was always very careful also to
avoid any approach to the sectarian system, or to attach
importance to the ipse dixit of the theological hero of the
day whoever he might be. He desired to have the
Homilies regarded simply as lessons for the accuracy of
which individuals were responsible ; while by himself and
his synod they were pronounced to be, on the whole,
satisfactory productions peculiarly suited to the exigency
of the times. In studying them we are never to forget that
the Homilies now published were designed, not to make
known what Luther opined or Calvin asserted, but simply
to inform the people what the Church has received from
our ancestors, and would hand on to posterity.
The Homilies were accepted by Convocation ; and the
archbishop, as it may be seen in his correspondence, was
particularly anxious for their immediate circulation. For
that very reason, perhaps, he found an unaccountable
obstacle at court. The queen, in spite of the urgency of
the primate and of Cecil, delayed her sanction of the
publication, instigated by Eobert Dudley, afterwards Earl
of Leicester, the bitter enemy of the archbishop.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 317
ithough one of the basest of mankind, Leicester was the
lider and abettor of the Puritans, being united to them
>y a common object of hatred — the Church : they, under p^ker. :
Le influence of pious though mistaken principles ; he, be- 1559-75.
mse he hoped, through their means, to obtain a further
Lare of the plundered Establishment.*
We may here mention another important work to New
J version of
which the archbishop began now to turn his mind, Scripture
although he did not complete his undertaking for several projec
years afterwards. The grand idea of an authorized ver-
sion of Scripture began to dawn in his mind, and at last
he came to the conclusion that, if the teaching of the
Church was to become what it professed to be — scrip-
tural, such a version would be absolutely necessary. His
principle was to state what the Church had received ;
to place the Bible in the hands of the children of the
Church ; and then to call upon them, if doubts were
raised against the Church's teaching by Puritans, Ana-
baptists, or others, to search the Scriptures, like the
good Bereans of old, to see whether these things were so.
Of the several versions of Scripture which had sue- ^.eva
r Bible.
ceeded each other, through the zeal of party, commercial
speculation, or the piety of individuals, since the middle
of King Henry's reign, we have had occasion already
to speak. They were all of them meritorious ; and, con-
sidering the disadvantageous circumstances under which
the translations had been made, they are very remarkable
works. But their defects were also great, and these
defects became the more apparent as men advanced in
the critical study of the original Scriptures.
In the reign of Edward VI., " the Great Bible " was, mi „
0 7 The Great
Bible.
* When this remark is made, we must acquit the Puritans of blame, 1539-40.
and remember that when he died, Leicester was probably not regarded
as more profligate than others in the Court.
318 LIVES OF T1IH
(ii \ p. to all intents and purposes, the authorized version, for
^ . was ordered that with this Bible every church should
Parker, supplied.
1559-75. Although opinions are divided on the merits of t
translation, the majority, perhaps, of impartial critics,
competent to form a judgment on the subject, will
admit that it was an improvement upon its prcdeo
sors. It was published in 1539, and although it is
quently called " Cranmer's Bible," there is no eviden
to show that Cranmer had any share in its preparatio
and his vacillating mind was not always consulted by t
unscrupulous minister of Henry VIII.*
It was a speculation of Crumwell's, and would pr<
bably have been called " Crumwell's Bible," if that mi
ister's death had not followed almost immediately upo
its publication; when, to mention his name was almos
tantamount, in the royal ear, to the utterance of treaso
Cranmer, however, made it his own, in one sense, b
prefixing some prologues, or, as we should call them
prefaces to it, and causing a re-issue to take place in 1540
Although we are not among those who would ui
duly depreciate this meritorious work, yet it cannot t
denied, that it had many and great defects. Among i
faults may be reckoned too great a deference to th
Vulgate, from which, rather than from the original Scri
tures, the version was made. It may have appeared
the writers that more authority attached to a versio
which had been accepted by all the European Churche
than could be claimed for any translation for which on]
two or three learned men were responsible ; but it ws
forgotten, that of the Vulgate itself no critical edition ha
as yet been published ; that it had not been revised,
* Westcott, p. 100. It was called " The Great Bible " from its
large folio.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 319
and that undetected errors had been for ages creeping chap.
into it — a fact tacitly admitted by the Council of Trent. ,- — -
When, on the accession of Mary, some of the most parked
learned of our divines, in distrust of their courage to .1559-75.
endure the fiery trial prepared for them, fled the country,
some there were, especially after the troubles at Frank-
fort, who made Geneva their home. Being possessed of
leisure for study, they determined to devote their time to
a new and more complete translation of the sacred
Scriptures into the English language.
Their residence in Geneva was advantageous to them,
as it introduced them to some of the most erudite scholars
of the age ; but the advantage was counterbalanced by
their being brought into subjection to the master mind of
John Calvin ; and by their embracing, through him, the
most narrow and sectarian system of theology that has
ever involved the world in the most bitter controversies
and the most angry disputes.
The refugees at Geneva and Zurich possessed in
Calvin and Beza assistants whose scholarship was, in
that age, unsurpassed, and whose minds were occupied
in similar pursuits ; for a critical revision of the French
and Italian versions was now engaging their attention.
Our countrymen became also acquainted with Eobert
Stephens, the celebrated printer, to whom, more than to
any other contemporary, the biblical student was indebted.
They were brought into intimacy with John Calvin
through William Whittingham, who had married his
sister. The brother-in-law of Calvin, though narrow-
minded and bigoted, was nevertheless a man of mark.
Of a good family, he had been educated at Oxford, and
had visited, for the purposes of study, several of the con-
tinental universities. He took an active part in the new
version of the Scriptures, and when Whittingham's New
390 LIVES OF THE
CHAP. Testament appeared in 1 557, it was received not onl
* — - with the applause of Puritans animated by party spirit,
PtokerT ^)llt with the grateful approbation of others, to whom a
1559-75. scholarly translation in a portable volume was of unspeak-
able value. The New Testament was followed by a
version of the whole of the Old Testament ; which,
however, did not make its appearance until the year 1560.
The New Testament, translated by Whittingham, formed
part of the Geneva Bible; and the better part, since it
is evident, that the same amount of industry was not
bestowed upon the Old Testament as had rendered the
translation of the New Testament so superior as to elicit
the praise of all parties competent to form a judgment on
the subject.
The intrinsic merits of the edition now published were
great. It was printed as a small quarto volume ; in
Eoman type, not, as the other editions, in black-letter ;
and it was divided, not only into chapters, but also into
verses. Preceding versions bad been printed much after the
manner of our modern paragraph Bibles. Frequent maps
and tables were added, and whatever could assist or
interest the ordinary reader.*
I have given an account of this Bible, because its merits
* Our chapter divisions date from the 12th century. The division
by verses was introduced in a margin of the Greek Testament by the
learned printer Stephens, in the year 1551. Our great authority for
our English versions of Scripture, and indeed for all that pertains to
the publication of the sacred volume, is Canon Westcott. He refers to
and corrects Anderson, whose learned work is ill arranged ; and he gives
just praise to the interesting historical account prefixed to Bagster's
Hexapla, which, though requiring revision, is unduly depreciated by
Anderson. Canon Westcott raises an indignant protest against such
party writers as Mr. Hallam and his followers, whom he accuses of
" misrepresenting every significant feature in an important episode of
literary history." See also Cotton's List of Bibles ; Lewis's History
of Translations, pp. 257-308 ; Neal's Puritans, i. 110 ; Collier, vi. 41 i.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. o21
were so conspicuous and its faults so occult that, when chap.
first it appeared, it received the sanction of the arch- * — '<- — »
bishop for its circulation, and the patronage of the queen, parked
It was published by subscription, but the greater part of * 559-75.
the expense was incurred by John Bodley, the father .of
that distinguished man, by whom, as the founder of the
Bodleian Library, the name is immortalized.
Bodley advanced his money chiefly as a commercial
speculation, or certainly as a good speculation he turned
it to account on the accession of Queen Elizabeth. In
1560, he obtained a special licence for the sole printing
of the Geneva Bible, and the monopoly was to continue
for seven years, dating from the 8th of January, 1560.
In the year 1565, he obtained a renewal of the mo-
nopoly, against the opinion of the queen and Cecil, but
at the solicitation of Parker, who united with the Bishop
of London in recommending the licence for which Bodley
petitioned.
It is difficult to understand Parker's object in thus
uniting with the Puritan party, unless it was to court
popularity and to disarm hostility against a Church
version which he was already projecting, and in which
he had made some advance. That version would not
have been undertaken if Parker had been satisfied
with the Genevan version ; but it is evident, that when he
subjected that work to a critical examination, he found
more cause to be discontented with it. It is sometimes
said, that the Calvinism in the notes to the Geneva Bible
is mild ; but this must be said by those who have never
examined the book. Neal, a friendly critic and historian,
informs us, that a dedication and epistle to the reader, which
appeared in the first edition, were afterwards omitted.
Parker was often culpably easy in extending his patronage
to literary works without examining them, and this may
vok ix, y
322 lives of tin:
ciiap. account for the appearance of the dedication and epist]
. — V — • iu the iirst edition, while the omission of these prefaces in
Park*, subsequent editions is their condemnation. Neal honestly
i559-7/>. admits, that they were withdrawn "because they touched
somewhat severely upon certain ceremonies retained in
the Church of England, which they excited her majesty
to remove, as having a popish aspect; and because the
translators had published notes which were thought to
affect the queen's prerogative." In the note on Revela-
tion ix. 3 — that we may show the animus of the men
— we remark that : " The locusts that come out of the
smoke are said to be like subtle prelates, with monks,
friars, cardinals, patriarchs, archbishops, bishops," &c*
The queen and Cecil may have continued the mono-
poly of John Bodley ; but this fact is doubtful, while it is
certain, that during the period of Parker's episcopate the
sale of the Geneva Bible decreased, reviving immediately
on Grindal's translation from the see of York to be his
successor.
Bishops' We need not pursue this subject further. What was
1563-68. the opinion of Parker and of the English reformers on
the character of the Geneva Bible, and the mischievous
tendency of its notes, is sufficiently proved by the zeal with
which the archbishop engaged upon a translation, designed
to be an authorized version to be used in every church.
• See Anderson's Annals, ii. 524. Strype, i. 413. Neal, i. 110.
Neal explicitly asserts that the petition for a removal of the monopoly
in 1563 was refused, and the impression stopped till after the death of
Archbishop Parker. Cardwell, in his Documentary Annals, ii. 31,
adds, that King James perused the Geneva Bible, and pronounced it
to be " very partial, untrue, seditious, and savouring too much of
dangerous and traitorous conceits." See also Cotton's List of Bible*,
Lewis's Hist, of Translations, p. 257. Strype's Whitgift, ii. 28.
Barton's Conference, p. 43. Newcome's Hist, of Translations, p.
Todd's Vindic. App. No. 3. Wood's Ann. ii. 313,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 323
His Bible was to embody the improvements of the Genevan chap.
translation, to represent the advanced state of biblical
literature, and to avoid that spirit of party which he re- v&Aw.
fused at all times to patronize. 1559-75.
In referring to this subject I have rather anticipated the
history of events, because it appears to be convenient to
place the whole subject before the reader from one point
of view. We do, indeed, only remark very slightly, if at all,
upon the fourteen translators ; for, although the Bishops'
Bible was not commenced before the year 1563, while
more than four years were required for its completion,
Parker was employed during the preceding years in col-
lecting materials for the work, and making his selection
of men.
It is indeed creditable to the government, and to
Parker as its ecclesiastical adviser, that in looking out
for learned men to co-operate with him in this important
undertaking, his selection of coadjutors was made largely
from the episcopal bench. The fact of their being
chosen when scholarship was the sole or the prominent
qualification, is a proof that the ecclesiastical appointments
were made, not at the solicitation of private interest —
though this was sometimes the case — but from a regard
to the learning and piety of the persons preferred. This
conduct is the more praiseworthy, when we observe
that, if the ecclesiastics chosen were not active in their
opposition to the measures of the queen and the primate,
there were many among them who gave but a cold sup-
port to their superiors, and who did not hesitate to make
it known, that while they obeyed, there were many points
on which they could have wished that obedience should
not be required.
The archbishop assigned certain sections or u parcels " Parker's
of the sacred volume to be perused by certain scholars Jj!
y2
selection
trans-
lators.
i:>r>9 7">.
124 LIVES OF tiii:
chap, selected by himself : they were to collate the various trans-
— r- — - lations already made, to correct them, and where need
"park^r might be, to supersede them by a new translation. He
endeavoured to engage Cecil in the work, and though he
did not succeed, the fact of this proposal proves two things,
— that Cecil retained, amidst the turmoils of office, fhe
scholarship for which lie had been distinguished at Cam-
bridge ; and that Parker did not reject, but rather sought,
without being able to obtain, the assistance of laymen.
The archbishop was to act as editor of the whole volume,
each translator submitting his labours to the supervisioi
and correction of the primate. Parker acted on a prin-
ciple which he adopted on other occasions : although he
caused the initials or other private mark to be affixed to
the work of each of the translators, he did not permit it to
be generally known who the translators were ; his desire
being, that the translation should be regarded as the work
of the Church, not as that of a few learned men, acting
independently and without rule. The editorial duties
being assumed by the primate, and synodal sanction being
obtained for the volume when completed, he was justi-
fied in thus crediting the work to the Church ; and what
the Church in one age sanctioned, the Church in another
age might correct. The one great object of Parker was
to avoid Sectarianism, which stereotypes its doctrines and
renders improvement impossible. The archbishop laid
down certain regulations or rules to be observed by the
translators. They were to follow the Great Bible, and to
make alterations only when there was a manifest devia-
tion from the Greek or Hebrew original. With an
evident allusion to the Geneva Bible, the English trans-
lators were warned " to make no use of bitter notes
upon any text, or yet to set down any determination
in places of controversy." Chapters and places "con^
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 325
taining matter of genealogies, or other such places not chap.
edifying," were to be noted with some mark that the > — -,— >
reader might eschew them in his public reading. Parker.
Words which in the old translation " sounded to any 1559-75.
offence of lightness or obscenity, were to be expressed in
more convenient terms and phrases." The archbishop
found an able coadjutor in the Bishop of Ely, Dr. Cox,
who urged the avoidance as much as possible of " ink-
horn terms," and an adherence " to such usual words as
in English people are acquainted with, so far forth as the
Hebrew could bear it."
Besides his duties as general editor, the archbishop
himself undertook the translation of the Books of Genesis
and Exodus in the Old Testament, and in the New, of St.
Matthew and St. Mark, with the Epistles of St. Paul, ex-
cepting the Epistle to the Eomans and the First to the
Corinthians. "The Sun of the Scriptures and the Tables
of Christ's Line," the Preface to the Psalter, the Preface
to the whole Bible, and the Preface to the New Testament
were also attributed to Parker.
The Bishops' Bible was published in 1568, in a magni-
ficent volume, printed by J. Jugge, cum privilegio regice
majestatis. Canon Westcott remarks on the favourable
contrast it affords when compared with other versions,
including the Genevan version, to the effect that no
words of flattery, such as disfigure and disgrace the
Calvinistic version, can be found in the Bishops' version.
It is even without a dedication.
Notwithstanding the manoeuvres of the Calvinists, and
the influence of their patron, the profligate Leicester,* when
* Leicester evidently used his influence with the queen to delay
her acceptance of the volume. It was signified at last through the
Canons of the Church, which could have had no legal effect unless
they had been authorized by the crown.
326 lives or Tin;
CJUP, the, Bishops' Bible bad fair play, it was so well received
— -v — ' that it superseded, to a considerable extent, the Geneva
Matthew -p.., . m r . . . . _ _ . _
Parker. Jbiblc. lo tins great work justice was not done during the
1569-75. primacy of Grindal ; but, even in spite of difficulties, it
became the basis of that authorized version which is
now upheld by the very Calvinists by whom it was at
first opposed. It was enjoined that each cathedral should
have a copy, and the same provision was extended, " so
far as it could conveniently be done," to all parochial
churches ; but not only this, it was ordered, moreover,
"that every archbishop and bishop should have at his
house a copy, to be placed in the hall or large dining-room,
that it might be useful to their servants or to strangers."
The assertions of Calvinists in favour of the Geneva
Bible have been, and still are, very often taken for granted,
even by those to whom Calvin is not a hero deserving
worship. It is said, and most probably with truth, that
the Greek scholarship was superior to the Hebrew ; but,
as regards the New Testament, the translators were
evidently up to the scholarship of the age ; and, indeed,
if they were indebted to the Genevan translators, they
certainly were not more so than they were to every other
translator. So far from deferring on all points to the
Swiss interpreters or translators, our divines called in the
assistance of Chatillon, or, as he called himself, Castalio,
avIio had been attacked by Beza with all the intolerant
vehemence which is characteristic of his age and party.
The tendency of the age, from which the Church of
Borne did not itself escape,* was to sectarianize Churches ;
or to create sects by providing each with a compact sys-
tem of doctrine reasoned out into minute detail. By its
* This may be seen in some of the definitions of the Council
Trent, and especially in the catechism of Pope Pius.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 327
" Confession," as such a document was technically called, chap.
each sect was to be distinguished from every other com- > V -
m unity of Christians * The human mind is, from its very parked
constitution, logical, and men are led into error not so 10.39-7.3.
much by conclusions wrongly drawn, but by premises sjo"seof
accepted without examination. Hence a love of system faith-
sectarianizes the mind ; and we are not surprised to hear
that a demand was soon raised In England for the adoption
of one, or other of the continental Confessions, or else for
the creation of a national Confession, to form the pecu-
liarity of the English Church, thus narrowed to a sect.
With these demands, some of the earlier reformers, such as
Cranmer, sympathized ; but by the marvellous and special
Providence of God, which has ever watched over the Eng-
lish Church, they found difficulties in the way which they
were unable to surmount. The whole tendency of Parker's
mind and of his system of theology ran in the opposite di-
rection ; and to his prudence we are indebted for an escape
from what would have constituted us a sect, and have
prevented for ever our union with other branches of the
Catholic Church.
But Parker had soon to encounter a practical difli- ^tateof
culty ; a difficulty wiiich seems to have been overlooked country,
by the learned divines who have treated on the Thirty-
nine Articles, but which must materially influence our
judgment of that formulary. The difficulty arose from
* If a Lutheran rejects the Lutheran Confession of Faith, or the
Calvinist the Calvinistic system, the first ceases to be a Lutheran and
the second a Calvinist. The difference between these Confessions and
the Thirty-nine Articles is apparent at once to those who pay attention
to the subject. If Convocation were to reject the Thirty-nine Articles
to-morrow, the Church of England would remain, as it has always
been, a living body, having in that character as much right to reject
the Thirty-nine Articles in the nineteenth celittiry as it had to enforce
them in the sixteenth.
328 LIVES OF THE
chap. the condition of the country, and of that condition w<
._ x- , have Parker's own statement. In a long letter addressed
r-irko^ S*r Nicholas Bacon, in March, 1558-9, from which quots
ioo9-7r>. tions have been already made, the archbishop, after hav-
ing denounced, in unqualified terms, John Knox * and his
mischievous political pamphlets, proceeds thus : " They
say the realm is full of Anabaptists, Arians, Libertines,
Free-will Men, &c., against whom only 1 thought ministers
should be needed to fight in unity of doctrine. As to the
Eomish adversaries, their mouths may be stopped with
their books and confessions of late days." The arch-
bishop received a letter from the queen to the same pur-
pose. The queen's majesty complains of an influx of
foreigners into England, " some of whom," she said,
" were infected with dangerous opinions, contrary to the
faith of Christ's Church."
While the Protestants and the whole reforming party
were thus divided ; the controversy became the more
acrimonious by the extreme and uncharitable violence
with which all these parties, however differing from one
another, united in their vituperation of whatsoever they
designated as popery.
No wonder that complaint was, under these circum-
stances, made of a diversity of teaching on the part of the
* Parker alludes particularly to " The first Blast of the Trumpet
against the monstrous Regimen of Women. By John Knox." This
is described by Hardwick as " a savage treatise." Of John Knox,
Archbishop Parker and the English reformers had a just abhorrence.
In writing to Cecil in November, 1559, Parker prays that God may
preserve the Church from such a visitation as Knox. — Correspondence^
p. 105. Randolph, in a letter to Cecil, quoted by Nares, says of the
Calvinistic preachers in Scotland, " they are as wilful as they are
unlearned." Of John Knox he said, " He is more vehement than
decent or learned. On Sunday last he gave the cross and the candle
such a wipe, that those as learned and wise as himself wished him to
have held his peace."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. o20
preachers ; nor are we surprised that in consequence chap.
of this complaint, it was considered necessary, not indeed — -^ — -
to devise a scheme of theology, but to take measures to VLrkerT
create an agreement upon certain of the more prominent 1559-75.
points of controversy, among those wThose business it was
to instruct a people whose ignorance was, taking the
mass of them, profound. On this ground the articles
had been drawn up at the episcopal " assessus ;" and
Parker could not resist a demand for an increase in the
number of articles, and for the submission of them, when
they rose to the importance of a formulary, to the judg-
ment of Convocation.
This was the origin of the far-famed Thirty-nine Arti- Thirty-
cles. Parker clearly understood the nature of the task Articles,
which devolved upon him. He was not to draw up a
new scheme of doctrine. It had been already ruled that,
in the Church of England, the preachers were to accept
the tradition of the Church and to carry it on, except
when synods, on comparing the tradition with holy
Scripture — the fallible tradition with the infallible Word
of God — had found the tradition to be at fault. Amid
the entangled web of human controversy Parker had to
point out what, in their teaching, the preachers were to
avoid ; or if there was recourse, in any instance, to dogma,
it was simply because it was only by a statement of fact,
that the nature of a controversy could be debated. Cer-
tain things the English clergy were not to teach, because,
upon those particular points the Church of England had
spoken authoritatively ; beyond this there was liberty.
They were not to inquire what Luther or Calvin opined,
but what the Church in all ages had taught, and what
the English Church in her late synods, held under the
authority of the sovereign, had decreed.
That the Thirty-nine Articles were intended to bd
330 LIVES Of Tin.
chap, articles of peace is an assertion which cannot be si
^ . stantiated by history. There was no immediate attempt
plrfcer!* t0 f°rce men to concur in opinion ; this Parker knew to
ioo9-75. be an impossibility; the desire was, to prevent them from
disputing in public, by showing that on certain contro
verted points, the Church, in synod, had given judgment ;
and men were called to act modestly by ''hearing th
Church." That the Thirty-nine Articles, as drawn up b
Parker, were controversial articles we may admit — we
may even contend ; but, as we have shown, the contro-
versy was not directed against the Catholic party, as i
sometimes supposed. The Catholics were in possession o
most of the churches ; the Eomanists, using the word in
its strict sense, had already left the Church — that is,
those who insisted upon the papal supremacy had quit tec
their preferments and had gone abroad ; a large party.
the vast majority of the clergy, remained in the English
Church, reprobating popery, but retaining a love for
medieval practices if not always for medieval doctrine ;
and among those there were some who were willing to
abjure allegiance to the pope, but who could not mak
up their minds to take the oath of royal supremacy, as
tendered by the government. This large body of both
clergy and laity, Cecil, as a statesman, had no wish to
offend ; the queen had an abhorrence of Calvin and th
Calvinistic tenets ; and the archbishop himself wras ac
cused, and he admitted to a certain extent the justice o
the charge, that he treated this body of men with leniency;
he declined, when they conducted themselves peaceably,
to press upon them the oath of supremacy. Add to
this what has been before affirmed, that all politica
parties were at this time afraid, not of the Catholics, but
of the ultra-Protestants, and it will be admitted, that
when modern controversialists would assume an exclusiv
y
!
!
I
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 33l
Protestant character for the Thirty-nine Articles, they chap.
speak from conjecture, not from history. So far from * — -r — »
denying that they arc opposed to much which is now Parker,
called Kornanism, the historian must affirm it ; but his 1559-75.
affirmation must be equally strong, that they are in the
same degree opposed to much which in these days would
be regarded as Protestantism.
The Articles will never be clearly understood unless
their strictly controversial character, as well as their posi-
tion in combating the two extremes, be fully admitted.
They are sometimes censured as containing an imperfect
statement of doctrine : this criticism, however, vanishes
when, on an appeal to history, it is found, that no general
statement of doctrine was intended ; and that a state-
ment on certain controverted points of theology or reli-
gious practice then in vogue was all that was intended,
as, indeed, it is all that we find. To the careless reader
it may appear that this statement is contradicted by the
first five Articles'; but upon examination it will be found,
that they had a controversial aspect, and stand opposed,
not to Pomanism, much less to Catholicism, but to ultra-
Protestantism. The Xicene doctrine, so clearly stated in
the Articles, was accepted by Catholics of every shade of
opinion, whether ^l?z(//c>-Catholics or Roman Catholics ;
they were, when not opposed, only partially accepted
by ultra-Protestants, of whom the queen and states-
men who now imposed the Articles had a just abhor-
rence— the Anabaptists, the Arians, the Libertines, and
" Unitarians" of every form ; and to these perhaps the
learned reader will add the Calvinists, for although Calvin
accepted the doctrine of the Trinity, he did not receive
the Nicene definition of that divine truth — the definition
adopted in the Articles*
332 LIVES OF THE
chap. As against the Romanists* the 22nd Article is regarded
— V — ' as specially pointed; but without any desire to defenc
Kirker.W their cause, wc must not forget, that the medievalists who
e
■
still composed the Church, did not think that it of
necessity concerned them. Purgatory, pardons, images,
relics, and the invocation of saints were held by the
Romanists of the day; but the conforming Catholic.
maintained that on most of these subjects there was
doctrine which was distinguishable from modern notion
prevalent in the Church of Borne, and which without
censure could be held and enforced. They argued,
that there was in the primitive Church a view of these
doctrines distinct from what was, at this period, held
by the Eomanists and opposed by Protestants. Now
the Church of England, it was argued, cannot condemn
the primitive Church, because to the Catholic fathers
and to the ancient bishops, as in the case of Jewel's
challenge, she makes her appeal against Eome. They
therefore continued their conformity as the government
desired ; and Archbishop Parker would not disturb them
if they conducted themselves like peaceable subjects, loyal
to Church and queen. The simple historical statement,
that this article did not drive them into nonconformity,
the extreme Eomanists having left them, establishes the
fact, that as conforming medievalists argue now, so they
argued in the sixteenth century. There were conforming
Catholics and there were conforming Puritans, and these
the government, with equal-handed justice, desired t
0
* The words Komanenses and Romanist.e were used by Luther and
Ulrich Von Hutten to designate the extreme party, — what we should
now call the Ultra-Montanes. So far back, says Archdeacon Hard-
wrick, p. 389, as the year 1520, Bishop Forbes remarks, in addition,
" Just so, in modern French, the expression parti romaniste is used for
the more prominent section of the Ultra-Montanes."
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 333
protect from persecuting papists on the one hand, and
from Puritans equally bitter in their persecution on the
other hand. **£
At the same time, while we admit that the Article just 1559-75.
mentioned, together with some others, was directed
against the extreme on the Catholic side, there are other
Articles, in which the medievalists were one with the
English reformers, and by which the ultra-Protestants
were even more pointedly condemned. Such are the
Articles on the three Creeds, on the Church, on the
Authority of the Church, on the Consecration of Bishops ;
to these we may add the 38th Article, - on that
Socialism which was confounded in many minds with
Protestantism, and the 39th Article, on a Christian
Man's Oath. No one can accuse contemporary Catho-
lics of error on these points ; and these Articles are, in
consequence, directed against the Protestants, by some
of whom the most lax opinions were at that time held.
The Articles on the Sacraments are, to the Catholic mind,
the least satisfactory. It is, however, to be remembered,
that they were drawn up before the definitions of the
Council of Trent were accepted by Eomanists; while on
no one subject was the Protestant world more divided.
To these Articles the extremes on either side would be
unwilling to give a full consent ; but certainly, if the
extreme on one side should contend that by them
Romanism is condemned, the extreme on the other side
could adduce proof of a designed condemnation of ultra-
Protestantism. One remarkable fact is often lost sight
of, namely — that in confining the term Sacrament — ex-
cept in the lax sense in which the term is applied in the
Homilies — to two only of the ordinances of the Gospel,
the object was not to depreciate the other means of
grace, but to elevate these two, If we were in these
I
•34 LTVES OP THE
chap, days to speak of seven Sacraments, we can easily imagine
: — ,. — - the fierceness with which we should be assailed, but it
Pa*w. would be very difficult to say why. Ultra-Protestants do
1459-Tfi. not discard Baptism and the Supper of the Lord, but
they do not admit them to be means of grace, more than
other ordinances — for example, preaching. Our reformers
on the contrary, held that by baptism we are united t
Christ, and that by the Holy Eucharist our union with Him
is continued. Other ordinances are means of grace — but
not of that special grace which makes these two generally
necessary to salvation. The English reformers, and
those who co-operated with Parker in drawing up the
Thirty-nine Articles, did not, like Zwingle and Calvin,
and other ultra-Protestants, regard these two Sacraments
only as "badges or tokens of Christian men's profession."
Using the word " sign " in the technical sense in which
it was understood by the universal Church, for the out-
ward part of any Sacrament, they directed the 27th
Article against the ultra-Protestants exclusively ; Baptism
being a sign of regeneration, or new birth, whereby, as
by an instrument, they that receive Baptism rightly are
grafted into the Body of Christ. In like manner, the
28th Article begins with an attack on the low view
adopted by ultra-Protestants, and proceeds to affirm that,
although Tran substantiation — a particular explanation of
the real presence of Him who has declared Himself
present whenever two or three are assembled in his
name — be rejected because it is repugnant to the plain
words of Scripture, yet if we rightly, worthily, and with
faith receive the outward and visible signs, the bread and
wine, we partake of the body and blood of Christ.
It is not intended here, however, to explain the Articles,
but simply to place before the reader the view taken by
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 335
Parker, and those who assisted him in drawing them. The chap.
archbishop realized his position. He was not the founder ^__^__
of a sect deciding upon a scheme of theology, by the ?*&**
acceptance of which his sect would be at all times dis- 1559-75.
tinguished; he was a Catholic metropolitan, keeping watch
and ward over the deposit he had received. He took
the Forty- two Articles for the bases of his proceedings,
and then was prepared to submit to Convocation a for-
mulary, the impartiality of which is proved by the fact,
that it has been claimed by both extremes, though be-
longing exclusively to the via media — that mean in
which truth is sure to be found. The Calvinists, at the
commencement of this century, claimed the Articles as
abetting them ; and now, at the close of the century,
the tables are turned, and a Scottish prelate has pub-
lished a learned treatise on the Articles, intended to show
that they are exclusively Catholic.
The archbishop, in preparing the Articles, invited the
co-operation of the Bishop of Ely, Dr. Cox, on whose
principles and good sense he could entirely rely ; of Dr.
Gheast, the Bishop of Eochester, a weak man, but easily
influenced by the archbishop; and of the Bishop of London,
Dr. Grindal, a man whom he loved for his many virtues,
and who, notwithstanding his Puritan proclivities, was not
a party man, although his ambition was a weakness, as
it consisted in a desire to please all parties.
The bases of the proceedings being the Latin Articles
of 1553, we refer with interest to a document preserved
in the far-famed library of Corpus Christi College, Cam-
bridge, an exact copy of which has been printed by Dr.
Lamb. In this document we find several alterations made
in Parker's handwriting, so far as the original is concerned,
while in the printed copy they are given to us in italics.
336 LIVES OK THE
CHAP. The archbishop added Wnw new Articles, and as many ii
•— •*- — ' number were omitted. In seventeen others, alteration
Matthew
Parker, were made to a greater or less extent. The Articles erase<
1W-75. were the 10th, Of Grace, and the 16th, Of Blasphemy
of the Holy Ghost; together with the 19th, Of the Ob-
ligation of all to observe the Principles of the Moral Law,
and the 41st, against the Millenarians. The four Articles
added were the 5th, Of the Holy Spirit ; the 12th, 0
Good Works ; the 29th, Of the Wicked which eat not th
Body of Christ in the use of the Lord's Supper ; and th
30th, Of both kinds.
In the 2nd Article the clause is introduced, " begotten
from everlasting of the Father, the very and eternal God."
This was an addition which the Catholics required, because
among the Protestants, as we have remarked before,
although the sects did not, in general, deny the doctrine
of the Trinity, there were some who demurred to the de-
finition, " Deus de Deo." Eegard here was had to the
error, not of Eomanists, but of ultra-Protestants. We
may further remark on the omission in the 3rd Article,
of our Lord's preaching to the spirits in prison. This
was omitted because, between the publishing of the Forty-
two Articles and the drawing up of the Thirty-nine,
almost all controversy on the subject had ceased. Surely
this not only proves the temporary nature of the Articles
in the design of the archbishop who drew them up and
of the Convocation which first adopted them, but it ought
also to be adduced as an example worthy of imitation
If the Articles were altered in the sixteenth century o
points upon which no controversy existed, — to require mei
to sign Articles in the nineteenth century, concerning whic
no controversy at present exists, is an inconsistency fro
which we may expect to be relieved. At a period when
many are oblivious of the distinction which exists
I
1559-75.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 337
tween the Catholic Church, on the one hand, and the chap.
Protestant sects and Komanism on the other ; at a period - ^' _
when we find ignorance prevailing on some of the funda- Matthew
mental verities of the Christian faith, we ought either to
have no Articles, or to have them entirely revised.*
The two Articles respecting the Old and New Testa-
ment were remodelled, and a list of the canonical
and apocryphal books was appended. In the 10th, Of
Freewill, the 9th and 10th of the preceding series of
Articles were united. The 11th, Of the Justification of
Man, and the 12th, Of Good Works, were enlarged ; to the
title of the 16th were added the words, " after Baptism."
From the 17th was withdrawn a clause which affirmed that
the divine decrees are unknown to us. In the 22nd, Of
Purgatory, the archbishop, with his usual caution, sub-
stituted the word Komish for that of Schoolmen. The
24th, Of Speaking in the Congregation in such a tongue
as the people understandeth, was drawn up in stronger
terms than before. The 25th, Of the Sacraments, was
so framed as to make the distinction clear between the
Sacraments and the Sacramentals, the ordinances which
unite to Christ, and the other means of grace* He ele*
vated the former without unduly depressing the latter.
In the 28th, alterations were made which have been
already noticed. f
* The treatises on the Thirty-nine Articles are numerous. The
historical student will study Lamb, Hardwick, Cardwell's Synodalia^
the Bishop of Ely, and the Bishop of Brechin. The learned reader
will refer to Strype ; but the student must be warned, that in what
relates to the Thirty-nine Articles, and Parker's concern with them$
Dr. Lamb shows him to have been inaccurate.
f It appears from the correspondence of our clergy with the foreign
reformers, that on the subject of the Eucharist there was known to
exist great differences of opinion among the divines of the Church of
England. See Zurich's Letters, ii. 125, 143. Dbrman, in his " Dis-
VOL. IX. Z
338 LIVES OF THE
Iii the 82nd, b clause was added by which Parker
availed himself of this opportunity to carry a point, upon
PatkheW t'H" cairPnS of which hia lnfart had long been fixed ; and
- .5u_7-i the legality of marriage on the part of bishops, priests,
and deacons was at length openly affirmed — made even
an article of faith. In the 34th, it was declared that
every particular and national Church hath authority to
ordain, cherish, or abolish ceremonies and rites of the
Church ; and the man is censured, whosoever by his
private judgment should openly break the traditions and
ceremonies of the Church. The titles of the Homilies
were given in the 35th, and this Article, as well as the
36th, Of Consecration of Bishops, was entirely recomposed.
In the 37th, Of the Civil Magistrates, in opposition to
proufe of Al. Novelles Reproofe," written" in 15G5, asserts that there
were great differences of opinion expressed in the synod of 15G2.
He affirms that, while some, like Edmund Gheast, Bishop of Rochester,
preached " The Real Presence," others, like Grindal, denied it.
Parker, he says, was suspected of being a Lutheran. Parker was not
narrow-minded, and he referred to things new as well as old in forming
his judgments — to the ancient fathers and to modern divines; but
among moderns he would have as little to do with the Swiss or Calvin-
istic party as possible. Like the English reformers who preceded
him, he consulted Lutheran, not Helvetian confessions; Lutherans deicr-
ring to, and Calvinists thinking scorn of, the traditions of the primitive
Church. The article on the Lord's Supper, as revised by Parker
and his associates, was especially distasteful to the " Swiss Party."
llumphrys and Sampson, writing to Bullinger in 15G6, complain that
the article which oppugned and took away the Real Presence in the
Eucharist in King Edward's Articles, was now so mutilated as to
express that doctrine. It was at the suggestion of Bishop Gheast, one
of Parker's coadjutors, that the paragraph was added, that the Body of
Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the Lord's Supper. He fully
admitted the fact in a letter to Cecil, lately discovered among the State
Papers, and quoted in pages 879-80 of this volume. Parker, who
was .charged with being at the head of a Lutherano-papistical ministry,
admits that there was material difference of opinion among the mem-
bers of the synod. ,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 339
'nox and other ultra-Protestants, the royal authority is chap.
asserted, and, so far as it pertains to things ecclesiastical, . — ; —
t . -, Matthew
explained. Parker.
The archbishop had prepared himself to submit several 1559-75.
other proposals for legislation to the synod. He pro-
posed, for instance, to make regulations with reference to
the apparel of the clergy, and to take more stringent Apparel 0
measures to prevent " the clashing of doctrine" which eeet&r
appeared in the sermons of some of the preachers. The
money payments made for a release from ecclesiastical Ecciesias-
censures he desired to see appropriated to " pious uses," censures.
and at the same time, that care should be taken for the
infliction of the punishment due to persons excommu- Excommu-
nicated. He intended to introduce a measure — carried mcatlon-
only within the last few years — for placing peculiars and Peculiars.
the sites of monasteries under episcopal superintendence ;
and that simony should be punished in the case of the simony,
presenter as well as in that of the presentee. Several
questions of minor importance suggested themselves to
Ids mind, such as related to dilapidations, to tenths, Diiapida-
and subsidies ; to the pensions to be paid to the reli- Pensions
gious, that is, to monks or nuns who had been driven, ^9**
& t ' religious.
or who had voluntarily retired, from the monasteries ;
and for the relief of the poorer clergy. Owing to
the difficulty of managing the Convocation, and the
opposition of the courtiers hostile to the Church, Parker
was unable to carry these wise measures ; but that we
are justified in speaking of them as wise, is apparent
from the fact, that several of these very measures
have been enacted in our days ; and by this delay in
their enactment, abuses haye been permitted to remain
in the Church, to the detriment of the institution, and to
the danger of public morality.
z 2
340 LIVES OF THE
CHAPTEE XI.
PARKER IN CONVOCATION.
Programme for the opening of Convocation drawn up by the Archbishop.
— Meeting of Convocation on 12th of January. — Sermon preached by
the Provost of Eton. — Dean Nowell prolocutor. — Defaulters pro-
nounced contumacious. — Meetings at the Chapter House of St. Paul's
and in Henry VII.'s Chapel. — Revolutionary measures of the minority.
— Bishop Sandys. — Alterations proposed in the Prayer Book. — Mino-
rity of thirty-three. — Dissenting tactics. — Church saved by Anglo-
Catholics. — Prolocutor accepted by the Primate. — Thirty-nine Arti-
cles accepted by the Northern Convocation as well as by that of Can-
terbury.— Clause in the 20th Article. — Nowell's Catechisms. — Cecil
and Parker opposed to Sectarianism. — Catechism formally received
but not adopted by the Synod. — Freedom of speech encouraged. —
Legislation prevented. — Unsatisfactory state of the Temporalities. —
Dissolution of Convocation. — Parker's description of the members.
— Lenient policy. — Clerical apparel. — Marriage with a deceased
wife's sister. — Convocation of 1571. — Subscription to the Articles. — •
Catholicism of the English Church. — Ancient Catholic canons still
the law of the Church of England. — Convocation of 1572. — Arch-
bishop's speech.
chap. Public processions and ceremonials of state were pecu-
liarly irksome to a man like Parker, whose tastes were
simple and whose health was infirm. Nevertheless he
Was aware, that he is no philosopher who does not attend
to little things ; and at a time when the courtiers were
endeavouring to bring the Church into contempt, he was
determined not to abate any part of the magnificence
which had hitherto marked the opening of Convocation
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 341
— an event regarded with an interest only second to that chap.
which was excited by the opening of parliament.* * — i_
The programme of the proceedings under which Con- p^kerT
vocation was to be opened was, if not drawn up by the 1559-75
archbishop, submitted to his inspection, and was by him ^cllnvo
carefully revised. Both the queen and the archbishop cation,
were careful to remind the people, that they had no 12, 1562.
intention to establish a Protestant sect in England ; and
that, although the old Catholic Church was to be re-
formed, it was, nevertheless, to remain the same old
Church, even as a man, when his face has been washed,
remains the same man he was before ; and therefore
Parker adhered strictly to ancient precedent. The Ee-
formation, however, required that some slight alterations
should be made in the programme. This was so skilfully
drawn out, that the Convocation is, to the present hour,
opened as nearly as possible according to the precedent
established by Parker, who did himself only modify, and
that very slightly, the forms which had been observed
in the medieval Church. Of our public ceremonials, the
opening of Convocation is the most striking, with the
exception only of the opening of parliament by the sove-
reign in person.
The Convocation was summoned to meet on the 12th
of January. It was on that day opened by Dr. Eobert
Weston, the archbishop's official of the Court of Canter-
* The registers of this Convocation were destroyed in the fire of
London, 1666. But a journal of the proceedings of the Upper House,
taken from certain extracts of the proceedings of Convocation from
1529 to 1562, was published by Bishop Gibson in his Synodus Angli-
cana in 1702. See also Strype's Annals, I. ii. 471 ; and Hardwick on
the Thirty-nine Articles, p. 133. Joyce, on English Synods, p. 554,
graces the outlines of the proceedings from the Acta in Superiore
Porno Convocatipnis, Anno 15G2, printed by Strype,
342
LIVES OF TIIK
CHAP.
XI.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-7o.
Procession
of the
arch-
bishop.
bury, iii virtue of a commission from the primate. Tli
commission issued by his grace to Dr. Weston, to Thomas
Yale, the archbishop's vice-general in spirituals ; to
Henry Jones, and to Valentine Dale, advocate of his
Court of Arches. The commission empowered them, or
some of them, to continue and prorogue the synod until
the next day, Wednesday, the 13th of January.
At eight o'clock in the morning of the 13th of January,
15G2-3, the Lord Archbishop entered his state barge,*
accompanied by the Lord Bishop of Lincoln ; and pass-
ing down the most splendid thoroughfare of London, he
landed at Paul's Wharf. Here his grace was met by the
advocates, proctors, and other officials of his court; and
they preceded him and the Bishop of Lincoln on foot to the
south door of St. Paul's Cathedral. At the south door,
the dean, the canons, and other ministers of the cathedral,
arrayed in their surplices, were in waiting, to escort his
grace to the vestry. In the vestry, the archbishop
found his suffragans in attendance ; and having assumed
the archiepiscopal vestments, he took his place in a
procession formed by his suffragans, all of whom were
arrayed in their convocation robes. They were pre-
ceded by the cathedral clergy in their surplices. f The
bishop of the diocese, of course, occupied the throne :
the dean's stall was appropriated to the archbishop ; his
* I take the account chiefly from the Acta in Superiore Domo
Convocations incepta? Anno 1562, as printed in the Synodus Angli-
cann. The archbishop's progress is described, and he is represented
as " solvens in naviculu sua vulgo nuncupata a Barge ad ripam vocatam
Paul's Wharf."
j- The frequent reference to the robes of the bishops and the other
clergy was occasioned by the " vestment controversy," then beginning.
The account drawn up, probably under Parker's inspection, might be
useful in showing, that conformity in this respect was expected on the
part of all who accepted the episcopal office.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 843
suffragans being placed, on either side, in the stalls of
the prebendaries. The ministers of the church, the
priest vicars and lay vicars together, chanted the Litany VarUr
in English. The Latin tongue, as has been subsequently 1 009-7.
the custom, might have been used ; but to avoid offence,
both the Litany and the Yeni Creator which followed,
were sung in English. The Provost of Eton was Sermon j
T & . -r-r- -, St. Paul'
appointed preacher on tne occasion. His degree was
that of B.D., and he preached in a black gown, that is,
in the gown and hood of a Bachelor of Divinity. The
pulpit was moved into the body of the church ; and
there the provost delivered a Latin discourse, taking for
his text, 1 Peter v. 2 — " Pascitc quantum in vobis est,"
etc. The sermon ended, the first Psalm was chanted, and
the Holy Communion was celebrated, the celebrant being
" the Eeverend Father, Lord Edmund Grindal, bishop of
the diocese." The archbishop and his suffragans received
" the Sacrament of the Saviour's Body and Blood."
Eeturning to the Chapter House, the bishops formed a Assembly
semicircle around the archbishop. His grace was seated chapter
in the middle, the suffragans being arranged on either side. House-
Some formal business having been first transacted, the
archbishop addressed the bishops and clergy there and
then assembled. He reminded them, that although a re- Arch-
formation of the Church had been commenced, yet it was across!
not completed. Much remained to be done. The main
business of the synod would therefore be to set in order
the things that were wanting in the Church. He assured
them that it was the earnest desire of the queen and her
councillors to render every assistance in their power, that
the good work already begun might be brought to a
happy termination. He directed the prelates and clergy
of the Lower House * to make choice of a referendary or
* They are>styled " Prcelatos et clerum inferioris domus." The title
3 1 1
LIVES oi' THE
CHAP.
XI.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Alexander
Nowell
elected
prolo-
cutor.
Presenta-
tion of
prolocu-
tor.
prolocutor ; and, as the manner then was, having granted
a liberty, he immediately infringed upon the grant by
significantly recommending to their choice the dean of
the cathedral in which they were at that time assembled,
Alexander Nowell. They were to present him for the
approval of the President of the Convocation, on the
following Saturday. The archbishop commissioned his
chancellor to receive the bishops' certificatories, and
having pronounced those who had not obeyed the present
summons contumacious, he adjourned the Convocation.
At two o'clock on the day appointed, the 16th of January,
the Convocation again met in the Chapter House of St.
Paul's. The Latin Litany was sung by the archbishop
himself in a clear and distinct voice ; the bishops and
clergy present joining in the responses.
The two Houses having separated after prayers, the
Lower House after a short interval re-appeared. Dr.
Alexander Nowell, Dean of St. Paul's, was introduced by
Gabriel Goodman, Dean of Westminster, and Thomas
Simpson, Dean of Exeter, as the person elected by the
Lower House to be their prolocutor or referendary. Dean
Nowell, as the custom then was, in the appointment
both of a speaker of the House of Commons and a pro-
locutor of the Lower House of Convocation, depreciated
himself, and gave sundry reasons to prove his insufficiency
for the office, though, if it were forced upon him, he
intimated his willingness to accept it. Another form was
observed — the Upper House required the Lower House
to retire while their lordships deliberated on the appoint-
ment. Everything having been pre-arranged, this form
did not consume much time ; and on the re-admission of
i
of Prelates is not confined in our public documents to bishops. Under
that denomination are included deans and archdeacons, and any of the
clergy who possess ordinary jurisdiction over their brethren,.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 345
the Lower House, the election of Dean Nowell was con- chap.
XI
firmed, subject to the sanction of the queen, - — r _-
The attendance of the bishops in the House of Lords pLkerT
then sitting would be occasionally required, and therefore, l559 75»
to meet their convenience, the next session of Convocation
was appointed to be held in Westminster Abbey.* On the
19th, the Dean of Westminster appeared to protest against
the assumption of any rights on the part of Convocation
within the precincts of the Abbey. It was admitted by
the archbishop, that this Convocation was held in the
precincts of the Abbey only by the courtesy of the clean
and chapter. This form is continued to the present day.
We must attribute to the quiet and unobtrusive policy
of the archbishop a fact otherwise unaccountable, that
most historians have overlooked, the violent and revolu- Revolu-
tionary measures proposed by a considerable party in the measures
Convocation of 1563, which, if carried out, woud have propose *
annihilated the Church. The conforming Puritans, those
who, adhering to Calvinistic theology, had a desire to
share likewise in the tithes and broad acres still in the
possession of the Church of England, formed a compact
body in the Convocation, to the number of rather more
than thirty. From their principles and their temper we
may form some notion of the difficulties with which Arch-
bishop Parker had to contend ; and in the frustration of
their machinations, so calmly effected, we read the wisdom
and self-command of the metropolitan.
As usual under such circumstances, this party was
abetted by those who had little or no sympathy with them
in their opinions ; but who sought popularity, and were
ambitious of appearing to the queen and to the states-
* " In capella nuncupata Henry VII.1 s Chapel infra Ecclesiam col-
legiatam Divi Petri Westminster situata." — Acta in Convcc. Annp
LIVES OF tin:
CHAP.
\1.
Matthfrw
Pwker.
i.vvj-:.-).
lvlwin
Bandy*
ttien of the age as better qualified to direct ecclesiastic*
affairs than the infirm primate. Among these was Sandys,
Bishop of Worcester, a worldly man, who gave the arch-
bishop considerable trouble, although lie always professed
to be personally attached to him, and probably did value
his friendship, Like the latitudinarian prelates of our own
time, he was found to be in his diocese so despotic and
tyrannical, that Parker, firm to his principles, but lenient
in his dealings with offenders, felt it his duty to remon-
strate with him. As age advanced, and ambition cooled,
Sandys took a more correct view of his duties ; and on the
archbishop's death he appeared as one of the mourners,
deploring, with evident sincerity, the loss of one who hac
the faculty of attaching his friends, and of winning to hi
friendship many who had at one time been among hi
opponents.
In the Convocation of 1563, and for some time aftei
Sandys was not only opposed to the archbisliop, but in
his correspondence scarcely expressed himself with tin
decorum and respect due from a diocesan to his eccl<
siastical superior.
A mischievous project was brought before the Upp(
House by Sandys, who was aware, on the one hand, th*
in the House of which he was himself a member, it woulc
receive scarcely any support, while it would secure hi
popularity with the Puritan party in the Lower House.
These, though powerful in influence and learning, and not
contemptible in numbers, were, nevertheless, not likely
to carry it, for the majority of the House consisted
of the Anglo-Catholics, who were prepared to vote
rather than to talk.* Bishop Sandys proposed certah
°
* We cannot suppose, when those at the head of affairs were ac-
customed to pack the House of Commons, that Parker had not taken
measures to secure a majority in Convocation favourable to Church
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 347
alterations to be made in the Book of Common Prayer, chat.
and he arranged his proposals un'der the three following s_^L- >
it . Matthew
neaOS . Parker.
I. In cases of necessity, women, duly licensed, had, 1559-75.
from time immemorial, been permitted to baptize children
when in danger of their lives. Among the inconsistencies
of party, the Puritans, who profess to have no faith in
the grace of orders, and who regard the clergy only as
preachers, took umbrage at this custom ; and the Bishop
of Worcester proposed, that the rubric granting the licence
should be altered, by the authority of the archbishop as
regarded the Church, and of the queen as regarded the
State. The Bishop of London, Dr. Grindal, opposed the
Erastianism of Sandys, and contended that the authority
to alter rested with the synod. The real difficulty with
Sandys was this : the Prayer-Book having been embodied
in an Act of the legislature, an alteration could hardly take
place without submitting it to parliament. The metro-
politan, however, could make the change so far. as the re-
# quirements of the Church were concerned, and Sandys
thought that the queen's imprimatur would serve the
purpose of an Act of Parliament.
II. Under this head Sandys proposed the abolition of
the cross in baptism, but was defeated.
III. He then proposed a Eoyal Commission to draw
up a scheme of Church discipline and government, and
sought to remove the former objections to his pro-
posals by suggesting, that application should be made to
views. It was his policy to permit the Puritans to be fully repre-
sented, though kept in a minority ; for although he much feared the
ultra-Protestants, he must have felt that the medieval party required
to be kept in check, and he was not unwilling to let them see the
extreme measures which would be forced upon them, if they did not
give their support to his moderate reforms.
348
LIVES OF THE
Minority
of thirty
three,
5
chap. Parliament to make their recommendation a law of t
— ^ — - realm.*
Parke** These proposals were evidently made to sound th
ir>o9-75. Convocation, and to ascertain wliether Church principl
were still recognised by the episcopal bench and t
majority of the other clergy. It is satisfactory to kno
that the Bishop of Worcester was supported by not on
of his right reverend brethren.
In the Lower House the party was more determined,
and a schedule was introduced, signed by thirty-three
members. It contained seven articles, directly pointed
against the Catholic customs and primitive principles of
the Church. They first denounced all scientific music
together with the use of the organ in divine service
requiring the psalms to be sung by the whole congrega-
tion, or to be said by the minister alone. As in the case
of the bishop, with a strange inconsistency, the party
which did not believe that any special grace is imparted
to a minister when he is ordained, declaimed against
lay baptism, and, with less inconsistency, against the use
of the cross in the administration of that Sacrament.
As regards the Eucharist, they would leave it to the ordi-
nary to decide whether the communicant should receive
kneeling ; and they were particularly opposed to such
actions, almost universally prevalent, as smiting upon the
breast. Our blessed Lord seems to have commended the
poor publican for doing so, but the action may have been,
even at that time, offensive to the Pharisees. Copes and
surplices were to be discarded ; and the clergy were
discharged from wearing, in common use, such gowns
and caps as had been worn from time immemorial,
* For an account of the Committee, see Strype's Annals, I. i. 470 ;
Cone. Mag. Brit. iv. 239 ; Collier, vi. 371 \ Synodus 4-nglicana j
and Joyce's English Synods, p. 363, et §eq.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 349
on the ground that they were still worn by the Koman chap.
priesthood. > — r- — •
Festivals and saints' days were to be discontinued. The Parker.
34th Article gave to these dissenters extreme annoyance ; 1559-75.
for, although it declared, what no Catholic could deny, that
it is not necessary that traditions and ceremonies should
be in all places one and utterly alike, it adds that, " who-
soever, through his private judgment, willingly and
purposely doth openly break the traditions and ceremonies
of the Church . . . ought to be openly rebuked."
Enough has been here advanced to show how perilous
the times were ; and this will strike us the more strongly
when we remark, that the schedule containing these pro-
posals, reduced to six heads or articles, was signed by
thirteen archdeacons, a provost, and five deans. Although
the number of assailants amounted to thirty-three,
there were among them only fourteen proctors. The church
Church was saved by a majority consisting of the repre- JS*^
sentatives of the parochial clergy, who were Anglo- Catholics.
Catholics — men not hostile to a reformation, who, after a
time, accepted the title of Protestant to distinguish them
from Puritans, but were as far removed from Calvinism as
was possible.
The debate began on the 13th of February, when a
warm discussion arose ; but in the end it was found that
a decided majority, being Anglo-Catholics, gave an indis-
putable though silent support to the archbishop, and reso-
lutely refused to tamper any further with the offices of the
Church : Even among the minority some Church feeling
displayed itself, as might be expected. The reader will
remember what has been remarked before, that among
the Puritans there was a division ; there were some who
believed in the doctrine of Episcopacy, and on that ac-
count conformed, to the great disgust of the rest of the
350
LIVES OF THE
CHAP
XL
Matthew
Parker.
i
>er
party. These now were 1 rue to their principles; or rati
we may say, their conduct on this occasion shows the jip
lice of the distinction made ; for they, while approving
\ood-7o. suggestions of Bishop Sandys and his abettors, suggestec
that the matter in dispute should be relegated to tin
judgment of the bishops.
An attempt was made to convert the Articles, by then
elongation, into a Confession of Faith ; the minority being
still resolute in their determination, if possible, to destroy
the Church by sectarianizing it. In the fourth session
Convocation, the prolocutor appeared before the Uppc
House with the report of a committee which propose(
the reconstruction of the Forty-two Articles of a formei
reign. It was proposed to effect this by a joint com-
mittee of the two Houses, whose report was to be sub-
mitted to the consideration of the whole Convocation.
The archbishop perceived, that their real object was t<
convert the Articles, intended merely to control th<
preachers within certain limits, into a Confession of Faith,
winch was to be obligatory upon every member of the
Church ; he must also have felt the more indignant be-
cause this was an attempt, as by a side wind, to obliterate
his authority. With great calmness and dignity he ad-
ministered a reproof: he pointed out to the prolocutoi
the irregularity of these proceedings ; he informed him thai
the subject had already been brought before the Upper
House, and he promised that, at a fitting time, the deci-
sion of their lordships should be communicated to tin
proctors and others of the Lower House.
The archbishop laid his draft of the Articles before his
suffragans ; and on the next day a discussion upon the subject
began. The whole matter wTas carefully considered, the
bishops sometimes, according to their convenience, meeting
in Henry VII.'s Chapel, at other times in the Chapter
!
?r
H
■
ARCHBISHOPS OF (JAXTERLUIIY* ool
[ouse of St. Paul's Cathedral. A correspondence was chap.
entered into with the Archbishop of the Northern Pro- -— ^ — -
vince ; and on the 29th of January, the Thirty-nine Arti- Parked
cles, as they have ever since been called, were unanimously 1559-70.
accepted, and to the document which contained them Accept-
the episcopal signatures were attached ; the Archbishop theThirty-
of York and some of his suffragans being included among ArtLies.
the signitaries. The latter circumstance gives to this
Convocation the character of a national synod.*
The Articles were immediately transmitted to the
Lower House, where it would appear that there was
not the same willingness to subscribe as had been dis-
played in the Upper House. When a legal case is re-
ferred, and the referee in his decision gives satisfaction to
neither party, it is said to be a sign that his judgment is
impartial and just. We may presume on the impartiality
with which the Thirty-nine Articles were drawn up, when
we find that they were entirely acceptable to none of
the parties into which the Church was split. Their sole
object was to place restraint upon those who had no wish
to be restrained. The Puritans were especially offended.
The document containing the Articles was returned to
the Upper House on the 5th of February, with only one
hundred names attached to it. It was accompanied with
a request that every member of the House should be re-
quired to subscribe it, — a request which seems to show
that some coercion or moral persuasion was necessary.f
• Synod. Anglic. 201. Cardwell's Synodalia, i. oG. These, together
with Wilkins's vol. iv., are the chief authorities for the history of this
important synod. See also Joyce's Hist, of English Synods, and his
Valuable notes.
f The document, with the signatures of both Houses of Convocation,
was ordered to be left in the custody of the. president of the Convoca-
tion, and by him was bequeathed to C. C. C. C, where it may be seen.
LIVES OF THi:
chap. A larger list of subscribers was on the next day
, — -,_- sented to the archbishop. Even after this there was a
Parker, delay ; and the ratification of the Articles under the
1 0.39-75. Great Seal did not take place till three years afterwards,
that is to say, they were not received by the laity. The
readiness of the Upper House to sign, proved that the
bishops were aware that something must be done to re-
strain the licence of preachers ; the slowness of the Lower
. House to accept the Articles, evinced on their part an
unwillingness to sacrifice their liberty.
What a synod has enacted, a synod may repeal ; and
the question may still be mooted, whether the Articles
are any longer necessary, or, if necessary, whether these
Thirty-nine ought not to be amended. Admirably adapted
they were in meeting the controversies of the sixteenth
century ; but other Articles, if Articles are required,
should be made to meet the heresies of the nineteenth
century.
The draft of the Articles, as submitted to the Upper
House of Convocation by the primate, had been slightly
altered by his suffragans — the alterations, indeed, were so
slight, that we may presume that they were simply in-
tended to assert their right to correct the work of the
metropolitan before they finally adopted it. These alter-
ations may be seen in Cardwell's " Synodalia."
Into the controversy respecting the clause in the 20th
Article, we are not in this place called upon to enter ;
" The Church hath power to decree rites and ceremonies,
and authority in controversies of faith." When a contro-
versy arose upon the subject in a subsequent age, it is
difficult to understand the object of those who would ab-
scind this Article, or a portion of it ; for that portion of the
disputed Article which relates to rites and ceremonies is
sufficiently expressed in the 34th Article. But the Articles^
chism.
ARCHBISH0P3 OF CANTERBURY. ■ 353
although a few years afterwards attached to the Church chap.
of England, are no more part of the Church of England ' — *- — '
Matthew
than the limpet which clings to the rock is the rock itself. Parker.
The Church of England existed hundreds of years before *wo-7«,
the Articles were drawn up, and in her reformation ap-
pealed to no articles of mere human authority, but to the
Bible and the primitive Church.
At this Convocation Nowell's catechisms were intro- The Cate-
duced. Strype says that No well undertook to compose
the catechisms on the advice of Sir William Cecil, but,
as Dr. Cardwell observes, the letter on which Strype
relies for this assertion does not, by any means, support
the assertion.* There is, however, no doubt that Dean
Nowell endeavoured to enlist Sir William Cecil on his
side ; and in the letter to that statesman, referred to by
Strype, the dean stated, that it was " a ground of com-
plaint to persons beyond the seas," that the Church of
England had no system of doctrine. " The opinion,"
wrote Nowell, " beyond the seas was, that nothing touch-
ing religion was with any authority or consent of any
number of the learned here in our country taught and
set forth ; but that a few private persons taught and wrote
opinions without the approbation of any authority at all."
What Nowell condemned as a defect we now admire as
an advantage.
It is probable that Cecil consulted the archbishop on
the subject ; it is certain that the minister was not per-
suaded by Nowell to rob the Church of its liberty, or to
bind it by the trammels of a sect. Cecil was too acute
not to be able to distinguish between a " Catechismus
Puerorum " and a confession of faith professing to explain
" the whole counsel of God." Parker had taught him
* Strype'a Annals, I. i. 525 ; Cardwell's Documentary Annals, i. 300.
VOL. IX. A A
354 LIVES OF THE
chap, that the tradition of the primitive Church, tested by t
_XI- _, Bible, was sufficient for members of a Catholic Church;
ParkerT an(l ^ tne Church of Eome, in Pope Pius's Catechism, or
1559-75. the Church of England, in the Thirty-nine Articles, fet-
tered their teachers on certain disputed points, this did
not interfere with our general liberty, and was only a
temporary arrangement.
Archbishop Parker respected Nowell as a man, and
probably expected to win him, like Jewel, to his pur-
poses ; at the same time, he exerted his influence silently
but effectually to prevent his larger catechism from ob-
taining synodical authorization. Nowell boasted that his
greater catechism had been favourably received by the
members of Convocation, many of whom " altered it and
underlined it with their remarks." He evidently alluded
to the minority of thirty- three ; but they only acted in their
private capacity, or as men in debate before a decision
was arrived at ; for he admits and laments that he failed
to obtain the authoritative sanction of the synod.*
Owing to the destruction of- the registers of the Convo-
cation, we find it difficult to give a history of NowelTs
catechism : we may be satisfied with expressing our deep
sense of gratitude to the Merciful Providence which has
exonerated us from a burden which it would have been
difficult to sustain ; for certainly the Church in its corpo-
rate capacity has no concern with the document. The
larger catechism did not pass the two Houses in 1562-3.
It was not published till 1570, and then, although ac-
cepted by the Lower House of Convocation, it did not
pass the Upper House.f Of its failure no doubt can be
entertained. One strong party in the country was always
* Burghley MSS. vii. 9. See also Churton's Life of Nowell.
| Sy nodus Anglicana, 215. It was never sanctioned by the queei
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 355
contending that it had synodical authority ; but by their chap.
opponents they were dared to the proof. The catechism . — ^ — *
is so completely forgotten now, that among well-informed p^LrT
divines it is scarcely known that it ever had existence ; a 1559-75.
circumstance which would have been impossible if it had
ever been adopted as a regular formulary of the Church.
Parker's conduct in the affair shows, that he could
hardly determine how to proceed. The case was per-
plexing in the absence of precedent ; and the expression
of the grounds of his hesitation to sanction it would have
been impolitic and inexpedient. It was suppressed, how-
ever, till 1570, when it was published with a dedication
to the archbishop — a concession which satisfied Nowell,
and yet did not commit the Church.
It was Parker's policy, in this Convocation, to encourage Freedom
a freedom of speech, so that our rulers in Church arid encmi?11
State might become acquainted with the requirements of ased-
the Church and the wants of the clergy ; but, at the same
time, he exerted himself to prevent legislation.
In addition to the matters already mentioned, the un-
satisfactory state of the temporalities of the Church was
taken into consideration, and inquiries were instituted, of
an important character, upon the regulation of parishes.
One measure was introduced with the object of regulating
the leases both of bishops and of deans and chapters.
Another Bill was brought in to regulate dilapidations ;
another, that due inquiry should be made into the fitness
of candidates who applied for confirmation. In the Upper Tempo-
House, the metropolitan urged his suffragans to be very
circumspect in their choice of Scripture-readers — or lay
helps, if we may give a modern designation to those who
discharged the duties implied' in that title. He was par-
ticular also in warning them against admitting to the
diaconate those who continued to support their families
A A 2
tion
356 LIVES OF THE
chap, by remaining in trade. Literates were, of necessity, or-
— XtL .* dained when candidates from the Universities did not
darken present themselves. It was ordered that no deacon should
1559-75. undertake an occupation for gain, who was provided with
an income amounting to twenty nobles. This was simply
an agreement among the bishops ; for it is true, speaking
generally, that at this Convocation no canons were passed.*
Parker's On the 14th of April the synod broke up, to the evident
Convoca- relief of Parker's mind. What his feelings were on the
subject is revealed to us in a letter to Sir William Cecil,
preserved among the archbishop's manuscripts. It was
written on the very day on which he was released from
his duties as president of the Convocation ; and after a
conversation with the secretary on the results of the
synod. " In consideration," he writes, " of yesternight's
talk, calling to remembrance what the qualities of all my
brethren be in reference of our Convocation societies, I
see some of them to be pleni rimarum, hac atque iliac
effluunt, although indeed the queen's majesty may have
good cause to be well contented with her choice of most
of them, very few excepted, amongst whom I count
myself. And furthermore, though we have done among
ourselves little in our own cause, yet I assure you o
mutual conferences have taught us such experiences, tha
I trust we shall all be the better in governance for here
after. And when the queen's highness doth note me
to be too soft and easy, I think divers of my brethren will
rather note me, if they were asked, too sharp and to<
earnest in moderation, which towards them I have use
and will still do, till mediocrity shall be received amongs
us. Though towards them qui /oris sunt I cannot bu
* Strype's Annals, I. i. 508-512, 520, 521. Grindal, p. 100,
Burnet, in. i. 365. Wake, p. 603.
tat
B-
ie
ill
!
ist
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 357
show civil affability, and yet, I trust, inclining to no great chap.
cowardness, to suffer wilful heads to escape too easily. « — r- — -
o 7 • , j) ik. Matthew
bed ista parerga. * Parker.
This letter is valuable, as throwing light on our great 1559-75.
reformer's character. It reveals to us the principle which pastoraiof
Parker adopted for the direction of his conduct ; a prin- ^suffra-
ciple from which, unfortunately for himself and the Church, sans-
he was too often led to deviate, from that desire to please
all parties, which was sure in the end to give satisfaction
to none. The letter also shows that the late synod was
regarded as having ended favourably to the Anglo-
Catholics — the men of peace as they then were — as was
really the fact, the Puritans having been foiled in almost
all their attempts to introduce their peculiarities. Parker
did not desire a triumph for either party ; his ambition
was to unite the two great parties — the Anglo-Catholics
and the Puritans — in one great school of thought. Under
these circumstances he determined to address a pastoral
to his suffragans, now returning to their dioceses, and he
submitted the draft to the supervision of his friend Sir
William Cecil. The draft is in the latter part so altered
and interlined, that it is difficult to make out its exact
meaning. In the letter eventually sent by the archbishop
to his suffragans, the subject is brought clearly to light.
After the usual formalities in the address, the arch-
bishop thus proceeds : " This is upon good and deli-
berate considerations to require you, as also upon your
obedience to charge, to have a grave, prudent, and godly
respect in executing the Act of the establishment of the
queen's authority over her ecclesiastical subjects, late
passed in parliament." We here see his tenderness
towards the Catholics, or the great body of conformists,
* Corresp.. p. 173.
358 LIVES OF THE
chap, especially among the clergy. Through the obstinacy
^— -r- — - Archbishop Heath, and the prelates acting with him, the
Parker! present bishops had been, of necessity, chosen from among
1559-75. the Puritans; and though their conformity implied the
renunciation of some of the worst features of Puritanism,
the archbishop evidently feared lest, in the intolerant
spirit of the age, the bishops being invested with
power, should so exercise it as to attempt to crush
instead of seek to conciliate that party in the Church,
which, though consisting of conformists, were more op-
posed to Geneva than to Borne. The oath of supremacy
might be, at any time, insisted upon ; but the policy of
the archbishop and of the government, at this time, was
not to press it upon those of the clergy who, disliking the
oath, still remained in their cures, discharging in a meek
and quiet spirit the duties of their calling. 4; If upon any
very apparent cause," proceeds the archbishop, implying
inaction and charitable allowance where such cause did
not exist, "your lordship shall be, as it were compelled,
for the wilfulness of some of that sort, to tender the oath
mentioned in the Act, the peremptory refusal whereof
shall endanger them in pra3immire, that immediately upon
such refusal of any person, ye do address your letters to
me, expressing the disorders of such a one who is fallen
into such danger, and ye proceed not to offer the said
oath a second time, until your lordship shall have my
answer returned to you in writing." He entreated his
brethren not to misinterpret his intentions, or to regard
him as the patron of a party, in which he admitted there
were many who " bore a perverse stomach to the purity
of Christ's religion ; " but to regard him in this respect as
only exhibiting " a pastoral care which must appear in
us which be heads of the flock, not to follow our own
private affections and heats, but to provide coram Deo
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 359
et hominibus, for saving and winning of others if it may chap.
be so obtained."* » — ^ — -
We may be permitted here to renew our remark, that pLkeT
these letters and the proceedings of the government, at 1559-75.
this time, are sufficient to show the error — leading some-
times to erroneous judgments in courts of law — of which
they are guilty who represent the Protestant party as in
the ascendant. They formed a minority, but a minority
armed with power. An application from Bishop Jewel
to the primate, whom he calls the " sacra anchora " to
himself and others, for advice under a special circum-
stance, is interesting, as showing that it was clearly under-
stood, that the Church being the same, after as well as
before its reformation had begun, the laws were of
necessity the same unless specially repealed, or by subse-
quent legislation rendered obsolete. The Bishop of Salis-
bury, John Jewel, writes thus : " The bearer hereof will
exhibit to your grace a Eoman dispensation under lead for
one Harvee, prebendary of my church. I beseech your
grace advertize me whether it will stand good in law or no,
and whether the party may enjoy it, not having or using
priestly apparel, but in all respects, going as a serving
man or no." What is more remarkable is, that from this
letter we learn that the controversy still existing, on mar-
riage with a deceased wife's sister, engaged attention in
the reign of Queen Elizabeth, and was a subject upon
which our reformers had no very decided opinion. The
bishop continues : " Chafin that hath married two sisters,
upon his appeal from your grace and me, hangeth still
upon the delegators, and, as much as I can perceive, is
not likely to have any great hurt at their hands. 1 zooidd
they would decree it were lawful to marry two sisters, so
would the world be out of doubt. ."
* Corresp. p. 174.
I
360 lives of Tin:
CHAP. From this time and for several years the Church
« — r-^— - tinued to be governed by the archbishop, whose
Parker rogatives as primate seem not to have been called into
1659-75. question or disputed. Convocation met several times,
but little business of an ecclesiastical character was trans-
acted. The Convocations were duly assembled, but wer
chiefly employed in granting subsidies to the crown.
Convooa- When the career of Parker was drawing to a close, a
wi?* w^sn prevailed, and to this he acceded, that a Convocation
should be held for the despatch of business ; and an im-
portant one took place in 1571. On this occasion the
sermon was preached by no less a person than Whitgift ;
and Aylmer, at that time Archdeacon of Lincoln, was
chosen prolocutor. Hitherto the bishops, acting under
the connivance of the primate, had been lax in requiring
subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles, to which, at first,
the Puritans were quite as much opposed as the Anglo-
, Catholics. But the papists from abroad, and those among
the Eegulars who had, clandestinely or through the con-
nivance of the government, retained their chaplaincies
in the private chapels of certain members of the English
aristocracy, were now plotting to disturb the peace of
the realm, and although the majority of the Anglo-
Catholics had been Protestantized, some of the older
of the clergy were suspected of a secret inclination to
listen to foreign and disloval councils. At this Convoca-
tion, therefore, the Thirty-nine Articles were read, con-
firmed, and signed by both Houses ; and every bishop
was supplied with a sufficient number to take down into
their respective dioceses, there to obtain the signatures of
the clergy — of the clergy alone, because the Articles were
intended, not as an exposition of doctrine to the Church
at large, but as a direction to the clergy only. No clergy-
man was to be licensed as a preacher by his bishop until
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 361
he had subscribed to the Articles. So unpopular, how- chap.
ever, were the Articles, and this whole proceeding, that . -^ ,
by some writers, the year 1571 is termed the woful year of ^rkS*
Subscription. 1559-75.
In the Upper House of Convocation of 1571, under
Parker's direction, a book of canons was arranged
and settled under the following title : Liber quorundam
Canonum discipline Ecclesioe Anglicance, but for some
cause or other, not explained, it was not laid before the
Lower House. These canons were observed, however,
by the bishops in the management of their several
dioceses ; and no objection was raised against them on the
ground of any want of authority — the ancient tradition
of episcopal authority still prevailing. The queen espe-
cially stated, that she regarded the authority of the bishops
as sufficient, and considered that the Lower House was
included in the decisions of the Upper.* That the
Thirty-nine Articles, while chaining the clergy, or not
permitting them to move beyond a certain tether, were
not regarded as obligatory upon the English Church,
is sufficiently apparent from the fact, that the very same
Convocation which required clerical subscription to the
Articles, declared, under the head De Concionatoribus,
that nothing was to be taught as matter of faith religiously
to be observed but that which was agreeable to the Old
and New Testaments, and collected out of the same Cathoii-
doctrine — not by the reformers, but by the ancient fathers English
and Catholic bishops of the Church.
This was a concession made to the archbishop and to the
English reformers generally, for they had been subjected
to some mortifications by the determined opposition still
shown against Church principles, by a powerful minority
in the Lower House.
* Strype, ii. 60.
362 LIVES OP THE
chap. It will be remembered, that in the reign of Hem
« — -r^ — • VIII. a committee had been appointed to reform the
VarkerT ecclesiastical law. Until this committee should complet(
1559-75. its work, it was enacted that the old Catholic canons
should continue to be, as they had long been, and still
are, the canons of the Church of England, provided that
they were not contrary to the statutes of the realm or
the prerogatives of the crown.
These reformers of the canons had completed their
work, or nearly so, when Edward VI. died ; and owing to
that event, it had not been confirmed by parliament or
accepted by the crown. The subject was again brought
before the parliament of 1571. But the queen and the
archbishop, true to their principle of not disconnecting
the present from the past, presented a tacit but effectual
opposition to the measure, and consequently for these
canons parliamentary authority was never obtained. The
Church of England is still governed by the canons in vogue
during the centuries which preceded the reformation of
the Church ; and Archbishop Tait, except where the
statute law has interposed, is as much bound by the
ancient canons as was Thomas a Becket and his successors.
Convoca- The Convocation of 1572 has to us a peculiar interest,
i572?f since to it were addressed the last words of Matthew
Parker.
This Convocation opened with the usual solemnities
and ceremonial ; the sermon was preached by Dr. Young,
one of the residentiaries of St. Paul's Cathedral, on the
9th of May ; the representatives of the clergy, the digni-
taries of the Church, and the law officers in the arch-
bishop's courts being duly assembled.
When the Convocation met the next day for business,
the Lower House was summoned into the presence of his
grace the president, and the heart must have been hard .
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 363
that remained unmoved. The aged primate, unable to chap.
stand, addressed the two Houses from his seat : he sat, >- — r- — »
bowed down by a premature old age, oppressed with many Parked
infirmities, and suffering under a mortal and most painful 1559-75.
complaint. However violently some were opposed to him
on principle, yet he had " borne his faculties meekly ; "
and although, being a man without enthusiasm, he was
not likely to enkindle enthusiastic feelings among his sup-
porters, there were few present who had not experienced
some act of consideration or kindness at his hands ; or, if
they had been subjected to the discipline of the Church,
administered by him, they could not but have felt, when
they looked back with calmness to the past, that they
were indebted to him for the forbearance which was
ever ready to abstain from the unnecessary annoyance
of those who set his authority at defiance, or who even
refused obedience to the laws of the realm and the canons
of the Church.
Everyone, he said, must be aware that he had been Parker's
commanded by the queen to convene, and those whom he the synod.
addressed to attend, this synod, for the furtherance of
some salutary end and object to the Church of Christ.
The assembly had been opened the preceding day by
tendering their homage to the Majesty of Heaven, and they
had heard from a man of piety and learning an exhor-
tation replete with erudition and sound advice. Having
made such a good beginning, they might fairly expect
that the rest of their labours would be brought to a
happy termination. If zeal in the propagation and pre-
servation of Christ's religion were the duty of all in their
several stations, he reminded the members of the synod,
that, in consideration of their orders and of the dignity of
their office, they ought not only to surpass all others in
their zeal and vigilance, but that they should be prepared,
364 LIVES OF THE
chap, if need should be, to sacrifice to the great cause their good
— , — * name, their worldly goods, yea, even life itself. They were
Parker, set apart by the Lord, and warned by the Holy Spirit to
1559-75. search the deep things of God, and to make his will known
to the people. They had their ancestors for an example ;
not only those who of late, having investigated the truth,
confirmed it by a martyr's death, but those also in the
apostolic age, of whose piety and success in this island of
ours many memorials still remain. Although of their
works some had been destroyed by Anti-Christ, and others
damaged by long desuetude, yet much had been handed
down to the present more enlightened age ; proving abun-
dantly that our orders and the ceremonies retained by us
are in perfect accordance with their institutions. Espe-
cially dear to us ought to be what emanated from our
predecessors in the Church of England.
He then went on to say, that even if the ancient tra-
ditions, which he so much valued, had failed, they were
so fortunate as still to possess the original Scriptures, in
Hebrew and Greek, upon which to fall back ; and then
by quotations from St. Cyprian and from St. Basil the
Great, he showed, that it was the primitive custom, by a
reference to the sacred Scriptures, to test the traditional
practices of the Church, and to prevent them from d
generating into superstition.
He enlarged on the principles on which the Beforma
tion should be conducted in England — a deference to tra-
ditional religion, all education being, in fact, a tradition
from father to son — corrected by a reference to the original
Scriptures : so that our religion does not depend upon a
single book, though we possess an inspired volume, to in-
struct us when and where, through the lapse of time and
the wiles of Satan, the religion we have inherited has
degenerated into superstition, as was seen to be the case
al
i
1559-75.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 365
until, by the printing press, the tradition as well as the XL
Scriptures of the Church had been stereotyped. Matthew'
Having laid before them the principles of the English
Eeformation, he left it to the members of the Convocation
and to persons of greater leisure than he himself possessed,
to enlarge upon them; and he confined himself to the
business more immediately before them. .
In order that their debates might be conducted without
confusion, and that due order might be preserved in their
proceedings, he should himself preside over the Upper
House ; and he directed, that on the following Wednesday,
the Lower House, having elected a prolocutor, should
present him to the president, in order that he might obtain
his grace's sanction.
On the day appointed Dr. Whitgift was elected prolo-
cutor. It was evident that it had been the intention of
the government, that this Convocation should proceed
to the transaction of business; but some cause or other,
probably the primate's ill-health, terminating in his death
three years after, presented an impediment, and very little
business of real importance was accomplished.
366 LIVES OF THE
CHAPTEE XII.
CONTROVERSIES.
Party government. — Vestment controversy. — The principle of Eliza-
beth's Government. — Reformation of an old Church, not the estab-
lishment of a Protestant sect. — Elizabeth's ecclesiastical policy. —
Two-thirds of clergy and laity were Anglo-Catholics. — Concessions
made on both sides. — Bishop Gheast's letter on the Eucharist. — Di-
versities of practice. — Bad taste of the Puritans. — Persecution of
Parker. — His life threatened. — Mandate of the queen to the primate
and his suffragans to enforce uniformity. — Vacillation of the queen.
— Earl of Leicester ; his evil influence with the queen. — A profligate
man though the leader of the Puritans. — Parker's employment of the
press. — Foreign theologians consulted. — Parker's misunderstanding
with the queen. — Change of opinion in Jewel and others. — The
attack nominally on vestments, in reality on Episcopacy. — Puritans
discovered Anti-Christ in the Church of England. — Royal Com-
mission.— Controversy with Sampson and Humphrys. — Parker's
generosity to his opponents. — Disturbances in London churches. —
Eucharist profaned. — Clergy in surplices mobbed. — Insults offered to
the archbishop's chaplains. — Forms observed in celebrating. — London
clergy cited before the Ecclesiastical Commissioners. — Addressed by
the Chancellor. — Licences for preaching revoked and renewed. —
Papal privileges asserted at Cambridge. — Parker's success. — Cha-
racter of the English Reformation. — Peter Heylin, Wolfgang
Musculus. — Establishment of Anglo-Romanism in opposition to
Anglo- Catholicism. — Excommunication of Elizabeth by the Pope. —
Establishment of Protestant Dissent. — Thomas Cartwright. — Oppo-
sition to Episcopacy. — All Church principles denied seriatim. —
Romish dissent not formally established before the time of Cardinal
Wiseman. — Puritan schism established at Wandsworth Troubles
towards the close of Parker's life. — Parliament of 1571. — Bitter
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 367
feeling of the Puritan members against the bishops and the Church. — ■
Violence of Strickland. — Peter Wentworth. — Precisians. — Brownists.
— Prophesy ings. — Earl of Sussex. — Visitation of the Isle of Wight. —
Parker insulted at Court. — His angry letter.
It is proposed in the present chapter to bring under chap.
XII.
one point of view, the more prominent of those contro- *-
• • i • i -n/r i t^i • i -, rm Matthew
versies m which Matthew Parker was involved, lhey Parker,
incidentally throw light on his character, as well as 15^9-75.
on the history of the age in which he played so dis-
tinguished a part.
The difficulties he had to encounter, or rather the
manner in which they were to be met, differed consider-
ably from the difficulties and the consequent controversies
by which the angry passions of modern polemics are
excited and the critical judgment of opposing parties
are called into action at the present time. By the
system of party government, which has gradually risen Party
up among us, the co-operation of independent thinkers ment.
can now be secured ; and mutual concessions are found
to be admissible, without any sacrifice of that freedom of
mind in regard to general principles, through which a
combination of friends is distinguishable from the sub-
mission of slaves to the will of a superior whose object is
not to lead but to domineer. We can now understand
how, in selecting a leader, we make choice of a primus
inter pares, with whom on all great principles we agree ;
and to whom, in the minor details necessary for the carry-
ing out of a great design, we are willing to defer. We
only separate, when, in the carrying out of our details we
discover a difference in what relates to a vital principle.
Very different was it in Parker's time : at that period
the sovereign ruled as well as reigned; and Elizabeth
was, in fact, her own prime minister. The other ministers
were merely the heads of departments. Between the
368 LIVES OF THE
chap, heads of the various departments there was not, of ne-
•* cessity, any union of opinion ; and, instead of seeking to
Parker, act together for the good of all, each minister thought only
1559-75. of the course to be by him pursued, to win the approba-
tion or retain the confidence of the queen. The queen
herself was sometimes jealous, lest, through a good under-
standing between her most trusted ministers, her own
power should be overlooked, and she become, instead of
a dictator, a mere puppet in the hands of men who owed
their official position to her discernment or favour.
The difficulties which a minister had to encounter,
when called upon to act under such conditions, were
so great as to become sometimes insuperable. When a
minister had done his best, he might be thwarted by a
favourite, who, also a minister, was known to be seeking,
not the public good, but his own aggrandizement. There
could be no unity of action between the ministers except
such as arose from private friendship ; and, what was
worse, there was no security of support from the crown,
except when the royal mind was awakened to a sense of
the dangers which beset the state. On great occasions
and emergencies, Elizabeth had the wisdom to see that
she must have a master-mind on which to rely, — and all
her subordinate ministers were therefore aware, that if
they desired to carry any great measure within their own
department, they would do wisely to consult Cecil before
approaching the queen ; although the queen would some-
times act in opposition even to Cecil's advice, merely — or
chiefly — in the fear, that if his advice were invariably
followed, he would become de facto king.
All these things must be taken into consideration, wh
we sit in judgment upon Parker in regard -to his admin
tration of ecclesiastical affairs, and to his proceedings
when conducting the reformation of his Church.
:
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 369
could not do all he wished, and he was, therefore, con- chap.
"VTT
tent to save from the general wreck what he could. ^ —
The great controversy which disturbed the peace, and p^kerT
distracted the mind of Parker during the first years of 1559-75
his episcopate, related to the vestments of the clergy. J™^™
When men are determined to quarrel, the devil will soon versy«
find a pretext for the controversy. Under evil influence,
the quarrel has, of late years, been revived, and Protestant
associations, so called, are established for the persecution
of those who would retain the sacerdotal vestments. To
many persons, viewing the subject from without, the con-
troversy appears to be perfectly puerile ; but, although it
is, comparatively speaking, easy to excite the malignant
passions of the ignorant, whether in high life or in low
life, and although human, even diabolical, passions may
be misrepresented as Christian zeal, still it is quite pos-
sible that, under the superincumbent mass of puerility,
an important principle or a holy sentiment may lie
buried.
Of the real merits of the " vestiarian controversy," as it
existed in the first years of the Eeformation, only a few
thoughtful persons could then, or can now, decide. The
impassioned multitude might understand their fanatical
leaders, when they declaimed against the government for
disturbing the peace of society, by insisting that the
English clergy should still retain, under certain modifica-
tions, those vestments in which for several centuries the
clergy of the Church of England had been accustomed
to officiate. They did not perceive, or they would not
admit, that if folly there were, that folly was not con-
fined to one party ; it was shared by those who refused
obedience to the ecclesiastical rulers " sitting in Moses'
seat," and succeeding to the authority of the Apostles.
Especially was this the case when, as in the case under
VOL. IX. B B
370
LIVES OF THE
CHAJP.
XII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Conces-
sions not
to havo
regard to
one party
only.
Conces-
sions made
to both
parties.
consideration, they were acting in obedience to the laws
of the land and the requirements of the Church. The
ancient vestments had, in many respects, become incom-
modious, and were open to various objections ; but this
was not the case with all. It was determined by our
ecclesiastical rulers to reform, but not to destroy. The
determination not to destroy was consistent with the
resolution at which the queen and her government had
arrived, of connecting the present with the past. They
continually bore in mind, that they were reforming the
old Church, not establishing a new sect ; and on this
principle, they so. ordered the Church, that, in small
things as well as in great, the people should be reminded
of the fact. Having liberated the Church from the
tyranny of the Bishop of Borne, Queen Elizabeth was by
no means prepared to hold the stirrup to a pope of
Geneva ; or, like the Puritans, to invest Calvin with the
pretensions of infallibility.
The soundness of Elizabeth's policy may be controverted,
but if we accept her scheme of reform as a dictate of
wisdom, we are not justified in blaming the queen for not
yielding to the Puritans ; when, in opposing details, they
were consciously aiming a blow at her known principle of
action. What was theoretically right or wrong she left it
to her clergy to discuss and determine ; what she, as the
ruler of the nation, had to do, when a determination had
been arrived at by the hierarchy, by the Convocation, and
by the parliament, was to compel her subjects to obey the
law : obedience she required, because she desired to pro-
mote the peace of the country. In order to effect this
object, she understood that concessions must be made :
but they were to be made not to one party only ; for she
was perfectly aware, that if there was a powerful minority
among her subjects who thought that she had not gone,
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 371
in the work of reformation, far enough, there was another chap.
party which, if not so deeply read, was certainly more — ,.v — *
numerous, whose opinion was, that she had gone too far. VarkeT
She could not forget the re-action which had followed the 1559-75.
Puritan excesses in the reign of her brother; neither
could she conceal from herself the fact, that among the
majority who enjoyed the benefices of the Church, there
were not a few who might, if provoked, be led to give
their support to the Queen of Scots. Elizabeth knew
full well, that it was not as the head of a faction, whether
papal or puritan, but as the queen of a great country,
that she ought to present herself to her people. The
opposite mode of proceeding had been the ruin of her
sister. By the short-sighted policy of the foreign powers
acting in the interests of the Bishop of Borne, Elizabeth
was compelled, against her inclinations, to win the support
of the Puritans by making to them large concessions ; but
these concessions must terminate somewhere, and where
could she better make her stand than upon a point which *
appeared to politicians to be either childish or factious ?
The line of policy which for ten or twelve years, in a Elizabeth'*
controversial age, prevented a rupture between Church !^Cy#
and state, if not always to be approved, is surely not to
be contemned. It is observed by JSTeal, the Puritan his-
torian, that " the services performed in the queen's
chapel and in sundry cathedrals were so splendid and
showy, that foreigners could not distinguish it from the
Boman, except that it was performed in the English
tongue." He says, that " by this method most of the
popish laity were deceived into conformity and came
regularly to church for nine or ten years, till the pope,
being out of all hopes of an accommodation, forbad them,
by excommunicating the queen and laying the whole
nation under an interdict." In this passage we have an
BB 2
372 LIVES OF THE
chap, instance of the manner in which a party historian, by
— _- giving to his statements a false colouring, and by using
Parker, consciously an incorrect term, can leave an erroneous
1559-75. impression upon the reader's mind, and lead him blind-
folded into heresy. If Neal had spoken of the members of
the Church as being Anglo-Catholic, thus distinguishing
them from the Eomanenses, Eomanists, or Papists, he
would in his assertion have been correct. Upon the
conforming Anglo-Catholics, the Bishop of Eome, as it
was the custom to style the pope, could make no im-
pression ; and therefore it was, that after a season of qui-
escence, his patience being exhausted, he sent a mission of
Eomanists into the kingdom. Soames, who quotes this
passage, makes the remark, that the parties whom the
Puritan uncharitably affirms were " deceived into con-
formity," consisted of two-thirds of the nation, and pos-
sessed an immense preponderance of its wealth.* They
were Catholics — Anglo-Catholics ; they were not papists ;
though it is possible that they would prefer popery to
Puritanism.
Neal also asserts, that the instructions given by the
queen's government to the ecclesiastical commissioners,
was " to strike out all offensive passages against the pope,
and to make people easy about the corporal presence."
The historian, in his ignorance or his prejudice, uses the
word corporal, which our reformers did not use, although
they did speak of the real presence of Our Blessed
Lor in the Holy Sacrament. He complains, that while
large concessions were' thus made to the Anglo-Catholics,
not a single word was uttered in favour of those Puritans
whom he describes as " the stricter Protestants." " She
was desirous to retain," he says, " images in churches,
crosses and crucifixes, vocal and instrumental music, wit]
* Elizabethan History, p. 9.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY.
373
all the old popish garments. The rubric that declared,
that by kneeling at the Sacrament no adoration was in-
tended to any corporal presence of Christ, was expunged."
Such was the Church of England as our first reformers
left her, and such she continued to be in all her broad
features, until the great rebel] ion annihilated those an-
cient traditions by which the Prayer Book could be best
interpreted.
The Anglo-Catholics, out of whom sprang the school of
divines of which the judicious Hooker is the represen-
tative and type, had submitted to much injustice, and in
spite of various attempts to stir them up to acts of sedition
and rebellion, they remained firm in their loyalty to the
queen. Without entirely approving the powers she claimed
or asserted, they supported the queen's government in her
determination to disavow the encroachments and exactions
of the papal see, to reform the ecclesiastical courts, and
to uphold the independence of their country. It would
have been a wanton act of tyranny to have refused to
them all toleration o fthose observances which were so dear
to their hearts, simply to gratify the Puritan, who was
too often excited by mere feelings of intolerance and
party zeal. To do justice to the government, we must
repeat the statement, that there were two extremes, to
whom it was necessary to pay equal attention. If it were
difficult to compel the Puritan to wear the surplice, it
was equally difficult to persuade the Anglo-Catholics —
that is, the majority of conformists — to lay aside the cope.
It was easy to claim concessions on the one side or the
other, but on neither side was it easy to make them, so
hard it is ri>%sh rou [xeo-ou.
That there was an honest, and, for a short time, a
successful, attempt to deal fairly with all parties, will be Catholic
apparent to such persons as will consult the injunctions, tan parties
Conces-
sions both
to the
374 LIVES OP THE
chap, the advertisements, the royal letters, and the other publio
>- , '-^ documents issued in the early part of Elizabeth's reign.
Varker. But the government was always under the influence
1559-75. of fear rather than of love. Fearing, at one time, the
Puritans, it endeavoured to obtain concessions from the
Catholics ; and then, when the seminary priests and
Jesuits made their appearance in England, the govern-
ment, taking alarm in the opposite direction, adopted
severe political measures which gave sufficient ground to
its assailants for the assertion, that the Catholics had
been treated with unjust harshness. Had the authorities
in Church and state been sufficiently powerful to carry
out their political schemes to a successful issue, the Ee-
formation in this country would have been, if not more
impartial, yet certainly more complete.
Acts of The archbishop avowed his determination to abide by
anti-papal, two Acts that had been passed in the late parliament,
but Ca-
tholic
introduced probably at his own suggestion. By the first
the Court of Faculties was instituted, to which attention
will be hereafter more particularly called ; an Act which
removed the granting of dispensations and licences from
the papal court to the court of the Archbishop of Canter-
bury.
We have here to remark, that the Papists, or persons
holding extreme opinions on the Catholic side, had
long before quitted the country ; and to this enactment the
remaining secular clergy were not, speaking generally,
opposed.
The nineteenth clause of the second of the two statutes,
to which reference is here made, contained the statutory
declaration, that it was never intended to drive the
Church of England into an uncatholic or sectarian posi-
tion.*
* 25 Henry VIII. cap. 21 ; 28 Henry VIII. cap. 19.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 375
The reformation of a colony of Christ's kingdom di- chap.
vinely instituted was seen to be very different from the
Matthew
establishment of a sect ot human origin. Parker.
.It was expressly declared, that it was not the purpose 1559-75.
of the sovereign or of the parliament, any more than of catho-
the Convocation, " to decline or vary from the congre- the church
gation of Christ's flock in anything concerning the very of Eng-
articles of the Catholic faith of Christendom."
At various times the queen expressed her resolution, Policy of
not only to uphold the Catholic principles of the Church, men™' '
but also to extend her favour beyond the immediate de-
mands of justice to all her subjects who should conduct
themselves with loyalty and discretion.
A declaration was made by the queen so late as in the
year 1570, in which, not long before the demise of Parker,
she indirectly declared her approbation of his policy in
Church affairs. This was long had in remembrance, and
was frequently quoted — by her friends, to prove the
liberality of her sentiments ; and by her enemies, to charge
her with inconsistency of conduct.
She declared, "that she would have all her loving
subjects to understand, that so far as they shall openly
continue in the observance of her laws, and shall not
wilfully and manifestly break them by their open actions,
her majesty's meaning was not to have any of them mo-
lested by any examination or inquisition of their con-
sciences in causes of religion, but will accept and treat
them as her good subjects." *
It is interesting, almost amusing, to see how in the A balance
„ of coiices-
government measures an attempt was often made to sions.
balance the concessions as they were granted first to one
side, then to the other. The statements are antithetical ;
* Annals, I. ii. 372.
376 LIVES OF THE
chap, and some of them will here be presented to the reader,
XII
— r-^ because they show the animus of the archbishop, whose
Parker, wise measures were eventually frustrated by the weak-
1559-75. ness of his successor in the see of Canterbury.*
A bible of the largest size was ordered to be placed ii
the parish churches, and every facility was offered t<
the public for the perusal of the sacred volume ; at the
same time, in accordance with the Church principles
• already noticed, each parish was to be provided with
the paraphrases of Erasmus, a Catholic whose mind was
in keeping, certainly not with the foreign, but rather with
the English Eeformation ; more of a reformer than he
had the courage to affirm or admit, but still a Catholic.
Preaching — the one great ordinance of Puritanism-
was encouraged, but only those among the clergy were
allowed to preach who were duly licensed .by the primates.
If the Anglo-Catholics had ground of complaint, that,
to please the Puritans, many edifying ceremonies were
abolished, and useful observances discontinued, the
Puritan, on the other hand, became liable to condign
punishment if he should maliciously neglect or violate the
rites or ordinances still retained and by public authority
appointed to be observed. The Puritans maligned the
priests, and regarded their ministers simply in the light of
preachers ; but the people were required to bear in mind,
that the priestly office or function was a divine appoint-
ment, and they were directed accordingly to treat the
priests with due respect. To secure this end, the clergy
were required to appear in public in the usual dress of
the priesthood ; wearing those square caps, against
* The reader is referred to the Injunctions of 1559, to the Advertise-
ments, to the Koyal Letters, and other public documents for the various
statements made above.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 377
which the Puritans entertained an unaccountable anti- chap.
patny. » — , — -
Indeed, both parties were admonished to abstain from Parker*
" convicious words " as applied to their opponents. The 1559-75.
Anglo-Catholics were prohibited from reviling the Puritans
as heretics, schismatics, sacramentaries, and such like ;
while the Puritans were warned against defaming the op-
posite party as popish or papistical. Although in parish
churches the Common Prayer was to be pronounced ■
in a language " understanded by the people," yet in the
universities and public schools the Latin Prayer Book
was permitted, and chanting was everywhere enjoined ;
the Litany and prayers were to be sung, and provision
was to be made for the study and cultivation of music.
In spite of the denunciations of Puritanism, the organ
and the anthem, still pealed through the vaulted aisles
of our cathedrals and larger churches, and priests offi-
ciated in their surplices and copes. Although the stone
altars were removed and replaced by communion tables,
yet the old form of words in the administration of the
Holy Sacrament, which had been erased in King Edward's
Second Book, was now restored. A rubric which seemed
to make a question of the Eeal Presence was expunged ;
and although common bread was tolerated, the use of the
wafer was recommended by the primate and the Bishop of
London, and was generally used in the churches. On
the communion table itself, two lights were permitted to
stand, for the " significance that Christ is the true light
of the world."
Although many medieval observances in the adminis-
tration of baptism had been, to the regret of the Anglo -
Catholics, discontinued, yet, to the disgust of the Puritans,
the cross was still retained ; as was also the ring in
marriage, against which the Dissenters protested, as an
378 LIVES OF THE
chap, intolerable superstition. Adoration towards the Lord's
XII
■- , '-' table was encouraged. The feelings of our reformers
Parkea-T with respect to ceremonial worship is proved by the
1559-75. retention or restoration of ceremonies on those public
occasions to which the people in general were not
admitted. Most of the ancient religious ceremonies
observed by the Knights of the Garter, which had been
abolished by King Edward VI., were restored by Queen
Elizabeth to the condition in which they had stood in her
father's time. Things, indeed, were so well arranged in
St. George's Chapel, that foreign grandees who were
admitted to the Order were not offended by certain
omissions in the ceremonial ; while at the same time, the
Protestant princes did not complain that their pre-
judices were shocked. Nothing proved more clearly
the via media of the Eeformation. Eeturning to pa-
rochial worship, we may observe, that although pro-
cessions were reduced in number, yet, out of regard to old
Catholic customs, which Puritans " maliciously " delighted
to set at naught, it was expressly ordered, that in prayer,
" All manner of people should devoutly and humbly kneel
upon their knees ; and that whenever the name of the
Lord Jesus should be, in any sermon, lecture, or otherwise
in church pronounced, due reverence should be made
with lowness of courtsey and uncovering of the heads of
the man kind, as thereunto doth necessarily belong a:
heretofore hath been accustomed."
On the subject of the Holy Eucharist, Parker had n
been involved to the extent of his immediate predecesso
Dr. Cranmer and Cardinal Pole ; but we have his opinion,
and an important one it is, in a letter addressed by his
friend Dr. Gheast, Bishop of Eochester, to Sir William
Cecil. Gheast was, as we have seen, inclined to yield
on the point of the ceremonies, though he observed them
himself, and caused them to be observed by others.
of
i
■rs,
i
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 379
There were, perhaps, other points of difference between chap.
him and Parker, but they were united in their opinion • ■ — »
on this sacred subject. Bishop Gheast's judgment was Parked
authoritative, because, in drawing up the Thirty-nine 1559-75.
Articles, it is known that the 28th article is to be traced
to his pen. So important, indeed, is this letter as an
ecclesiastical document connected with the reformation
of the English Church, that it shall be presented to the
reader in extenso. It is dated December 22, 1566 : —
" Greeting in the Lord.
" Eight Honourable, — I am very sorry that you are
so sick : God make you whole ; as it is my desire and
prayer. I would have seen you ere this, according to
my duty and good -will; but when I sent to know whether
I might see you, it was oftentimes answered that you
were not to be spoken with.
" I suppose you have heard how the Bishop of Glou-
cester found himself grieved with the placing of this
adverb — only — in this article : ' The Body of Christ is
given, taken, and eaten in the Supper after an heavenly
and spiritual manner only,' — because it did take away the
Presence of Christ's Body in the Sacrament ; and privately
noted me to take his part therein, and yesterday, in my
absence, more plainly vouched me for the same.
" Whereas, between him and me, I told him plainly
that this word ' only ' in the aforesaid article did not
exclude the Presence of Christ's Body from the Sacra-
ment, but only the grossness and sensibleness in the
receiving thereof ; for I said unto him, though he take
Christ's Body in his hand, received it with his mouth,
and that corporally, naturally, really, substantially, and
carnally, as the doctors do write, yet did he not, for all
that, see It, feel It, smell It, or taste It.
" And, therefore, I told him I would speak against him
LIVES OF THE
CHAP.
XII.
Matthew
Parker.
herein, and the rather because the article was of my o1
penning. And yet I would not, for all that, deny an]
thing that I had spoken for the Presence. And this
1559-75. the sum of our talk. And this that I said is so true
all sorts of men, that even Dr. Hardinge write th the same,
as it appeareth most evidently by his words reported in
the Bishop of Salisbury's book, page 325, which be these :
' Then we may say that in the Sacrament His very Body
is Present ; yea, really ; that is to say, in deed, substantially ;
that is, in substance, and corporally, carnally, and natur-
ally ; ' by which words is meant, that His very Body, His
very Flesh, and His very Human Nature is there, not after
corporal, carnal, or natural-wise, but invisibly, unspeak-
ably, supernaturally, spiritually, divinely, and by wai
unto Him only known.
" This I thought good to write unto your honour f
my own purgation.
" The Almighty God in Christ restore you to your oh
health, and long keep you in the same, with increase
virtue and honour.
" Yours whole to his poor power,
" Edm. Eoffe]
" To the Right Honourable, and his singular good Friend,
" Sir William Cecil, Knight,
" Principal Treasurer to the Queen's Majesty."
The good intentions of the queen and her governmei
in this line of policy were frustrated by the violence
that party spirit which was, in the affairs of religion,
rancorous in the sixteenth century as, alas ! it still tc
often is in the nineteenth. A suspicion of the trutl
that the civil authorities shrunk from a recourse
extreme measures, gave courage even to the timi<
and many there were who took pleasure in defying tl
ei
C
cl
tt
01
;
AECHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 381
government, and in perplexing the advisers of the crown, chap.
In the country parishes things went on much as usual, < — ^~>
and Elizabeth's government was popular, because, through parker.
the peace of the realm, the cultivators of the soil could 1559-75.
enjoy the fruits of their industry. There the " old
atholics " were tacitly habituating themselves to those
hanges in the Eitual, which led them on to a love of
he Prayer Book. Not so the towns. In the activity
of town life there was a love of excitement and con-
roversies were bitter, the Puritans being in the ascen-
ant. It became evident that the Puritans would not
e contented unless they could oust the Anglo-Catholics
— that is, two-thirds of the clergy without counting the
aity — from the Church ; and the annihilation of Puri-
tanism became, in a spirit of retaliation, the object of
he papists. Instead of conciliating, both parties were
ent upon exasperation ; so that at length Cecil, acting
n the advice of Parker, called the queen's attention to
he incongruous manner in which the services of the
hurch were performed in the metropolis, in the follow-
ng document : —
" Some perform divine service and prayers in the
chancel, others in the body of the church ; some in a
seat made in the church ; some in the pulpit, with their
faces to the people ; some keep precisely to the order of
the book, others intermix psalms in metre ; some officiate
with a surplice, and others without it.
c< In some places the table stands in the body of the
church, in others it stands in the chancel ; in some places
it stands altar-wise distant from the wall a yard, in others
it stands in the middle of the chancel north and south ; in
some places the table is joined, in others it stands upon
tressels ; in some the table has a carpet,, in others none.
" Some administer the communion with surplice and
382 LIVES OP THE
chap, cap, some with surplice alone, some with neither ; some
— ^ — . with chalice, others with communion cup ; some with
Parked unleavened bread, others with leavened ; some receive
1559-75. kneeling, others standing, others sitting ; some baptize in
a font, others in a basin ; some sign with the sign of the
cross, others make no sign ; some administer in a surplice,
others without ; some with a square cap, some with a
round cap ; some with a button cap, some with a hat ; some
in scholars' clothes, some in others."
That this is a partial statement is clear, for we might
say the same of the practice of the Church in the
nineteenth century : it would not be wholly false, and yet
it would only be partially true. From this statement we
see, however, that the controversy had already begun
to change its ground. It was no longer merely a strife
about images, crucifixes, chasubles, and copes ; these were
beginning to be lost sight of in the zeal against the cap,
the surplice, the tippet, and the wafer bread.*
The Anglo- Catholics, secure in their majority, were still
quiescent. The Puritans were the assailants ; but in the
country parishes they caused as yet but little disturbance.
In the* towns, the Puritans were now clamouring for
the abolition of the episcopal function, if not of its name ;
for the abolition of set forms of prayer, and of the sacra-
mentals of the Church. They retained, indeed, as their
sects still do, the name of Sacraments, as applicable to
two ordinances, although, in their estimation, Baptism
and the Supper of the Lord are denuded of that specie
grace attached to them severally by the Catholic Churcl
The reader will remember to have been shocked at th<
application of ridicule, in sacred polemics, by the myi
midons of Crumwell. A better spirit was now manifested,
but the bad taste was not entirely extinguished.
We have an instance of it in the case of the Dean
* See Zurich Letters, i. 133.
sm
i
n-
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 383
Wells, Dr. Turner — one of the most obnoxious and ir- chap.
xii
reverent of his party. ■ — r— *
A wretched man in the city of Wells was convicted of parkei-7
adultery. He was prosecuted in the Dean's Court, and 1559-75.
sentenced to an open penance in the cathedral. A large Dr.Tumer.
congregation assembled, and the criminal was seen issuing
from the vestry arrayed in the cast-off robes of a
priest. Turner's profane jocosity was exhibited against
the episcopate on another occasion. The dean was in the
habit of calling bishops " white coats " and " tippet gentle-
men.'" " Who gave them," he would ask, " more au-
thority over me than I have over them, to forbid me
preaching, or to deprive me — unless it be from their
holy father the pope ? " The Bishop of Bath and Wells,
Dr. Gilbert Berkley, first remonstrated with the un-
happy man, in private, on the impropriety of his con-
duct, and then admonished him publicly. The dean
acted consistently on his own principles, for he first
ridiculed the bishop in the deanery, and then denounced
his orders from the pulpit.
Turner, who was a humourist, educated a pet dog —
and a wonderful clog he was. He was taught a variety
of tricks, as a bishop travelling through Wells experienced.
A certain bishop having called upon Dr. Turner, was
invited to partake of the decanal hospitality, and to meet
a few friends at dinner. The dinner was served, and to
the bishop was assigned the place of honour at the head
)f the table. To his well-instructed puritan dog the dean
Lerely said "The bishop sweats," and straightway, rushing
it his lordship, the dog seized his square cap, and bringing
it to his master, received his approbation, and had his
share of the luxuries of the table.
It would have been pardonable if things had not pro- Persecu-
ceeded further than this poor joke ; but every attempt Parker by
was made to lower the English reformers — or, as the tans.
384 LIVES OP THE
chap, party styled them, the Court Keformers — in public
— r— - matiou. The learned men to whom we are indebted for
Parker, the reformation of the Manual and Missal, and so for
i
1559-75. the establishment of the Book of Common Prayer, wer
reputed or misrepresented as a papistical, or, at th
best, as a " Lutherano-papistical " ministry.* Archbishop
Parker had not only these hard names to bear, but he
was called " Matthew meal-mouthe," and also a " linsey-
woolsey bishop." The archbishop was sometimes alarmed
lest an attempt should be made upon his life.
Aware of his timidity, the Puritans, through anonymous
letters, amused themselves, at one time, by playing on
the simplicity of the primate's steward, who warned his
master, that there was a determination to take off by
poison, or otherwise, reformers whose scheme of reform
had not descended to puritanism. That Parker was
alarmed, and that many persons believed that some such
attempt upon the lives of our leading men would be
made, there can be no doubt; but although a person
was prosecuted under circumstances of strong suspicion,
the impartial reader will, perhaps, if he thinks fit t
examine the subject, come to the conclusion, that th
object of the conspirators was rather to terrify, than
murder the archbishop.
The alleged conspiracy did not take place until man
years had elapsed ; but it is mentioned here, that the
reader may have in mind the alarms to which Parker was
:
* Zurich Letters, i. 177; ii. 143. Gualter, in a letter to Beza,
bearing date July 23, 1556, speaks of the English reformers, aswolve
papists, Lutherans, Sadducees, and Herodians. Ibid. ii. 125. Referenc
is made to these passages, and they might be multiplied, to show,
what is frequently forgotten, that the great body of English churchmen
both of the clergy and of the laity, were, though not Romanis
yet decidedly Catholics.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY
385
subjected ; while the very circumstance of his being
easily alarmed, renders his firmness the more praiseworthy,
and we shall have occasion to show that in moral courage
he was not deficient.
Although Parker was not an Erastian, he sometimes
acted as if he were ; and he set a bad example of appeal-
ing to the authority of the crown, when his own authority
was defied, as it sometimes was, by the very persons who
were sworn to defer to it. It was thus that, in 1564, he
brought the royal authority to bear upon certain bishops,
who withheld from him their support. Among the
bishops several, at first, sympathized with the Puritans
rather than with the Anglo-Catholics ; and though they
dared not disobey the queen, they had no inclination to
share the unpopularity of the primate, who in treading
the via media, provoked opposition on either side.
That Cecil's report to the queen was drawn up with
the concurrence of the archbishop, if not by his advice,
there can be no doubt. The queen was irritated, and
was quite ready to act, when it was further suggested,
that she should strengthen Parker's hands by addressing
to him a letter, in which, with reference evidently to the
report, she expressed her determination to have " all
such diversities, varieties, and novelties, as tended to a
breach of charity, and were against the laws, good usages,
and ordinances of the realm, reformed and repressed, and
brought to one manner of uniformity throughout our
realm and dominions." She directed the Archbishop of
Canterbury (and she promised to issue a similar mandate
to the metropolitan of the northern province) to confer
with his suffragans ; calling in the aid, if necessary, of the
royal commissioners, that measures might be immediately
taken to enforce uniformity. No one was to be instituted
or collated for the time to come, unless he solemnly
VOL. IX. CC
CHAP.
XII.
Matthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Royal
mandate to
the pri-
mate.
Unifor-
mity to be
enforced.
386 LIVES OP THE
chap, promised that uniformity which the bishops were re-
• — . — - quired to enforce.*
Parke? The archbishop lost no time; and on the 30th of
1559-75. January he wrote to the Bishop of London, to communi-
bbhop'a cate t^ie <lueeil's commands to the bishops of his province.
directions jje wrote, at the same time, privately to Cecil, telling
Bishop of him, that it was only from a minority of his suffragans
that he could expect a cordial support ; and he hoped
therefore, that " no back-door influence " would be per-
mitted, such as should induce the queen to change her
mind, f
The queen had yielded to the sound advice of her true
and faithful friend and counsellor, Sir William Cecil ; and
she was quite aware of the mischief which would accrue
to the state from puritanism, if it were permitted to
proceed on its way to anarchy unrestricted and unre-
strained. At the same time, she also knew, that the
Anglo-Catholics were in the majority, and were strong
enough to resist the machinations of their opponents i1
they could be roused to exertion. It was unpleasant te
present herself as a butt to so powerful a party as that oi
the Puritans, and she was selfish enough to desire ttu
the bishops should incur the responsibility and unpopi
larity of her measures, while she would only appear oi
the scene when it should become absolutely necessary to
exert the powers of the state.
Parker in Parker knew this, and resented it. At the present time
versywith the queen was also under the fascination of that bole
the queen. bad m^ Robert Ducney5 Earl of Leicester. $ He
* Corresp. p. 223-6. t Ibid- P- 229-
J Sir Robert Dudley, K.G., younger son of John Duke of North-
umberland, was created Baron Denbigh, September 28, 1563, anc
Earl of Leicester on September 29, 1569 ; he must therefore have bee
at this time in the highest favour with the queen.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 387
obtained over the queen the same kind of fascination, chap.
amounting almost to a monomania, as Anne Boleyn had . X*L .. .
exercised over Elizabeth's father ; and Leicester, though par£rW
one of the most profligate men of the age, was, never- 1559-75.
theless, a Puritan or patron of Puritans ; and he was not Leicester's
7 x influence
unwilling to exhibit before the court that influence over with the
the queen's mind, which seemed occasionally to nullify
the wise counsels of Cecil.
Because Cecil upheld the Church, Leicester was the Leicester
supporter of sectarianism. He was sensible of the power |ur^ane
which pertained to a man who represented a powerful
party in the realm ; and we are not to be severe upon
the Puritan party for having selected such a leader,
because a man's real character cannot be fully known
while he remains an actor in the scenes of this busy world.
We know, indeed, from various sources, that there was
a charm in the manner of Leicester, which might well
disarm suspicion, until certain facts in his history were
brought to light, which, during his lifetime, could seldom
amount to more than suspicions.
That the Puritans should select as their leader a man,
who, at the best, was a dissipated and self-indulgent
worldling, might, indeed, surprise us if history, in every
age, did not announce the fact, that parties choose their
leaders, not on account of their merits, but because of
their power, adventitious or personal. To Leicester, the
Bishop of Durham, Pilkington, supported by Whittingham,
his dean, addressed themselves, and pleaded with ability
the cause of those Puritans who, to obtain preferment,
had conformed, but struggled to be free from all restraint.
They desired to be exonerated from their pledges and
their vows, and they represented to the royal favourite,
that the queen, by deserting the Church, would increase
the number of her loyal and devoted subjects. Whit-
cc 2
388 LIVES OF THE
chap, tingham concluded his letter by complaining of the lenity
*- — r— - shown to the Anglo-Catholics, whom he styled Papists ;
Parker* and he exclaimed, " Oh, noble earl, be our patron and
1559-75. stay in this behalf, that we may not lose that liberty that
hitherto by the queen's benignity we have enjoyed."*
Leicester nevertheless was quite aware, that although
he had the heart of the queen, yet her mind was with
Cecil. Cecil felt secure, that, on an emergency, the
queen could overcome her passion and bring her power-
ful intellect and her iron will to uplift the capricious
woman into the patriot queen ; but he was also aware
that, when things went on smoothly, she would frown
upon Cecil and Parker, if it were only to win a smile
from her fascinating favourite. Parker, in writing to the
secretary, complained bitterly of the queen's conduct.
He remarked, that it would have been far better to have
permitted things to remain as they were, than, after
threatening and exasperating their opponents, to retire
ignominiously from the battle, if not defeated, yet cer-
tainly not confirmed in power. He went so far as, in a
letter evidently intended to meet the queen's eye, to utter
a threat, saying, that if a remedy were not provided, " I
will no more strive against the stream ; fume or chide
who will."
Parker expressed himself thus strongly, because he saw
the queen determined, in her selfishness, to compel him
to adopt active measures, and to bear the blame of the
if blame there were, by himself and unsupported.
-
Parker Like the Puritans, Parker had discovered the value of
tigress, the press ; and, on the side of conformity, he enlisted the
pens of Jewel, Gheast, and even of Horn, Bishop of
Winchester. As these persons had, at a former period of
their lives, expressed their dislike of the retention of sacer-
* Neal, i. 126.
ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY. 389
dotal garments, and certain other ancient ceremonials of chap
• XIT
the Church of England, it was supposed, that their change
of sentiment would have had a salutary effect upon the Parker?
Puritans in general. But the truth is, that they regarded 1559-75.
the vestment controversy as relating to the non-essentials
of religion ; and therefore, they had come to the conclu-
sion that, for the sake of peace, a concession might be
made to the prejudices of a large party in the Church.
Bishop Jewel, and others who had sent in their adhe-
sion to the government of Parker in ecclesiastical affairs,
had now become sensible that the Church would not
gain, if, to gratify the noisy Puritans, the more peaceable
Anglo -Catholics should be provoked to resistance. That
Jewel and Gheast and some others should have thought, at
first, that concession to the Puritans in the vestment con-
troversy would have been the best policy is not wonderful ;
but the wonder is, that modern readers should make no
allowance for a change of opinion in men of inquiring
minds, who lived in an age when all around was in a
state of commotion. They realized the principle, that
they were called upon, not to establish a Protestant sect,
but to reform a branch of the Catholic Church ; and
they gradually became aware, that although the popular
clamour was raised against the " sacerdotal vestments,"
the real attack was made upon the "episcopal regimen."
Throughout this controversy, and long afterwards, a dis-
like to the Catholic and scriptural ordinance of episcopacy
may be traced as the chief motive power in the mal-
contents.
The line taken by those prelates of the Church of Foreign
England had an indirect influence upon some of the gians con-
foreign divines. Gualter and Bullinger were consulted, sulted'
and not seeing the precise point of the controversy, they
advised the English Puritans to conform in what related
390
LIVES OF THE
5HAP.
XII.
]\I;ttthew
Parker.
1559-75.
Puritans
discovor
Anti-
christ in
the Church
of Eng-
land.
Prayer
Book
popish.
Festivals,
organs,
chanted
service,
figured
music,
popish
abomina-
tions.
Bowing at
the name
of our
Lord.
The intro-
duction of
wafer-
bread in
the Eu-
charist.
Popish
vestments
in the Ke-
formed
Church.
to the clerical attire ; but their interference had no
salutary effect upon the leaders of the non-conforming
party. In vain also did Parker produce the authority
of Bucer and Peter Martyr.
The Puritans now openly complained, that in the
ecclesiastical regimen " many traces of Anti-Christ were
retained." The Prayer Book, it was said, was filled with
many absurdities and silly superfluities. Although the
grosser superstitions had been taken away, the whole, it
was affirmed, was composed on the model of the papists.
The greater part of the canon law was still enforced, and
from it ecclesiastical censures were generally taken.
Festivals were retained in the name of saints with their
vigils as formerly ; the service was chanted with the
accompaniment of organs and figured music. All persons
were required reverently to bow themselves at the name
of Jesus. Chancels were preserved in churches, and
generally throughout the Church the prayers were said
or sung in the place accustomed in medieval times, unless
the bishop should order it otherwise. In the adminis-
tration of " the Supper,5' wafer-bread had been rein-
troduced, after having been done away with in the reign
of King Edward : in every church throughout England,
the minister was arrayed in a surplice, and in the larger
churches the chief minister was obliged to wear a cope.
Two other ministers, called the Deacon and Archdeacon,
were to assist him in the reading of the Epistle and
Gospel. Such was the Church of England in the first
days of the Eeformation.
In their external dress, the Ministers of the Word, as
the Puritans called them, were compelled to conform
themselves to that of the Catholic priests, such as the
English clergy still claimed to be : the square cap was
imposed upon all, together with a gown as long and loose
ARCHBISHOPS OP CANTERBURY. 391
as conveniently might be ; and to some also was added a chap.
• XTI
silk hood. This was the state of the controversy, as we « — r-w
learn from the correspondence of the period, in the year parked
1566* 1559-75.
Of Parker's controversies with the queen we have already Ecciesi-
said something, and we shall have occasion to say more. Com-
The uncertainty of obtaining the queen's support, even misslon-
when carrying out her own commands, had the effect
of inducing him to employ the aid of the Ecclesiastical
Commission, which was framed under a late Act of the
parliament. This was a great misfortune, and introduced
an Erastian principle into our system not easily eradi-
cated. It may not be easy to vindicate Parker's conduct,
but it certainly is not difficult to account for it. Attacked,
as Parker was, by one powerful party, and only luke-
warmly assisted by the other, it is difficult to say what
course he could have pursued different from that which
he thought it expedient to adopt. His difficulties in
the year 1565 were the greater, because the Puritan
party were at this time under the direction of two men
equally distinguished for their learning and their piety,
and not wholly unamenable to moderate counsels.
Dr. Sampson had been attracted from the peaceful Contro-
deanery of Chichester to the deanery of Christ Church, sampsml
which placed him at the head of society in Oxford. a^^um"
There he found, in the President of Magdalen College,
Dr. Humphrys, a man of congenial spirit with his own.
When officiating in London, these highly respectable
divines refused to comply with the discipline of the
Church. They were admonished by the Council; and
they addressed to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, over
whom the archbishop presided, a supplicatory letter in
* See Zurich Letters, and Parker's Correspondence.
392 LIVES OF THE
chap. Latin. They corresponded with Gualter and Bulling(
*. — r— ' and were led into a controversy with them and some
ParkeT their brethren in England, the merits of which it is not
1.559-75. necessary here to discuss. It is only necessary to ob-
serve, that although the Ecclesiastical Commissioners
were divided in their opinions, the decision of the